New Mexico AG dodges questions in CNN story about luxury trips sponsored by corporate lobbyists
From his involvement in a lawsuit to stop Elon Musk's "unconstitutional power grab" to litigation challenging President Donald Trump's federal funding freeze, Torrez has garnered widespread media attention in his role as AG.
Torrez learned late last week not all press is good press.
The New Mexico Democrat became the poster boy of a CNN story about international trips sponsored by lobbyists for corporate giants, some that have been sued by states. But he managed to dodge a reporter's questions.
"New Mexico's attorney general is on his way into a public meeting," CNN's Kyung Lah says as she ambushes Torrez on the stairs of a gated building. So begins her investigative report about a bipartisan group of attorneys general who joined corporate lobbyists on an exclusive trip to South Africa in 2023.
"We gotta run," Torrez tells Lah, with a nervous laugh.
"We've reached out to your office. We hadn't heard back," Lah informs Torrez.
cnn1.jpg
The CNN report lists the names the attorneys general who participated in a trip to a South African resort in 2023. The full story is at www.cnn.com/2025/03/28/politics/video/state-attorney-general-trips-luxurious-invs
"Sure, let me do this, and then we can have a talk," Torrez says before he starts to walk away.
"Afterwards?" Lah asks; Torrez appears to nod his head in agreement. "OK, thank you, sir," she says.
Lah's report questions why Torrez and other attorneys general would accept invitations to join corporate lobbyists on a cost-covered trip to South Africa featuring a safari, a stay at a five-star hotel, wine tours and gourmet restaurants that serve Wagyu steaks.
'Companies the AG's have sued'
CNN had obtained text messages about the trip, including a guest list of more than a dozen attorneys general, whom Lah notes were the chief law enforcement officers of their states. But they weren't alone, she reports. A long list of corporate lobbyists and lawyers from some of America's most powerful companies, such as Amazon, Pfizer, TikTok and Uber, were also invited, "some of the same companies the AG's have sued," Lah says.
She reports the group that "put it all together" is the Attorney General Alliance, which is "funded by those private businesses."
"It calls donations 'sponsorships,' " she reports, adding, "the more corporations pay, the more they get."
The alliance began as the Conference of Western Attorneys General, which describes itself as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and bipartisan group of 15 western states and three territories.
Torrez serves as vice chairman of CWAG's executive committee.
A spokesperson for Torrez and what is now known as the New Mexico Department of Justice defended his participation in the trip.
cnn3.jpg
The corporate lobbyist-funded trip to South Africa for attorneys general featured a safari, a stay at a five-star hotel, wine tours and gourmet restaurants that serve Wagyu steaks. Watch the full story at www.cnn.com/2025/03/28/politics/video/state-attorney-general-trips-luxurious-invs
"Attorney General Torrez has been and will continue to be one of the most active consumer protection advocates in America and his participation in bipartisan, international events sponsored by a 501(c)(3) has had zero impact on his aggressive approach to protecting New Mexico's citizens from corporate abuse," Lauren Rodriguez said in a statement Monday.
"Every recent New Mexico Attorney General has participated in delegation trips that include training programs on a variety of critical issues including human trafficking, narcotics interdiction, money laundering and the regulation of the digital economy," she added.
Rodriguez said the nature of their work demands that attorneys general, both Republican and Democratic, learn from and build connections with international law enforcement partners and regulatory experts in other nations.
"The fact that Attorney General Torrez routinely sues private sector guests of the AGA is evidence enough that his participation in these events has had no impact on his steadfast commitment to protecting New Mexico's families," she said.
Rodriguez did not immediately respond to follow-up questions, including whether Torrez has participated in any other AGA-sponsored international trips or whether he planned to attend any in the future, including the AGA's annual meeting in June in the U.S. Virgin Islands or what is listed in its events calendar as a "chairs initiative" in Alaska in August.
'Focused on fostering collaboration'
Lah says in her report no Republican attorney generals agreed to interviews and she "caught up" with Torrez and other Democratic attorneys general at an unspecified public event.
"His office is part of a multistate case against Amazon," she reports. "The company had a representative invited to the AGA's South Africa trip."
Lah reports the alliance "would not talk to CNN on camera" but issued a statement saying "foreign delegations have a key goal of strengthening bipartisan relationships" and "educate all delegates on pressing civil and criminal issues."
In response to questions from The New Mexican about the corporate lobbyist-sponsored trips, Tania Maestas, deputy executive director and general counsel for the alliance, sent a statement Monday saying the nonprofit, which is over 40 years old, is "focused on fostering collaboration and providing educational trainings for our AG members and their staff on complex issues in law and public policy."
"Our foreign delegations strengthen bipartisan relationships within the attorney general community on issues that range from human trafficking, anti-corruption, money laundering, cybersecurity, as well as all types of organized crime," the statement continued. "Because our mission is educational, it centers around promoting the rule of law, training law enforcement, and exploring emerging legal issues."
The CNN report includes an interview with Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who was among the elected officials who attended the South Africa trip and who was also at the event with Torrez.
"I understand how this game is played," Ellison tells the reporter. "I mean, us reporters and politicians [and questions about], 'Oh, you went on a trip,' and try to embarrass the politician. I understand that thing. But I will say that there is real work that we're doing that is important for our constituents. It has a lot to do with the fact we live in a globalized world."
Lah questions the ethics of such trips.
"I get it. I know where you're coming from," responds Ellison, who appears visibly annoyed. "I'm just telling you that we have substantive programs; our constituents are disadvantaged if we are not having meaningful conversations with international partners."
Ellison then tells Lah he'd like to "end the conversation right there." When Lah thanks Ellison for his time, he responds with a smile and says, "Whatever."
In the final 45 seconds of her report, Lah notes "New Mexico's AG did not stick around like he promised to respond to our questions."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit.
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labor market. Advertisement Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than $2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. Advertisement 'I think this is addictive,' said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' The Port of Baltimore on June 30, 2025. ALYSSA SCHUKAR/NYT Trump has long fantasized about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the United States away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans. Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year. Advertisement 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Workers welded steel components together at a Thomas Built Buses plant in High Point, N.C., on July 21, 2025. TRAVIS DOVE/NYT Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president. 'Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place,' Tedeschi said. Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently introduced legislation to send $600 to many Americans. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Trump said last month of the tariffs. Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social program, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy. Advertisement 'That's a hefty chunk of change,' Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. 'The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogram.'' Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the United States, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax. 'This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue,' said Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. 'And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue.' This article originally appeared in
Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
U.S. tariff: South Africa implements emergency measures to shield local exporters
The government of South Africa has announced plans to draft emergency measures to support local exporters affected by the U.S. President Donald Trump's newly imposed 30% tariff; a policy shift expected to severely impact the country's automotive and agricultural sectors. The South African government announced emergency measures to support exporters affected by the US's newly imposed tariffs. These tariffs, set at 30%, target industries like automotive and agriculture, and are part of a US trade policy shift. Negotiations with the US are open, while efforts to finalize a support package for impacted sectors continue. The tariff, which was announced via an executive order on Thursday, is set to take effect within seven days and forms part of President Trump's broader push to reshape global trade in favour of the United States. In response, the country's Trade and Industry Minister, Parks Tau announced the launch of an 'Export Support Desk' to assist affected businesses and help them identify alternative international markets. The minister described the situation as 'a trying moment for South Africa,' underscoring the immediate risks to jobs and economic stability, a Reuters report confirmed. President Cyril Ramaphosa also addressed the development, revealed in a press release that his government is finalising a support package for vulnerable exporters, with further details expected in the coming day ' All channels of communication remain open to engage with the U.S., and our negotiators are ready pending invitation from the U.S., ' Ramaphosa said. The United States is South Africa's second-largest bilateral trading partner after China, importing a wide range of goods including automobiles, iron and steel, citrus fruits, and wine. However, rising diplomatic tensions, fueled by disagreements over South Africa's foreign policy positions and domestic affirmative action laws, which the Trump administration has openly criticised, have clouded the trade relationship. Trump unmoved by South Africa's tariff plea According to Reuters, South Africa had spent several months attempting to negotiate a trade compromise with Washington. Among its proposals were increasing purchases of U.S. liquefied natural gas and committing to investments in U.S. industries in exchange for tariff exemptions. However, U.S. officials reportedly remained unresponsive. The executive order signed Thursday imposes new duties on dozens of countries, many of them emerging markets, rekindling fears that African economies could become collateral damage in Washington's increasingly protectionist trade agenda. While the establishment of the Export Support Desk has been welcomed by some stakeholders, political opponents questioned its adequacy. South Africa's official opposition party, The Democratic Alliance,, dismissed the initiative as 'laughable.'
CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Goldberg on potential Harris 2028 run: ‘I don't see how she's a solution to anything'
Bernie Sanders adviser Faiz Shakir and CNN Political Commentators Kate Bedingfield, Brad Todd, and Jonah Goldberg join CNN's Kasie Hunt to respond to Kamala Harris' reemergence on the scene as Democrats grapple with who can win in 2028.
