DA anniversary: Can a ‘white party' govern SA again?
Twenty five years since the DA was formed, the party is still trying to convince South Africans that they are not a whites-only party.
The party was established on June 24 2000, following a merger between the Democratic Party (DP) and the New National Party (NPP).
Over the years, the party has seen many prominent black leaders leave for various reasons, including Mmusi Maimane, Herman Mashaba, Lindiwe Mazibuko, Mbali Ntuli, and former Midvaal mayor Bongani Baloyi.
Political analyst Sanet Solomon said the departures of these black leaders have left many South Africans wondering about the internal affairs of the DA.
'The DA has been subject to a lot of critique given its struggle to retain its prominent black leaders. This challenge has translated into its inability to extend its voting base.
'While some of its policies have the ability to positively impact society, voters are also influenced by perception,' Solomon said.
Transformation in the top structures
Solomon said black leaders do not seem to have strategic positions in the party, which could easily create an impression that the party only really serves one racial group.
'Voters may need to see better integration. This may require the Federal Chair to be one racial group, the Chief Whip of another group, and the leader of a completely different group.
'South Africa is diverse, and this needs to be reflected in their leadership positions. There are phenomenal and competent people across all the diverse groupings. This is what people want to see,' she said.
Despite the DA being the second biggest party in the government of national unity (GNU), Solomon said it is unlikely the party will run the country by themselves anytime soon.
'Some of their policies would be suitable for a ruling party, but it is unlikely that they would be able to become a majority party as the current system of proportional representation would result in more coalition governments,' she said.
ALSO READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor?
DA's balancing act
Another analyst, Professor Susan Booysen, said the DA has made progress since it was founded.
'They have managed to keep their electoral territory, opinion polls indicate that they have made slight advances.'
Booysen said that even though the DA is not close to being a majority party in SA, it could use the current coalition politics to influence policy.
'If they continue this current but modest progress, then they will probably be a very likely or inevitable coalition partner for future governance,' she said.
Booysen said the DA has been forced to tread carefully around issues of race in the party.
'They are doing an often torturous, delicate, intricate balancing trick between coming across as more inclusive and simultaneously playing to their own small, racially-defined constituencies.
'It is the dilemma it is going to run into: simultaneous and competing endorsements by its own small internal constituencies and the broader South African community that is looking for restitution.'
DA for all
DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp rubbished claims that the party only serves white interests.
'The DA is the most diverse party in South Africa, and we elect leaders on merit, not race.
'Yes, people come and go in politics, but we remain focused on building a capable, non-racial alternative that serves all South Africans.'
Aucamp said the party has proven that it can lead where it governs, and is now ready to take over the Union Buildings.
'South Africans are ready for a government that gets things done. The DA has shown we can lead with competence and integrity, and more people are turning to us to rescue the country from decline, including in Gauteng,' he said.
The party will celebrate its birthday with a blanket drive on Tuesday.
NOW READ: 'I am finally home' – Liam Jacobs ditches DA for Patriotic Alliance
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Philippi smash-and-grab: DA MPs recount terrifying attack
DA Members of Parliament, Ian Cameron, Nicolas Godsell, and Lisa Schickerling were involved in a smash-and-grab incident in Philippi. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Media Three Democratic Alliance (DA) Members of Parliament responsible for police oversight narrowly escaped a violent smash-and-grab attack in Philippi on Tuesday afternoon. Portfolio Committee on Police Chairperson Ian Cameron, together with colleagues Lisa Schickerling and Nicholas Gotsell, were travelling near the intersection of New Eisleben and Govan Mbeki Roads when unknown suspects broke the windows of their vehicle and began throwing bricks at them. Cameron described the attack as 'horrific'. He recounted: 'They threw bricks at the vehicle. I managed to hit one of them, but they kept coming back. I tried fighting back, and when I looked at Nicholas, his body was on his lap. I took out my gun and shot. I am not sure if I hit anyone. The incident left me with broken teeth, and I had so much blood on my clothes.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Gotsell was hospitalised but is not in critical condition, while Cameron sustained minor injuries. Schickerling escaped unharmed. Cameron said he acted quickly and in self-defence to prevent further harm to his colleagues. The DA condemned the attack and reiterated the urgent need for improved policing in high-crime areas. DA Chief Whip George Michalakis said: 'This incident is a portrayal of the out-of-control crime that South Africans face daily. No one is exempt from it. We again call on the Minister of Police to properly resource SAPS in crime-ridden areas such as Philippi.' Michalakis praised the prompt response of the City of Cape Town Metro, the provincial government, police, and emergency medical services, highlighting that their quick intervention helped prevent further harm to the MPs. Western Cape provincial commissioner Lieutenant-General Thembisile Patekile confirmed that police received a report of the attack and that two people were injured. 'The ambulance was called at the scene. Our teams will get to the bottom of it,' he said. 'In most smash-and-grab incidents, the motive is robbery, hijacking, or theft out of a motor vehicle. At this stage, we do not know what was stolen.' Community leaders condemned the attack. Dumisani Qwebe called it a 'wake-up call' and urged anyone with information to come forward. He noted that the area usually has police visibility and CCTV coverage, which may assist in identifying the suspects. 'That intersection was not so bad, and we are surprised because there is always police visibility, and now we must make sure that it is always monitored. 'There is a CCTV camera, and hopefully we will find something from it.' The DA reiterated that policing is a national function and stressed that adequate resourcing of police stations in crime-ridden communities is vital to prevent similar incidents and ensure the safety of all South Africans.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Commander-in-Chief asleep at the wheel
South Africa faces unprecedented challenges under President Cyril Ramaphosa, whose leadership is marred by scandals and inaction. From the Phala Phala scandal to rising lawlessness, Lance Witten explores the implications of a leader seemingly out of touch with reality. Image: Dall-E 3 South Africa is spiralling into chaos under the leadership of President Cyril Ramaphosa. Here is a leader who has stumbled from one embarrassing crisis to another, fumbling the ball, seemingly fiddling while Pretoria burns. Most infamous among Ramaphosa's foibles was his handling of the break-in at his Phala Phala home, a scandal for which he has so far escaped accountability. We've never gotten to the bottom of the hundreds of thousands of dollars stashed in couches and other furniture that adorn his Limpopo game farm, with investigations and reports into the matter either conveniently clearing the president of any wrongdoing, or having had their adoption and public release blocked by political machinery. I assume one of the shady deals made to include the DA in the Government of National Collusion– erm, Unity was for the centre-right party to drop the matter. But it's not just Phala Phala that taints Cyril's "legacy" – his complicity in the 2012 Marikana Massacre prior to him taking up the highest office in the land is another thing he's never faced the music for. Now, as South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa has fallen asleep at the wheel. Ramaphosa's military chief, General Rudzani Maphwanya goes on an ostensibly unsanctioned visit to Iran to meet his army counterpart, placing further strain on tensions between the US and South Africa. The visit was a clear disjunct with South Africa's foreign policy. Did Ramaphosa not know General Maphwanya was visiting Iran? Does the president not receive a daily security briefing? Is he not the Commander-in-Chief? Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In July, Navy Admiral Monde Lobese launched a scathing attack against the Treasury, accusing it of sabotaging the operational capacity of the SANDF through inadequate budget allocations. Also in July, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, KZN Police Commissioner, held a press briefing dressed in Special Task Force fatigues, dropping bomb shells about corruption and interference in police investigations at the highest level of SAPS management, right up to the Police Minister. All this happens on Ramaphosa's watch, and he does... nothing? Does he even know what's going on? Ramaphosa admitted in April 2022 to the commission investigating the 2021 civil unrest and riots that cost the South African economy R50 billion (with a "B), that there was a failure of Crime Intelligence leading up those eight fateful days in July. Riots that happened on his watch. Surely such a failure would not be allowed to repeat itself by our Commander-in-Chief? Nope, fast forward to July 2025 and we have vigilante group March and March actively preventing South African citizens from entering public healthcare facilities, in full view of the police, emboldened by the fact that some of them—whose actions are illegal and resulted in their arrest—were let off with a warning. March and March continues to operate illegally, demanding people present ID documents to enter public healthcare facilities. The security cluster is "monitoring the situation", while the Commander-in-Chief holds a National Dialogue costing the country millions.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Rethinking social literacy in post-apartheid South Africa
Jamil F. Khan 19 August 2025 | 10:27 Literacy Department of Basic Education (DBE) colonialism Picture: Education has always been a political space in South Africa. The battle for custody of knowledge has, in many ways, shaped the society we live in today. Within this battle, ways of knowing and unknowing, remembering and forgetting, are equally valuable commodities. Related to knowing is the practice of literacy, by which many countries measure their social development. This literacy refers to our ability to read and count words and numbers. Literacy in post-1994 South Africa has been a contested space, with our Department of Basic Education having restructured and redefined the education system a number of times. The definitions of milestones and passing requirements have also evolved, the enduring impact of one being the introduction of a 30% pass mark implemented under former Minister of Basic Education, Angie Motshekga. This decision has had an enduring impact, having made its way into social discourse as a signifier of the decline of education in South Africa. Though I would agree that it is a very low bar, this regulation has interacted with the social landscape in an interesting way. It has become a racialised accusation of incompetence and stupidity that is said to be a part of the mediocrity that comes from Black governance. This idea also interacts with the disdain expressed towards Black Economic Empowerment as an aid to Black mediocrity and corruption. Though the mechanics of the pass mark requirement (which is much more complex) are completely misunderstood, ignoring that a report card with a 30% aggregate will not get someone into university, the narrative that all education is inferior makes education a form of corruption itself. Though our literacy rates have shocked us when announced, there is an arena where we are consistently failing: social literacy. South Africans are deeply estranged from each other, with very few tools to read our society the way we would read books. The destruction of a shared social literacy might be one of the biggest prices we paid through colonisation and apartheid. While we might want to focus on seemingly more important things like the economy, we must realise that the social, which is the practice of being human, affects everything else, for as long as humans run those systems. To co-operate in efforts to truly "fix" our country, we must get to know each other better. The motto on our coat of arms says "!KE E:/XARRA //KE" which translates into "diverse people unite" in the indigenous |Xam language. While, of course, profound and beautiful as a sentiment, not least for being expressed in one of our oldest indigenous languages, it is not easy to achieve. The diversity we have comes with deeply painful histories, and in many ways, it was foisted on us with violence. What we hope to celebrate is how we have survived, despite it. To acknowledge these complications when we engage with our diversity, requires a critical diversity literacy (CDL). A framework developed by Wits Professor Emeritus Melissa Steyn, CDL suggests a way for us to read our society better and so become more literate in our engagement with diversity. In order to be critically diversity literate, there are ten criteria that we must commit first is that we must understand that our differences are constructed by unequal power, and they affect us differently and have different meanings attached to them. The second is that we must be willing to recognise that categories, such as race, gender, sexuality, class, ability, with which we name each other, are not just names; they are attached to different levels of privilege and oppression and that they determine our life experiences in various ways. Criterion three demands that we learn ways of analysing privilege and oppression while acknowledging that they are dynamic systems that work together to have cumulative effects on people's lives. Fourth, we must also understand that oppressive systems are not only a part of historical legacies, but they still operate today, right now. Fifth, we are a product of our social experiences and environments. This understanding hopes to steer us away from the totalising discourses that produce stereotypes. Number six asks us to focus on the languages we use to voice our relationships to each other's differences. This does not only, but can, refer to the modification of our diverse group of South African languages, but also learning a vocabulary to speak about and describe privilege and oppression, in any language. Language must evolve to help us meet each other in our interactions. The seventh criterion requires that we, through the use of our newly acquired vocabularies, learn to see through the ways that power has normalised oppression and sanitised privilege, as a natural state of the world. This requires a rejection of the explanations that maintain the status quo. Number eight reminds us that different locations in the world have produced different hierarchies of inequality, and therefore, we cannot apply the same analysis to each location. Here, a historical analysis becomes important again. It also reminds us that people's shared experiences of oppression and privilege across contexts show us that it is not coincidental, but the outcome of coordinated systems of unequal power. The second last criterion, nine, requires an engagement with our emotions. Not only in the sense of expressing our emotions, but also understanding how our emotions towards people who are different to us, shape our actions and reactions towards those people. Being critically diversity literate is as much about feeling as it is about thinking our way to a better place. That better place is envisioned with the tenth and final criterion of CDL, which requires us, while having hopefully internalised the previous criteria, to channel it into our efforts to transform every level of our society into spaces of deepened social justice. The importance of our social literacy and our ability to see ourselves and the divisions that separate us lies in the price of an ever more fractured social contract, that we cannot afford to pay. This is a test we cannot fail because the success of our country relies deeply on our ability to co-exist equitably. To be literate in this way is for us to truly confront the estrangement that still makes co-existence amongst South Africans a difficult task. Jamil F. Khan is an award-winning author, doctoral critical diversity scholar, and research fellow at the Johannesburg Institute for Advanced Study.
