DA anniversary: Can a ‘white party' govern SA again?
The DA is now part of the government of national unity alongside the ANC.
Twenty five years since the DA was formed, the party is still trying to convince South Africans that they are not a whites-only party.
The party was established on June 24 2000, following a merger between the Democratic Party (DP) and the New National Party (NPP).
Over the years, the party has seen many prominent black leaders leave for various reasons, including Mmusi Maimane, Herman Mashaba, Lindiwe Mazibuko, Mbali Ntuli, and former Midvaal mayor Bongani Baloyi.
Political analyst Sanet Solomon said the departures of these black leaders have left many South Africans wondering about the internal affairs of the DA.
'The DA has been subject to a lot of critique given its struggle to retain its prominent black leaders. This challenge has translated into its inability to extend its voting base.
'While some of its policies have the ability to positively impact society, voters are also influenced by perception,' Solomon said.
Transformation in the top structures
Solomon said black leaders do not seem to have strategic positions in the party, which could easily create an impression that the party only really serves one racial group.
'Voters may need to see better integration. This may require the Federal Chair to be one racial group, the Chief Whip of another group, and the leader of a completely different group.
'South Africa is diverse, and this needs to be reflected in their leadership positions. There are phenomenal and competent people across all the diverse groupings. This is what people want to see,' she said.
Despite the DA being the second biggest party in the government of national unity (GNU), Solomon said it is unlikely the party will run the country by themselves anytime soon.
'Some of their policies would be suitable for a ruling party, but it is unlikely that they would be able to become a majority party as the current system of proportional representation would result in more coalition governments,' she said.
ALSO READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor?
DA's balancing act
Another analyst, Professor Susan Booysen, said the DA has made progress since it was founded.
'They have managed to keep their electoral territory, opinion polls indicate that they have made slight advances.'
Booysen said that even though the DA is not close to being a majority party in SA, it could use the current coalition politics to influence policy.
'If they continue this current but modest progress, then they will probably be a very likely or inevitable coalition partner for future governance,' she said.
Booysen said the DA has been forced to tread carefully around issues of race in the party.
'They are doing an often torturous, delicate, intricate balancing trick between coming across as more inclusive and simultaneously playing to their own small, racially-defined constituencies.
'It is the dilemma it is going to run into: simultaneous and competing endorsements by its own small internal constituencies and the broader South African community that is looking for restitution.'
DA for all
DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp rubbished claims that the party only serves white interests.
'The DA is the most diverse party in South Africa, and we elect leaders on merit, not race.
'Yes, people come and go in politics, but we remain focused on building a capable, non-racial alternative that serves all South Africans.'
Aucamp said the party has proven that it can lead where it governs, and is now ready to take over the Union Buildings.
'South Africans are ready for a government that gets things done. The DA has shown we can lead with competence and integrity, and more people are turning to us to rescue the country from decline, including in Gauteng,' he said.
The party will celebrate its birthday with a blanket drive on Tuesday.
NOW READ: 'I am finally home' – Liam Jacobs ditches DA for Patriotic Alliance
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Floyd Shivambu talks past, present and future
JOHANNESBURG - Former UmKhonto WeSizwe Party General Secretary Floyd Shivambu, wants South Africans to tell him if the country needs another political party. Shivambu has been deployed to parliament after being axed as SG, but his scathing attack on the party could prove to be end of that relationship. Shivambu has made it clear he is not leaving the MKP despite his demotion from SG to ordinary member. Speaking at a media briefing in Midrand on Thursday last week, Shivambu said he would not be joining the ANC or the EFF, which he strongly criticised. Despite the fallout, Shivambu expressed unwavering support for the party and its founder and president, Jacob Zuma. But the former EFF leader also didn't hold back in his remarks about the EFF. "Some said I should never rejoin EFF because it is a cult and I agree. There is no room for sound ideological reasoning there," Shivambu explained.
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
DA rejects govt plan to take food distribution away from NPO's
JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance says centralising the Gauteng food bank would increase food insecurity. The Gauteng government wants to centralise the food parcel distribution by 288 non-profit organisations. Under its plan, five regional food banks will become one. The DA however disagrees. It says while establishing a central food bank may seem cost-effective, the effects are dire. "The department will likely face increased distribution costs, creating barriers to the delivery of food parcels and leaving many, including vulnerable children, at risk of hunger. "Furthermore, local suppliers to food banks and NPOs would also be left out in the cold, leading to unintended job losses," the party says. The DA is of the view that if NPOs continue as food drop-in centres and regional food banks this will assist in reducing transportation costs.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Behind the lottery licence — how elite networks shape government contracts
All of this fits into what is becoming a prevailing narrative among the English-speaking chattering classes — that Paul Mashatile is linked to many businesspeople who win government contracts. And is able to benefit from these relationships. I imagine you're as unsurprised as I am that there is already such a fight over the awarding of the contract to run the national lottery. When you consider that winning the contract is virtually a licence to print money, it was always predictable that the lawyers would be licking their lips. Even so, I was a little taken aback at the important story published by the amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism on Monday, 22 June 2025. It shows how closely linked at least one of our politicians is to people who benefitted from the deal. As the story explains, one of the shareholders in the Sizekhaya consortium which won the deal is Bellamont Gaming. One of the directors at Bellamont is Khumo Bogatsu, who is the twin sister of Deputy President Paul Mashatle's wife, Humile Mashatile. The other director of Bellamont is Moses Tembe, who also appears close to Mashatile. Prevailing narrative All of this fits into what is becoming a prevailing narrative among the English-speaking chattering classes — that Mashatile is linked to many businesspeople who win government contracts. And is able to benefit from these relationships. But it is much more complicated than that. For a start, to make this stick, you would have to prove that Department of Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau made this decision in an unfair manner. And to do that, you might need to have proof that Sizekhaya should not have won this fair and square. It all reminds me of a fun piece of Zimbabwean lottery trivia. In 2000, the president of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, actually won a lottery. Now, no one could prove that the odds had been stacked in his favour. But so complete was his control over Zimbabwean society at the time, it would have been weird for there to be no interference. Now, I can't prove that Mugabe made this happen. But I can say that the elites in that society just knew that to survive they had to keep him happy. No doubt you might believe that what has happened here is to the benefit of Mashatile. Or, you could believe that this is just a coincidence. That might not be as strange as it might sound. One of the quirks of our society is that our elite, the people who really make decisions, is relatively small. And while that happens in other societies too, here there is a dynamic that links people to the ANC. This is because, in the past, if you were black and ambitious, you probably knew people who were in the ANC. It's just the way of things. Apartheid For example, in the legal field, many people know each other because they worked together during apartheid. In fact, one law firm – Maluleke Seriti Makume Matlala – produced five judges who were sitting on our courts at the same time. That's a record that is unlikely to ever be beaten. This leads to situations where people know each other very well in all sorts of ways. There was another recent example that may actually show the dangers of this. Sipho Pityana recently won an important ruling in the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria based entirely on the relationships between people. As always in these stories, there is a long and complicated back story. Sipho Pityana was the only candidate to be chairperson of Absa when he was accused of sexual harassment at AngloGold Ashanti (no finding was made against him). Maria Ramos was a director there at the time. The head of the Prudential Authority, Kuben Naidoo, then phoned her and the outgoing chairperson of Absa, Wendy Lucas-Bull. Eventually, the Prudential Authority made it known it would not accept Pityana as the Absa chairperson and, in the end, he was not appointed. He has told The Money Show that this clearly only happened because the people involved knew each other. And knew each other well. And that he was unfairly treated as a result. Informal process For now, the courts have accepted this. That's because the Prudential Authority should never have followed an informal process in the first place (unfortunately, the authority has not accepted an invitation to provide a right of reply). Pityana himself is also an example of a family that can produce more than one person who ends up within the elites of our society. His brother Barney Pityana has played many roles … and is currently the chairperson of the National Lotteries Commission (which plays no role in awarding the national lottery licence). But this kind of small elite, with groups of people who have deep relationships with each other, may well be bad for our society. It creates situations where someone like Moses Tembe, or even Edwin Sodi, might be able to capitalise on those relationships. And so one government contract leads to another government contract. As I say, this happens in other places. But here at least, thanks to investigative groups such as amaBhungane and Scorpio, we all know about it. And in this case we are all going to learn a lot more about how the decision to award the national lottery was taken. Because those who lost out have already started a process to possibly review the decision.
