Green leadership hopefuls set out fight for frustrated Labour supporters' votes
Challenging them, Mr Ramsay's current deputy Zack Polanski claimed 'bold messaging at the national level' had been 'missing' from his party's high offices.
Green Party members began voting on August 1 and are halfway through the process, with polls closing on August 30.
'One of our top priorities, absolutely, is winning over support from people who are utterly disillusioned with Labour,' Mr Ramsay told the PA news agency.
'But there will also be people from other parts of the political spectrum who are also feeling politically homeless, deeply care about the environment, want to see our services restored.
'And in the era of politics that we're now in, there are so many people who don't think about politics in old left-right terms, and we need to be the ones that are showing what Greens stand for – for social justice and for a liveable future for people and planet.'
Mr Ramsay, the Waveney Valley MP, said the Greens under his leadership would move to tackle 'inequality and poverty, the decline of our public services, the degradation of our natural environment and the threat of climate breakdown'.
Mr Polanski said his party was 'here ultimately to replace the Labour Government'.
The London City Hall member said: 'In the same way that Reform have really made the Tories collapse, I think there's a huge space for the Green left in this country to galvanise and to take votes away, and to say that we don't have to take second-best and actually you can have a party that's unapologetic about its values – that will stand up for migration, that will stand up for the poorest communities, and will take the fight to wealth and power.'
He added: 'Alongside the Labour Government, of course, Reform are a huge issue for the entire country.
'But I think the problem is a Labour Party pretending to be that antidote to Reform whereas they're just mimicking them.
'And if people want Reform-lite policies, then they'll just vote Reform.'
Under Mr Ramsay's co-leadership with Carla Denyer, with Mr Polanski as their deputy, the party gained 241 council seats in 2023, and picked up a further 74 last year.
The Green Party also secured four seats at the general election.
Mr Polanski pledged to 'continue' with existing efforts but added: 'What has been missing, though, is the bold messaging at the national level, and we need to make sure that before we've even knocked on a door or someone's picked up a leaflet, they already know that the Green Party stand for so much more than the environment.
'Now, the environment is really important to us, it will remain really important to us, but this is about lowering bills, rent controls, making sure that we're funding our public services and taxing the super-wealthy, all measures that are increasingly popular.'
Mr Ramsay warned that Mr Polanski's language was aimed at 'the 'progressive activist' section of the public', who were already convinced by the party's messaging.
He added: 'Having that credibility alongside the distinctive Green policies that we're putting forward is so crucial and it's what's taken us out of the wilderness years that the Green Party was in in my early time in the party.
'I've been in the party 27 years. People used to say, 'Well, I like what you stand for but can you really win? Can you really take on these positions and make a real impact?
'We've demonstrated that now and we've got to continue that route of continuing to build our impact and continuing to build on a record-breaking success and a record-breaking strategy.'
Mr Ramsay said he was 'concerned about the Green Party going down a populist route, given that populism relies on polarising and divisiveness'.
Mr Polanski said: 'The idea that eco-populism is divisive is a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is I'm talking about, which is the 99% versus the 1%.
'Now that 1% are corporations who are destroying our environment, destroying our democracy and destroying our communities, so if it's divisive, it's where the division already is, which is between the super-rich and then everyone else who is working hard with their hands and their brain.'
Ms Denyer, the Bristol Central MP, is not standing for a leadership role.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Reform will 'fail women' if it scraps Online Safety Act, Angela Rayner says
Reform UK risks 'failing a generation of young women' if the party scraps the Online Safety Act, Angela Rayner has said. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Nigel Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet if it repeals the legislation as promised if it wins the next general election. Rayner's warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Reform over the act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. However, civil liberties campaigners and some MPs have argued the law opens the door to censorship and poses a danger to free speech. Meanwhile cybersecurity experts warn that asking people to hand sensitive details to third-party providers to comply with new age verification requirements could present an opportunity to scammers and blackmailers if a data breach were to occur. On the other hand, many people are already being exploited in the form of "sextortion", were victims are persuaded to perform sexual acts on webcam, with the material used to blackmail them. Even if blackmail isn't involved, a growing number of people have found themselves the victims of so-called "revenge porn", which more often involves someone seeking to use what you thought were private images to embarrass or humiliate you. The Online Safety Act aims to address these issues through the creation of a specific offence of "intimate image abuse". Reform has said it would repeal the law and replace it with other means to protect children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Farage and his colleagues have said the act is an example of overreach by the government and a threat to free speech, which prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle. The Cabinet minister claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the act – including Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the the deputy prime minister has questioned how Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse without the Online Safety Act's protections.'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws," Rayner said. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.'Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the government have outlined also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety.'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. "Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship.'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rayner accuses Farage of fuelling revenge porn culture
Angela Rayner has claimed Nigel Farage would open the floodgates to revenge porn and 'fail a generation of young women' by scrapping online safety laws. In a direct attack on the Reform leader, the Deputy Prime Minister warned that removing protections would enable 'a vile, misogynistic culture on social media'. Her broadside reflects how Labour strategists are convinced Mr Farage has misread the public mood and that voters support more regulation of the internet. Reform hit back on Saturday, saying it would 'always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship'. Laila Cunningham, a party councillor, said Ms Rayner could not 'claim to protect women while placing unvetted illegal migrant men' in communities. The row erupted amid controversy over the application of the Online Safety Act and concerns that the enforcement of it is impinging on free speech. Initially passed by the Tories, the legislation is designed to protect children in particular from freely accessing harmful material like extreme pornography. It requires websites to block access to adult content with strict age verification checks, such as artificial intelligence (AI) face scans or by demanding people's bank account details. But ministers are concerned it is being enforced 'over-zealously' by firms, with examples of blocked content including a Commons debate on grooming gangs. The controversy has prompted Reform to pledge that Mr Farage would repeal the legislation, warning it is turning Britain into 'a borderline dystopian state'. Shortly after the act came into force last month, the Reform leader said: 'It begins to look as though state suppression of genuine free speech may be upon us already.' Ms Rayner said the move would lead to a rise in instances of 'intimate image abuse' online, which is more commonly referred to as revenge porn and can include uploading images online, as well as sharing them by text and email or even showing another person an image. 'Intimate image abuse is a devastating crime and contributes to a vile misogynistic culture on social media that we know translates into physical spaces too,' Ms Rayner said. 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. 'It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' The row between the pair could foreshadow a future election campaign, were Sir Keir Starmer to step down and be replaced by his deputy. Ms Rayner has long been rumoured to be on leadership manoeuvres and her high-profile attack on Mr Farage will be seen as a further burnishing of her credentials. Reform has led in every opinion poll since the beginning of May and has an eight point cushion over Labour according to the latest YouGov survey. The meteoric rise of Mr Farage's party has unnerved Downing Street and Labour MPs, many of whom sit on wafer thin majorities in the Red Wall. Labour strategists think he has made a mistake by attacking the Online Safety Act, with a recent poll showing seven in 10 voters back age verification checks on porn. The Deputy Prime Minister led the attack after Peter Kyle sparked controversy by suggesting that Mr Farage was on the side of sex offenders such as Jimmy Savile. The Science Secretary faced widespread criticism and calls to apologise over the slur, which the Reform leader described as 'absolutely disgusting'. Joining the attack on the Reform leader, Jess Phillips, the Safeguarding Minister, claimed Mr Farage was 'happy for online spaces to remain a wild west'. 'Nigel Farage's Reform have shown they have a total disregard for the abuse, hatred, and vile criminality millions of women face online,' she said. 'Reform have no idea and simply don't care about the grave damage their decisions could have.' 'Women are more unsafe than ever' Cllr Cunningham, a former prosecutor who has been tipped to run for London Mayor, challenged Ms Phillips to a debate on women's safety. She said that 'women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour' and accused the Safeguarding Minister of 'wilfully deceiving voters on this issue'. Ministers had shown they will 'take more steps to monitor your social media posts than they will to monitor the unvetted men they house at your expense', she added. Writing for The Telegraph, she said: 'Labour are attacking Reform for pledging to scrap the Online Safety Act as if that legislation is the last line of defence for women. It isn't. 'It's a cover for censorship and an excuse to hand unelected regulators sweeping powers to silence views they don't like, while doing nothing about the real crimes happening on our streets. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals.' Online laws are a force for good, and for parents' peace of mind By Emily Darlington MP Picture this. Your teenage daughter gets her first mobile phone for her birthday. She's excited about the prospect of messaging her friends, sharing funny videos, posting about the day out she's had with her friends or family. Instead, she's randomly contacted by someone on social media who says they're a friend of a friend. They speak, friendly at first. But the conversation turns. The person starts using sexually explicit language. They ask your daughter to take revealing pictures. She doesn't know what to do. She feels pressure. This person threatens your daughter. If she doesn't share these images, they will tell her family something egregious that will embarrass her. She feels scared, even ashamed. She obliges. These photos are now in the hands of a predator. Who knows what they will do with them? Who knows who this manipulative figure really is? These exploitative crimes are on the rise – with 14 per cent of young women having experienced threats, or actual sharing, of intimate images. It's just one of the many emerging threats against daughters, sisters, and mothers across our country - and it's not just women and girls, with young men being victimised by online predators too. Social media and other online spaces have evolved quicker than legislators across the world have been able to act. Labour has brought in new online laws to protect women and children online. The tide is changing. But there's a new threat in the joint effort in tackling these heinous crimes… Nigel Farage. There had been a political – and indeed public – consensus that social media has become a wild west. A space for violence, misogyny, the promotion of terrorism – and an open forum for predators. That's why it'll send shivers down the spines of parents that Farage and his Reform party want to scrap the new safeguards that have recently been put in place. They shamefully haven't put forward any plan as to how to how they'll replace the vital new protections this Act provides. It's profoundly irresponsible and frankly, profoundly unpatriotic. It could put millions of young people at risk of becoming the next victims, put them in danger of being radicalised, and being exposed to extreme hatred. Enough is enough. This is a test for Reform. In an age where technology should be harnessed for good, we have a choice. We can look forward and ensure that protections are in place for everyone to use the internet in a safe and enjoyable way. Or we can surrender in the way that Farage is choosing. That would mean predators are emboldened to prey on the unsuspecting. It could damage a whole generation and change lives for good. Of course the new online laws are a change. There's no denying that. But they're a force for good, and for parents' peace of mind. That's why it's vital we confront Reform on this. Protecting the citizens of Britain is the first duty of any government. Reform won't even do that. They're not safe for our children - and they're not fit to govern.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform party leader Nigel Farage has criticised the Act (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'
