
Is Trump being schooled in the art of the deal, Russian-style?
No one has ever accused Donald Trump of lacking self-belief. Perhaps that had helped him in life, and to overcome deficits in his personality that might have prevented him from becoming a billionaire and president of the United States. Which he did.
He famously wrote a book about this – ghost-written, actually – with the title, The Art of the Deal (the ghost-writer also came up with that). And we never stop hearing about it.
Vladimir Putin has probably never read Trump's much-cited 1987 business memoir, nor his other works, including Kick Ass and Think Big, How to Get Rich, or the more modestly titled Midas Touch. But the ex-KGB man and modern-day czar has also done quite well for himself. Could he be about to give Trump a masterclass in how to do deals the Russian way?
At the moment, Putin is clearly playing for time, not least to allow his forces to make further gains on the ground before the ceasefire line is frozen, as seems inevitable. One of Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff, was left cooling his heels in Moscow while Putin took a first look at the putative deal, which has to be 'carefully, painstakingly studied by both sides', in Putin's terms. Now Witkoff is taking Putin's non-committal answer and steep demands for Ukrainian emasculation back to Washington. Another American peace envoy, the hapless Keith Kellogg, has been kept well away from the Kremlin, the kind of thing Trump would usually lose his rag about.
Putin has deployed a typically skilful diplomatic negotiating ploy – agreeing with Trump 'in principle', while disagreeing in practice.
The idea [of a ceasefire] is good, and we absolutely support it, but there are issues we need to discuss and negotiate with our American colleagues, maybe a phone call with President Trump,' declared Putin, disingenuous as ever.
The Russian president also says the ceasefire already agreed between America and Ukraine 'should lead to an enduring peace and should remove the root causes of this crisis'. Cheeky. These supposed 'root causes' go back to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1990, which Putin regards as a tragedy of historic proportions, and the very notion of Ukraine as a legitimate independent state. If the root cause is the dissolution of the last Russian empire, the freedoms won by Poland, East Germany, Romania, the Baltic States, Ukraine, Georgia and all the rest, then addressing that, and getting them all out of Nato, will take a little longer than Trump has in mind.
Further, in immediate terms, Putin demands that Ukraine partially demilitarises itself during the one-month ceasefire: 'We want guarantees that during the 30-day ceasefire, Ukraine will not conduct mobilisation, training or receive weapons.' All Donald wanted from Vladimir was a simple ' Da! '.
Yet, judging from his predictably hard-line statements, Putin plainly has zero intention of agreeing to a rapid ceasefire. The deal Trump got under duress from Volodymyr Zelesnky was supposed to be so good that Putin would tear his arm off. But Trump handed all the best cards, which America possessed, to the Kremlin.
Putin knows that Trump is desperate for a deal, and it will take almost anything to fulfil his (overdue) promise the he could settle the war in Ukraine in 24 hours, even before formally he took office. Putin knows Trump won't offer Ukraine a security guarantee, and that he wants to stop sending expensive American armaments. For that matter, he has also heard Trump say he doesn't think Putin will invade Ukraine again, or any other country.
Trump has made no secret that he wants to convene a summit of the new Big Three in world affairs – a Trump-Putin-Xi pow-wow where they can carve the world up into spheres of influence. Nothing to do with Ukraine is going to be allowed to get in the way of that. He's called Volodymyr Zelensky a dictator and said Ukraine started the war, giving up on the Kremlin's 'talking points'.
Putin and Russia are in an immensely weak position compared to America, but Trump seems to have forgotten how powerful he is. So Putin knows the strength of his (unwarranted) bargaining position, and that he can play Trump along, and make him wait. It's a humiliating rebuke.
So, no deal? That depends.
It could be that Trump could, more or less, accept Putin's terms, dismember Ukraine and leave it to Putin's mercy – but the fighting would stop, 'peace', of sorts, would return. It would be a miserable deal for Ukraine, the United States and the world. But Trump could declare victory and move on, safe in the knowledge that the MAGA base aren't bothered about the fate of Europe. Trump should be humbled by such a denouement – but he will present himself as the natural winner of this year's Nobel Peace Prize.
Or… Putin could overplay his hand, force Zelensky to reject the deal and leave Trump in such a difficult position that he might even decide to back Ukraine, arming them to force Putin to agree to reasonable terms. Admittedly, that is the less likely outcome, but Trump, as we all know, is erratic and prone to tantrums. He's made some threatening noises about what might happen if Putin rejects his deal – and he would not wish to be seen to be defeated, even by such a respected adversary.
We shall soon see whether Trump has indeed got the Midas touch, and can pull off the deal of the 21st century… or if he is about to have his ass kicked by the more coldly calculating President Putin. There's rather more than Trump's ego at stake this time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Close to a million Russian troops dead or injured in Vladimir Putin's war
Russian losses in Putin's war on Ukraine are staggering - but the Kremlin is preparing a fresh offensive even whilst talks are ongoing to achieve a peace settlement Russia has lost close to a million troops to death or injury in the war in Ukraine, latest intelligence estimates declare. The number of troops put out of battle in ferocious clashes stands at 986,080 - with a staggering 1,140 killed or injured and taken from the frontline in just 24 hours. In addition, intelligence analysis suggests, Moscow has lost 10,865 tanks and almost 40,000 drones to Ukraine's defence of the invasion. Ukraine has destroyed 1,172 anti-aircraft systems, 372 warplanes, 336 helicopters, 28 warships and boats and even a submarine. The staggering claims of Russian losses have led to Moscow having to recruit as many as 14,000 North Korean soldiers who have also suffered losses. It is believed at least 1,000 of Kim Jong-Un's troops are believed to have died in battles in Russia 's effort to drive Ukraine invading troops out of Kursk. It comes as Russia is believed to be building up a huge force of 50,000 assault troops in readiness for a new Summer offensive near Sumy, in Ukraine's north east. Kyiv has confirmed Moscow forces have managed to capture four villages close to the region's border with Russia. It is believed the Kremlin has ordered a buffer of several miles in the region. But the Sumy regional governor stated that the residents of these settlements had been evacuated long ago, and "there is no threat to civilians." The attack on Sumy was originally planned for last year but was interrupted by Ukraine's mini-invasion into Russia's Kursk region. Ukraine is also believed to have suffered significant losses although there are no official figures available. Recently, the Ukrainian military also warned that Russia may be preparing new attacks on Kharkiv as Moscow gathered its troops close to the border with the region. Fighting has intensified along all of Ukraine's frontlines, stretching for over 800 miles and across multiple regions of the country. This week Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky s aid Russia mobilises around 40,000 to 45,000 men for its military every month, while Ukraine mobilises about 25,000 to 27,000. He said it is yet another indicator of Moscow intensifying its war efforts despite numerous calls from Kyiv, Brussels and Washington to agree to an unconditional ceasefire. Zelensky added: "When the US sends signals that it wants to do something positive with Russia, then Russia ramps up its mobilisation.' It comes as Ukraine's weapons developers are pushing forward with making futuristic defences using artificial intelligence. One breakthrough has been the 'robot tank' officially dubbed the Sky Sentinel which is a high-power .50-caliber M2 Browning machine gun which shoots down missiles and drones. Fitted onto a turret the device is placed near the frontline and independently of humans once it is programmed, it detects, tracks, calculates the trajectory of incoming weapons and fires. It can engage moderately fast, low-flying targets moving at speeds of up to 500mph – enough to intercept Russia's 'Kamikaze' Shahed drones, which operate at less than 120mph.


ITV News
25 minutes ago
- ITV News
School children to be taught importance of the armed forces under new government plans
Children in Britain will be taught about the importance of the armed forces in school under new government plans. The proposal, first reported by the Telegraph, is part of the government's strategic defence review which is due to be published on Monday. It will recommend that state school students should be taught the value of the military, to help young people learn about careers in defence, and to boost their connection with the armed forces in an increasingly insecure world. The plans include a suggestion army reservists could visit schools and speak to children about working in the military. From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below... While the review doesn't suggest the lessons will be part of the curriculum, they are expected to be delivered through PSHE lessons. The Telegraph reports officials hope the scheme can be rolled out nationally from primary schools through to secondary schools. The plans are meant to help tackle the recruitment and retention crisis in the military - the Army, Navy, and Air Force are all currently below their targets for personnel numbers. Last April the size of the army fell below 73,000, the lowest level since the early 1800s. The strategic defence review was launched by the Labour government shortly after the election, designed to usher in a "new era for defence" in an time of global instability. The prime minister announced in February that the UK would increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, funded by a cut in the overseas aid budget. As ITV News Political Correspondent Carl Dinnen reported last week, the review will call for much greater investment in hi-tech weaponry, particularly drone and anti-drone systems, a shift that is already underway as a result of the war in Ukraine. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) announced this week they will spend over £ 1 billion on AI and drone technology to speed up decisions on the battlefield. Some commitments - such as the nuclear deterrent, NATO membership and support for Ukraine - are baked into the review's parameters. The reviewers have also been asked to look at how to reinforce UK homeland security with reports that a civilian 'Home Guard', separate from the Reserves, will be among the recommendations. Unusually for a defence review, the key work has been done independently of the Ministry of Defence by the former NATO Secretary-General and Defence Secretary Lord Robertson, former Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff General Sir Richard Barrons, and Dr Fiona Hill, who advised Donald Trump on European and Russian affairs during his first term.


New Statesman
27 minutes ago
- New Statesman
It's time to go long on Farage-coin
Nigel Farage has had a paradoxical week. On Tuesday, he hit Labour from the left by calling for the two-child benefit cap to go. Forty-eight hours later, he flew to Las Vegas for a conference with Bitcoin magnates to tout his plans to lower taxes on cryptocurrency. All of which poses a question: is Farage for benefits or billionaires? The Reform leader was more at home in Vegas than you might expect. One pundit – wearing bulky headphones like a UFC commentator – introduced Farage as the 'the leading UK presidential candidate'. They clearly see him as one of their own. That fame is partly down to his fluency in the lexicon of the American right. He champions pensioners in London; in Las Vegas he attacks 'globalists' and 'big' government. Keir Starmer is branded a 'socialist' – a villain for Maga, in other words – and the crux of politics becomes the decline in 'our Judeo-Christian values'. Such elasticity pays off. Farage basked in standing ovations, languidly sprawled in his chair. He has never been this certain in his domination of politics. Remember that on Brexit night he conceded defeat before the full results came in. Now, he mimics those presidential candidates who talk about 'when' they will win the election. He detailed his career, tailored for his audience, with unusual pride: commodities trader, radio presenter, GB News host. 'Frankly I think I've got much more experience than a bunch of Oxford-educated human rights lawyers to run the country,' he said. Farage's antennae are sharper than most. Where he leads, other politicians follow. He condemned China's authoritarianism in January 2021, for instance, only for parliamentarians to declare a genocide against the Uyghurs later that year. He spent the pandemic filming boats of migrants crossing the Channel, a now hegemonic issue. He first went to a crypto conference three years ago in Amsterdam as Rishi Sunak laid out plans to make the UK a crypto hub. But how many votes are in crypto? American politics usually grows rotten on its journey across the Atlantic. Ask jaundiced progressives how popular woke is now. Trump, who has his own memecoin, is his own repellent – America First, after all, means putting the US over allies. Farage had to distance himself from Elon Musk after X became a campaign headquarters for Britain's race riots last summer. This year, tariffs plunged Trump's approval ratings among British voters, even with those who support Reform. Yet Farage still calls Trump a 'friend' and has set up a 'Doge unit' to cut local government spending. He is riding two horses – and two countries – at once. Farage's gamble is that crypto is popular on the home front, not just with his American bros. The trick lies in the youth – something you couldn't often say about the populist movement a few years ago. One YouGov survey last year found that 24 per cent of 18-34 year-olds own cryptocurrency, compared to 12 per cent of the population overall. 'My message particularly to young people is help us to help you bring our country properly into the 21st Century,' Farage said. What resolves Farage's paradox is that cryptocurrency is a form of populist finance. It's a decentralised currency often used to shield money from law enforcement, central banks and Wall Street. Eric Trump said at the conference that he 'would love to see some of the big banks go extinct.' The last speaker of the day was Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road, a dark-web marketplace which used Bitcoin, who was arrested for drug trafficking offenses in 2013. Trump pardoned him two days after taking office. For its acolytes, cryptocurrency is the key to a new anti-establishment economics. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Farage sees himself as a marshal within this anti-system movement, standing against the globalist elite abroad, and the Conservative-Labour consensus at home. Like Trump – whose supporters range from Elon Musk to Steve Bannon, two men who resent each other's views – Farage can glide between libertarianism and populism. He speaks the language of both and seems to think holding that coalition together is the route to No 10. That means calling for welfare one day, and hawking London as a crypto capital the next. [See also: Nigel Farage's political personality disorder] Related