Rapper Future denies Instagram model Gorgeous Doll's claims of five-year secret relationship
Instagram model Gorgeous Doll has sparked controversy with claims that she was in a secret five-year relationship with rapper Future. In a series of social media posts, she alleged that the Mask Off artist not only pursued other women during their time together but also tried to silence her when she attempted to speak out. Future, however, has flatly denied knowing her.
Gorgeous Doll's accusations surfaced on March 2 when she claimed Future threatened to have her TikTok account deleted to prevent her from sharing their alleged history. She further alleged that she once walked in on the rapper being intimate with multiple women in a hotel room. 'I opened the door, I look, I close the door, I call my mom immediately because I was losing it,' she recounted.
According to the influencer, Future first met her at a strip club, and as their relationship progressed, she realized that he was 'everybody's man.' She also claimed that he invited her to a Christmas party, only for her to discover him with rapper and model Dess Dior, whom he dated between 2020 and 2021.
Additionally, she alleged that he gifted her an Audemars Piguet watch, only to later diss her in a song after learning she had been involved with someone else.
The situation escalated when Gorgeous Doll claimed Future tried to issue a gag order to stop her from speaking publicly. In response, she stated, 'In the five years that I've dealt with you, never once have I signed an NDA. So you're going to lose. You may win a couple of fights, but I will win the war.' She even hinted at taking legal action to claim credit for being an inspiration behind some of his songs.
Future has since denied all accusations. In a video shared by Gorgeous Doll, the rapper can allegedly be heard saying, 'I don't know you bruh. I don't even know you.'
IG model had Future crashing out on the phone after she exposed their alleged 5+ year relationship. 😳pic.twitter.com/o4WKObH0rf — My Mixtapez (@mymixtapez) March 1, 2025
This isn't the first time the social media personality has been at the center of controversy. She recently made headlines after claiming that rapper Latto was involved in an altercation that allegedly led to her miscarriage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Man threatens to sue DDG after DreamCon fight over 'doo doo garbage' insult
A man known as Lil Jay has announced plans to sue Twitch streamer and rapper DDG, his brother DuB, and their crew after an altercation at DreamCon 2025. The incident occurred after Lil Jay repeatedly called DDG 'doo doo garbage,' a nickname that's been used online following recent abuse allegations made by singer Halle Bailey against the streamer. Footage from the event, now viral on social media, shows Lil Jay being punched and thrown to the ground by DuB, DDG's brother, before security intervened. Jay claims his chain was broken during the fight and that he was banned from the event immediately after. In a TikTok posted after the incident, Jay stated, 'I gotta take legal action against him, his brother, somebody out here. That's unacceptable for real.' He added that he believed the 'doo doo garbage' nickname was 'all jokes' and didn't expect such a violent reaction. Meanwhile, DDG responded to the incident by warning others not to use the phrase, saying the last person who did 'lost some Mario coins.' DuB also responded, mocking Jay's legal threats and stating, 'You cannot sue nobody for trying to fight me… it didn't go the way that your brain thought it was gonna go.' The incident has further fueled controversy surrounding DDG, who is already facing public backlash amid serious allegations from Halle Bailey.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson kiss stuns fans at CCXP MX25 conference
At the star-studded CCXP MX25 convention in Mexico City, Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson captivated fans during the highly anticipated "Jurassic World: Rebirth" panel. Their unexpected and electrifying on-stage interaction quickly became the talk of social media, fueling excitement for the upcoming July 2025 blockbuster. Fans flooded social media platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and X (formerly Twitter) to react to the lively chemistry between Bailey—who is openly gay—and Johansson. Clips from the panel have gone viral, sparking excitement and curiosity among fans. While some speculated about their off-screen relationship, others saw the moment as a playful nod to their characters in the film. Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson at #CCXPMX25 — best of jonathan bailey (@badpostjbailey) June 1, 2025 didn't have scarlett johansson and jonathan bailey being an iconic duo on my 2025 bingo card… but here we are — best of jonathan bailey (@badpostjbailey) June 1, 2025 JONATHANNN AND SCARLETT JOHANSSON?!?!?!! WHAT IS THISSS OMG — Scarlett's daughter (@nanalovesnat) June 1, 2025 Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson sharing a sweet moment at the end of the Omelete panel at #CCXPMX25 — we weren't ready for that duo! — best of jonathan bailey (@badpostjbailey) June 1, 2025 "Jurassic World: Rebirth" is set to revive the popular franchise with fresh storylines and new characters, raising fans' expectations. The dynamic between Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson at the convention has amplified anticipation for the movie's release. Industry observers note that moments like these during promotional events can significantly boost a film's visibility and fan engagement. The viral reaction on social media underscores the power of celebrity interactions at fan conventions in driving entertainment buzz. As the release date approaches, fans will be eager to see if the on-stage chemistry translates to the big screen.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Nobody's content with the 'content'
Recently, Fahad Mustafa's old comments against family vlogging and the overuse of the word 'content' resurfaced online and caused an uproar among Tiktokers and YouTubers. "'Content' is the most overrated word in this country. There is no such thing as content. Everyone is selling their families. They haven't even left graveyards alone. They go to their mother's grave, and record themselves saying I'm missing my mother, please pray for her. What kind of 'content' is this?" Mustafa had said when asked about sharing the screen with digital content creators during a TV appearance. "I can tell a good or a bad story. But I can't sell my family. I can't sell myself. If you go on a film or TV shoot, it takes time to do this. They can't understand that this takes us 8 to 10 hours since they live in a 10-second world." While the comment offended the Instagram, TikTok and YouTube content creators especially Rajab Butt, as Ricky Gervais says, "Just because you're offended doesn't mean you're right." This back-and-forth has sparked a debate between the traditional media vs digital 'content'. But it's not a clash between Mustafa and Butt. The actor didn't even mention the YouTuber by name. The scope of this is much bigger than a forced, illogical personal feud. Content overload What Mustafa spoke about is a worldwide concern of artists in the face of countless challenges faced today. Be it AI coming in as a wrecking ball to destroy authentic human expression, shorter attention spans engineered over the last decade by social media overconsumption or the declining understanding of storytelling and art due to the aforementioned issues, there are already more than enough battles artists today are fighting to preserve their chosen media and forms of expression. This is not to defend shows like Mustafa's Jeeto Pakistan, which feed into the same Black Mirror-esque humiliation-in-exchange-of-gifts convention. But Mustafa has created work with a certain artistic integrity in film and TV both, namely Actor in Law and Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum. However, phone cameras and social media platforms combined today have created an illusion that everyone is an artist, actor, or filmmaker. While the democratisation of the media has had numerous benefits, and this is certainly not an issue of gatekeeping, talking into a camera and showing what you cooked for lunch does not exactly require an abundance of talent or skill. There are many arguments to be made against family vlogging. The internet is full of stories of disgruntled and traumatized individuals forced by their in-house vlogger, be it a parent or a child, to be documented 24/7 for the sake of views. But the crux of the matter isn't even that. It's the fact that 'content' has replaced art, cinema and storytelling. The issues start with the usage of the word 'content' which piles up every artform into one giant automated factory where every creation serves the algorithm and the algorithm, in turn, feeds it back to us. It disintegrates the distinguishing characters of each art form and strips it of any value. This is why Mustafa's comments about the word ring true. If everything is content, then there's no difference between a feature film that takes years to produce and a bag of apples. This argument doesn't devalue platforms like YouTube which can be used for a myriad of purposes from education to art and music and everything in between. It criticizes the forced homogeneity of all art forms. And family vlogging is definitely not an art form. Casting influencers In recent years, even in Hollywood, we have seen a number of so-called social media influencers turn to film and TV. But none comes to mind when thinking about who has excelled and been recognized for their skills. One can bring up Logan Paul but he has succeeded in WWE and pro-wrestling is a vastly different kind of storytelling than film or TV. Films which star the influencers usually land on streaming platforms which again play by the algorithm and casting content creators becomes essentially the same as product placement or a gimmick to cater to the said individual's social media following. Earlier this year in an interview with Variety, Ethan Hawke also lamented the fact that filmmakers are being forced to cast based on Instagram following. He said, "Sometimes I'll be setting a movie up and someone will say, 'Oh, you should cast Suzie.' I'm like, 'Who is she?' 'She has 10 million followers.' I'm like, 'OK cool, has she acted before?' 'No, but ' And you're like, 'Wow, so this is going to help me get the movie made? This is crazy.' So if I don't have this public-facing [platform], I don't have a career? And if I get more followers I might get that part? What?" Just because someone is a social media 'content' creator doesn't automatically mean they'd be good at acting or creating any kind of art. The mindset involved in both is on the opposite ends of the spectrum. That ties in with another question: aren't most studio films made with the intent of profit and hence, they cast bankable actors to attract their fanbase. How is that different from casting a digital content creator? One response to that would be that the bankable actors can usually, if not always, act and do their job well. It's the same as when Pakistani media networks and digital platforms tried to make the 'Chaiwala' into the next big star after he went viral for his looks. It didn't work. As a filmmaker, there's a massive difference between working with trained professionals and amateur enthusiasts. Most of the time, the lack of understanding of the process results in a low-calibre work. But we live in a world where everyone only wants to be on screen and get those 15 minutes of fame. And if 10-second reels can do that, who would spend months and years to tell a good story?
