Top European holiday spot urged to charge £86 a DAY to ‘stem obscene rivers of tourists'
The popular destination welcomes around 30 million tourists each year and has already taken measures to "stem obscene rivers of tourists".
A Venice businessman has now proposed the city introduce a €100 (£86) entry fee for day-tripping tourists.
Setrak Tokatzian, who is the president of St Mark's Square resident's association, said the charge would help to combat what he called 'obscene' overtourism in the historic Italian city.
As of right now, seven out of 10 visitors to only stay in Venice for a day, and often do not spend money in local shops.
The city became the first metropolitan area globally to charge day-trippers an admission fee, which was introduced on 25 April 2024.
Holidaymakers with hotel or Airbnb reservations within the city are exempt but other tourists have to pay €5 (£4.20) to visit.
Significant increase
The proposed €100 (£86) fee would be 20 times more expensive, aiming to deter tourists who do not contribute to the local economy.
Tokatzian described Venice as being is in a 'state of calamity' in an interview with local newspaper Corriere del Veneto.
'This tourism is obscene, there's a complete explosion of overtourism like never before, with a type of people wandering around without entering shops or even knowing where they are," he said.
Tokatzian, who owns a jewellery shop in the city, called for the charge in order to stem the 'rivers of people' arriving in Venice.
'They move from one place to another, often guided by tour operators, boarding gondolas, hopping into taxis, rushing here and there, but no one buys anything," he explained.
The tiny coastal village named the Venice of England is home to the country's best B&B
He added that tourists who 'don't know what culture is' often bypass storefronts to spend money on 'illegal vendors' selling grain for pigeons and roses.
A €5 (£4.20) to €10 (£8.35) levy was trialled between April and July this year.
Last-minute tourists who made reservations less than four days in advance were charged the higher rate.
Daytrippers visiting during peak hours, 8:30AM to 4PM, have to pay the daily fee.
Meanwhile, overnight tourists with hotel reservations are exempt from the charge.
Which? reveals the destinations that have highest and lowest amount of tourist
Ten highest:
Zakynthos (149,886.95)
Istarska Zupanija (Istria in Croatia) (133,466.93)
Fuerteventura (118,720.31)
Lanzarote (117,785.17)
Dodecanese Islands - Kalymnos, Karpathos – Iroiki Nisos Kasos, Kos, Rodos (113,790.45)
Tiroler Oberland, Austria (112,716.37)
Pinzgau-Pongau, Austria (Salzburg Alps) (109,009.7)
Cyclade Island group- Andros, Thira, Kea, Milos, Mykonos, Naxos, Paros, Syros, Tinos (104,152.63)
Kerkyra, Corfu (100,079.59)
Außerfern, Austria (97,299.12)
Ten of the lowest:
Benevento (398.17)
Rybnicki, Poland (351.1)
Targovishte, Bulgaria (332.15)
Arr. Soignies, Belgium (284.11)
Podunavska oblast, Serbia (277.83)
Severoistočen, North Macedonia (177.84)
Olt, South West Romania (148.3)
Călăraşi, South East Romania (123.97)
Dytikos Tomeas Athinon, region near Athens (64.13)
Teleorman, Romania (21.54)
Tourists per square km (highest)
Paris (418,280.1)
Central Athens (88,534.92)
Copenhagen (63,943.88)
Tourists per square km (Lowest)
Svalbard, Norway (2.4)
Teleorman, Romania (1.21)
Jan Mayen, Norwegian volcanic island (0)
Most overnight stays (highest)
Mallorca (51,193,029)
Paris (43,919.010)
Rome (41,135,744)
Overnight stays (Lowest)
Zasavska, Slovenia (22,990)
Teleorman, Romania (6,983)
Jan Mayen (uninhabited Norwegian island) (0)
Exemptions are also granted to residents, Venetian-born visitors, students, and workers.
Opposition to fees
The proposal faces opposition as critics argue that such a high rate would not teach visitors 'respect'.
The former president of the St Mark's Square association Claudio Vernier shared his thoughts on social media.
'To believe that an entry fee of €100 can solve this sick system is a pure illusion," he said.
'Asking 100 euros to enter does not educate the visitor. Doesn't teach them respect, doesn't make them more aware."
He pointed out that charging such a high entry rate may work against the city.
'Those who spend a similar amount will expect a perfect, luxurious, frictionless 'theme park' experience — an expectation that cannot be met in a lively, historic, fragile city," he said.
More on Venice
And a recent discovery surrounding 'The Lion of Venice' statue has left people shocked.
Plus, information on why Venice is sinking and when it will be underwater?
Brits could face a fine of up to £250 ahead of new rules in the city.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
China is being urged to explain 'secret basement' under its London 'mega-embassy'
has ordered China to explain why it has redacted blueprints for its 'mega-embassy' set to be built in London, amid fears the building's basement rooms could be converted into 'spy dungeons'. As Housing Secretary, Rayner has given Beijing two weeks to either provide unredacted plans, according to the FT. If China does not do this, the deputy prime minister has ordered it to 'identify precisely and comprehensively' the withheld parts and explain why the floorplan for the basement and other areas of the Royal Mint Court development have been 'greyed out'. According to Rayner's letter to the Chinese embassy, she highlighted that two suites of anonymous rooms and a tunnel were redacted 'for security reasons'. Other buildings on the plans were also partly greyed out, including the Cultural Exchange Building and Embassy House. It also highlights a Home Office request for a 'hard perimeter' around the embassy that may represent a 'material amendment to the application that would require further consultation'. The letter asked for further information in order for the Housing Secretary to make a 'lawful determination' on whether to allow the site to go up, adding that 'no view has been formed yet.' The new embassy, if built, would sit opposite the Tower of London in the former Royal Mint and would be China's largest in Europe. Critics fear the site will become the centre of increased espionage operations and may be used to harass Chinese dissidents. The US has already expressed 'deep concern' over the project, as it sits close to the City of London, home to some of the world's largest financial institutions. MPs in the Netherlands have also raised similar concerns. The site was sold to China by the UK government in 2018 for £255million. A full decision on whether the embassy will be allowed to be built will be made by September. It comes after diplomatic sources warned the Mail on Sunday that the new embassy will have on-site accommodation for more than 200 intelligence officers. A source said: 'There will effectively be a student-style campus for spies in the heart of the City. 'And those spy dungeons are so deep that the sensitive cables are virtually at head height.' The MoS can also reveal that the embassy plans exempt a 'cultural exchange' section from 'inspection and verification' by UK authorities. A US security source said 'cultural interests/exchange' is a 'euphemism for intelligence and security services', adding: 'It's where they often stuff their security and intelligence staff, among other diplomats. 'And if it's a "cultural" centre/space, why do they always declare it off limits in planning documents?' Ex-Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said: 'Everywhere there is a mega embassy... Chinese state-sponsored, trans-national repression of those who have fled the Chinese state or who criticise it grows dramatically. 'It's simple: a bigger embassy has more spies and more repression.' Shadow Levelling Up Secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Labour had been 'caught red-handed trying to ram through this sinister embassy' in a 'desperate attempt to woo the Chinese Communist Party to bail out their failing economic policies'. He added: 'It is shocking Labour want to sign a legal document that will ban British officials checking what is being built in the embassy building. This is yet another surrender document from a Labour Government that puts foreign interests over British interests.' 'The so-called cultural exchange will clearly be used by Chinese spies and communist bullies to further their political ends.'
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Destination X airs shock double exit as three axed players return in show twist
DESTINATION X aired a shock double exit tonight - as three axed players returned in a major show twist. The BBC programme sees a group of strangers try to figure out where they are in Europe through a series of clues in a bid to win £100,000. 4 The second episode's destination was the Matterhorn, and tonight's edition saw the remaining players head off to one of the five countries that border Switzerland. At one point, the group took a train through a scenic forest, with a challenge allowing one team to get further clues as to where they were. They then returned to the bus and hit the road once again, failing to realise that they hadn't actually gained any ground until they found themselves back at the same train station the next day. Host Rob Brydon had a further surprise in store for them, by bringing out Ashvin, Claire and Chloe-Anne. Viewers will remember that the three players had failed to make it on to the bus in episode one, but had now returned for a second chance to join the adventure. Rob explained that the members of the losing team from the previous task would each join forces with one of the returning players and go head to head. These were James, Ben, Darren and Nick, but the winning team - Judith, Josh and Saskia - had the chance to save one of them outright, and they chose Darren. The remaining trio then picked their teams and working together, they all had to go through a box of items for a specific destination chosen by the announcer, and find pieces that had nothing to do with that location. After two rounds, James and Ashvin were the losing team, and they then had to go head-to-head for the final spot on the bus. In the end, Ashvin picked the right items, meaning James had to leave there and then. Fans stunned as THREE Destination X contestants are immediately axed in brutal opening twist The news left the rest of the team - in particular Saskia - shocked, and James was in tears as he said goodbye. But that wasn't the end of the departures, as the players still had to lock in where they thought this week's final destination was, with the person furthest away being sent packing as well. Having seen the clues, the winning team were convinced it was Munich in Germany, but had decided to try and throw the losing team off by suggesting it was Dortmund. After everyone had locked in their locations, Rob revealed the sad news that Ben had been the furthest from the destination - which was Munich - and that he would be leaving the bus immediately. Destination X continues tomorrow night at 9pm on BBC One. 4 4
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pension deals boost profits at Legal & General as employers look to offload defined benefit schemes
Britain's biggest money manager Legal & General saw profits jump as it cashed in on a boom in buyouts of UK pension funds. The buyouts, which are also known as pension risk transfers (PRTs), are when businesses pay financial firms to take over the running of legacy pension schemes. It is one of L&G's most lucrative divisions, with the FTSE 100 firm landing £3.4billion worth of PRT deals in the first six months of the year, up from £1.5billion in 2024. It helped the group, which manages over £1 trillion in assets, make a profit of £859million for the period, 6 per cent higher than last year. L&G boss Antonio Simoes said it planned to expand further into PRT, saying it was eyeing £42billion worth of deals. Employers are keen to offload defined benefit pension schemes, most of them long closed to current employees but which still incur costs. The surge in PRT deals also comes despite Chancellor Rachel Reeves introducing measures to try to encourage employers to keep running defined benefit schemes in the hope they will invest in areas that boost the UK economy. So lucrative is the pension transfer market it has attracted new rivals to L&G. In July, Athora, a European insurer owned by US private equity giant Apollo Global, snapped up Pension Insurance Corp, one of the UK's biggest players in PRT, for £5.7billion. And last week Canadian outfit Brookfield swooped on LSE-listed retirement saving specialist Just Group with a £2.4billion bid. But Simoes said L&G was 'firmly on track' to hit targets and reiterated plans to hand £5billion to its shareholders over three years. The shares dropped 2 per cent, or 5.3p, to 256.2p as analysts were disappointed that its solvency ratio, a key measure of financial strength, had dropped to 217 per cent from 223 per cent. L&G's push into the pensions market comes after Simoes warned Britons were not saving enough for retirement and called on the Government to lower the age of auto-enrolment in workplace schemes to 18, from 22. 'We really need to tackle how much we as individuals and employers are contributing,' he told the Daily Mail. Last month, the Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall, announced a review of the state pension age alongside a wider probe into retirement savings.
