New training programme launched for young lawyers to stay ahead of AI curve, strengthen basic advocacy and drafting skills
[SINGAPORE] In response to technological disruptions in the legal sector, a new training programme will equip young lawyers with skills and knowledge in artificial intelligence (AI), as well as strengthen proficiency in basic advocacy and drafting skills.
Set up by the Singapore Academy of Law (SAL), the Junior Lawyers Professional Certification Programme (JLP) offers structured training for young lawyers in both disputes and corporate practice areas.
Participants, for instance, can take courses on the ethics of generative AI, prompt engineering for lawyers and cross-boarder contract drafting, among others.
The programme was launched on Wednesday (May 21), with an opening conference held at Parkroyal Collection Marina Bay.
It is open to lawyers with up to five years of post-qualification experience. In addition to the mandatory opening conference and masterclass, participants are required to complete 11 more modules within two years in order to obtain certification.
To earn certification in either the disputes or corporate track, lawyers are required to complete at least four modules that are specific to their chosen area of specialisation.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Most of the disputes modules will be led by current or former members of the judiciary as trainers or guest speakers.
In his opening address, SAL chief executive Yeong Zee Kin said the JLP will 'bring structure to what was previously left to chance', ensuring that lawyers learn fundamental legal skills in a holistic way.
Participating in this programme is voluntary but recommended. Lawyers can use SkillsFuture to offset fees, while some law firms have offered to sponsor their associates.
Disruptive shifts
The JLP chiefly seeks to address the disruptive impact of generative AI on the legal sector, Yeong told The Business Times in an interview before the launch.
The widespread accessibility of generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT has made it possible for anyone to generate simple contracts, or even seek advice on litigation strategy – even without formal legal training, noted Yeong.
'Because all these tools are coming on stream and clients have access to them, it means that clients' expectations when they come to see a lawyer is going to be higher,' he added.
In this environment, lawyers need to move beyond basic information gathering to deliver greater value to their clients.
The JLP thus aims to plug this gap, by helping young lawyers keep abreast of AI advancements and strengthening their proficiency in basic legal skills.
Yeong views the programme as a bridge between the Bar exams and the specialist accreditation exams that senior lawyers take when seeking to specialise in a particular field.
Lawyers are required to take modules each year to fulfil continuing professional development (CPD) requirements, but these courses are usually ad hoc in nature, he said.
The JLP, on the other hand, provides a more 'structured way for some of these very fundamental skills and very crucial domain knowledge' for young lawyers.
And since the programme is voluntary, Yeong hopes it attracts serious participants.
'If you want to just take enough courses to fill your CPD requirements, there are a lot of free and cheap courses,' he said. 'This course is not for lawyers with that kind of mentality… it is meant for those who want to learn.'
Addressing attrition
While the JLP reduces attrition among young lawyers by focusing on career support, Yeong recognised that it does not resolve the perennial issue of the high work demands and long hours within the legal profession.
To this, he said SAL has other plans in the works, such as the legal profession symposium in July.
'That's intended to address workplace issues, (such as) the changing expectations between different generations of lawyers, the interactions between juniors and seniors,' he said.
Workplace pressures could also be an obstacle for young lawyers, who have to juggle their personal development with tight work deadlines, to take up training courses.
Acknowledging this, Yeong said it would not be feasible to require all law firms to allow their associates time off to attend the programme.
What SAL has done is to get law firms to sign a training pledge to demonstrate their commitment to supporting the JLP and other training initiatives. Fifty-two legal organisations have signed this pledge.
SAL will work with the firms to ensure that they develop good practices over time, said Yeong.
It will also monitor the programme's sign-up rates to see if its 'message is not getting through', he added. More than half of the 80 slots for the programme have been taken up thus far.
'Law is a knowledge-based profession, so the acquisition of knowledge will never end, because things change, business models change… new areas of law will come out,' said Yeong. 'We need to continue sharpening our skills and learning new things.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Can digital collaboration reshape gender equity?
WORKPLACE equity has been a long-running conversation in business circles, yet the numbers tell us progress remains uneven. While women now hold 29 per cent of C-suite positions globally, the so-called 'broken rung' continues to be a major hurdle: for every 100 men promoted to manager, only 81 women make the same leap. In Singapore and across Asia, the push for greater diversity in leadership is often met with structural and cultural challenges. Deeply embedded societal expectations about caregiving and traditional work hours, together with unconscious biases in hiring and promotion, have slowed progress. But technology is changing the equation with new ways to level the playing field. For companies striving to build a more inclusive workplace, the question is no longer 'why' gender diversity matters – that case has been made many times over. The real question now is 'how' to achieve it in a sustainable, meaningful way. Digital tools driving workplace flexibility What we all need to understand is that technology is not just changing how we work, it is fundamentally altering who can work and when. This shift has profound implications for women who have historically shouldered disproportionate caregiving responsibilities. The conversation around flexibility has evolved significantly post-pandemic. In Singapore, companies are leveraging technology to create asynchronous workflows that accommodate different life demands. At Neat, we have embraced this shift by implementing cloud-based collaboration tools designed to support flexible work arrangements. Intelligent scheduling solutions like Microsoft Copilot, Zoom Scheduler, Reclaim AI and Calendly help streamline meeting coordination and optimise time management, while project management platforms such as Asana, Trello, and enable teams to track tasks with flexible deadlines. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Additionally, artificial intelligence-powered assistants like Zoom AI Companion enhance productivity by summarising meetings, automating workflows and providing real-time insights, making flexible work more efficient and effective. These tools implement cloud-based collaboration tools with features specifically designed to support flexible work arrangements. Moreover, they introduce performance metrics that focus on outcomes rather than hours logged, such as OKR (objectives and key results) frameworks that prioritise measurable results over time spent working. Collaboration tools make seamless transitions between work and personal commitments a reality, helping eliminate the 'always-on' culture that has traditionally disadvantaged women. For too long, we have had to make impossible choices between professional ambition and caregiving responsibilities. But when technology is used thoughtfully, it removes barriers, allowing work to fit into life, not the other way around. In fact, research shows that 82 per cent of women feel more productive when given flexible work options, and 84 per cent consider workplace flexibility a major factor when applying for jobs. Companies seeing the most success are those using technology not just as a convenience, but as a strategic asset for inclusion. When work becomes more accessible, everyone benefits, not just those who have traditionally thrived in rigid, one-size-fits-all environments. Gender equity in career progressions and workplace culture But flexibility is just the first step. Without intentional career support, women risk being left behind in leadership pipelines, stuck in roles that offer work-life balance but not advancement. This is why the same digital tools that enable flexibility must also be leveraged to create more equitable career progression opportunities. Closing the gender gap requires a fundamental shift in how organisations approach talent development. Traditional mentorship models must evolve into active sponsorship programmes, where senior leaders deliberately advocate for female talent in leadership pipelines. Technology is emerging as a critical enabler of this transformation. For instance, digital mentorship platforms such as MentorCruise feature match employees with sponsors based on career goals, skills and interests – rather than relying on informal networks (which often favour men). Additionally, virtual reality-based leadership training programmes are a powerful tool to prepare women for executive roles. These programmes simulate high-stakes decision-making scenarios, helping to build confidence and executive presence in a low-risk environment. While technology is a powerful enabler, it cannot replace cultural change. Companies must actively audit their workplace policies to ensure that they are designed for inclusivity – not just gender-neutral on paper, but truly equitable in practice. For example, Singapore's evolving parental leave policies are a step in the right direction, but normalising paternity leave uptake is equally important. When companies actively encourage male employees to take leave, it reduces the stigma around caregiving and creates a more level playing field. Leadership teams must fundamentally reframe diversity from a compliance checkbox to diversity as a business driver. The reality is, companies with more women in leadership consistently outperform their peers in profitability, innovation and employee satisfaction. Rewriting the equity equation in Singapore Singapore is at a crossroads. As the country continues to position itself as a global leader in hybrid work and digital innovation, workplace dynamics are rapidly evolving. With 76 per cent of companies now offering remote work options for two to four days a week – up from 54 per cent in 2023 and surpassing the global average of 72 per cent – Singapore has a unique opportunity to redefine workplace equity and set new benchmarks for the future of work. Companies can move beyond good intentions to real impact by leveraging technology strategically, redesigning career pathways and embedding inclusivity into corporate culture. Because when the path to greater equity is accessible to all, workplaces can become fairer, stronger and better equipped for the future. The writer is chief people officer at Neat
CNA
18 hours ago
- CNA
Lawyers face sanctions for citing fake cases with AI, warns UK judge
LONDON :Lawyers who use artificial intelligence to cite non-existent cases can be held in contempt of court or even face criminal charges, London's High Court warned on Friday, in the latest example of generative AI leading lawyers astray. A senior judge lambasted lawyers in two cases who apparently used AI tools when preparing written arguments, which referred to fake case law, and called on regulators and industry leaders to ensure lawyers know their ethical obligations. "There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused," Judge Victoria Sharp said in a written ruling. "In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities ... and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services." The ruling comes after lawyers around the world have been forced to explain themselves for relying on false authorities, since ChatGPT and other generative AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. Sharp warned in her ruling that lawyers who refer to non-existent cases will be in breach of their duty to not mislead the court, which could also amount to contempt of court. She added that "in the most egregious cases, deliberately placing false material before the court with the intention of interfering with the administration of justice amounts to the common law criminal offence of perverting the course of justice". Sharp noted that legal regulators and the judiciary had issued guidance about the use of AI by lawyers, but said that "guidance on its own is insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence".
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
OpenAI appeals data preservation order in NYT copyright case
OpenAI is appealing an order in a copyright case brought by the New York Times that requires it to preserve ChatGPT output data indefinitely, arguing that the order conflicts with privacy commitments it has made with users. Last month, a court said OpenAI had to preserve and segregate all output log data after the Times asked for the data to be preserved. "We will fight any demand that compromises our users' privacy; this is a core principle," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in a post on X on Thursday. "We think this (The Times demand) was an inappropriate request that sets a bad precedent." U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein was asked to vacate the May data preservation order on June 3, a court filing showed. The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside regular business hours. The newspaper sued OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023, accusing them of using millions of its articles without permission to train the large language model behind its popular chatbot. Stein said in an April court opinion that the Times had made a case that OpenAI and Microsoft were responsible for inducing users to infringe its copyrights. The opinion explained an earlier order that rejected parts of an OpenAI and Microsoft motion to dismiss, saying that the Times' "numerous" and "widely publicized" examples of ChatGPT producing material from its articles justified allowing the claims to continue.
