US suspends licences to ship nuclear plant parts to China
WASHINGTON: The US in recent days suspended licenses for nuclear equipment suppliers to sell to China's power plants, according to four people familiar with the matter, as the two countries engage in a damaging trade war.
The suspensions were issued by the US Department of Commerce, the people said, and affect export licenses for parts and equipment used with nuclear power plants.
Nuclear equipment suppliers are among a wide range of companies whose sales have been restricted over the past two weeks as the US-China trade war shifted from negotiating tariffs to throttling each other's supply chains. It is unclear whether a Thursday call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would affect the suspensions.
The US and China agreed on May 12 to roll back triple digit, tit-for-tat tariffs for 90 days, but the truce between the two biggest economies quickly went south, with the US claiming China reneged on terms related to rare earth elements, and China accusing the US of 'abusing export control measures' by warning that using Huawei Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world violated US export controls. After Thursday's call, further talks on key issues were expected.
The US Department of Commerce did not respond to a request for comment on the nuclear equipment restrictions. On May 28, a spokesperson said the department was reviewing exports of strategic significance to China.
'In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licenses or imposed additional license requirements while the review is pending,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
US nuclear equipment suppliers include Westinghouse and Emerson.
Westinghouse, whose technology is used in over 400 nuclear reactors around the world, and Emerson, which provides measurement and other tools for the nuclear industry, did not respond to requests for comment.
The suspensions affect business worth hundreds of millions of dollars, two of the sources said.
They also coincide with Chinese restrictions on critical metals threatening supply chains for manufacturers worldwide, especially America's Big Three automakers.
Reuters could not determine whether the new restrictions were tied to the trade war, or if and how quickly they might be reinstated. Department of Commerce export licenses typically run for four years and include authorized quantities and values.
But many new restrictions on exports to China have been imposed in the last two weeks, according to sources, and include license requirements for a hydraulic fluids supplier for sales to China.
Other license suspensions went to GE Aerospace for jet engines for China's COMAC aircraft, sources said.
The US also now requires licenses to ship ethane to China, as Reuters reported first last week. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners said Wednesday that its emergency requests to complete three proposed cargoes of ethane to China, totaling some 2.2 million barrels, had not been granted.
Enterprise said a May 23 requirement for a license to sell butane to China, in addition to the ethane, was subsequently withdrawn. Dallas-based Energy Transfer said it was notified on Tuesday about the new ethane licensing requirement, and planned to apply and file for an emergency authorization.
Other sectors that have been hit with new restrictions include companies that sell electronic design automation software such as Cadence Design Systems.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Ceasefire but no peace: Bilawal warns of ‘less safe' South Asia despite Trump-led de-escalation
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, former Foreign Minister of Pakistan and current head of the Pakistan People's Party, leads a delegation to Washington, which played a key mediatory role in a ceasefire after Pakistan's conflict with India in May. Photo: AFP Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has warned that South Asia remains at risk of a full-scale war despite a US-brokered ceasefire between India and Pakistan, calling for sustained diplomatic efforts and international engagement to avoid further escalation. Speaking to US news network Newsmax, Bilawal said a ceasefire between the two nuclear-armed neighbours had been achieved in May with the help of former US president Donald Trump and his team, but cautioned that peace remained fragile. 'At the moment we have achieved ceasefire between India and Pakistan, thanks to the role played by President Trump, his team, Secretary Rubio, and that's a big achievement. The US deserves credit for that,' he said. 'But... we have achieved ceasefire, we haven't achieved peace and we are actually in a situation in South Asia right now where we [are] less safe than we were before this conflict.' Bilawal, who also chairs Pakistan's Parliamentary Diplomatic Committee, warned that the threshold for war between the two rivals had dangerously decreased, particularly in the event of a cross-border terrorist attack. 'If there [is] any terrorist attack in India or anywhere in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), it means war between India and Pakistan and that's not sustainable,' he said. Tensions between the two countries escalated last month following a deadly attack in Pahalgam, IIOJK, in which 26 Indian tourists were killed. On May 7, India launched airstrikes on Pakistani soil, prompting Islamabad to respond with Operation Bunyanum Marsoos. A US-brokered ceasefire was reached on May 10, halting further military action. Bilawal said Pakistan's agreement to the ceasefire had come after consultations with Washington and should be seen as the beginning of a broader peace process. 'We did so while communicating with the United States and we will communicate that this would just be the start,' he said, calling for dialogue at a neutral venue.'We work towards permanent peace through dialogue and diplomacy... we should discuss all friction points with India.' While expressing confidence in the current US leadership's willingness to support regional stability, Bilawal also voiced concern that the Indian government could sabotage mediation efforts. 'I also suspect that Indian government will try and sabotage the President's efforts,' he said. 'Just like President Trump played a role in achieving this ceasefire, we will be looking to the US to encourage their friend and ally India to have a dialogue with Pakistan.' Praising Trump's influence, Bilawal said the former president had the trust of both countries and could help bring them back to the negotiating table. 'I think President Trump is the one man at the moment who can bring about peace between India and Pakistan,' he said. 'I think his stature, his leadership qualities and his vision supports peace... he is friends with Pakistan, he is friends with India so he can talk to both of us as friends and try and convince [us] to get along.' He reiterated that Kashmir remained a core issue in any future dialogue. 'We have to discuss Kashmir as a root issue... because if [we] keep ignoring Kashmir, they will keep producing the cannon forger for terrorists to use in such events.' He said Pakistan was willing to engage on counterterrorism and recalled previous US-Pakistan cooperation in that domain. 'We had done a great job while working with them. The one country that US President thank[ed]... after he was elected President was Pakistan for our cooperation.' Bilawal also accused India of 'weaponising water' by threatening to cut off water supplies to Pakistan — an action he said violated international norms. 'We are really looking to the international community to add their voice to ours in condemning India's decision to cut off our water,' he said. On trade, Bilawal said talks with US officials had shifted from traditional security concerns to economic cooperation. 'We are actually sitting with Americans talking about trade rather than terrorism, war and other things,' he said, noting particular interest in agriculture and mineral investment. However, he cautioned that peace was a prerequisite for foreign investment. 'If we have peace in the region then business is gonna progress,' he said. 'If the aggression [is] gonna continue, if they [are] gonna continue [to] support terrorist proxies in Balochistan... then it's not gonna create an environment that's conducive even if our trade talks go well,' he added.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Iran says US travel ban ‘violates international law'
Listen to article Iran denounced on Saturday a renewed United States travel ban targeting Iranian nationals and citizens of 11 other countries, calling the measure a reflection of 'deep hostility' and a 'racist mentality' within American decision-making. The executive order, signed on Wednesday by US President Donald Trump, revives sweeping entry restrictions that will come into effect from Monday at 12.01am. EDT (0401 GMT). The restrictions apply to citizens of Iran, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Read: US imposes new sanctions on Iran, targeting 10 individuals and 27 entities Trump said the ban was necessary to protect the United States from 'foreign terrorists,' citing national security concerns following a firebomb attack at a pro-Israel rally in Colorado last week. More than a dozen people were injured in the incident. Authorities later identified the suspect as an Egyptian man who had overstayed a US tourist visa. Iranian officials condemned the move as discriminatory, politically motivated and in violation of international law. 'The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals—merely due to their religion and nationality—not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates international law,' a senior official from Iran's foreign ministry said in a statement published on X, formerly Twitter. Read More: Iran's Khamenei rejects US nuclear deal proposal to halt uranium enrichment Alireza Hashemi-Raja, director general for Iranians abroad at the ministry, called the measure 'a clear sign of the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers.' He warned that the ban could entail 'international responsibility' for the US, although he did not specify any potential legal action. The latest executive order closely resembles a travel ban implemented by Trump during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021. That policy faced criticism for disproportionately targeting Muslim-majority nations and was ultimately repealed by former President Joe Biden in 2021. Iran and the United States severed diplomatic ties following Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, and relations have remained strained ever since, especially over Tehran's nuclear programme, regional influence, and sanctions. Also read: Iran urges Europe not to back IAEA resolution on nuclear compliance Despite the lack of formal relations, the United States is home to the largest Iranian community outside Iran. According to Tehran's foreign ministry, there were about 1.5 million Iranians living in the US as of 2020. The Iranian foreign ministry said the ban deprives 'hundreds of millions of people of the right to travel based solely on their nationality or religion,' calling it discriminatory and harmful to global engagement. The statement also noted that the timing of the order—days after the Colorado rally attack—was misleading and risks fuelling xenophobia and Islamophobia in US policy. There was no immediate response from Washington to Tehran's remarks.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to sensitive social security data
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen the morning before justices are expected to issue opinions in pending cases, in Washington, U.S., June 14, 2024. Photo:REUTERS Listen to article The US Supreme Court granted on Friday the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a key player in President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. On the request of the Justice Department, the judiciary had put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeds in a lower court. Hollander found that allowing DOGE unfettered access likely would violate a federal privacy law. The top court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with DOGE. BREAKING: The Supreme Court grants DOGE affiliates access to Social Security Administration records. Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson would deny the request. — SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 6, 2025 The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the order. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent that was joined by fellow liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticized the court's majority for granting DOGE "unfettered data access" despite the administration's "failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards." In a separate order on Friday, the Supreme Court extended its block on judicial orders requiring DOGE to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. DOGE swept through federal agencies as part of the Republican president's effort, spearheaded by Musk, to eliminate federal jobs, downsize and reshape the US government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30. Two labor unions and an advocacy group filed suits to prevent DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration (SSA), including social security numbers, bank account data, tax information, earnings history and immigration records. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending checks each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans. Democracy Forward, a liberal legal group that represented the plaintiffs, said Friday's order would put millions of Americans' data at risk. "Elon Musk may have left Washington DC, but his impact continues to harm millions of people," the group said in a statement. "We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that SSA had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed without proper vetting or training. They demanded access to some of the agency's most sensitive data systems. Hollander in an April 17 ruling found that DOGE had failed to explain why its stated mission required "unprecedented, unfettered access to virtually SSA's entire data systems". "For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records," Hollander wrote. "This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation." Hollander issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited DOGE staffers and anyone working with them from accessing data containing personal information, with only narrow exceptions. The judge's ruling did allow DOGE affiliates to access data that had been stripped of private information as long as those seeking access had gone through the proper training and passed background checks. Hollander also ordered DOGE affiliates to "disgorge and delete" any personal information already in their possession. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in a 9-6 vote declined on April 30 to pause Hollander's block on DOGE's unlimited access to Social Security Administration records. Justice department lawyers in their Supreme Court filing characterized Hollander's order as judicial overreach. "The district court is forcing the executive branch to stop employees charged with modernizing government information systems from accessing the data in those systems because, in the court's judgment, those employees do not 'need' such access," they wrote. The six dissenting judges wrote that the case should have been treated the same as one in which 4th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 to allow DOGE to access data at the US Treasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel Management. In a concurring opinion, seven judges who ruled against DOGE wrote that the case involving Social Security data was "substantially stronger" with "vastly greater stakes," citing "detailed and profoundly sensitive Social Security records," such as family court and school records of children, mental health treatment records and credit card information.
