Pared-down gun seizure bill clears second committee
A bill that would make it easier and faster for police to seize guns belonging to a person deemed a risk to themselves or others passed a judiciary committee test Wednesday afternoon on a party-line vote.
A more-expansive version of the bill was among Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's legislative priorities last legislative session, but it died without escaping the House of Representatives. The governor applauded its passage Wednesday in a news release:
'This revision to existing law closes a dangerous gap that puts lives at risk,' she said. 'I commend the House Judiciary Committee for their swift action on this legislation, and I strongly urge both chambers to act with the same sense of urgency this issue demands.'
House Bill 12 amends a 2020 law that created a civil procedure enabling a judge to approve a temporary seizure of a person's guns based on requests to law enforcement from family members, employers, school officials and others. The 2020 law says gun owners may have up to 48 hours to surrender their weapons after a judge approves an officer's petition.
In a news release, House Democrats shared a few other public safety bills that have passed their first committee and are slated to be heard in House Judiciary in the coming days;
House Bill 31: Fourth-Degree Felony for Shooting Threat
House Bill 38: Possession of Weapon Conversion Device
House Bill 39: Juvenile Record in Firearm Background Checks
House Bill 50: Penalties for Vehicle Thefts
House Bill 4: Criminal Competency and Treatment
House Bill 86: Human Trafficking Changes
House Bill 73: Childhood Sexual Abuse Statute Of Limitations
The amended version, sponsored by Rep. Christine Chandler (D-Los Alamos) and Joy Garratt (D-Albuquerque), seeks to clarify that if an officer deems a person a risk in the course of their official duties, the officer doesn't need a request from a third party before seeking a judge's approval to order a weapons seizure.
The bill also eliminates the 48-hour window and requires a gun owner served with an order to surrender firearms 'immediately' to police.
In 2024, according to state court data, judges in 15 counties reviewed 94 petitions to grant year-long seizure orders and approved 74 of them. Eighteen were denied or dismissed, and judges extended two others. Garratt said the denied petitions demonstrate that judges aren't rubber-stamping police requests to receive weapons.
'They go before a judge,' Garratt said. 'They're not automatically granted.'
The bill passed by a vote of 7-4, along party lines, and now heads to the House Floor.
Republican lawmakers said they were concerned the bill didn't actually do much, was overly broad or created permanent records of a brief moment of crisis. The bill sponsors countered that the bill simply clarified that officers can bring these petitions themselves, which has caused judges in different judicial districts some confusion.
Opponents in the audience said the bill was too punitive for people who had not been convicted of crimes, but supporters, including members of Moms Demand Action, said acting quickly to remove firearms from volatile situations can save lives.
The 2024 version would have allowed health care professionals to request that a judge consider a temporary gun seizure. It would have also permitted district courts to issue 24/7 search warrants over the phone if a person refused to surrender their guns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
5 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
California Legislature to Consider Their Own Redistricting Efforts
This week, the California Legislature will begin considering legislation to authorize a referendum to decide whether to temporarily bypass California's independent redistricting commission and allow voters to decide on whether to accept congressional maps redrawn to favor Democrats in upcoming elections. The Legislature meets amid an escalating national standoff between the two major parties, as Republicans in Texas are moving forward—on the request of the Justice Department and President Donald Trump—with action that could see their state's voters hand Republicans five extra seats in the U.S. House in the midterm elections.
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Why this swing seat House member is doubling down on Trump's megalaw
'Mike Lawler is a liar who doesn't care about New Yorkers,' said Democratic Congressional Campaign spokesperson Nebeyatt Betre. 'These are the facts: His vote guts Medicaid, rips health care away from his own constituents, puts hospitals across New York at risk of closing, and raises costs for working families — all so that billionaires can pay less in taxes. New Yorkers have made clear they are sick and tired of Lawler hurting his own community, and these latest lies from Lawler won't change the fact that voters are ready to reject him come Election Day.' Lawler, who bowed out of running for New York governor last month, is seeking a third term in a suburban New York City district that Kamala Harris won by one point in last year's presidential contest. Republican consultants believe Lawler's early effort to run toward Trump's law — and not away from it — is smart timing before Democrats can frame their own campaigns around it. 'Too often we find ourselves in a defensive posture because we're reactive more to the mainstream media than what voters are thinking,' said Dave Catalfamo, a New York GOP operative. 'It's smart to shape the narrative now.' Yet Lawler is leaning into a contentious law that significantly reduces funding for services like Medicaid. A national Pew Research Center poll last week found a plurality of voters, 46 percent, disapprove of the legislation. Only 32 percent of those polled approved of it. In New York, a statewide Siena University survey released last week found 69 percent of voters were concerned the measure would cut funding to rural hospitals. That same poll, though, found just over half of voters — 51 percent — do not support using state money to support health care for undocumented immigrants. New York Democrats have heaped scorn on the measure and plan to focus their campaigns next year around the provisions of the law that slash Medicaid spending and money for federal nutrition programs. New York's state budget — already facing a $7.5 billion hole — is expected to lose an additional $3 billion in federal funding for the Essential Plan, which covers roughly 1.6 million low-income New Yorkers who are not eligible for Medicaid. Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul's office last month estimated the law will lead to the health care sector in New York cutting more than 34,000 hospital jobs and resulting in a $14.3 billion hit in economic activity statewide. 'There are seven Republican members of Congress in this state who literally voted against the interests of their districts, the people who put them in office,' Hochul said at a July rally against the legislation. 'That's not a real good strategy for reelection, is it?' Lawler is already facing headwinds next year as House Republicans work to keep their narrow majority. He got into a testy exchange earlier this month with MSNBC host Joe Scarborough over the legislation's impact on hospitals in his House district. (Lawler insisted the state government needs to do a better job managing the Medicaid program.)
Axios
16 minutes ago
- Axios
Whitmer's big gamble for '28: Working with Trump
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is taking a gamble that other potential 2028 Democratic presidential contenders are not: that party voters might reward her — or at least not punish her — for working with President Trump. Why it matters: Whitmer's approach is a sharp break from other prominent Democrats such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who are defining themselves as anti-Trump warriors. State of play: Whitmer has visited the White House three times this year — most recently this month, when she met with Trump to discuss tariffs, Medicaid funding and northern Michigan's recovery efforts from a spring ice storm. During previous Oval Office meetings, they discussed stationing a fleet of new fighter aircrafts at Selfridge Air National Guard Base and a $1 billion federal project aimed at protecting the Great Lakes from damaging invasive carp, sources tell Axios. Trump has told reporters that Whitmer is a "very good person" who was doing an "excellent job" when she came to the White House in early April. When Trump visited Michigan later that month, he called the governor onstage. "I'm not supposed to do that. She's a Democrat. They say, 'Don't do that. Don't have her here.' I said, 'No, she's going to be here.' She's done a very good job," Trump said. The intrigue: Trump shows an affinity for those who are cordial with him, regardless of their party affiliation. He's said privately that Whitmer is one of the national Democrats who most impresses him. Senior White House advisers also have been complimentary of Whitmer, saying she's been particularly collaborative on the Great Lakes project. Trump, by contrast, frequently blasts Newsom, whom he derides as "Newscum," and Pritzker, whom he calls "probably the worst" governor in the country. It wasn't always so warm between Trump and Whitmer. Trump referred to her as "half-Whitmer" during his first term, and said she was "dishonest." In 2020, Whitmer accused Trump of being "complicit" in a foiled plot by a militia group to kidnap her because he had refused to denounce far-right hate groups. More recently she has tossed some criticism Trump's way on his "big beautiful" tax and spending bill and his tariffs plan. Whitmer called the former a "big betrayal bill," and said the tariffs were "dangerous." The big picture: If Whitmer runs in the 2028 Democratic presidential primary, it would test whether Democratic voters want party figures to oppose Trump at every turn — or show some willingness to work with him on issues on which they agree. Whitmer's team argues that voters are eager for collaboration, and points to polling indicating that 54% of Democrats in Michigan approve of her approach toward Trump. "The things she is working with the administration on are good for the state. She is about getting sh*t done. That is her ideology. And she is succeeding in that," said Democratic pollster John Anzalone, a Whitmer adviser. Some Republicans think Whitmer is being savvy. "She's taking a gamble, but it's a gamble that's more likely to be successful than the agenda that animates the Democratic Party currently," said Jason Roe, a Michigan-based GOP strategist. Reality check: Democratic primaries are heavily influenced — at least initially — by activists in the party's liberal base, who passionately oppose Trump. Whitmer has gotten pushback from Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, who after a Whitmer-Trump meeting posted on X: "Appeasement is not workable strategy with a fascist." Whitmer is sensitive to the criticism. She tried to hide her face behind a folder when a photographer spotted her in the Oval Office in April — an image that went viral. Trump later said privately he thought Whitmer had made a mistake by trying to shield herself. She has not been afraid to criticize Trump -- including on Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which Whitmer has labeled the "big betrayal bill," and on tariffs, which she has called "dangerous." But Whitmer — whose swing state Trump won in 2016 and 2024 — has long had friendly relationships with Republicans. Whitmer's father, Richard Whitmer, headed Michigan's commerce department under Republican Gov. William Milliken. During the 2018 governor's race, she drew endorsements from several prominent Michigan Republicans. She has close working relationships with several GOP legislators, including state House Speaker Matt Hall. What they're saying: "I've always said that I'll work with anyone to get things done for Michigan," Whitmer said in a statement to Axios. "That's why I've continued to go to Washington, D.C., to make sure that Michiganders are front and center when critical decisions are being made."
