Donald Trump Gives Update on Israel-Hamas Gaza Ceasefire
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that Israel has agreed to the terms of a proposed 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and warned Hamas to accept the deal before the situation deteriorates further. The announcement came just days before Trump is set to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Monday for high-stakes talks aimed at ending the ongoing conflict.
"My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza," Trump said in a statement. "Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War." Trump added that Qatar and Egypt would present the final proposal to Hamas.
Urging acceptance of the deal, Trump warned Hamas that rejecting it would have severe consequences: "I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE."
The U.S. has stepped up diplomatic efforts in recent weeks, applying pressure to both Israel and Hamas to reach a ceasefire agreement that also includes a mechanism for the release of hostages. Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer was in Washington Tuesday to meet with top American officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and special envoy Steve Witkoff, to discuss the potential truce, regional threats, and Iran.
The ceasefire discussions came as humanitarian concerns in Gaza intensified. More than 150 international aid organizations, including Oxfam, Save the Children, and Amnesty International, issued a joint statement Tuesday calling for the dismantling of the controversial Israeli- and U.S.-backed aid distribution system in Gaza. The system has faced mounting criticism amid reports of disorganization and violence at food distribution points. Witnesses said at least 10 Palestinians were killed while trying to collect food, a tragedy that spurred the latest outcry.
Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes continued across Gaza, with Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis reporting at least 37 fatalities in southern Gaza. "Tents, tents they are hitting with two missiles?" cried Um Seif Abu Leda, whose son was among those killed. Grieving residents laid flowers on body bags as funerals were held.
Complicating matters further, Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz issued a strong warning after a missile believed to have been launched from Yemen was intercepted by Israeli defense systems. Air raid sirens sounded across parts of Israel, and officials reported two additional projectiles launched from Gaza. Though all were intercepted, Katz warned that Yemen could "face the same fate as Tehran," referring to the recent short-lived war between Israel and Iran.
Nasruddin Amer, deputy head of the Houthi media office in Yemen, responded defiantly on social media: "Yemen will not stop its support for Gaza ... unless the aggression stops and the siege on Gaza is lifted."
Though Prime Minister Netanyahu has not detailed the agenda for his upcoming White House visit, he told his Cabinet that a trade deal would be among the topics discussed. Iran is also expected to figure prominently in the talks, especially in light of Trump's successful brokering of a ceasefire between Israel and Tehran following their recent 12-day conflict.
As the region continues to smolder and humanitarian conditions worsen, all eyes will be on Washington next week to see whether diplomacy can deliver a long-sought truce—or whether Gaza's war will drag on into an even bloodier chapter.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Will Trump's big tax bill help or hurt you? Why it could depend on your income
President Donald Trump's tax bill could make future generations "worse off," no matter their income, according to a new report from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Like other analyses, the nonpartisan research initiative's latest findings suggest most Americans would see tax cuts, with high-income households – which tend to pay more taxes – seeing the largest gains. Long-term, though, the Penn Wharton Budget Lab's July 1 report projects lifetime losses for all income brackets. "It's still higher-income households that are the winners, especially those who are alive today," said Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model. The analysis also found the Senate's version of the tax bill, which narrowly passed on July 1, would lead to higher deficits and slower economic growth compared to its counterpart from the House. The bill heads to the House for final approval. Trump has asked for a final version on his desk and ready for signature by July 4, but acknowledged the deadline may be "very hard to do" as some House Republicans voice frustrations with changes made in the Senate. Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP The legislation, dubbed the 'One, Big Beautiful Bill' by Trump, would make the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term permanent, increase the child tax credit and introduce other tax cuts, including no taxes on tips or overtime wages. To help pay for the cuts, the government would reduce spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, and make cuts to Medicaid, a program that provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans. The version in the Senate has some key differences from the House bill, including: Permanent tax breaks for corporations that allow businesses to deduct the full cost of qualifying investments and research projects immediately, rather than over a number of years. In the House's bill, these tax breaks were in effect from 2025 to 2029. Permanently enhancing the standard deduction, adding $750 for single filers, $1,125 for heads of households and $1,500 for married couples starting in 2025. There was a temporary adjustment in the House's version that added $1,000 for single filers, $1,500 for heads of households and $2,000 for couples from 2025 to 2028. Permanently raising the child tax credit to $2,200 starting in 2026, compared to a temporary increase to $2,500 through 2028 in the House bill. "The Senate one makes things more permanent," Smetters told USA TODAY. "On the one hand, we don't have to revisit the same politics in four years. On the other hand, there's a fiscal cost associated with that. That means more debt and more burdens inherited by future generations." More Americans would also lose Medicaid under the Senate's version, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, with an estimated 11.8 million people uninsured by 2034, compared to previous estimates of 10.9 million people under the House's proposal. 5 takeaways: Trump asserts dominance with 'big, beautiful bill' Senate passage Various analyses suggest Trump's tax bill would reward higher-earning Americans more than their lower-earning counterparts. A June analysis of the House bill by the Congressional Budget Office, for instance, found resources for the poorest would decrease by about $1,600 per year under the legislation, largely due to cuts to Medicaid and food aid ‒ which would be more aggressive under the Senate bill. Meanwhile, the wealthiest would gain about $12,000 on average. Another June report from the Yale Budget Lab suggests the bottom fifth of earners would lose about $560 per year while the top 20% would gain $6,000. But all future generations, no matter their income, would experience lifetime losses, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. High-income households are set to lose $5,700 under the Senate's bill, while low-income households would lose $22,000. The report points to a reduced social security net and lower wages as the main drivers. Under the House bill, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projected lifetime losses ranging from $500 for high-income households to $15,800 for low-income households. "The future generations, they're going to be worse off. It doesn't matter where on the income bracket they fall," Smetters said. "Ultimately, someone has to pay for (the tax bill), and we're basically passing it on to the next generation." While the House version showed a 0.4% gain in GDP by year 10, according to the Budget Model's previous analysis, the Senate's version would yield a 0.3% loss. After 30 years, GDP would drop 4.6% under the Senate bill compared to a 1.5% drop under the House version. Primary deficits are projected to increase $3.1 trillion over the next decade through the Senate's tax bill, compared to roughly $2.7 trillion under the House bill, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Other reports have also found a higher debt load under the Senate bill. The Congressional Budget Office projects it would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, $800 billion more than the House's bill. And a July report from the Yale Budget Lab says the Senate's bill would add $3 trillion to the debt by 2034, compared to an estimated $2.4 trillion under the House bill. According to the most recent Penn Wharton Budget Model analysis, the lowest-earning households stand to lose after-tax-and-transfer income in both the short- and long-run, while higher earners would see gains under the Senate bill. Those earning less than $18,000 would lose $235 on average in 2027 and $1,380 by 2033. Those earning between $18,000 and $52,999 would lose $75 in 2027 and $1,625 by 2033. Those earning between $53,000 and $95,999 would gain $1,350 in 2027 but lose $130 by 2033. Those earning between $96,000 and $178,999 would gain $3,880 in 2027 and $2,825 by 2033. Those earning between $179,000 and $271,999 would gain $6,615 in 2027 and $4,985 by 2033. Those earning between $272,000 and $400,999 would gain $9,360 in 2027 and $7,670 by 2033. Those earning between $401,000 and $1,019,999 would gain $20,605 in 2027 and $18,645 by 2033. Those earning between $1,020,000 and $4,450,999 would gain $36,020 in 2027 and $29,430 by 2033. Those with an income above $4,451,000 would gain $290,485 in 2027 and $82,255 by 2033. Smetters said figures may be slightly adjusted as more information on specific amendments becomes available. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Trump's tax bill help or hurt you? It may depend on your income
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'no tax on tips' is getting close to the finish line. Here's how it will work.
A "no tax on tips" proposal has broad support among politicians and Americans across party lines, though critics – including a restaurant trade group – warn the tax break could be costly and apply only to certain workers. The Senate on July 1 narrowly approved President Donald Trump's policy bill, which includes a provision that would make the president's 'no tax on tips' campaign promise a reality. The House started debating the legislation on July 2, and Trump has asked to have the bill ready to sign into law by July 4. Here's what we know so far about how "no tax on tips" could roll out and who would benefit. The Senate's version of the tax bill could create a temporary tax deduction for income from tips through 2028. Unlike the House bill, which is only offered to workers making less than $160,000 a year, the Senate version would decrease the deduction for workers making more than $150,000, rather than excluding them entirely. The Senate bill also caps deductions at $25,000. The bill also creates a new deduction for overtime pay through 2028. While the House version has no cap and applies only to workers making less than $160,000 per year, the Senate bill caps the deduction at $12,500 and decreases deductions for those making more than $150,000. Because the tax cut would not apply to payroll taxes, the roughly 37% of tipped workers who don't make enough to pay federal income taxes would see no benefits from the tax break, according to a 2024 estimate from the Yale Budget Lab based on 2022 tax figures. Erika Polmar, executive director of the Independent Restaurant Coalition, said the tax break would also be confusing and unfair for certain workers because it does not accommodate service charges, an alternative to tips. 'This bill is ultimately unfair to the line cooks, dishwashers, porters, and prep staff that are vital to independent restaurants,' Polmar said in a July 1 statement. "We urge Congress to amend the tax code so all gratuity-based income — tips and service charges — earns the same relief, giving businesses a single, stable set of rules." Polmar added that the tax break would be "costly to business owners and taxpayers alike.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that no taxes on tips could increase the deficit by $40 billion through 2028. There are also concerns that the tax break could exacerbate the country's tipping fatigue. The IRC statement points to a report from the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, that says the proposal could incentivize employers to lean even more heavily on tips. The bill has received praise from the National Restaurant Association, another industry trade group. The association is 'pleased to see' the inclusion of policies that deduct taxes on tips and overtime, according to Sean Kennedy, the group's executive vice president for public affairs. 'This bill includes the most important pro-growth tax policies restaurant operators need to continue to power the national economy,' Kennedy said in a July 1 statement. 'We appreciate the work that has gone into getting this bill through the Senate and encourage the House to quickly pass it, sending it to the President for signature.' Trump's tax bill: Will Trump's big tax bill help or hurt you? Why it could depend on your income The average tax cut for families that benefit would be roughly $1,700, while the bottom 20% of earners would save $200, according to the Budget Lab. A February analysis from the Tax Policy Center, a joint venture from the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, found ending taxes on tips would benefit about 2% of all households, or 60% of households with tipped workers, with an average tax cut of roughly $1,800 per year. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How 'no tax on tips' will work and who will benefit the most Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
About 70 National Guard troops activated to protect Alligator Alcatraz
Just fewer than 70 Florida National Guard troops have been sent to guard the remote migrant detention center in the state's Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' the Pentagon's top spokesperson announced Wednesday. 'Nearly 70 Florida National Guard are on state active duty … conducting base camp security at Alligator Alcatraz,' chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters. The activation comes after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said he would send 100 Guard troops there, with people arriving at the facility as early as Wednesday. President Trump on Tuesday toured the site in southern Florida at the Miami-Dade Collier Training and Transition Airport, afterwards saying the complex is 'surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is really deportation.' The facility, estimated to cost $450 million annually, will hold migrants awaiting deportation and could house around 5,000 people, officials have claimed. But Democrats have denounced the complex, with Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) describing the site as an 'internment camp,' and 24 House Democrats on Wednesday began lobbying for the site's closure. 'They target migrants, rip families apart, and subject people to conditions that amount to physical and psychological torture in facilities that can only be described as hell on Earth,' Frost said in a statement last week. 'Now, they want to erect tents in the blazing Everglades sun and call it immigration enforcement. They don't care if people live or die; they only care about cruelty and spectacle.' Trump has increasingly used the military in his immigration crackdown, placing 8,500 service members at the U.S.-Mexico border and 5,000 in Los Angeles to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents that have received pushback due to their sweeping immigration raids. Deportations are expected to ramp up after Senate Republicans overnight advanced a major spending package that injects tens of billions of dollars into immigration enforcement spending.
