
Crown courts at ‘breaking point' as backlog reaches new record high
Official figures published on Thursday show there were 76,957 open cases waiting to be heard at the end of March, up 11 per cent on the previous year. A quarter of those — some 18,093 cases — have already been open for a year or more.
Last month, The Independent revealed trials are being listed for 2029 as the backlog leaves defendants and victims waiting up for four years for justice.
It comes as Sir Brian Leveson prepares to publish a report on 'once-in-a-generation' reforms to the courts system to reduce the load on the crown courts.
Responding to the latest figures, minister for courts and legal services, Sarah Sackman KC MP, said: 'Despite the hard work of people across the criminal justice system the situation in our Crown Court is reaching breaking point.
'We inherited a courts crisis with an ever-growing backlog which, at its current rate of increase, will hit 100,000 before 2028.
'It is simply unacceptable that any victim has to wait years to see justice done and it is clear the status quo is not working.
'Only radical reform can deliver swifter justice for victims and that is why we asked Sir Brian Leveson to make recommendations for once-in-a-generation change, to be published in the coming weeks.'
The government asked Sir Brian to consider major overhauls, including giving magistrates' more sentencing powers and introducing intermediate courts which would see some cases tried by a judge and two magistrates, rather than a lengthy jury trial.
He will also consider how new technology, including Artificial Intelligence, could be used to drive efficiencies in the courts.
However the Law Society has warned only 'sustained investment' across the justice sector will tackle the backlog, arguing that establishing a new court will 'waste money, time and energy'.
The trial of a 38-year-old mother from south London is among those facing 'jaw dropping' delays after it was listed for 3 January 2029.
She will face a charge of possession with intent to supply cannabis, which she denies, in a two-day hearing at Woolwich Crown Court.
In another case, likely to last three days, three men will stand trial at the same court, on 15 January, over the theft of motor vehicles, which they also deny.
The cases were described by Stephen Nelson, the barrister representing the woman and one of the men, as 'straightforward and not complicated" – and said the delays were 'jaw-dropping'. He warned that one client was in poor health and might not live to see his case come to trial in 2029.
In March, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced judges will sit collectively for 110,000 days in the next year, 4,000 more than allocated for the previous period, to help victims see justice done faster.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Galleries warn they will be ‘crippled' by new policy which allows people to visit for free
Britain's leading heritage organisations have urged the government to close a 'loophole' in new consumer rights legislation, warning it could 'cripple them'. Heads of organisations including the National Trust, Tate, Historic Royal Palaces and Victoria & Albert Museum wrote to the government to highlight how the new rules could allow people to abuse their membership schemes. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA) will allow consumers a 'two-week cooling off period' after purchasing a charity membership scheme. This means they could obtain the membership, use its perks to enjoy paid-exhibitions or visits for free, before cancelling and getting a full refund days later. The letter, seen by The Times, asks the prime minister to ensure charities are treated differently to commercial businesses to protect this vital revenue stream. A National Trust spokesperson told The Independent: "Up to now membership has been treated as a charitable donation by law and this is part of a long-held recognition that UK charities are fundamentally different from commercial businesses. 'Charities are currently facing sustained financial pressures, due to the difficult economic climate. This legislation would add to that cost burden and see more charities having to reduce their vital services. 'Just last month the Government made a firm commitment through the Civil Society Covenant to support our sector: closing this loophole would be a clear demonstration of that commitment." The DMCCA was introduced by the previous Conservative government but has been put into place under this government. It is intended to protect consumers following growing concerns around 'subscription traps'. However, heritage organisations and galleries have become increasingly reliant membership schemes for vital funding in recent years. 'The proposed cooling-off period would create a loophole that could allow people to join charities as members and enjoy benefits, such as free entry to sites, for a two-week period before claiming substantial refunds for the rest of the year,' their letter to the government reportedly reads. 'This threatens to cripple the very future value of membership itself as a functional model of income generation for charities with visitor models — currently worth hundreds of millions [of pounds] to charities across the UK every year.' Under the rules, someone could hypothetically buy a National Trust family membership for £168.60 before visiting several sites within two weeks - which could cost upwards of £100 for the family. They could then cancel their membership, receiving a full membership refund, having not paid for their visits. A similar concern applies to galleries, who sometimes offer members free access to paid exhibitions. A government spokesperson said it was engaging with charities on the issue and added: 'The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act does not change the definition of what constitutes a consumer contract. 'Our plans to protect consumers from rip-off subscriptions will not unfairly affect charities, and we continue to engage closely with them to understand their concerns.'


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scottish Labour MSP Colin Smyth arrested and charged over indecent images
MSP Colin Smyth has been arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images, prompting his suspension from Scottish Labour. The South Scotland MSP was arrested on Tuesday and is due to appear in court at a later date. He was first elected as an MSP in 2016 and returned to Holyrood again at the 2021 election. The Scottish Parliament website now lists him as an Independent. A spokesperson for Police Scotland said: 'On Tuesday, August 5, 2025, officers executed a warrant at a property on Marchfield Avenue, Dumfries. 'A 52-year-old man was arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images. He is due to appear at Dumfries Sheriff Court at a later date.' A spokesman for Scottish Labour said: 'The whip has been removed from Colin Smyth MSP, pending an investigation. 'We cannot comment further on this matter while the investigation is ongoing.' It is understood the MSP was administratively suspended by Labour after the party became aware of the police investigation.


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The only way to solve England's water crisis is state control
The behaviour of private water companies is widely recognised as unacceptable: they flout regulations, cause significant environmental harm, neglect their responsibilities, and still pay enormous sums to directors and shareholders. Ofwat's rulings and fines appear ineffective, often penalising consumers (Letters, 18 August), while renationalisation is dismissed as prohibitively expensive. We propose an alternative means of controlling private-sector companies – replace Ofwat's monetary fines with state-owned voting shares of equivalent value. This approach would have several immediate benefits. By exercising shareholder rights, the state – on behalf of the public – could directly influence company policies; the public purse would gain revenue from dividends; and over time, as the state's shareholding increased, full nationalisation would become financially Ruth Sinclair and Dr Jill VincentLoughborough, Leicestershire Your article says that not a single reservoir has been built since water privatisation (How can England possibly be running out of water?, 17 August). But close to 100 were built in the 35 years prior to privatisation. The plundering of our public services and natural resources is a national disgrace. Public ownership is the only way to end this grisly LockwoodCarshalton, London Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.