
Crown courts at ‘breaking point' as backlog reaches new record high
Crown courts are at 'breaking point' and there will be 100,000 outstanding criminal cases by 2028, a minister has warned, as the backlog reaches a new record high.
Official figures published on Thursday show there were 76,957 open cases waiting to be heard at the end of March, up 11 per cent on the previous year. A quarter of those — some 18,093 cases — have already been open for a year or more.
Last month, The Independent revealed trials are being listed for 2029 as the backlog leaves defendants and victims waiting up for four years for justice.
It comes as Sir Brian Leveson prepares to publish a report on 'once-in-a-generation' reforms to the courts system to reduce the load on the crown courts.
Responding to the latest figures, minister for courts and legal services, Sarah Sackman KC MP, said: 'Despite the hard work of people across the criminal justice system the situation in our Crown Court is reaching breaking point.
'We inherited a courts crisis with an ever-growing backlog which, at its current rate of increase, will hit 100,000 before 2028.
'It is simply unacceptable that any victim has to wait years to see justice done and it is clear the status quo is not working.
'Only radical reform can deliver swifter justice for victims and that is why we asked Sir Brian Leveson to make recommendations for once-in-a-generation change, to be published in the coming weeks.'
The government asked Sir Brian to consider major overhauls, including giving magistrates' more sentencing powers and introducing intermediate courts which would see some cases tried by a judge and two magistrates, rather than a lengthy jury trial.
He will also consider how new technology, including Artificial Intelligence, could be used to drive efficiencies in the courts.
However the Law Society has warned only 'sustained investment' across the justice sector will tackle the backlog, arguing that establishing a new court will 'waste money, time and energy'.
The trial of a 38-year-old mother from south London is among those facing 'jaw dropping' delays after it was listed for 3 January 2029.
She will face a charge of possession with intent to supply cannabis, which she denies, in a two-day hearing at Woolwich Crown Court.
In another case, likely to last three days, three men will stand trial at the same court, on 15 January, over the theft of motor vehicles, which they also deny.
The cases were described by Stephen Nelson, the barrister representing the woman and one of the men, as 'straightforward and not complicated" – and said the delays were 'jaw-dropping'. He warned that one client was in poor health and might not live to see his case come to trial in 2029.
In March, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced judges will sit collectively for 110,000 days in the next year, 4,000 more than allocated for the previous period, to help victims see justice done faster.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration slaps down UK after MPs pass assisted dying bill
The Trump administration has lashed out at the UK after MPs passed Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill - accusing Britain of 'standing for surrender and death'. The president's State Department said the US 'reaffirms the sanctity of life' in an attack on the Labour MP's Terminally Ill Adults Bill. 'The western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death,' it said in a social media post from its Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. It said the bill is 'euphemistically' said to be for terminally ill adults, but described it instead as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The attack comes a week after the bill, which would legalise assisted dying for those diagnosed with a terminal illness, passed with a slim majority of just 23 votes. Those with fewer than six months to live would be able to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. The bill is now heading to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, where it is set to face more opposition. The US intervention came after Sir Keir Starmer slapped down Wes Streeting for raising concerns over how assisted dying would be funded if it becomes law. The prime minister said he was 'confident we've done that preparation' and that it is his job to 'make sure the bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects'. Last week's crunch assisted dying vote, which saw the bill narrowly pass by just 23 votes, came after months of impassioned debate, culminating in a tense third reading debate on Friday. Ms Leadbeater described the passing of the assisted dying bill at third reading as a 'result that so many people need'. The Spen Valley MP added: 'When you've spent as much time as I have with people who have got experience of losing loved ones in very difficult circumstances, and you've spent time with terminally ill people who are just asking for choice at the end of their days, then this is absolutely the right thing to do.' Among the MPs who backed the bill were the prime minister and his predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, health secretary Mr Streeting and deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, meanwhile, voted against. The passage of the bill in parliament has put the UK at odds with the US, and marks the second time the State Department has criticised Britain under Sir Keir. The department's human rights arm previously warned of its 'concerns about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom' after the prosecution of anti-abortion campaigner Livia Tossici-Bolt.


Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK PM Starmer's authority tested as domestic struggles overshadow summit diplomacy
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked in parliament on Thursday why he had not appeared in front of lawmakers for the past two weeks. His answer was simple - he had been busy with international affairs. The question underlines Starmer's awkward position - just a year after winning one of the biggest election victories in British history, his audience abroad is much less hostile than the one at home, where his party is divided over welfare reforms. With Starmer's Labour Party lagging behind Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK in opinion polls and the prime minister's own popularity tumbling, more than 100 of his lawmakers are threatening the biggest parliamentary rebellion of his premiership to kill off the government's plans to reform the welfare system at a vote due next week. On a trip to the NATO summit in The Hague this week, Starmer, 62, sat alongside U.S. President Donald Trump for talks and shared hugs and handshakes with other world leaders but was noticeably tetchy when asked if the rebellion brewing at home showed a lack of political judgment on his part. "I am comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs," he said as he vowed to lead his party into the next national election, which is not due until 2029. Downing Street officials say the vote is shaping up to be the biggest test of Starmer's authority to date. Were he to suffer his first parliamentary defeat, or were the government to pull the vote or make big compromises, his leadership would be undermined. More fundamentally, the officials say the reforms to save money and encourage more people back into work are an essential part of what Starmer sees as a decade-long project to fix Britain's problems. Annual spending on incapacity and disability benefits already exceeds the country's defence budget and is set to top 100 billion pounds ($137 billion) by 2030, according to official forecasts, up from 65 billion pounds now. Ministers are in talks with lawmakers to offer compromises to ensure the legislation is passed next Tuesday. One key area under discussion concerns the number of people who would lose access to benefits designed to cover disability-related costs. One of Starmer's ministers, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters he thought a deal to see off the rebellion would eventually be reached. But a Labour lawmaker, who also asked not to be named, said the government's best option would be to pause the legislation and rework it, adding that he would not vote for changes that could push tens of thousands of people into poverty. "People are very, very upset at the way the government has handled this," the lawmaker said. The decision to cut payments to some of the most vulnerable in society is particularly painful for politicians in the centre-left Labour Party, which founded the state-run National Health Service and traditionally sees itself as the protector of the country's welfare state built after World War Two. Rebels may have been encouraged after the government reversed another unpopular policy - cutting payments to millions of pensioners to help them pay energy bills each winter. Starmer told parliament on Thursday he wanted the "values of fairness" to be at the heart of his reforms and attempts to reach a consensus would continue over the coming days. ($1 = 0.7277 pounds)


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Council could introduce order on car meet hotspot in Peterborough
More than 150 people have supported a public space protection order on a hotspot for unauthorised car meets and cruising City Council proposed the order for Pleasure Fair Meadow Car Park as a way of tackling vehicle-related anti-social 18 people opposed the order. They said there were limited locations in the city for car enthusiasts who like to meet and do not commit any implemented, anyone involved with vehicle-related nuisance and anti-social behaviour at the site could be fined up to £1,000 or face a fixed penalty notice. Pleasure Fair Meadow Car Park is a council operated long stay public car is monitored by a CCTV camera and, from April 2023 to November 2024, 32 incidents were logged concerning anti-social or dangerous driving and vehicle-related anti-social ranged from large scale car meets of about 300 cars to smaller also carried out stunts such as doughnuts, hand brake turns and other dangerous driving, said the Local Democracy Reporting of the Liberal Democrat group, Christian Hogg, who represents the ward where the car park is located, said: "It has taken an incredibly long time to get to the point where we are right now."It is absolutely most welcome, as the residents around Pleasure Fair Meadow Car Park have been blighted for years with screeching tyres, revving engines and loud music on a regular basis."It has been incredibly destabilising for people's work patterns and not being able to get a proper night's sleep."A report, following a public consultation in March, stated people in the area also had concerns regarding speeding and drug against the order said there were "limited locations for car enthusiasts to meet in Peterborough".Alison Jones, cabinet member for housing and communities, is expected to make a decision on the order by 3 implemented, it would allow the council and police to tackle vehicle-related nuisance and anti-social behaviour at the councillor Julie Stevenson said: "It can feel almost like people who love cars and getting together to enjoy them are being unfairly punished and I have some sympathy with that."Obviously, it is the behaviour of a few that are spoiling it for many, which is a huge shame and I hope those who run the car meets will talk to the council and try to find some compromise to do it safely." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.