logo
The future of Alien, without Sigourney Weaver

The future of Alien, without Sigourney Weaver

Yahoo28-07-2025
In space, no one can hear you scream. But what about down here? Well, we're about to find out. Having spent seven ­movies in the furthest reaches of the ­galaxy, the Alien franchise, begun by ­Ridley Scott in 1979, is about to be, quite literally, brought down to Earth.
In Noah Hawley's upcoming ­Disney+ TV series, Alien: Earth, a research vessel owned by the mega­corp Weyland-Yutani, familiar from the films, crash-lands into the Bangkok of 2120 (two years before the events onboard the spaceship Nostromo in the first Alien film). The crash brings HR Giger's unmistakable Xenomorph, plus a whole host of other nasty intergalactic beasties, to our planet. The snappy new ­tagline tells you all you need to know: 'We were safer in space.'
Hawley – the writer-director known for his innovative take on Marvel superheroes in Legion and his daring extension of Coen Brothers' lore in the Fargo anthology series – has given the sci-fi horror franchise another twist.
Alongside the familiar 'synths' – the unsettling androids made famous in the franchise by Ian Holm, Lance Henriksen and (in the Prometheus films) Michael Fassbender – and cybernetically enhanced 'cyborgs' (humans with hi-tech additions), Hawley has introduced an even more troubling creation: the 'hybrid'. These are synthetic beings downloaded with human consciousness, created by a shadowy corporation named Prodigy. In this case, the consciousness of a group of terminally ill children, who become known as 'the Lost Boys'. Forget Alien, this is Frankenstein for the 21st century.
'The first idea when I started thinking about Alien was the fact it's not just a monster movie,' says Hawley. 'The Ian Holm reveal – that he was a synthetic. He was artificial intelligence, and that artificial intelligence was trying to kill them.'
When Hawley began writing the show, 'ChatGPT didn't exist', but the series' central question about our reliance on and suspicion of AI has become eerily prescient. 'It's like Noah saw into the future,' says Sydney Chandler, who plays Wendy, the leader of the Lost Boys and the central figure of Alien: Earth.
It is the past, however, that has inspired Hawley. The look and feel, particularly in the opening scene, is pure 1970s. Andy Nicholson, the production designer, pored slavishly over the original two films (1979's Alien and James Cameron's 1986 ­follow-up Aliens). He used the Nostromo as a blueprint for the vessels and taking inspiration from 1970s Italian furniture and car interiors.
'We decided it should be the future as imagined in 1979,' says Nicholson, 'and not to go in the direction of Prometheus'. Scott, an executive producer on the project, was happy to let them get on with it. 'Every time I spoke to him, he was storyboarding,' says Hawley. 'First House of Gucci, then The Last Duel, and then Napoleon. He made at least three movies while I was ­making one season of television.'
Both Hawley and Nicholson are careful not to criticise Scott's Prometheus movies, but it's clear they want a clean break from them. 'The 1970s movie-ness of Ridley's film and the very 1980s movie-ness of Cameron's film, those were a big part of it for me,' says Hawley. 'Prometheus is a prequel, but one in which the technology feels thousands of years more futuristic. So I had a choice. And there was just no way to make Alien without the retrofuturism of technology.'
Indeed, much of the look has stuck so closely to the first two films' concepts that many of the original designers have been given production credits on Alien: Earth.
This is seen most starkly in the very first few minutes of the show, which begins just as Alien did, with a group of workers on board a vessel bound for Earth, the Weyland-Yutani owned Maginot, waking up from cryostasis.
The aesthetic – from the furnishings and computer graphics to the sweaters and the moustaches – is pure 1979. 'I really wanted to send a message that the movie I was most inspired by was Ridley's,' explains Hawley. Even Jeff Russo's soaring score apes that of Jerry Goldsmith's memorable intro music – with a twist. 'You want to pay homage to what came before and yet also forge a new identity – that's the trick, right?' says Russo.
As we approach the Maginot, Russo's orchestral title track is assailed by distortion and, most disturbingly, human voices. It's Alien, Jim, but not as we know it. Soon the Maginot, and its mason jars of alien lifeforms, are lying in pieces in Prodigy City, 'New Siam', on a sweltering Earth.
Those lifeforms were the major challenge. Hawley decided they could not simply rely upon Giger's world-famous, biomechanical Xenomorph. Nicholson felt the pressure: 'The Xenomorph was the scariest space creature you'd ever seen. And these creatures had to be worse.'
Before the Maginot goes down in flames, we see the jars and glass boxes filled with all sorts of primordial, unearthly beings. 'The first movie is rooted so much in body horror and a genetic revulsion about parasites,' says Hawley, 'and this really uncomfortable, pseudosexual, penetrative design aesthetic. So I just went with: what is the worst thing? What makes me the most uncomfortable or repulsed or disgusted?'
The answer, seemingly, lies in a creature known as T Ocellus, a ­grotesque, tentacled octopus/jellyfish thing that seems to be made out of eyes. 'That was the one,' says Nicholson, wincing. 'I saw the design and thought, 'Oh God, who came up with that?''
The jury is out on whether it is the creatures that will scare the living daylights out of viewers or whether it will be Boy Kavalier, a 20-year-old tech trillionaire played by Samuel Blenkin who runs Prodigy and has created the synthetic-human hybrids.
In the world of Alien: Earth, humanity is controlled by five megacorporations who, in the style of the East India Company, have largely usurped democratic governments. The companies are in an arms race for control of the Earth, the known galaxy and the future of human life itself. Thus when Weyland-Yutani's ship crashes into Prodigy City, Kavalier smells an opportunity.
An unscrupulous tech CEO with a god complex? Which real-life equivalent could Hawley have been thinking of? All of them, he says: 'It's narcissism that defines so many of these figures. The 'Great Man' has come back. And yet in many ways none of them want to grow up. If there's a metaphor between our show and our present moment, it's when you look around at all the really deep, complicated, intrinsic problems that we're having on this planet. What they really require to solve them is adults.'
Not wanting to grow up is key to the Peter Pan-obsessed Kavalier, who has named his research facility Neverland and reads the book to the children each night. When they transition to their synthetic bodies, Kavalier rechristens them all from JM Barrie's story – alongside Wendy, there's Slightly, Tootles, Curly, Nibs and Smee.
Kavalier, of course, is The Boy Who Never Grew Up. 'He likes that analogy,' says Hawley. 'Peter Pan is a dark book. There's a moment where Peter is angry and frustrated, so he breathes in and out as quickly as he can, because he believes that every breath he takes kills a grown-up. And it is implied that as the Lost Boys mature, he 'thins them out', to keep that out of his world. And those elements felt like they fit, thematically.'
Chandler's Wendy is the first of the Lost Boys to transition and acts as a big sister to the others as they get used to their new – adult, superhuman, immortal – bodies. Chandler, the 29-year-old daughter of actor Kyle Chandler (Friday Night Lights, Bloodline), is a relative unknown, yet was determined to land the role.
She flew out to Canada, where Fargo was being filmed, the morning after reading the script, and convinced Hawley to let her take him for dinner. Her determination (she calls it 'impulsivity') and passion for the role impressed him. It's a great piece of casting – Chandler imbues Wendy with an otherworldly gawkiness, a disarming innocence and an unnerving unknowability.
The actress, understandably, wishes to avoid comparison between Wendy and Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley. 'You can't recreate Alien. You can't recreate Ripley. If the scripts had gone in that direction, I wouldn't have wanted to do it. My goal was to bring as much strength and honesty and integrity and backbone to the character [as I could], because that's what I looked up to when I saw Alien for the first time.'
For all the ingenious concepts within Alien, what underpins the franchise is human greed and the extent to which corporations are happy to play God. Like all classic sci-fi, the humans in the TV series unleash forces they can no longer control. Does Hawley feel that, via AI, we are at such a point now? 'I don't think AI is going to take my job,' he says. 'But I'm at a rarified level of storytelling, with an idiosyncratic approach. [However] I think if you are a writer on Law & Order, you should be worried.'
But Hawley has bigger concerns, and they can be seen in the blood, guts and synth fluid of Alien: Earth. 'Europe does a much better job of regulating technology and thinking about the human implications of it. In the US, it's still about the dollar. And I worry there are no brakes on this train, because the people who would be the brakes are not incentivised to slow it down. I worry it's going to get away from us very quickly. If it hasn't already.'
Alien: Earth comes to Disney+ on August 13
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Astronaut retires after returning from troubled test flight and extended stay in space
Astronaut retires after returning from troubled test flight and extended stay in space

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Astronaut retires after returning from troubled test flight and extended stay in space

Astronaut Butch Wilmore is retiring from NASA less than five months after he returned from a troubled test mission that left him aboard the International Space Station far longer than expected, the space agency announced Wednesday. Wilmore, along with NASA astronaut Suni Williams, piloted the first crewed flight of Boeing's Starliner spacecraft last year. The mission gained worldwide attention when the spacecraft experience several serious issues en route to the space station, including thruster outages and gas leaks. Williams and Wilmore had been expected to stay about eight days in orbit. But NASA and Boeing spent weeks attempting to pinpoint what went wrong with their vehicle and assessing whether Starliner was safe to carry the astronauts home. The space agency ultimately decided returning the duo to Earth aboard Starliner was too risky a proposition. NASA announced last August that Williams and Wilmore would join the next International Space Station crew rotation along with two other astronauts on SpaceX's Crew-9 mission and remain aboard the orbiting laboratory for several additional months. Williams and Wilmore ultimately returned home in March — more than nine months after they left Earth. Such a duration of stay in orbit is not uncommon, as astronauts routinely live on the space station for six months or longer when they serve on staff rotation missions. 'Legacy of fortitude' Both astronauts have maintained the position that they were fully prepared for their extended stay in space, saying they each understood the risks and uncertainty associated with test flying a spacecraft for the first time. Williams and Wilmore also repeatedly sought to quash narratives that they were 'abandoned,' 'stuck' or 'stranded' in space. 'That's been the narrative from day one: stranded, abandoned, stuck — and I get it, we both get it,' Wilmore told CNN's Anderson Cooper in February. 'Help us change the narrative, let's change it to: prepared and committed despite what you've been hearing. That's what we prefer.' Wilmore's 'commitment to NASA's mission and dedication to human space exploration is truly exemplary,' said Steve Koerner, the acting head of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, where astronauts train, in a statement Wednesday. 'His lasting legacy of fortitude,' Koerner added, 'will continue to impact and inspire the Johnson workforce, future explorers, and the nation for generations.' Wilmore's departure from NASA follows the example set by Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley, the two astronauts who piloted the first crewed test flight of SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule in 2020. That mission marked the last for both Behken and Hurley, who have each since retired. Wilmore, a Naval officer and test pilot who served in 21 combat missions, joined NASA's astronaut corps in 2000. He flew on three missions during his 25 years of service, including a mission on the space shuttle Atlantis and a trip to the space station on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft. Notably, upon his return to Earth on a SpaceX capsule in March, Wilmore said that he would theoretically fly aboard one of Boeing's Starliner capsules again if given the opportunity. 'We're going to rectify all the issues that we encountered. We're going to fix them, we're going to make it work,' Wilmore said during a March 31 news conference. 'And with that, I'd get on in a heartbeat.' Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more. Solve the daily Crossword

NEON Picks Up Movie Based on Surreal Japanese Horror Game
NEON Picks Up Movie Based on Surreal Japanese Horror Game

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

NEON Picks Up Movie Based on Surreal Japanese Horror Game

NEON Picks Up Movie Based on Surreal Japanese Horror Game originally appeared on GameDaily. The Exit 8 might not be a game that's widely known to gaming fans, but it is beloved by gamers who have played it. It's from Japanese development Kotake Create and is essentially a walking simulator about being trapped in an underground passageway and trying to figure out how to escape by observing your surroundings. The game is very surreal and features elements of horror. This led to Genki Kawamura directing a feature film version of the game. The film is set to release in Japan on August 29. Luckily, American fans will eventually get a chance to see the film. NEON, the studio behind Parasite and Longlegs, has acquired the North American distribution rights for Exit 8. There isn't a set release date for the film in North America, but it is said to be coming out early next year. NEON has a fantastic track record when it comes to horror movies, so Exit 8 might be one of the better video game adaptations to come out. Exit 8 may not have been one of the games that translated well to film, but the fact that NEON is involved bodes well for the movie's quality. Here's hoping it can be better than the disappointing Until Dawn movie we got this year. This story was originally reported by GameDaily on Aug 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword

Fact Check: Scientists Did NOT Agree That 3I/ATLAS Is Alien Spacecraft Approaching Earth For 'Surprise Attack' In November 2025
Fact Check: Scientists Did NOT Agree That 3I/ATLAS Is Alien Spacecraft Approaching Earth For 'Surprise Attack' In November 2025

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Scientists Did NOT Agree That 3I/ATLAS Is Alien Spacecraft Approaching Earth For 'Surprise Attack' In November 2025

Does the scientific community as a whole share the notion that a newly discovered interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is an alien spacecraft heading to Earth for a "surprise attack" in November 2025? No, that's not true: The NASA website says that it's a comet and that it doesn't pose any risk to Earth. Three astronomers told Lead Stories that, as of this writing, the scientific community overwhelmingly shares this view. The scientist proposing the alien theory said he did so to challenge people to think, while, nevertheless, implying an interest in an influx of government money to fund that line of inquiry. The claim appeared in a post (archived here and here) on TikTok on July 27, 2025, under the following caption: Scientists at Harvard discovered an unknown object headed towards the Earth at 130,000 mph and its 15 miles in diameter and apparently is very unusual and possibly a space craft. #space #aliens The narrator in the video continued: Now they're saying it's going to be here by the end of November. They don't just think it's an object. They think it's a spacecraft coming to attack the Earth. It's called 3I/ATLAS, and they're worried about a surprise attack. This is what the post looked like on TikTok at the time of writing: According to the NASA website (archived here), 3I/ATLAS was first discovered on July 1, 2025. The shape of its path, differentiating from orbit around the Sun, allowed astronomers to conclude that it's an interstellar object, the third known of that class. While some of its characteristics are yet to be determined, the scientific community agrees that 3I/ATLAS is a comet, reads the NASA website: ...it has an icy nucleus and coma (a bright cloud of gas and dust surrounding a comet as it approaches the Sun). This is why astronomers categorize it as a comet... The space agency additionally clarifies that, contrary to the posts on social media, 3I/ATLAS poses no danger to Earth: Although the trajectory of the object brings it into the inner solar system, it won't come close to Earth. As the comet 3I/ATLAS journeys through the solar system, it won't come closer than 1.6 au (about 150 million miles, or 240 million kilometers) to our planet. Despite this information being publicly available on a government website, many other posts were trending under the keywords "massive alien mothership approaching Earth": for example, here (archived here and here), here (archived here and here) and here (archived here and here). Some of them, specifically professor Avi Loeb (archived here), of Harvard University's Astronomy Department. Talking to a CBS affiliate (archived here and here) in late July 2025, he implied that the newly discovered object can be anything, including being a technological product of another civilization. On August 1, 2025, Lead Stories contacted Loeb via email to clarify his views. On the same day, he wrote back, suggesting, among other things, that "3I/ATLAS might be an alien probe based on its unusually rare trajectory". Loeb, however, went on to explain the alien theory was a kind of thought experiment, saying: I laid out this possibility in order to encourage observers who are convinced that 3I/ATLAS is a comet to collect as much data as possible in an attempt to prove me wrong... Even if 49 out of the next 50 interstellar objects to be discovered by the Rubin Observatory will turn out to be comets or asteroids, the one outlier of technological origin might change the future of humanity. He also pointed out that a draft version of one of his papers that has yet to undergo a peer review process -- "Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?" (archived here) -- reads: We strongly emphasize that this paper is largely a pedagogical exercise, with interesting discoveries and strange serendipities, worthy of a record in the scientific literature. By far the most likely outcome will be that 3I/ATLAS is a completely natural interstellar object, probably a comet... At the same time, Loeb, who made similar claims rejected by the scientific community before (archived here), said: Committees of mainstream scientists who decide how to allocate federal funds often resist investments in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence by arguing that it is too risky and might result in wasting taxpayers' money. But if these reviewers were humble enough to ask the taxpayers what they wish to spend their tax money on, they would find the search for extraterrestrial intelligence to be at the top of the priority list. Gatekeeping and ridicule are not the landscape I wished for when I started my scientific career 45 years ago... Earlier, on July 31, 2025, Chris Lintott (archived here), a professor of astrophysics at the University of Oxford, referred to Loeb's theory of alien involvement as "absolute nonsense", continuing: It's a comet, and no danger at all. It's exciting enough we get to study an object that formed before the Sun was born, and there's no need to invent stupid stories to get attention. Two more astronomers told Lead Stories: The existing consensus among the members of the scientific community is that 3I/ATLAS is a comet. Jane Luu (archived here), a professor of astrophysics (archived here) at the University of Oslo, emphasized in a phone conversation with Lead Stories on August 1, 2025, that it's not just her or a few other people but many scientists who are currently studying 3I/ATLAS. She said there is no evidence to support speculations about the nature of 3I/ATLAS: Our observations have shown it's a comet. It doesn't come close to Earth: It's not on a collision course. On August 1, 2025, David Jewitt (archived here), a UCLA professor of astronomy, told Lead Stories via email: I've seen a lot of comets, and all I can say is that 3I looks to me like a comet. When asked to evaluate the potential risks posed by the comet, he said: There's more danger that your toaster oven will explode, assuming you have a toaster oven.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store