
National Dialogue's big question of cost shrouded in mystery
The National Convention – the preclude to the National Dialogue – is supposed to be the launchpad for months of citizen-led talks about South Africa's future.
However, it will be held later this week amid big questions over budget and readiness, and without the buy-in of several foundations that were behind the initial process.
Last Friday, legacy foundations including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation and four others withdrew from the gathering, citing concerns over government control, the continued absence of a confirmed budget, and a rush to stage the National Convention on 15 and 16 August.
'The continued absence of a confirmed, approved budget allocation and a last-minute commitment of initial funds has made sound preparation impossible. This raises real risks of a poorly organised and unaccountable process.
'The push to proceed has created pressure to engage in emergency procurement, which may violate the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA),' the foundations said in a statement on Friday, 8 August.
They said the withdrawal of their participation in the Preparatory Task Team (PTT) – which comprised the foundations, NGOs, community groups and representatives from the Presidency – and the first National Convention, did not mean a withdrawal from the National Dialogue project itself.
While the Presidency has insisted that costs are being managed and will be largely covered by in-kind contributions, it has not revealed a final budget for the National Dialogue.
This is because a budget for the National Dialogue will be finalised only after the National Convention, according to Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya.
'The total budget for the National Dialogue will be developed as the structure and form of the community dialogues are finalised by the Convention, and will depend on in-kind contributions, donations and other resources that can be mobilised,' a statement from Magwenya said on Sunday, 10 August.
In response to questions, Magwenya told Daily Maverick: '[The] total budget will be confirmed after the finalisation of the full roll-out process of the Dialogue by the National Convention.'
Cost confusion
Questions surrounding the total cost of the National Dialogue have been made ever more complicated by a recent report in the Sunday Times, which suggested a clash was taking place behind the scenes between President Cyril Ramaphosa and former president Thabo Mbeki, over arrangements for the National Dialogue.
In its report, the Sunday Times cited government insiders who claimed that the foundations had proposed an initial R853-million budget for the National Dialogue, which they then 'begrudgingly' lowered to R700-million, after Ramaphosa refused their request. This allegedly then went down further to a budget of R452-million, the publication reported.
The Sunday Times article seems to suggest that the total budget for the National Dialogue has been finalised at R452-million.
However, this is untrue, with the Presidency confirming the budget hasn't been finalised.
In addition, the foundations dispute the claim that they proposed an R853-million budget. Magwenya didn't respond to questions on the matter.
CEO of the Steve Biko Foundation Nkosinathi Biko, who was the chairperson of the PTT, and CEO of the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation Janet Jobson told Daily Maverick that the figure of R853-million reported by the Sunday Times was, in fact, never put forward among the PTT for consideration.
'I have never heard of a figure of R853-million, and I was chair of that PTT,' said Biko.
Jobson told Daily Maverick that the PTT had proposed an initial R76-million for a National Dialogue that was first conceptualised as a digital platform.
'That was for quite a different vision of the Dialogue National; largely as a digital platform and through the process of engaging citizens through technology. But, in discussions, it emerged that we felt it necessary for it to be a face-to-face process, and one that reached every corner of the country,' said Jobson.
'After that, we started the budgeting process for a much more extensive initiative,' she said.
The PTT workshopped scenarios and approaches for a face-to-face dialogue, and a request was made to cost the roll-out of that model, which came back at R700-million, according to Jobson. However, she said, R700-million was never a figure considered for approval.
A figure of about R450-million was also a proposed scenario that was discussed among the PTT, but again it was never approved, according to Jobson.
'Transparent and accountable'
In their joint statement, the foundations called for the National Dialogue to be 'transparent and accountable, with no space for corruption or mismanagement of funds in its process.'
Chairperson of Parliament's Standing Committee on Appropriations Mmusi Maimane, in a statement on Monday, expressed 'serious concerns' over the funding and implementation of the National Dialogue, saying he would seek clarification on the funding from the National Treasury.
'While the National Dialogue is vital for our democracy, we are deeply troubled by the absence of a concrete funding strategy. There is no dedicated allocation in the national budget and, in an already constrained fiscal environment, we cannot afford to divert resources from other critical priorities,' said Maimane.
He said the funding model had to be sustainable and accountable, and could not place an added burden on taxpayers.
Maimane said the committee had written to the National Treasury requesting clarity on the budget vote funding the National Dialogue, and an impact assessment report on programmes that might be affected by diverted funds.
In Sunday's statement, Magwenya said that all budgetary processes relating to the National Convention were consistent with the PFMA.
He said the costs of the convention were being funded from the existing budgets of the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac), and the Presidency for secretariat support, communications and logistics.
'The provisions in the Appropriation Act and the PFMA will be used to reimburse the Department of Employment and Labour, and Nedlac, in the Adjustments Budget later this year. All procurement and management of public funds will adhere to the PFMA and applicable Treasury regulations. All funds will be accounted for through the normal public finance mechanisms,' said Magwenya.
In response to questions from Daily Maverick about the concerns over transparency and accountability, Magwenya said: 'The National Convention could not be pre-empted. Any finalised budget prior to the National Convention would have been speculative. The National Treasury has made provisions for the National Dialogue, which will be finalised after the Convention. In-kind support or sponsorship has been secured for the Convention and more support will be secured for the Dialogue roll-out.
'Any talk of an absence of a funding strategy is devoid of reality and truth. Public expenditures are reported in Parliament and in budgetary processes. I don't understand what informs concerns about transparency,' he said. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
31 minutes ago
- IOL News
Legitimacy crisis looms over National Dialogue as organisations withdraw
The withdrawal of Thabo Mbeki's foundation and others underscores significant concerns regarding transparency and preparation for the National Dialogue, raising vital questions about leadership and accountability in South Africa's pursuit of a cohesive national vision. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Just two days before its scheduled start, the National Dialogue is facing a crisis of legitimacy, with several organisations withdrawing their participation due to concerns over transparency, funding, and the ANC's intentions. More organisations have withdrawn from the National Dialogue, citing concerns over its legitimacy, transparency, and effectiveness. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) has questioned the financing of the event, while the Freedom Front Plus, ActionSA, Solidarity, and Afrikaner Leierskapsnetwerk (Afrikaner Leadership Network, ALN) have all announced their decision not to participate. This follows the withdrawal less than a week ago of the Mbeki Foundation and other prominent legacy foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, and FW de Klerk Foundation, from the ambitious event. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The foundations stated that a key factor in the decision was the uncertainty regarding the R700 million allegedly allocated for the National Dialogue. They also cited concerns over the rushed timeline, inadequate preparation, and shift towards government control as reasons for their withdrawal. The MK Party has questioned who will finance the dialogue and slammed it as an "expensive sideshow" designed to bypass Parliament and give the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making. 'The Ministry of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), whose duty is to guard against waste and ensure that government spending addresses urgent national priorities, has disgracefully allowed public resources to be poured into a politically engineered 'Convention' that has no legal mandate, no parliamentary approval, and no place in the constitutional order. 'Deputy President Paul Mashatile and his Inter-Ministerial Committee have no authority to set up alternative governance platforms with public funds. This is not citizen-led, it is ANC-led, and the DPME's silence shows that it has been reduced to a rubber stamp for the Presidency's pet projects,' the MK Party said through its spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndlela. The party further highlighted the neglect of essential services in various provinces while funds are being poured into the National Dialogue. Some of the issues cited include rural clinics closed due to medicine shortages and unpaid staff, communities in eThekwini going weeks without clean water, schools without desks forcing children to sit on the floor, and ambulance response times stretching beyond four hours, among other concerns. The VF Plus believes the ANC-led government is not ready for genuine dialogue and has refused to abandon its failed economic and foreign policies. "A political party with such a mindset and approach cannot act as a credible facilitator for the Presidency or a participant in a national dialogue," the party said. ActionSA said that while they would not fully participate, they would deploy two senior Members of Parliament as observers to monitor and exercise oversight over the convention. "We will not participate in or lend legitimacy to a process under these circumstances," ActionSA said. Solidarity Movement and AfriForum said the ANC had hijacked the National Dialogue and would not participate. "The ANC wants to hijack the intended National Dialogue to try to win back lost support, rather than to find answers to the crisis," said Flip Buys, chairperson of the Solidarity Movement. Afrikaner Leadership Network (ALN) expressed concerns about the lack of transparency and openness in the planned process and will not participate in the National Convention. However, the Presidency has confirmed that the inaugural National Convention of the National Dialogue will proceed on August 15-16, saying it would be formally launching a constitutionally mandated process aimed at developing a national compact for transformation, despite all concerns. The ANC has noted the decision by several National Legacy Foundations and organisations to withdraw from the Preparatory Task Team of the National Dialogue and urged the government to urgently address the concerns raised. Without outright saying it was in support of the event, the party said it believed the National Dialogue must be rooted in inclusive participation, guided by the spirit of the Constitution and liberation values. 'The ANC reaffirms that the process is about building trust, healing social divisions, and forging national unity through broad-based societal engagement.'

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa's Opposition Parties Criticise Q2 Jobs Data Amid Unemployment Crisis
concerns about growing number of unemplpyed people in the country Image: Ron Lach/Pexels South Africa's second quarter 2025 jobs data has triggered strong criticism from political parties and organised labour, with calls for urgent economic reforms, job creation programmes, and government accountability. They have all warned that the country's unemployment crisis is worsening in real terms. 'Jobs give dignity and independence, but the current pace of growth is far too slow to make a dent in South Africa's unemployment crisis,' said Free SA spokesperson Reuben Coetzer. 'We cannot pat ourselves on the back for adding 0.3% more jobs when our working-age population is growing at the same rate, or faster. In realterms, we are standing still, while millions remain jobless.' Free SA argued that the Western Cape's recent rise to become the province with the second highest number of employed people, overtaking KwaZulu-Natal, shows the benefits of a more business-friendly environment. 'The Western Cape's example shows that a more business-friendly environment delivers results. Other provinces and national government must take note,' Coetzer said. The group called for reduced policy uncertainty, the removal of unnecessary regulations, reforms to restrictive labour laws, and urgent improvements to infrastructure and services. The DA's spokesperson on Employment and Labour, Michael Bagraim, said the figures show 'the ANC's economic policies are not working and are only driving more and more South Africans into misery.' He added: 'We cannot do the same thing over and over and expect a different result, which is why the DA's plan to turbocharge the economy is so important.' Bagraim said the DA's plan includes cutting bureaucracy and red tape, scrapping 'job-killing race-based legislation,' ensuring electricity security, improving local government functionality, and reducing crime to encourage investment. 'The time for talkshops is long past. The time to take action is now,' he said. FEDUSA said the high unemployment rate was 'a big setback for the country's economy and many households,' warning that it makes life harder for families, increases poverty and inequality, and slows economic growth. The union federation called for more job opportunities, stronger support for small businesses, improved skills training, and policies that encourage investment. 'With the upcoming National Dialogue, FEDUSA demands that it must produce actionable outcomes on employment creation, decent work, and wage progression, written into a national compact with timelines, deliverables, and accountability mechanisms,' the organisation said. While FEDUSA acknowledged the slight rise in the employment rate, it stressed that 'the increase in the official unemployment rate shows that job creation remains a major challenge for South Africa.' ActionSA leader in Parliament Alan Beesley said the GNU had overseen 'almost 350 000' more unemployed people so far in 2025, describing the government as 'hapless' and 'rudderless.' He accused coalition partners of being 'at odds with their coalition partner, the ANC, on virtually every element of their supposed plan to 'save' South Africa's economy.' 'Minister Meth, if not you, then who will take action?' Beesley said, referencing the Minister of Employment and Labour. He also warned that slow growth, which has not exceeded 1% under the GNU, could face further pressure from 'anticipated new US tariffs.' 'For those impacted, this is not just the absence of work but a suffocating darkness that erodes hope, dignity, and self-worth. According to the expanded definition, 12 million South Africans remain trapped in that darkness,' Beesley said.


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
National Dialogue: Concerns about financial transparency and hotel bookings for delegates
Several foundations say that the first national convention has been rushed. The Thabo Mbeki Foundation has raised renewed concerns about the funding model for the National Dialogue. This comes after the organising committee for the first convention taking place this week revealed that some delegates will be booked into five hotels in Pretoria. According to the organisers, provision has been made for 1 000 delegates. On Monday, 755 people had been invited from more than 30 sectors and over 200 organisations. Bongani Kupe, a special projects manager at the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, told The Citizen that one of the reasons the legacy foundations had pulled out is because there was no clarity on where delegates would be accommodated. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa-Mbeki feud reignites as foundations withdraw from National Dialogue 'This is why we said, can we postpone this so that we can put everything in context, so that we can lower the cost of this. 'Some of the sectors, I am sure they would have been able to say we will come, but we will foot our own bill. Those that would have said they cannot afford; we could have found reasonable accommodation for them. 'The intention is not to make this a commercial project, the intention should be a substantive project that will change the trajectory of South Africa,' he said. Lack of financial transparency Kupe said the issue of financial transparency is of importance if the dialogue is a citizen led process. 'Initially, we had said this would cost between R76 million and R700 million; there was no figure that had been finalised. We then said to the government, we need to discuss this. They never came back to us in time to say this is what we think we can contribute. They just took the project because they then said they have the resources, they can do this on their own,' he said. Kupe said the foundations did not want to risk their names in a venture that was veiled in secrecy or the lack of transparency. 'Our fear is that you, as reporters, will come to us and ask us how much this cost, and we will say we do not know. Then it will be clear that this is not citizen led,' he said. Kupe said the foundations had decided not to attend the first convention at the end of this week. 'We do not like the fact that the government has taken over instead of the process being citizen-led. We have been planning this thing for some time without the government. We do not want this to be an imbizo where people come together, complain, and then disperse. 'We want this to kick-start a process that is nation-building, that is why we wanted every sector to be engaged even before the first national convention,' he said. ALSO READ: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven Where will the money come from? According to a statement from the Presidency on Monday the costs of the first convention are being funded from the existing budgets of Nedlac and the Presidency for secretariat support, communications and logistics. 'The provisions in the Appropriation Act and the PFMA will be used to reimburse the Department of Employment and Labour and Nedlac in the adjustments budget later this year,' said the Presidency. NOW READ: National Dialogue must be place for 'women to raise their voices', Ramaphosa says