The Irish Times view on competition in banking: work to be done
The National Productivity and Competitiveness Council ( NCPC) serves a useful role in trying to prod the Government into action on measures to increase competition to the benefit of consumers and businesses.
Its latest review of its recommendations
from 2020 to 2023 – and what action they led to – is perhaps too kind to the previous administration and the current one.
Much of what has been done could be defined as process – reports and studies completed, for example – which are important, but no substitute for action. And in other cases Ministers claim to have taken reports on board – such as those by the commissions on housing and on tax and welfare– but have not taken up the reform agendas outlined in any meaningful way. There have been areas of real progress, for example on personal injury claims, but they are sporadic.
One area which the NCPC has usefully put in focus is retail banking, where both businesses and households continue to pay higher borrowing rates than their EU counterparts. Lack of competition, resulting from the long shake out in the banking sector after the financial crash and the departure of Ulster Bank and KBC, is a key factor. As the report points out, earlier this year interest rates on SME loans averaged 5.66 per cent in Ireland, versus a euro area average of 3.97 per cent.
There has been a welcome influx of smaller and non-bank players in some parts of the market, but overall competition is lacking. And, as an official Retail Banking Review published in 2022 points out, smaller players, reliant on wholesale funding, can struggle to compete over the business cycle against the big institutions, which have a huge base of personal deposits.
READ MORE
There is no quick answer here, but the review pointed out a range of areas where progress could be made to encourage competition. However, a suspicion remains, that, scarred by the crash, Government officials and the Central Bank still prefer to go softly-softly which lets the banks siphon excess profits out of the market, rather than pushing for value for customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
Housing Minister pulls plug on almost 500 social homes across six sites over rising costs
ALMOST 500 HOMES have been delayed after Housing Minister James Browne pulled the plug over concerns about the costs involved in the multimillion euro project. The social housing developments were understood to be near shovel-ready and were to be delivered under a public private partnership (PPP) scheme across six sites. Up to 244 of the homes were planned for Dublin and the others are spread across Kildare, Wicklow and Sligo. It is unclear when the homes will now be delivered, but the Housing Minister stressed tonight in a statement to The Journal that the government aims to to deliver them 'as expeditiously as possible' through an 'alternative procurement and delivery strategy'. The decision is set to have significant ramifications, as the department confirmed this evening that housing officials will now carry out a review of four upcoming PPP bundles – each earmarked to contain hundreds of homes. 'After careful evaluation of the costs associated with the 486 homes which were to be delivered under PPP Bundle 3, the Department has decided not to proceed with contract award on a value for money basis,' Browne said tonight. 'The department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing that PPP Bundle 3 was designed to provide. These social homes are very much needed and remain a priority for Government, my Department and the relevant Local Authorities.' Brown said that all six sites have 'full planning permission' and that the department is determined to deliver the homes quickly under a new procurement and delivery strategy. The sites that have been hit by the delay are: 68 homes at the Ready Mix Site, East Wall Road, Dublin 3; 93 homes earmarked for older people in Shangan Road, Ballymun, Dublin 9; 83 homes in Collins Avenue, Whitehall, Dublin 9; 73 homes in Ardrew, Athy, Co. Kildare; 106 homes in Burgage More, Blessington, Co. Wicklow; and 63 homes in Rathellen, Finisklin, Sligo. Advertisement It is not yet known how much the project was set to cost the taxpayer but inflation has been an increasing issue in the housing sector in recent years. In the two previous public private partnership projects, delivered under the same process, final capital spend was €119 million and €129 million respectively. Homes in the latter of those projects costed on average €277,000, excluding VAT. Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said the sudden reversal means the minister needs to provide funding to local councils to deliver the homes directly with contractors 'without any further delay'. 'I have always argued that PPPs don't represent value for money for the taxpayer. It's somewhat ironic the government are now saying they don't believe PPPs are good value for money,' Ó Broin told The Journal . He said that the schemes are a poor way to deliver social housing, partly due to the complex structure requiring up to five different partners for each housing project. 'The most important thing now – on foot of the minister's decision – is what he's going to do to deliver, as a matter of urgency, these homes which are badly needed,' Ó Broin added. 'Homelessness is rising, house prices are rising, waiting lists are rising, council waiting lists are rising. This needs to be resolved as soon as possible.' This week's halting of the PPP scheme is likely to pile further pressure on the government over its housing delivery numbers. The government came under fire in recent months for missing its overall 2024 housing target of 40,000 homes by a margin of 10,000. And it came in for further criticism in April when it emerged that it had fallen short of its social housing target for last year by 18%, amounting to 2,345 homes. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
14 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Labour slams decision for ‘Arts' to be removed from Department's name
This week, the name of the Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media was changed to the Department of Culture, Communications and Sport. Responsibility for Tourism has moved to the Department of Enterprise, while responsibility for the Gaeltacht has moved to the Department of Rural and Community Development. Labour TD and spokesperson for the Arts, Rob O'Donoghue, said the move sent 'a clear message to artists across the country that they don't matter'. 'As of June 2, this Government has made the decision to remove the word 'arts' from the Department, despite having a Department of Arts since 1994 with now President Michael D Higgins as Minister for responsibility with the Department,' Mr O'Donoghue said. 'This move sends a clear message to artists across the country that they don't matter and aren't a priority. It's shameful,' he added. Mr O'Donoghue said arts and music were 'at the heart of Ireland's identity, but that sectoral change was needed to support workers. 'Subsuming arts into merely culture will lead to a further dilution of Government attention towards the thousands of artists in Ireland who are so passionate about what they do,' Mr O'Donoghue said. The Arts spokesperson said while the arts has an economic impact, by attracting tourism to the country, there had been a 'hollowing out of many arts spaces and venues' across the country. 'What artists need is more engagement from Government, not less. We saw the enormous positive impact of initiatives like the basic income scheme for artists,' Mr O'Donoghue said. 'Having a carved out section within the Department is so important for artists to have trust and faith in the system that their livelihoods are being taken seriously by Government,' he added. The Basic Income for the Arts scheme (BIA) was introduced in 2022 as a three-year pilot project to help artists deal with precarious incomes. The first of its kind in Ireland, the BIA gives a payment of €325 per week to 2,000 artists and creative arts workers. It was massively oversubscribed when introduced, with more than 8,200 eligible applications received when it opened. With the scheme due to come to an end in August, uncertainty over the BIA's future has caused considerable anxiety within the sector. Minister Patrick O'Donovan has signaled his support for retaining and expanding the scheme. However, a government decision is yet to be made on the future of the scheme. In response, the Department of Culture, Communications and Sport said the new name 'more succinctly captures the full remit of the Department'. "The word Culture includes the Arts and is a common term used in the title of equivalent Ministries in the EU, noting also that EU Ministers meet at the Education, Youth, Culture and Sports Council,' a department spokesperson said. 'It should be noted that a previous format of the Department was the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht,' they added.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Tesla suffers suffers biggest one-day drop in market value after Trump-Musk spat
Tesla 's market value suffered its biggest one-day drop on record on Thursday as an escalating feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk triggered a sharp sell-off in the carmaker's shares. The electric vehicle group's shares closed down more than 14 per cent, erasing $153 billion (€134 billion) from its market capitalisation, after the US president signalled he could terminate US government contracts with Mr Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social. Thursday's drop left Tesla's share price down 25 per cent since the start of the year. READ MORE The spat between two of the world's most powerful men included repeated barbs from Mr Musk on his platform X and Mr Trump's comment that the billionaire, who has been a close ally since the election, was 'wearing thin'. The Tesla sell-off reverberated through US stock markets, with the S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite ending the session down 0.5 per cent and 0.8 per cent respectively. Both indices began to decline at around midday, when Mr Trump and Mr Musk began exchanging insults. The pair's 'petulant drama shook up the stock market', said Mike Zigmont, co-head of trading and research at Visdom Investment Group. 'The bond market didn't care, nor should it.' Tesla investors have had a rollercoaster few months. The stock rallied hard in the final quarter of last year after Mr Trump won his second term as president, but fell between mid-December and early March amid a broader market sell-off fuelled by Mr Trump's trade wars. Shares in rivals to Mr Musk's space exploration group SpaceX and its satellite broadband network subsidiary Starlink rose on Thursday as Tesla fell. AST SpaceMobile gained 7.5 per cent while communications group EchoStar jumped 17.4 per cent. The breakdown of Mr Musk's relationship with Mr Trump comes as his public interventions in European politics, including support for far right parties, have contributed to falling car sales across Europe. In March, JPMorgan strategists wrote in a note to clients that they 'struggle[d] to think of anything analogous in the history of the automotive industry, in which a brand has lost so much value so quickly'. The cuts Mr Musk made to federal government spending as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency also sparked a backlash. The Tesla boss stepped back from his government role at the end of May, having blamed 'blowback' against his businesses. Some investors said the market should have anticipated Mr Musk's feud with Mr Trump, despite their earlier bonhomie. Renowned short seller Jim Chanos said on X that it was the 'Most. Predictable. Break-up. Ever.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
