logo
‘Russians At War' Director & Producer Talk Backlash & Direct-To-Audience Release: 'The Best Counter To The Protests & Hate Is For People To See The Film'

‘Russians At War' Director & Producer Talk Backlash & Direct-To-Audience Release: 'The Best Counter To The Protests & Hate Is For People To See The Film'

Yahoo3 days ago
Director Anastasia Trofimova and producer Cornelia Principe are launching a direct-to-audience release this week of the former's controversial documentary Russians at War, in a bid to get it seen after a year of protests and cancellations.
The two-hour work gives sobering insight into the futility and carnage of armed conflict through the lives of Russia-aligned soldiers on the front of the country's unprovoked war against Ukraine, with whom Trofimova embedded over a period of seven months.
More from Deadline
Idris Elba's 'Dust To Dreams' Starring Seal Set To Premiere In TIFF Shorts + Full Lineup
TIFF Primetime Lineup: 'The Lowdown', 'Wayward' & 'Black Rabbit' Set To Premiere in Toronto's Series Showcase
'Damned If You Do' Trailer: Gianni Di Gregorio's Comedic Reflection On Love & Family Closes Venice's Giornate Degli Autori
After an incident-free world premiere at the Venice Film Festival last year, the doc met with protests in Canada from pro-Ukraine groups ahead of its North American premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF), with the former deputy prime minister Chrystia Freeland, who is of Ukrainian descent, leading the charge.
The protestors accused the film of being Russian propaganda – in a war of Russia's instigation in which more than 13,500 Ukrainian civilians and between 60,000 to 100,000 military personal have been killed and another 10 million people have been displaced – although none of them had seen the film at that point. At least 250,000 Russian troops have died in the conflict.
TIFF canceled the festival screening, instead playing the film in the TIFF Lightbox Theatre on the first Tuesday after its 2024 edition ended, using security staff who were still on site to ensure the safety of Trofimova, her producers and the spectators in the room.
'Anastasia had her very own security detail. I had someone following me around even when I went to the bathroom. When we were on stage for the Q&A, there was a line of security in front of us. People who came had to be security scanned. It was a quite a production, but the festival had to make sure everybody was safe,' recounts Principe.
The Oscar-nominated Canadian producer (To Kill A Tiger) produced the documentary under her Raja Pictures banner with Sally Blake and Philippe Levasseur at Paris-based Capa Presse.
The fallout would continue throughout the year with Athens and Zurich among festivals which pulled the film due to protests and security concerns.
Principe also reveals that the International Film Festival Amsterdam (IDFA) rescinded an invitation issued in August 2024 for its Best of Fests sidebar saying they could not create a constructive dialog around the work.
'That was surprising,' she says of the disinvite, which occurred under the radar before the festival unveiled its lineup.
In the meantime, the push back has only strengthened the film team's resolve to get the film seen, with the producers opting for a direct-to-audience strategy.
'The best counter to the protests and the anger is for people to see the film,' says Principe. '99% of the protests came from people who hadn't seen the film… I totally agree that peaceful protest is a great and constructive way to voice one's opinion, but it would be nice also to see the film.'
Principe cites documentaries such as Brett Story and Stephen Maing's Union, following Amazon workers as they attempt to unionize, and Oscar-winning documentary No Other Land, which also released direct-to-audience, as inspirations for going down the self-distribution route.
'For films that are potentially controversial for some communities or some groups or corporations, going direct-to-audience seems to be the way to go,' says Principe. 'Getting it out there as far and wide as possible was really our plan and it seemed more and more after things happened in Canada and TIFF, that doing it ourselves was the way to go.'
Working with the direct-to-audience platform of tech entertainment company Gathr, the producers have created the www.russiansatwar.com website, where spectators will be able to gain paid access to the film from August 12.
'It took months and months to get our website together. It's a very fulsome website with lots of content to give people background on the making of the film, frequently asked questions, criticisms that we address, all that is there,' says Principe.
The release is worldwide but excludes Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, with the production planning to make it available in those territories for free at a later date.
'That's going to be a separate release because it will be free and we need to make sure that it can actually be accessed in Russia, says Principe.
An experienced TV producer and documentarian, who has also worked in Syria and Iraq, Trofimova knew the film would receive pushback from some quarters for the human light in which it portrayed the Russia-aligned soldiers but was not prepared for the full-out backlash it sparked as it embarked on its festival tour last year.
'I think it was easier to go to the front and to be in the war than to deal with what happened afterwards because it was so unexpected. The documentary community has been very supportive overall and very understanding, but what was a shock to me is, how easy it is to be accused of something that people say you did, not that you actually did or said yourself,' she says.
'Most of the people who have been attacking this film, and the most vicious attacks, of course, have been happening online, have not seen the film… In Toronto, where we were the top news story for at least a week, journalists asked the protesters, 'Have you seen the film?' They would reply, 'No, we have not, and we refuse to.' What was surprising for me was, why this anger directed at the film? Why this anger directed at me? Because it's like I became their personal enemy, or the film became their personal enemy.'
The fallout has also raised questions for Trofimova around the power of coordinated deplatforming campaigns.
'It has been quite interesting to realize how easy it is for anyone in the documentary community to be attacked and silenced by some sort of interest group, because it didn't take that much to be honest. A lot of the stuff is online. It's quite organized. There's been quite a coordinated defamation deplatforming campaign against this film,' she says.
'It's left quite a bit of damage. I'm not talking about our emotional state, but rather the fact that it started off so well. It was receiving invitations from the world's top festivals and the attacks on it made it so much more difficult for people to program it and to see it. That was the shocking thing.'
She also questions the implications of what happened to her for other documentarians who want to tackle controversial and complex topics in the future
'It made me wonder how do we make complex films? It's a question for anyone who wants to take on a big, controversial problem in the world, and we have a lot of them. Now more than ever, documentaries have this huge responsibility to try to explain, to tackle them, to analyze them, to get in there. What do we have to be prepared for as filmmakers next time we go in?,' she says.
Trofimova is not certain it is safe for her return to Russia any time soon given the unflattering light in which Russians at War portrays conditions at the front for the country's soldiers, but she hopes to able to return one day to continue a personal mission to capture Russian stories that are told neither in the local media, or internationally.
'The thing about war documentaries is that if you're just faithfully observing and recording this reality, you cannot make anything but an anti -war film, because the longer you stay and the longer you see the futility and how people who are very dear to someone back home, they're just gone. And the same thing goes for both sides… it becomes very, very tragic.'
Principe notes how this time last year, she and Trofimova were iin Paris finishing post-production on the work ahead of the Venice premiere.
'A year ago, we were looking forward to Venice. A year later, we're looking forward to releasing the film online, so that people can see it and judge for themselves,' she says.
'They don't have to love the film. They have to don't agree with the film, but watch it and then, we'd love to hear what you think.'
Best of Deadline
Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds
A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media
'The Boys' Season 5: Everything We Know So Far
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway
Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway

Investors are in wait-and-see mode. Fed watchers have had quite a week, getting a hot Producer Price Index, a tame Consumer Price Index, and solid retail sales data out today. As it stands, markets are still betting on that September rate cut from the Jerome Powell-led Federal Reserve. There have been a few earnings stumbles in CoreWeave (CRWV), Applied Materials (AMAT), and Cava (CAVA), but a few bright spots from the likes of Cisco (CSCO). The Bullish (BLSH) IPO saw an enthusiastic response. And now markets cast their gaze to the highly anticipated meeting today between President Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The outcome of this meeting could have a host of surprises that bullish investors haven't even thought about! Stock analysis: Intel The Trump administration is reportedly in talks to have the US government take a stake in Intel (INTC). An Intel spokesperson didn't comment directly on this to me, but offered this: "Intel is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump Administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation.' The questions here are numerous. Why would the administration even want a stake in an Intel that is far behind chief rivals Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)? I encourage Trump to compare Nvidia's earnings report on Aug. 27 to the last disaster from Intel a few weeks ago. The president isn't known to hitch his ride to losers. Intel has been a loser and may stay that way in the chip game for some time. Then again, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government when embattled CEO Lip-Bu Tan and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company? I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder! Intel has billions in cash and doesn't need the money that comes with terms from any government deal. There is a lot at stake here, as Intel should be a beacon of US chip-making, not the punching bag in tech circles. The company's financials have taken a major hit, with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. "[A stake would] be a big step for Intel, but right now Intel is on a horse and buggy compared to the Godfather of AI Jensen [Huang] and Nvidia," Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives told me. Roundtable analysis: More tech When a Wall Street analyst who has been a bear on a stock for a while suddenly issues an upgrade, it always catches my attention. Today, we have that situation on Salesforce (CRM). DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria lifted his rating on Salesforce to Neutral from Underperform. Luria said investor sentiment has declined sharply on Salesforce in recent months as questions mount around the company's acquisition strategy and near-term margins. But what may not be factored into the stock is new activist investor activity, Luria said. Luria pointed out that noted activist investor Starboard Value — led by Jeff Smith — increased its stake in Salesforce by 47% this quarter, according to new 13F filings. Starboard pushed for big changes at Salesforce three years ago, which ultimately led to a new focus on margin expansion by CEO and co-founder Marc Benioff. Luria said, "We believe this is a signal there will be another round of investor activism and increased pressure on management to refocus on growth of the core business, additional margin expansion and hold off on dilutive M&A." Meanwhile, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold 20 million shares of Apple (AAPL) during the period, according to a new 13F filing. Berkshire's Apple holdings remain its largest equity stake by market value, despite dropping by about $9.2 billion in the second quarter. Is Buffett signaling he is concerned about Apple's tariff exposure? Perhaps. After all, Apple did warn tariffs would hit its profits by $1.1 billion in the current quarter. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors
How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors

US President Trump is set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. Slatestone Wealth chief market strategist and host of Yahoo Finance's Trader Talk, Kenny Polcari, shares his expectations for the meeting and how it could move markets, while Nomura's chief economist David Seif examines the potential economic impact of the meeting's outcome. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. Kenny, I want to go over to you here. This is a market that is still inclined to trade on economic data rather than geopolitical events, but this meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin could that change the tone of the market, do you think? Listen, it can change the tone temporarily. Geopolitical stuff can cause chaos, short term chaos in the market because it doesn't really price stocks in the long term. So on a day like today, everybody's gonna be paying attention. They want to see how long Trump stays in the room or not in the room, right? He's already made it very clear. If he stays in there less than five minutes, there's no deal, he doesn't want to talk about it. And there's going to be more more threats and sanctions on Russia. If the if the if the meeting goes longer than five minutes, then we can all assume that maybe they're making some progress. And that should help to settle things down. So yes, while it's not gonna price stocks in the long term, people should be paying attention although it's not going to hit until 3:00 this afternoon just because of the time difference. So the market may not have a lot of time to react. David, good to see you here this morning, David. What What Hey, how are you? Good. What are the economic ramifications of a meeting like this? Well, you know, I think that the the Russia Ukraine war, of course, is is sort of a travesty, um, from a humanitarian basis. It's not a first order importance to the United States. And I actually think that if there were to be some sort of a solution, either coming out of this meeting, or or in the near future, uh, one of the biggest beneficiaries at least in sort of the developed world would actually be Europe. Europe has this war on its on this war on its doorstep. And, um, solving it would unlock a lot of the potential that, uh, or undo a lot of the hit that occurred in 2022 when the war began. Uh, In addition, I think other countries could benefit such as India because that would allow them to avoid these, the the tariffs that Trump has talked about from trading with Russia. And so relief from those could also be a benefit to, uh, to India in particular, which is is one of the main trading partners with Russia that's also been a historic US ally. Ali, I've been making the argument all week, the market has totally forgotten about geopolitical risks, so focused on corporate earnings, what's happening with interest rates, but look, any bad headline from this meeting will likely dent stocks. Full stop. Look, Brian, geopolitical risks are always lurking around the corner, and you often don't know when they're going to hit. And I referenced earlier that Israel-Iran escalation, and that really took markets by surprise. We saw that intense spike in oil. We saw equities fall. There was a lot of concern whether we could be heading into a World War III situation. So that's always something that you have to keep in mind. But I totally agree with you. There's just a lot of momentum in stocks right now. There's a lot of risk trading. We are looking at Big Tech cap companies continuing to outperform. Crypto stocks have surged. And like you were saying, earnings have really been a big driver for that. And across the board, we've seen analysts raise their forecast for the S&P 500, specifically citing earnings. And it's not just earnings expectations for 2025. It's really for 2026 and beyond as well. So that is where the optimism is stemming from that this rally has legs and that it can also continue to trade higher from here. And I've been speaking to a lot of sources about whether or not we are overbought in this market. And they tell me no, that we're really at a fair value considering where earnings are and how the fundamental story has largely remained intact. Of course, we saw those hotter than expected inflation reports this week. TBD on the impact of that will have on the Fed and equities and trade policy moving forward. Kenny, I originally met you eons ago down the New York Stock Exchange trading floor. So let's pretend we are back there right now. What trades do you put in or put on going into the close, knowing that this meeting with Trump and Putin will happen likely 30 minutes before the market closes? So I think you have to decide on where you stand, right? I'm more optimistic. I actually think that there's going to be a deal. So if that were the case, then I'm gonna I'm going to go long the market, right? I'm going to be I'm going to buy bets. I'm going to be in the market. If you're on the side of the case that you think there's not going to be a deal and the market's going to back off, then you want to get short the market or at least maybe you want to get short parts of the market, right? You'd want to go long oil. You'd want to go long gold if in fact, you think that there's not going to be a deal. So it depends on who you are is gonna dictate how you set yourself up or how you how you get ready for what this may be. I'm optimistic. I think there's going to be a deal. I think oil's going to go lower. I think gold's going to go lower. And I think stocks will continue to move higher. Related Videos Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold Apple shares. Should you? US July Retail Sales Rise Despite Tariff Uncertainty Watch: Trump Departs White House for Putin Summit on Ukraine Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

StanChart shares fall 7% after U.S. lawmaker calls for probe
StanChart shares fall 7% after U.S. lawmaker calls for probe

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

StanChart shares fall 7% after U.S. lawmaker calls for probe

LONDON (Reuters) -Shares in Standard Chartered fell 7% on Friday after a U.S. Republican lawmaker wrote to the Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for action to be taken against the bank over alleged "ongoing sanctions evasion". Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, requested in a letter shared on the X social media platform and published on her website that a special attorney be appointed to look into Standard Chartered's alleged failings. Standard Chartered did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The bank's shares, which had been about 1.5% lower earlier on Friday, plunged and were last down 7% at 1433 GMT. One trader linked the share move to the letter. Like other European lenders, Standard Chartered's stock has risen sharply this year and hit a near 12-year high earlier this week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store