Industrial firms to face £685m property tax hit after energy support pledge
Just a week after the Government's industrial strategy revealed electricity costs for about 7,000 energy-intensive businesses would be cut by scrapping green levies, estimates suggest many of the larger firms are set to see their business rates bill soar.
Around 4,300 large-scale industrial properties in England – across manufacturing sectors such as automotive, aerospace and chemicals – will face a new business rates levy costing them around £685 million a year, according to tax and software firm Ryan.
The levy, which comes into effect in April, is part of next year's business rates revaluation and is being used to fund tax breaks for high street retail, leisure and hospitality sectors, Ryan said.
Alex Probyn, a practice leader of property tax at Ryan, said that while the industrial strategy move to reduce energy bills was welcome, 'it's perverse to then ask those very same businesses to foot the bill for high street tax cuts through higher business rates from 2026, a year before the energy support will come into effect'.
He added: 'If the goal is to boost UK competitiveness, we need a coherent strategy that tackles the total burden of fixed costs — not one that gives with one hand and then takes with the other.'
It follows Sir Keir Starmer's 10-year industrial strategy, which includes a measure to cut bills by up to 25% to help firms compete with foreign rivals.
Under the new plans, a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme from 2027 will cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms by exempting them from levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market.
Around 500 of the most energy-intensive firms, including the steel industry, chemicals and glass-making, will also see their network charges cut. They currently get a 60% discount through the British Industry Supercharger scheme, which will increase to 90% from 2026.
But Ryan is calling for more coherence in strategy from the Government, cautioning that any benefit from lower energy bills risks being undermined by increased property taxation.
UK firms already face the highest property taxes in the developed world and more than double the European Union average, according to the firm.
Mr Probyn said: 'We're seeing two opposing policies rolled out simultaneously. One aims to support industry by reducing energy costs.
'The other increases a key fixed operational cost — property tax — on the very same businesses to subsidise other sectors.
'There is no coherent strategy; it's a contradiction.'
A government spokesperson said: 'We are making it easier and quicker for businesses to invest and grow by cutting British industrial electricity costs with unprecedented new support which will cut electricity costs by around 20-25% for thousands of businesses.
'Our reform to the business rates system will also create a fairer business rates system that protects the high street, supports investment and levels the playing field.
'A new, permanently lower business rates in 2026 will benefit over 280,000 retail, hospitality and leisure business properties and will be sustainably funded by a new, higher rate on the 1% of most valuable business properties.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Burnham urges MPs to vote down welfare cuts despite Starmer's U-turn
Andy Burnham has urged MPs to vote against Sir Keir Starmer's welfare cuts on Tuesday despite the reforms being watered down. The Labour Mayor of Greater Manchester said the changes to the benefits system risked creating an 'unfairness and divide' among disabled people. It comes after Sir Keir caved in to a revolt by more than 120 of his own MPs and agreed that existing disability claimants would be able to keep their benefits. But tougher eligibility criteria for the personal independence payment (PIP) will still apply to new claimants, prompting warnings from rebels of a 'two-tier' welfare state. Sir Keir's about-turn is also expected to cost the Treasury about £1.5 billion a year by the end of the decade. Speaking at a panel event at Glastonbury Festival on Sunday, Mr Burnham declared he still opposes the revised policy. He said: 'What's been announced is half a U-turn, a 50 per cent U-turn. 'In my view, I'd hope that MPs vote against the whole Bill when it comes before Parliament.' Mr Burnham added that it 'simply can't be justified to make disabled people your target', saying the Government should have carried out an impact assessment. Looking ahead to Tuesday's vote in the Commons, he continued: '[MPs] face the prospect of, if they accept this package, someone could come to their surgery in two years saying: 'Why did you vote to make me £6,000 worse off than someone exactly the same, but who was protected because they were an existing claimant? 'I hope they think carefully before the vote, because the vote will create that unfairness and divide in disabled people… Many will face trouble down the line.' Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, will set out the concessions the Government has made to its welfare reforms later today. Ahead of Sir Keir's climbdown last week, Mr Burnham had joined Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, in criticising the Government's crackdown on disability benefits. In an interview over the weekend, Sir Keir said he had been too 'distracted' by world events to get to grips with the backbench rebellion. He told The Sunday Times that he was 'heavily focused' on the crisis in the Middle East, which he claimed was 'context rather than an excuse'. The changes to the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill have appeased a large number of the MPs who had planned to vote the legislation down. Dame Meg Hillier, the chairman of the Treasury committee, said the concessions were a 'workable compromise' and is expected to withdraw her amendment to kill off the Bill. However, some Labour backbenchers have insisted they will vote against the legislation regardless of the Prime Minister giving way. Clive Efford, the Labour MP for Eltham and Chislehurst, said he was still unconvinced by the proposed cuts. Unknown poverty impact Mr Efford told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'There's still £3.5 billion worth of savings that are required in these measures and we don't yet know the poverty impact that they will have. 'So the original motion was asking for more time to understand the impacts of these changes and that still applies to those who will be adversely affected.' Nadia Whittome, the MP for Nottingham East, said Mr Burnham was 'right' to continue to take a stand against the cuts. Jon Trickett, a veteran of the Labour Left, said Sir Keir was heading 'out of the frying pan into the fire' and 'making a total balls up'. 'Two brothers with the same genetic disorder – the older fell ill, is disabled, and receives PiP,' Mr Trickett said. 'The younger will have the same fate. But he won't receive PiP because of the 'concessions'. Two brothers, same disability, treated differently – wrong, wrong, wrong.' Vicky Foxcroft, who quit the frontbench over the welfare cuts earlier this month, argued on Sunday night that Sir Keir's concessions did not go far enough. Ms Foxcroft said she was yet to decide how she would vote on Tuesday but called on ministers to provide further reassurance. 'I would hope that actually we start to ensure we listen to disabled people and their organisations right across government,' she told The Guardian. 'This isn't just about warm words, this is about making sure we get policy right… Right now, we're kind of tinkering in terms of things to make it the least worst situation we can. 'And we need to learn lessons from that and make sure that we get these things right going forward.'
BreakingNews.ie
37 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
BBC under pressure amid criticism of ‘death to the IDF' chants at Glastonbury
British prime minister Keir Starmer has led criticism across the political spectrum of chants at Glastonbury for 'death' to the Israeli military as the BBC faced pressure to explain why it kept broadcasting. Rapper Bobby Vylan, of rap punk duo Bob Vylan, on Saturday led crowds on the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)'. Advertisement A member of Belfast rap trio Kneecap suggested fans 'start a riot' at his bandmate's forthcoming court appearance related to a terrorism charge. Responding to the chants from Bob Vylan, Mr Starmer said: 'There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech. 'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence. 'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.' Advertisement A member of Kneecap said 'f*** Keir Starmer' during their performance after the UK prime minister called for the band not to play at the festival. Local police said video evidence from the performances would be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation. Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis said Bob Vylan's chants 'very much crossed a line'. 'We are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence,' she said in a statement. Advertisement UK Conservative lawmaker Chris Philp said Bob Vylan was 'inciting violence and hatred' and should be arrested and prosecuted. 'By broadcasting his vile hatred, the BBC appear to have also broken the law,' he said. 'I call on the Police to urgently investigate and prosecute the BBC as well for broadcasting this. Our national broadcaster should not be transmitting hateful material designed to incite violence and conflict,' he posted on X. England's health secretary Wes Streeting called it a 'pretty shameless publicity stunt' and said the BBC and Glastonbury have 'questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens', speaking to Sky News. Advertisement Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the scenes 'grotesque'. 'Glorifying violence against Jews isn't edgy. The West is playing with fire if we allow this sort of behaviour to go unchecked,' she wrote on X. England's culture secretary Lisa Nandy has spoken to the BBC director general about Bob Vylan's performance, a British government spokesperson said. The BBC said it showed a warning during the performance and that viewers would not be able to access it on demand. Advertisement Bob Vylan performing on the West Holts Stage (Ben Birchall/PA) A spokesperson for the broadcaster said: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. 'During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. 'We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.' The Israeli embassy said it was 'deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival'. The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it would be formally complaining to the BBC over its 'outrageous decision' to broadcast Bob Vylan. 'Our national broadcaster must apologise for its dissemination of this extremist vitriol, and those responsible must be removed from their positions,' a spokesperson said. Bob Vylan, who formed in Ipswich in 2017, have released four albums addressing issues to do with racism, masculinity and class. Bobby Vylan's real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster (34), according to reports. He is listed on Companies House as the director of Ghost Theatre Records, which is operated by Bob Vylan. Kneecap performing on the West Holts Stage (Yui Mok/PA) In a statement posted to Instagram, Vylan said: 'Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place. 'As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us. 'Let us display to them loudly and visibly the right thing to do when we want and need change. 'Let them see us marching in the streets, campaigning on ground level, organising online and shouting about it on any and every stage that we are offered.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Bob Vylan (@bobbyvylan) Kneecap have been in the headlines after member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. The group performed after Vylan's set on the West Holts Stage with Ó hAnnaidh exclaiming 'Glastonbury, I'm a free man' as they took to the stage. In reference to his bandmate's forthcoming court date, Naoise Ó Caireallain, who performs under the name Moglai Bap, said they would 'start a riot outside the courts', before clarifying: 'No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.' In the run-up to the festival at Worthy Farm in southwestern England, several politicians called for the group to be removed from the line-up and Mr Starmer said their performance would not be 'appropriate'. During Kneecap's set, Ó hAnnaidh said: 'The prime minister of your country, not mine, said he didn't want us to play, so f*** Keir Starmer.' Lifestyle In Pictures: Glastonbury fans beat the heat as Kne... Read More Kneecap also gave a 'big thank you to the Eavis family' and said 'they stood strong' amid calls for the organisers to drop them from the line-up. A BBC spokesperson said an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance was available on iPlayer. 'We have edited it to ensure the content falls within the limits of artistic expression in line with our editorial guidelines and reflects the performance from Glastonbury's West Holts Stage. As with all content which includes strong language, this is signposted with appropriate warnings.'
Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Minister quizzed on PIP welfare U-turn - 'How on earth did it get to this point'
In a dramatic climbdown on Thursday, Keir Starmer agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments. But he still faces a major rebellion A government minister has been quizzed on Keir Starmer's U-turn on cuts to disability benefits after a bruising week for the Prime Minister. Skills Minister Baroness Jacqui Smith was pressed after the government was forced last week to introduce major concessions to avoid a humiliating Commons defeat. In a dramatic climbdown on Thursday, the PM agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments. The changes to PIP will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. But Mr Starmer is still facing a rebellion at tomorrow's crunch vote, with as many as 50-60 Labour MPs still said to be considering voting against the government. It would be the biggest revolt of Mr Starmer's premiership so far. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Baroness Smith was told: "It's quite a bruising week for the government. Looking at it now, how on earth did it get to this point?" The ex-Home Secretary replied: "What I think is important is what we're going to be starting tomorrow is really important reform of a broken welfare system. "Welfare reform is always difficult and I think actually the engagement that;s happened with Labour MPs, who are rightly bringing the concerns of their constituents about how this reform is going to work, have made this legislation better." Baroness Smith also said she hoped that Labour MPs will "feel able to support" the government at tomorrow's crunch vote after the concessions announced last week. The minister also suggested it was not "constructive" to discuss potential punishments for MPs who may decide to rebel against Mr Starmer's welfare plans. Asked on Sky News what the consequences should be for Labour MPs who vote against the government on the matter, she said: "I don't think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here." She later added: "It's always the case in legislation that you introduce the Bill, you have a second reading on the principles, and then you think about the details as you take that through all of its stages in Parliament. I'm sure that that will continue to happen." But speaking on Monday the Labour MP Clive Efford said he still will not support the welfare bill even after the Government made concessions. He told the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4: "I think there are a lot of people waiting to hear what the Government is saying today who may be inclined to accept what the Government has done. READ MORE: MPs on fence ahead of crunch welfare vote as 'costs facing disabled people soar' "For me the situation hasn't changed for those people who will be adversely affected and until we know and understand the impact on them, we shouldn't be taking what I think is a leap in the dark." He added: "There are choices that the Government can make here; there are other places it can go to identify the resources. What we want to see, and fully support, is measures the Government is putting in the palace to assist people to move into work, the right to try, we support, but we can't guarantee the savings. "When you're asking for £3.5 billion regardless of the impact of those changes that can only adversely affect people who are in the benefit system. We cannot make assumptions about how much we can save in the welfare system ahead of actually bringing in those changes and seeing how they work." Plans for a major review of PIP will also be set out today, which will be co-produced by disabled people, organisations who represent them and MPs. It is hoped that the terms of the review - which will place disabled people at the heart of it - will persuade nervous MPs that the legislation is now heading in the right direction.
