logo
A once-niche market for secondhand stakes in private funds is booming. What it's like to work in secondaries.

A once-niche market for secondhand stakes in private funds is booming. What it's like to work in secondaries.

There's one corner of the private investment world benefiting from the Trump bump going bust: Secondaries.
"Secondaries" professionals buy stakes in privately held funds from investors looking to cash out early. They have been busy of late, closing a record $162 billion in deals last year, according to asset manager BlackRock. Demand could ratchet up again this year as investors look to raise cash to protect against the financial fallout of some of Trump's policies.
"I always joke there aren't any bad times for secondaries," Matthew Roche, a partner at secondaries firm StepStone told BI. "There are some really good times for secondaries, and this is one of them."
Uncertainty around Trump's tariffs has slowed already sluggish dealmaking, which is expected to lead to even more private equity investors looking to exit funds that have yet to make distributions. Large investors could also turn to the secondaries market to raise cash in the face of a volatile stock market
It's not just tariffs. The endowments of Harvard and Yale are in the process of selling private equity stakes amid a federal crackdown on university funding. While Harvard's sales process began last fall, according to someone with knowledge of the sale, and Yale said it's been in process "for many months," the sales come at a time of growing uncertainty for university finances.
As this niche industry takes center stage, it raises questions about the people and firms behind the deals. What firms specialize in secondaries investments? What is the job like, and how does it differ from other financial industry jobs?
We spoke to investors, recruiters, and a lawyer with deep secondaries experience to understand what private equity's hottest strategy does every day.
The firms
The secondary market has existed almost as long as private equity itself, but it was long viewed as a fringe strategy. Nowadays, it's considered a core strategy, making up the bulk of assets for some firms, including French private equity firm Ardian, which boasts the world's largest secondaries platform, north of $97 billion in assets managed. Other key players include Lexington Partners, HarbourVest, and StepStone.
It's also become a must-have strategy for any megafund, with Apollo raising $5.4 billion in a debut fund that closed this year. Blackstone, which acquired its secondaries business, Strategic Partners, from Credit Suisse in 2013, is now the second-largest secondaries investor in the world. Goldman Sachs ' asset management unit also has a fund.
Secondaries investors are a category of private-equity professional, but rather than finding companies to turn around, they are responsible for locating, assessing, and executing private fund transactions, sometimes with the help of investment banks like Evercore or Jefferies.
Like other private equity pros, they are using money raised from investors. The secondaries industry raised a record $50 billion in the first three months of the year, according to Preqin. The goal is to buy shares at a discount to their future value.
The traditional secondaries deal is led by investors looking to cash out. These deals are known as "LP-led" deals. Increasingly, the industry has been transacting deals on behalf of buyout firm sponsors, known as "GP-led" deals, as more private equity firms struggle to make distributions to impatient investors.
The pace
The secondaries business is "fast-paced," said Keith Brittain, cohead of Hamilton Lane's $24 billion secondaries platform.
It's not high-frequency trading, as deals can take weeks or months from start to finish, but there are many more transactions in secondaries than in the world of corporate buyouts.
"Even in a two-year associate program at a traditional large/mega fund buyout, you're lucky if you get to see one deal from start to finish," said Alix Connors, a principal at recruiting firm Opus Advisors.
Roche said some incoming associates at StepStone came to the firm for a change of pace
"Our recent junior hires appreciate that every day can be different: different sponsors, different sectors, and different companies, with many active deals at all times," Roche said.
Holly McCarthy, founder of Opus Advisors, compared the workload to a "sample platter" of "sizes, sectors, and strategies.""You can work on a tech venture deal in the morning, a megafund buyout deal by lunch, and a real estate deal in the afternoon," McCarthy said.
The hours
Secondaries can also offer a bit more work-life balance than corporate buyout investing.
"You have a bit more control over your calendar," McCarthy said.
Connors said buyouts can be a bit like "banking 2.0" with a highly demanding, intense workload. Secondaries offer more "predictability," she said, though the recent increase in activity has likely led to longer hours.
And while the pay is below that of a buyout fund star, it's not by much.
"You might earn slightly less, but the trade-off in deal reps and lifestyle is worth it," McCarthy said.
But don't expect that you're going to always be home for dinner. Schedules can still be "inconsistent," said Brittain. "Like many transaction and investment-oriented jobs, you don't always have control of timelines."
The deals
The secondary investor is focused primarily on financial modeling, research, and closing deals. It's for those who want to underwrite versus meeting with CEOs and running businesses.
Brittain said secondary investors who buy a share of a fund must do financial due diligence on the overall fund, including the deals in the fund and the private equity manager.
On the GP-led side, diligence is even more thorough.
"You're not underwriting 20 assets or 200 assets, you're underwriting one or a small number of companies," Brittain said.
You also get a chance to look under the hood of other private equity firms."You have to underwrite the quality of the GP," Brittain said. "Can they buy well? Can they exit well?"

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 10 most popular new cars & SUVs of 2025 (so far), according to Consumer Reports
The 10 most popular new cars & SUVs of 2025 (so far), according to Consumer Reports

Miami Herald

time22 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

The 10 most popular new cars & SUVs of 2025 (so far), according to Consumer Reports

Looming economic uncertainties, stubbornly high interest rates, and Trump's tariffs on imported auto parts and automobiles might lead you to think that 2025 is the worst time ever to buy a new car. But 3.9 million new vehicles were sold in the first few months of the year, which represented a 4% increase over 2024. And while current economic headwinds have caused Cox Automotive to reduce its full-year new vehicle sales estimates from 16.3 million to 15.6 million, that still means millions of people are heading over to their dealerships to purchase a new car or SUV. Because the simple fact is, if you need a new car, you need a new car. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Buying a new vehicle seems to be an increasingly smart investment, due to the fact that used cars aren't the steals they used to be. Their prices have also been on the rise: According to data from Edmunds, the average price of a three-year-old vehicle is now an incredible $30,522, which significantly narrows the cost differential between new and used vehicles. There are plenty of advantages to buying a new vehicle, with safety and reliability at the top of the list. Related: The 10 most reliable car brands in 2025 according to Consumer Reports New cars are safer Due to advancements in safety technologies and structural designs, new cars typically have more standard safety features than used vehicles. These days, automatic emergency braking (AEB) comes standard on most new vehicles, while blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic warning systems are other common new-vehicle features that can often help to prevent accidents from occurring in the first place. New cars are more reliable In addition, shiny new cars come with shiny new components, lessening the chance of immediate mechanical issues. They also have the added benefit of a factory warranty, which covers repairs for a certain period-something older, pre-owned vehicles might not. Consumer Reports (CR), the venerable product testing and consumer advocacy organization, has been in business since 1936, which means it has weathered economic ups and downs for 89 years. In fact, its entire purpose, which is to provide unbiased reviews of tens of thousands of products in order to inform consumers on product quality and safety, was shaped by the harsh economic realities of the Great Depression. Related: The 10 best compact crossover SUVs according to Consumer Reports Acknowledging the challenges car buyers face in 2025, CR put together a few helpful hints for consumers so they can avoid overpaying for their vehicles. They include: Avoid buying first-year "redesigned" models, which have received plenty of media hype and, often, a steep price tag to match. Instead, CR suggests waiting another year so that the vehicles' inflated sticker price comes down-and any "kinks" the new model experiences have been worked out, consumers should select smaller vehicles, or ones with fewer features, simply due to the fact that they have lower material and manufacturing costs. Because smaller vehicles weigh less, they also experience lower destination charges, which get passed on to the consumer. CR suggests that car buyers do their research online and find out what prices cars in their area are selling for, as well as what their MSRP is. That can help you determine a vehicle's true value-as well as how much you're willing to spend to get it. Consumer Reports listens to the feedback it receives from its 6 million members; in fact, it takes into account which cars and SUVs consumers are searching for online when it compiles its list of "most popular" vehicles. More on Consumer Reports: The best gas grills under $250, ranked by Consumer Reports dataThe least expensive car brands to repair & maintain according to Consumer ReportsTop 10 electric cars that aren't Tesla, based on Consumer Reports data But the venerable consumer advocacy group doesn't stop at data. It then cross references these vehicles with results from its own, extensive internal tests in order to rank its list in order of highest-rated vehicles. This helps consumers to know they're making the smartest possible buying decision-no matter what's going on in the world at large. CR road-tests dozens of vehicles at its testing facility in Colchester, Connecticut, putting each car and SUV through a barrage of tests, including acceleration, braking, crash testing, emergency handling, smoothness of ride, and fuel economy, to name a few. It then surveys its members on metrics such as reliability and overall satisfaction, combining all results together into its Overall Score. CR notes that each of the vehicles on its list of "Most Popular New Cars and SUVs" have received high Overall Scores. And, all of these vehicles are categorized as SUVs. However, while all of the vehicles that made its list come with standard automatic emergency braking (AEB), it notes which ones also come with blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic warning systems. Here's the list: 2025 Subaru Forester MPG: Overall 29 / Hwy 39 Price: $29,995–$43,295 2025 Toyota RAV4 MPG: Overall 27 / Hwy 38Price: $29,250–$40,605 2025 Honda CR-V MPG: Overall 26 / Hwy 33Price: $30,100–$50,000 OWS Photography, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 2025 Subaru Crosstrek MPG: Overall 29 / Hwy 41 Price: $26,560–$33,360 2025 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid MPG: Overall 37 / Hwy 41 Price: $28,850–$40,205 Ethan Llamas, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 2025 Mazda CX-5 MPG: Overall 24 / Hwy 33 Price: $28,770–$40,800 2025 Honda CR-V Hybrid MPG: Overall 35 / Hwy 38 Price: $34,650–$41,100 2025 Toyota Highlander MPG: Overall 22 / Hwy 33 Price: $39,820–$53,975 2025 Toyota Highlander Hybrid MPG: Overall 35 / Hwy 41 Price: $39,520–$53,675 Related: 8 popular vehicles that are less reliable than you think, according to Consumer Reports The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event
AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event

Miami Herald

time22 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event

Lisa Su has seen the future and she wants to tell you all about it. The chairwoman and CEO of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) took the stage at the chipmaker's "Advancing AI" developers conference to give the attendees an idea of what's next. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "At AMD, we're really focused on pushing the boundaries of high performance and adaptive computing to help solve some of the world's most important challenges," Su said during her keynote address. "Frankly, computing has never been more important in the world. "I'm always incredibly proud to say that billions of people use AMD technology every day, whether you're talking about services like Microsoft Office 365 or Facebook or Zoom or Netflix or Uber or Salesforce or SAP and many more running on AMD infrastructure." Su said her company's latest AI processors can challenge Nvidia's (NVDA) chips in a market she now expects to soar past $500 billion in the next three years, according to Bloomberg. The new installments in AMD's MI350 chip series are faster than Nvidia's counterparts and represent major gains over earlier versions, Su said at a company event Thursday in San Jose, Calif. I-The MI355 chips, which started shipping earlier this month, are 35 times faster than predecessors, she said. Though AMD remains a distant second to Nvidia in AI accelerators - the chips that help develop and run artificial intelligence tools - it aims to catch up with these new products. More Tech Stocks: Palantir gets great news from the PentagonAnalyst has blunt words on Trump's iPhone tariff plansOpenAI teams up with legendary Apple exec The stakes are higher than ever: Su previously predicted $500 billion in market revenue by 2028, but she now sees it topping that number. "People used to think that $500 billion was very large number," she said in a briefing following her presentation. "Now it seems well within grasp." In February, AMD's forecast for its data center business reflected slower growth than some analysts predicted. AMD says the new update to its MI range will restore momentum and prove it can go toe to toe with a much bigger rival. AMD said that the MI355 outperforms Nvidia's B200 and GB200 products when it comes to running AI software and equals or exceeds them when creating the code. Purchasers will pay significantly less than they would versus Nvidia, AMD said. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. AMD, like Nvidia, is restricted from shipping its most powerful components to China under U.S. trade curbs. The company is lobbying hard to try to get the Trump administration to allow them to freely offer AI components to other countries. AMD shares are down 4.1% this year and off nearly 28% from a year ago. Several investment firms issued research reports following AMD's "Advancing AI" event, including Evercore ISI analyst Mark Lipacis, who raised his price target on the company to $144 from $126 and affirmed an outperform rating on the shares. The AI event indicated that AMD is making progress on the ROCm software stack as well as in penetrating hyperscalers' internal inferencing workloads, the analyst tells investors. The hyperscalers are the major providers of cloud infrastructure and services. The AMD Instinct customer list expanded from Meta Platforms (META) , Oracle (ORCL) and Microsoft (MSFT) to OpenAI, xAI, Cohere, RedHat IBM's (IBM) software subsidiary, and Humain, said Lipacis. He says that increased visibility into AMD's data-center graphics-processing units warrants a higher price-to-earnings multiple. Yahoo Finance calculates the forward p/e at just under 30 for AMD and under 34 for Nvidia. Related: Analysts reboot Oracle stock price targets after earnings Roth Capital analyst Suji Desilva raised the firm's price target on AMD to $150 from $125 following AMD's AI event and affirmed a buy rating on the shares. The analyst said he was encouraged by AMD's artificial intelligence portfolio progress across processors, AI GPUs, networking, software and rack systems. Desilva said he expected faster 2026 growth with the ramp of the MI350 accelerator-based Helios rack solution. AMD sees the addressable market growing faster than previously expected, with AI inferencing and agentic AI trending as growth drivers on top of "significant" AI training investment to date, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Citi analyst Christopher Danely maintained a neutral rating on AMD with a $120 price target after the "Advancing AI" event and the launch of its latest artificial intelligence chip, the MI355X. He noted that AMD raised the AI total addressable market and announced a new customer, xAI, but it did not provide a revenue forecast for its AI business, which would benefit the stock. Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider
After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider

The social media-driven feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk may have simmered down a bit, with the rhetoric cooling and Musk even deleting some of his ill-considered posts about Trump from X and then apologizing for them. But the shockwaves generated by the tit-for-tat insults and threats still reverberate through NASA and the commercial space sector. When Trump threatened to pull all of SpaceX's government contracts and Musk responded by threatening to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, an apocalyptic scenario that would have cripped NASA loomed. Fortunately, both men have since backed off. Even so, according to the Washington Post, NASA and the Defense Department are quietly urging commercial space companies to hurry the development of hardware that can compete with what SpaceX has to offer. Encouraging competition with SpaceX is sound policy regardless of the relationship between Trump and Musk. However, that competition is months, if not years, in the future. The next flight of the Boeing Starliner, which failed so spectacularly in 2024, will be early next year at the earliest. The Blue Origin New Glenn, an answer to the SpaceX Falcon family of rockets, may launch once more this year and is a long way from achieving Falcon-level launch cadence. It is in Trump's and Musk's interests, and that of the American space effort, that both men repair their relationship and move on. One of the issues that drove Trump and Musk apart was Trump's abrupt and inexplicable withdrawal of the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and private space traveler, for NASA administrator. Musk had championed Isaacman, who is well regarded in the aerospace community, and took it to heart when Trump changed his mind about his own nominee. The resulting leadership vacuum at NASA is being filled by Congress. The Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), has offered its own ideas for a NASA budget. The Senate Commerce document is at odds with the White House proposal in one important aspect. Whereas the Trump budget eliminates the Space Launch System after Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway, Senate Commerce would retain the massive, expensive rocket at least through Artemis V and would build the Gateway to support future Artemis missions. A NASA administrator such as Isaacman would be able to argue for the White House's approach. As for Isaacman, some people in the MAGA world, no doubt stung by the near-universal outrage sparked by his treatment at the hands of the White House, have started to trash the former nominee in the media. A recent Daily Caller story quoted unnamed White House officials accusing Isaacman of not only giving money to Democrats but of supporting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at his companies and in his private spaceflights. But both of these facts were known when Isaacman was nominated. According to the story, the officials said, 'Isaacman would have been a black spot on an administration otherwise filled with Republican Trump supporters or, at least, individuals like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who backed the president prior to the election.' To hear these unnamed sources talk, Isaacman is no better than left-wing House members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and their Squad. It should be noted that even if Isaacman wanted to impose DEI policies at NASA, he couldn't because of Trump's executive order prohibiting it across the federal government. Isaacman posted to X in his own defense: 'I am a moderate and donated to both parties for different reasons … my largest contribution was to President Trump — because I support many of his policies. I definitely did not like the direction this country was going over the last 4 years.' He went on to state, 'I have never spoken against the President. I have never voted against him.' It sounds like Isaacman is very loyal to Trump, remarkable under the circumstances. The suggestion of disloyalty is spurious and against the White House's interests. Isaacman's situation could provide the basis of a rapprochement between Trump and Musk. Musk has already apologized to the president for some of his posts on X, particularly the one suggesting that Trump is named in the Department of Justice's files on Jeffrey Epstein. But the president should admit fault as well. He was deceived by some of his staff about Isaacman's character. If it is not too late, he should reverse himself a second time and send his fellow billionaire's name back into nomination. NASA, the U.S., and the Trump-Musk partnership would gain as a result. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store