Defence's Waiouru housing project fails to break ground after deal with Ngāti Rangi falls over, sources say
Waiouru military training camp
Photo:
Google Maps
The Defence Force's flagship project to fix up poor housing that is bad for soldiers' health has failed to break ground two years after it was funded, according to sources in Waiouru.
None of the 50 houses promised for Waiouru have been started, according to feedback from the town, which the NZDF has not disputed.
Budget 2023 earmarked the thick end of $75 million for the new houses.
A Defence tender to find a builder went out a year ago.
But on Wednesday the government said, "Discussions regarding Waiouru are ongoing and progressing well, as part of a wider Treaty Settlement."
Asked what the talks were about, Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk's office said, "We don't have anything further to add outside of our existing statements currently."
NZDF did not address what the new discussions were about either. It did not respond when asked what had happened to the project and any contract.
RNZ understands its deal with Ngāti Rangi that underpinned the housing project fell over at the last minute.
Ngāti Rangi is hosting the National Hautapu Ceremony for Matariki next week at Tirorangi Marae.
The iwi referred RNZ's questions to the NZDF.
It said in 2021 that, "Housing is on the top of our priority list. As part of our settlement we have an
arrangement with the New Zealand Defence Force
out at Waiouru to build 50 homes. That project we're still working on with NZDF."
Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Penk told Cabinet colleagues last year that NZDF's widespread "dilapidated" housing was harming military output.
Defence has vacancy rates of about 30 percent and "ten percent of personnel leave the NZDF predominantly due to the unsatisfactory working, training and living environments", he said.
Budget 2025 signalled the start of $9 billion in promised new defence spending by 2029, containing about $3 billion for 15 projects, mostly to do with weapons or IT systems.
However, the Budget provided just a fraction over the next four years to address the billion-dollar backlog in maintenance and renewals that is outstanding; past Cabinet papers gave this figure, and NZDF confirmed on Tuesday that its spending on defence regeneration was half a billion dollars behind what the 2019 plan demanded.
In August 2024, Penk expressed shock after seeing photos of
black mould in Waiouru families' homes
.
"No family should have to live like that, let alone the families of those who sacrifice so much to serve their country," he said.
The
temperature low
in Waiouru over the last 30 days has been under one degree on 17 days.
Some housing "poses potential health risks and can cause housing-related stress to ... personnel and their families", and was linked to health conditions like asthma, a Cabinet minute in 2023 said.
The 50-house project was announced as settled a year ago, under the Te Tiriti settlement with Ngāti Rangi seven years ago.
Ruapehu district mayor Weston Kirton and his council
celebrated the deal
11 months ago.
"I don't have any detail, only to say that it seems to be stalled in some shape or form," Kirton told RNZ on Wednesday.
No building appeared to have taken place - a
playground and community park
were in the tender, too - and the council was not privy to why, or to Defence talks with iwi.
"The minister should give us an update on what progress there is on the Defence presence in the Waiouru community," Kirton said.
NZDF had earlier threatened to shut up shop entirely at the central North Island settlement and head south, so he had been delighted when the settlement secured the army's training area and the housing deal began to firm up.
"It was all go," Kirton told RNZ.
"They were very excited, they wanted to retain the training area at Waiouru.
"We were excited, the fact that they were going to put resouces back into Waiouru."
Ruapehu mayor Weston Kirton.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
On Wednesday, Penk initially made no comment at all about Waiouru, then, when prompted again by RNZ, provided a single line about the "discussions".
Shortly before that, in a longer statement, he had said, "The government is improving accommodation for our sailors, soldiers and aviators by addressing decades of underinvestment, which has left Defence housing stock in poor condition."
Penk referred in that statement to projects in Devonport, Trentham and Manawatū, but not Waiouru, even though Waiouru had the lion's share of Budget 2023's tranche one funding for housing upgrades.
"The Waiouru New Build Housing is one of the first projects implemented under the Homes for Families Programme," said its tender.
Two months ago on Facebook, Penk posted - next to a headline '$12 billion for a stronger NZ' cheering the defence capability plan released in April - that: "This Government is rebuilding the Defence Force after decades of underfunding."
"Defence housing, messing and dining spaces are going to benefit from fresh investment.
"Our military personnel deserve healthy and modern spaces to live and rest in while they serve our country."
The 50-house Waiouru deal was designed to signal the starter's gun on a
half-billion-dollar upgrade of the army camp
over the next 25 years, and of an overall $3 billion overhaul of 1600 defence houses countrywide.
Most of those required "upgrading urgently", past Cabinet papers said.
Penk a year ago told a Cabinet committee the estate was a "critical enabler of military effect; providing the working, training and living environments required for generating and maintaining defence outputs".
"The dilapidated condition of the NZDF estate is evident everywhere, but mainly in the living and training environments, and with utilities such as power, water supply and sanitation."
A 2024 estimate put deferred maintenance at $480m across the estate, which includes not just houses but other facilities.
Some "critical" defence assets were so poor in some places that a "wholesale shutdown of operations at that location may be needed", Penk stated.
The NZDF's annual report a year earlier had said 99 percent of its houses met Healthy Homes standards.
Asked how that was possible given what Cabinet had been told, NZDF told RNZ: "Healthy Homes compliance does not address the state of NZDF's barracks or working accommodation and does not necessarily address whether a home is aged, fit for purpose and or in an accelerated state of deterioration."
Penk had said in August 2024 that funding was constrained but the government was looking at options for improving the housing.
Earlier, Budget 2024 funded 35 leased homes at Devonport Naval Base.
New initiatives in Budget 2025 funded just $4m of capital and $16m for housing over four years. More would be added "once the business case is approved by Cabinet", NZDF said.
The business case related to a revision of its 2019 estate regeneration plan to fit a 2024-2040 timeline.
This had to be revised, in part, to "address consequences of insufficient funding since the 2019 business case", official papers said.
"The business case is still being drafted and Cabinet's decision on it will be released when that occurs in the next couple of months," it told RNZ.
NZDF mentioned about $30m for upgrades at Devonport Naval base, but this does not appear to be for housing.
Budget 2025 also had $120m for depreciated funding of estate assets. It put $26m into deferred maintenance this year, and $104m over four years, against the $480m backlog.
Penk said in his statement that three construction contracts and a future lease agreement had been signed for 61 new homes with Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei on Auckland's North Shore, and to lease additional houses in Sunnybrae.
A new tender signalled "more housing solutions will be sought this year, including at Trentham and in the Manawatū", he said.
Budgets 2023 and 2024
provided $75.4m capital and a total $17.1m over four years, Defence said. This included a renovation pilot for 13 properties at Burnham, Linton and Ohakea.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
25 minutes ago
- RNZ News
What you need to know about the Parent Boost Visa
Ethnic communities were excited to see the unveiling of the long-awaited Parent Boost Visa on Sunday, which aims to support parents visiting their families in New Zealand for longer durations. However, the excitement was followed by mixed emotions as they worked hard to figure out the conditions they would need to satisfy for their parents to be eligible for the visa. Questions emerged about the visa's health insurance and income requirements, among other things. Immigration New Zealand said it would release more information on its website prior to applications opening on 29 September. Until then, here's what we know about the Parent Boost Visa so far. It is a multiple-entry visitor visa that allows parents of New Zealand citizens and residents to visit for up to five years, with the possibility of extending it for another five years, enabling a total stay of up to 10 years. Applicants must have a sponsor who is their biological or adopted child and is a New Zealand citizen or resident. The sponsor must also agree to cover the applicants' essential costs, including accommodation and other daily expenses. There are three ways to meet the financial requirements. The sponsor must earn at least the New Zealand median wage, which is $69,804.80 a year to sponsor one parent, or 1½ times the median wage for joint sponsors, equivalent to $104,707.30. The amount increases by 0.5 times the median wage ($34,902.40) for additional parents being sponsored. Immigration New Zealand updates the median wage it applies to visa applications in February each year. Alternatively, parents can have a personal income equivalent to New Zealand Superannuation, which is $32,611.28 per year for a single parent and $49,552.88 for a couple. Otherwise, parents must have personal funds worth $160,000 for a single applicant or $250,000 for a couple. Photo: RNZ Applicants must hold at least one year of health insurance that covers emergency medical care (minimum $250,000 a year), repatriation, return of remains and cancer treatment (minimum $100,000). They must hold valid health insurance for the entire duration of their stay in New Zealand. No. Applicants must apply for a Parent Boost Visa when outside New Zealand. "This offshore application requirement reinforces the visa's temporary status and the expectation that parents maintain a connection to their home country," Jock Gilray, director of visas at Immigration New Zealand, told RNZ. Parent Boost Visa holders can study for up to three months each year or undertake remote work for an offshore employer. They do not have the right to work for a New Zealand employer. Visa holders are required to leave New Zealand any time between three and four years of the visa to complete a health check to confirm they can continue to meet the health standards, Immigration Minister Erica Stanford said. Gilray said the visa is a temporary one and it's essential that holders maintain strong connections to their home country, and the requirement to leave New Zealand supported that approach. The visa cost most people $3000 to apply and $2450 for people eligible for the Pacific fee band. Applicants also needed to pay the $100 International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy. After three years, an additional processing fee was charged for the third-year health check of $325 for most people, or $240 if eligible for the Pacific fee band. At the media standup on Sunday, Stanford said the visa was "not a regular visitor visa" when explaining the hefty application fee. "There's quite a lot more to it that we're going to have to check in terms of health and insurance, a character and many other things," she said. "It is more akin almost to a residence application, so it will take longer and will cost us more to process." An elderly couple walks down Auckland's Queen Street. Photo: RNZ / Yiting Lin Immigration New Zealand estimated most applications would be processed within four months. Timeframes would depend on the information and evidence provided, whether further assessment was required (for example where there are potential health issues) and demand for the visa. Immigration New Zealand said no English-language requirement was needed. Applicant must remain out of New Zealand for three months after the first visa expired before applying for a second five-year-visa, Gilray said. This was also to reinforce the visa's temporary status and the expectation that parents maintained a connection to their home country, Gilray said. Sponsors must continue to live in New Zealand while their parents visit to ensure they could provide the support required, Gilray said. "This won't prevent the sponsor from going on holidays, but they should primarily reside in New Zealand," Gilray said, adding that further information about this requirement will be made available before the application opens. This visa is only available for parents of New Zealand citizens and residents except in some cases where the sponsor's parents are deceased and grandparents who fill this role could be included. Instead, grandparents can use the Parent and Grandparent Visitor Visa to enter New Zealand. There is no cap. Luxon said the government was expecting 2000 to 10,000 takers a year, averaging 6000 annually. Although parents on the visa must hold private health insurance to visit, some worry that having them in New Zealand for prolonged periods risks putting pressure on the country's health system due to limited resources and staffing shortages. A spokesperson from Stanford's office told RNZ the two health examinations at application and three years would ensure that parents were healthy enough to stay in New Zealand. "The requirement for ongoing health insurance will support the visa holder to meet their health costs as they will not be eligible for publicly funded healthcare," the spokesperson said. Aside from the standard visitor visa, people can also apply for a Parent and Grandparent Visitor Visa, which allows visa holders to visit New Zealand for up to six months at a time, and 18 months in three years, with an application fee of $441. A Parent Resident Visa allows parents to live in New Zealand indefinitely, with income thresholds for sponsors that have been described as a hurdle. The 2500 yearly cap, application backlog and ballot system have also made the process difficult for many families. It costs $5810 to apply. Parents will be able to apply for a Permanent Resident Visa after holding this visa for 10 years. There is also the more expensive Parent Retirement Resident Visa, which requires parents to have at least $1 million to invest in New Zealand for four years and have at least $500,000 for settlement, and an annual income of at least $60,000. Parents can stay here indefinitely with this visa, which costs $12,850 to apply. If parents meet all conditions, they may be granted a Permanent Resident Visa at the end of the four-year investment period. The government said the Parent Boost Visa was not a pathway to residence. "Those seeking permanent residence should consider submitting an expression of interest under the Parent Category Resident Visa," according to Immigration New Zealand's website. Settings for Parent Boost Visa would be reviewed in 2027 to ensure they were working as intended, Stanford's office said. For more information, visit the Immigration New Zealand website .

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Judge Ema Aitken's behaviour at NZ First event to be reviewed by Judicial Conduct Panel
Photo: RNZ Insight/Dan Cook The government has confirmed a Judicial Conduct Panel will look into the behaviour of Acting District Court judge Ema Aitken. She is accused of interrupting a New Zealand First function at the exclusive Northern Club in Auckland in November, allegedly saying leader Winston Peters was lying. She argues she did not recognise Mr Peters' voice and did not know it was a political event. The Judicial Conduct Commissioner in January recommended a panel be set up to look into the alleged misconduct. Judge Aitken challenged that recommendation through a judicial review - saying there was insufficient reason provided for a panel and it was unclear what the scope of its work would be measured against - but it failed . Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith will set up the panel to avoid any perception of bias by the Attorney-General Judith Collins. It will consist of two judges and a layperson, and will write a report on whether it would be justified to have Judge Aitken removed. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Funding cut hurting Pacific and Maori students
In Aotearoa New Zealand, education advocates say a government decision to remove special funding for Pacific and Maori students in vocational courses harks back to the days of a one-size-fits all education model. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.