logo
New housing scam in Karnataka: Contractors get funds, but beneficiaries get work

New housing scam in Karnataka: Contractors get funds, but beneficiaries get work

India Today8 hours ago

A large-scale housing scam has come to light in Karnataka's Haveri district, where contractors allegedly received payments from the Housing Department for the construction of homes, but made beneficiaries build the structures themselves. This came to the fore during a recent meeting held with Haveri district in-charge Minister Shivanand Patil, who then ordered an official inquiry into the matter. The findings, accessed exclusively by India Today, are based on an official inspection report submitted to the Deputy Commissioner in May 2025.advertisementThe Housing Department, acting on behalf of the Karnataka Slum Development Board, had been tasked with constructing housing units in Haveri district under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana - Housing for All (PMAY-HFA) scheme. According to protocol, the department is meant to complete construction and hand over the homes to the Slum Development Board, which in turn allocates them to beneficiaries.However, the inspection report submitted to the Deputy Commissioner in May 2025 reveals widespread irregularities across Savanur, Shiggaon, and Bankapur taluks. Many contractors reportedly informed beneficiaries that they would only be providing building materials and labour equivalent to 350 square feet, with the onus of actual construction falling on the beneficiaries. Even this support was only partially provided in many cases, with materials supplied only up to 50 per cent and labour charges left unpaid.advertisement
In Savanur, where 696 houses were sanctioned at a total cost of Rs 43.71 crore, 545 houses were completed while 151 were still in progress. Work began in October 2021 and was executed by M/s Nakshatra Infrastructure under contractor Selvi Shanmuga. Although Rs 28.97 crore has been released so far and Rs 10.54 crore disbursed to 527 beneficiaries under the Gruha Bhagya scheme, the report notes that many homes remain incomplete. During site inspections, officials found that plastering and electrical connections were still pending, and the actual construction was carried out by beneficiaries themselves with only partial assistance.In Bankapur, 454 houses were sanctioned with an estimated cost of Rs 27.76 crore. Contractor G Chandregouda began work in October 2021. At the time of the inspection, only 100 houses were completed, 154 were still under construction, and 200 were pending due to site clearance issues. Financial progress stood at Rs 12.32 crore, of which Rs 7.57 crore had been released. Rs 3.74 crore was disbursed to 187 beneficiaries under Gruha Bhagya. Here too, the same pattern was reported: beneficiaries received partial material, no labour payment, and electricity was unavailable in several homes. Some beneficiaries had built homes beyond the approved size, reportedly without official support.advertisementShiggaon had two packages of housing works. In the first package, 500 houses were sanctioned at a cost of Rs 26.54 crore, with work starting in July 2021 by contractor Krishnamurthy & Co. While 474 houses were completed and 26 remained in progress, only Rs 17.92 crore had been released out of a financial target of Rs 25.35 crore. Rs 3.42 crore was distributed to 171 beneficiaries. Here too, contractors were reportedly absent during inspections. Beneficiaries said they built the houses themselves with partial support and no labour cost provided. Despite construction, several homes had no electricity, with contractors unresponsive to complaints.In the second package for Shiggaon, 350 houses were sanctioned with a budget of Rs 20.77 crore. Contractor TN Paramesh of Chair Ventures LLP began work in July 2021. As per the report, 160 houses were completed and 190 were in progress, with Rs 11.96 crore released and Rs 4.65 crore disbursed to 242 beneficiaries. The inspection found similar concerns: contractors were missing from the sites, beneficiaries reported incomplete support, and officials were informed on the spot of the lack of contractor engagement.Across the three taluks, the report identifies a consistent pattern of malpractice: contractors allegedly billed the full amount while providing only partial materials, failed to pay labour charges, and often remained absent or unresponsive. Beneficiaries were left to complete construction on their own, sometimes building beyond the approved area. Basic amenities such as plastering and electricity connections were often missing.advertisementThe official report, dated May 8, 2025, was submitted by the Sub-Divisional Officer of Savanur along with Executive Engineers from the Public Works Department, Panchayat Raj Engineering Division, Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Department, and the Karnataka Slum Development Board. The report called for necessary action and was sent to the Deputy Commissioner of Haveri for further proceedings.The revelations come in the wake of a political storm triggered by a leaked audio clip purportedly featuring Congress MLA BR Patil in which he accuses officials of the Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation of large-scale corruption, including bribery in house allotments.In the clip, Patil is heard accusing officials linked to the Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation of widespread corruption, alleging that houses were allotted only to those who paid bribes. He also claims that recommendation letters from elected representatives were routinely ignored. The conversation is reportedly between Patil and Sarfaraz Khan, personal assistant to Housing Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan.- Ends
advertisementIN THIS STORY#Karnataka

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Husband and In-Laws in Alampur Suicide Case
Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Husband and In-Laws in Alampur Suicide Case

Hans India

time25 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Husband and In-Laws in Alampur Suicide Case

Gaadwal: In a tragic case that resulted in the death of a young woman and her daughter, the Principal District Sessions Court in Gadwal upheld the earlier judgment issued by the Alampur Magistrate Court, sentencing the husband and his parents to three years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500 each. The verdict was delivered by Hon'ble Judge Smt. Premalatha. Case Background: On October 17, 2015, Savitramma, a resident of Alampur, filed a complaint at the Alampur Police Station, stating that her daughter Shailaja (28) was married to Eshwarayya from Gundimalla village two years prior. The couple had a daughter, Madhuri, who was one year old at the time of the incident. Initially, the marital life was peaceful, but over time, Shailaja began facing mental harassment from her husband Eshwarayya, and in-laws Munemma and Krishnayya. Unable to bear the harassment, Shailaja and her infant daughter Madhuri poured kerosene on themselves and committed suicide. Based on the complaint, a case was registered under Crime No. 104/2015 under sections 498(A), 306 r/w 34 IPC. The then Alampur CI conducted an investigation and found that the husband, along with his parents, had mentally tortured Shailaja, which drove her to suicide. The accused were arrested and sent to judicial remand. A chargesheet was filed, and during trial, the Alampur Magistrate convicted the accused as follows: A1 – Eshwarayya, S/o Peddaiyya, Age: 30, Occupation: Laborer, Resident of Gundimalla A2 – Peddaiyya alias Krishnayya, Age: 65 (Deceased during the proceedings) A3 – Munemma, W/o Peddaiyya, Age: 60, Occupation: Laborer, Resident of Gundimalla The Alampur Magistrate awarded a jail term, which the accused challenged in the Principal District Sessions Court. However, Judge Smt. Premalatha upheld the conviction for A1 (Eshwarayya) and A3 (Munemma) and imposed a 3-year rigorous imprisonment along with a Rs. 500 fine each. A2 (Krishnayya) had passed away during the trial. Police Officials Commended: District Superintendent of Police T. Srinivas Rao lauded the police team and legal personnel for their efforts in securing justice for the victims. He emphasized that no offender, regardless of status, can escape the law and highlighted the judicial system's commitment to delivering justice. The SP appreciated the contributions of: DSP Mogilayya, Alampur CI Ravi Babu, Former SI Parvathalu, Current SI Venkata Swamy, Public Prosecutor Vinod Chari, Court Liaison SI Jikki Babu, ASI Prasa, Court Officer Ma Basha. Their collective dedication ensured that the accused were convicted and justice was served.

Two sentenced to six years jail for liquor smuggling in Aurangabad
Two sentenced to six years jail for liquor smuggling in Aurangabad

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Two sentenced to six years jail for liquor smuggling in Aurangabad

Aurangabad: Special excise court in Aurangabad on Monday sentenced two men to six years rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh each for their involvement in liquor trade. The judgment was delivered by additional district and sessions judge-cum-excise court-II in connection with Pauthu police station case no. 14/18 (TR 1233/22, GR 279/18). The court found Kopindra Kumar and Umesh Yadav of Manjholi village under Pauthu police station area guilty under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. According to the FIR registered on March 2, 2018, Pauthu police station in charge and investigating officer Arvind Kumar found both the accused carrying country-made liquor manufactured in Jharkhand. Special public prosecutor (SPP), Kumar Yogendra Narayan Singh, said the conviction was based on witness testimonies, seizure lists and the liquor examination report.

14th judge steps aside from Sanjiv Chaturvedi's cases
14th judge steps aside from Sanjiv Chaturvedi's cases

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

14th judge steps aside from Sanjiv Chaturvedi's cases

Dehradun: The additional chief judicial magistrate (ACJM) of Nainital, Justice Neha Kushwaha, has recused herself from hearing a criminal defamation case filed by Indian Forest Service (IFS) officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi against Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) judge Manish Garg. This brings the number of judges who have withdrawn from matters involving Chaturvedi to 14. Chaturvedi had filed the case in Nov 2023, alleging Judge Garg used foul language against him during open court proceedings on Oct 16, 2023. The ACJM cited 'family relations' with CAT judge D S Mahra, who regularly visits her official residence, as grounds for recusal. "In such a situation, it would not be fair for me to hear this case," she said. Chaturvedi later filed a criminal contempt petition against Mahra in Nov 2024, after a bench led by him issued a contempt notice to Chaturvedi in connection with the same defamation matter in Oct 2024. In Feb 2025, CAT judges Havinder Kaur Oberoi and B Anand withdrew from hearing Chaturvedi's petitions. Their bench directed the registry not to list his cases in future, without citing any reason. The matter concerned the officer's appraisal report. Earlier, in Feb 2024, a Uttarakhand high court judge recused from Chaturvedi's deputation-related matter. In 2018, the high court had directed that his service issues be heard only at the CAT's Nainital circuit bench and imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on the central govt, which was upheld by Supreme Court. The high court reiterated the direction in 2021, which the central govt challenged. In March 2023, the SC referred the matter to a larger bench. In Nov 2013, SC judge Justice Ranjan Gogoi stepped aside from hearing Chaturvedi's plea seeking a CBI probe into alleged corruption by then Haryana CM Bhupinder Singh Hooda and others. Later, in Aug 2016, SC judge UU Lalit also withdrew from the same matter. A Shimla court judge stepped aside in April 2018 from hearing a defamation case filed by then Himachal Pradesh chief secretary Vineet Chowdhary against Chaturvedi. In March 2019, CAT chairman Justice L Narasimhan Reddy recused himself from transfer petition cases involving Chaturvedi, citing "unfortunate developments". CAT Delhi judge Justice RN Singh withdrew from another service matter involving Chaturvedi in Feb 2021. A high court judge recused in May 2023 without stating any reason. In Nov 2023, CAT judges Manish Garg and Chhabilendra Roul stepped aside. In Jan this year, CAT judge Justice Rajeev Joshi also withdrew from a case related to Chaturvedi's service issues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store