War of words erupts between present and former TTD chiefs
Speaking to the media in Hyderabad on Wednesday, Chairman Naidu defended his nine-month tenure, asserting that transparency has guided every decision of the board.
'Not a single rupee of devotees' money has been misused. We are here to serve Lord Venkateswara, not to exploit his devotees,' he declared. Naidu claimed that all resolutions were taken only after due deliberation and insisted that irregularities were the legacy of previous administrations.
Launching a direct attack on his predecessor, Naidu alleged that Karunakar Reddy's family benefitted personally from temple resources, citing inflated ticket sales and other irregularities.
He challenged Reddy to an open debate, warning that 'those who looted the institution will soon face the law.' BR Naidu also criticised YSRCP president YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, and Bhumana for their remarks which he said hurt Hindu sentiments.
He further blamed the YSRCP government for financial decisions in 2022 that left TTD paying Rs.140 crore annually in interest.
Responding from Tirupati, former chairman Karunakar Reddy accused Naidu of dragging the sacred institution into 'political mudslinging.' Pointing to the Vaikuntha Ekadasi tragedy, in which six devotees lost their lives and over 60 were injured, Reddy alleged that Naidu refused to apologise despite appeals from Deputy Chief Minister K Pawan Kalyan. 'Instead of accountability, he is showing arrogance,' he charged.
The YSRCP leader also alleged irregularities in the functioning of the Sri Venkateswara temple in Delhi during Naidu's leadership, questioned liquor sales in TTD residential colonies, and raised doubts about Naidu's rapid rise in wealth.
'How did a man who once worked in BHEL and ran a garment shop suddenly become a multi-crore businessman and media owner?' he asked, hinting at possible forex violations and ticket rackets.
Calling Naidu's 'rowdy-like' remarks, Reddy said no chairman had ever tarnished the sanctity of the deity in such a manner.
He demanded a CBI probe into Naidu's allegations against him and former CM Jagan Mohan Reddy, declaring, 'If guilty, I am ready for punishment.'
With the two leaders trading bitter accusations, devotees worry that political battles are overshadowing the trust's primary duty—serving pilgrims and safeguarding the sanctity of one of the world's most revered temples.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sambhal temple-mosque row: Court sets August 28 to hear case
A court in Chandausi on Thursday (August 21, 2025) fixed August 28 to hear the ongoing Shahi Jama Masjid-Harihar temple dispute. The matter was listed for hearing before civil judge (senior division) Aditya Singh. Advocate of the Hindu side, Gopal Sharma, told PTI that on Thursday, the opposite side filed an application saying that since this matter was pending in the Supreme Court, the present court did not have the jurisdiction to hear this case. The matter was then deferred to August 28. The Muslim side has challenged the maintainability of the case in the Allahabad High Court, but on May 19, the High Court upheld the trial court's order permitting a court-monitored survey and directed it to proceed with the matter. While talking to reporters, Shahi Jama Masjid's advocate Qasim Jamal confirmed filing the application and a judgment related to the Worship Act. It was directed till the Supreme Court heard the case, all religious matters will not be heard by any other court, he added. "Neither any case can be heard nor any action can be taken, when the order of the Supreme Court is still pending and a stay has been imposed till the next hearing," he said. Mr. Jamal added, "If this hearing takes place then it will be a violation of the Supreme Court's guidelines." The trial court, therefore, said any objection should be filed by August 28. The dispute dates back to November 19 last year, when Hindu petitioners, including advocates Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain, filed a suit in the Sambhal district court claiming the mosque was built over a pre-existing temple. A court-ordered survey was conducted on the same day (November 19), followed by another on November 24. The second survey on November 24 led to significant unrest in Sambhal, resulting in the death of four persons and injuries to 29 police personnel. The police booked SP MP Ziaur Rahman Barq and mosque committee head Zafar Ali in relation to the violence besides registering an FIR against 2,750 unidentified persons.
Scroll.in
9 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Muslims in UP's Moradabad told not to name wedding bands after Hindu deities
The police in Uttar Pradesh's Moradabad have ordered Muslim wedding band operators not to name their bands after Hindu deities after a complaint was filed on the chief minister's portal, the Hindustan Times reported on Thursday. A complaint was registered by a lawyer on July 9, claiming that about 15 to 20 Muslim band operators in the district were running their businesses using the names of Hindu deities, the newspaper quoted unidentified police officers as saying. The complainant claimed that the practice hurt religious sentiments. Superintendent of Police (City) Kumar Ranvijay Singh told Amar Ujala that several band operators in the district were summoned on Tuesday and told to remove such names. 'All of them have said that they will remove the names,' he was quoted as saying. The complainant told the Hindustan Times that the wedding band industry in Moradabad was largely dominated by Muslims. 'Yet many of these establishments operate under Hindu names, including those of gods and goddesses,' he said. 'This is an attempt to distort identity,' he alleged. 'The chief minister [Adityanath] himself has called for action against such practices.' The action taken by the police based on his complaint was not discrimination, but 'legal action', he told the newspaper. This came a month after the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments directed eateries along the Kanwar Yatra pilgrimage route to display quick response codes with their owners' identities. The matter was challenged in the Supreme Court, where a counsel for the Uttarakhand government reportedly claimed that the real problem was dhabas named 'Shiva Dhaba' or 'Parvati Dhaba' being run by Muslims. On July 22, the court refused to examine the legality of the directives issued by the two state governments. Similar orders were issued by Uttar Pradesh in 2024. The police in the state's Muzaffarnagar had claimed at the time that the decision was taken to ' avoid confusion ' among devotees who will travel on the route.
India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
Online Gaming Bill 2025: Companies warns massive job cuts, shut down, how will it impact industry?
Parliament on Thursday cleared the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, with the Rajya Sabha giving its nod amid uproar and without any debate. The legislation, introduced by Electronics and IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, aims to prohibit all online money-based games while encouraging the growth of eSports and social gaming platforms. The Upper House passed the bill after turning down amendments proposed by Opposition members. What Is Online Gaming Bill? The bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. Add as a Preferred Source It also seeks to prohibit advertisements related to online money games and bar banks and financial institutions from facilitating or transferring funds for any of such games. Online money games are played by depositing money in expectation of winning monetary and other rewards. Also Read: Meet new Shark Tank India judge, who sold house to start a company, later sold it for Rs 100 crore to build Rs 10000000000 business empire, his name is… Massive Layoffs And Companies To Shut Down? 'There are more than 20,000 current jobs at risk, with a possibility of over 300 companies shutting down. Around 50% of franchise domestic/national level sports leagues may be closed and sponsorship revenue loss for teams & leagues could range from 30 to 40%,' an industry source told LiveMint. The source added, 'Non-cricket & grassroots sports may collapse without real money gaming advertisers. The impact of it could lead to a decline in ad spends, with lower sports broadcasting/media revenues.' Shark Tank India Fame Anupam Mittal On Online Gaming Bill 2025 Shark Tank India fame, Anupam Mittal in his linkedin post said, India also just banned real-money one shot, we killed a sector that – pumped in ₹27,000 cr of GST annually – drove ₹10,000 cr+ of ad revenue – gave thousands a legit livelihood in games of skill Why? Because many got addicted. Some went broke. Fair concerns but do we ban alcohol because some become alcoholics? Do we ban stock trading because some blow up their savings? Story Highlights Online Gaming Bill What Is Online Gaming Bill How Online Gaming Bill will impact Industry Online Gaming Bill in Lok Sabha Anupam Mittal Added that most bans usually have the same outcome of Govt loses revenue, Users lose protection And Black markets win (reportedly 8.3 lakh crore illegal gaming market in India).
