'It's the Wild West': Dozens of women develop botulism linked to anti-wrinkle injections
Nicola Fairley is one of dozens of people who have developed botulism linked to unlicenced anti-wrinkle injections.
She had the procedure done with her regular beautician after winning a Facebook competition for three areas of "Botox".
"Within two or three hours my forehead and the sides of my eyes had started to freeze," Nicola says.
"At first I thought 'amazing', that's what I wanted - then it just carried on."
Nicola was eventually sent to A&E in Durham, where she met several other patients who all had similar symptoms.
Doctors were stumped. "They thought I'd had a stroke," she says.
"We all had problems with our eyes, some of us with our breathing. I couldn't swallow - they put me on nil by mouth because they were worried I would choke in the waiting room."
It turns out all of the patients had recently had anti-wrinkle injections containing botulinum toxin.
Health officials believe they were imported, illegal products.
Botulism - the disease they caused - is so rare many doctors never see it in their entire careers.
It can cause symptoms including slurred speech and breathing problems, and can be deadly.
The disease is so unusual, and so many cases were coming in, that doctors exhausted their stocks of anti-toxin and had to ask hospitals as far away as London to get more.
The UK Health Security Agency has so far confirmed 38 cases of botulism linked to cosmetic toxin injections, but Sky News has been told of several more.
The outbreak began in the North East but cases have now been seen in the East of England and East Midlands as well.
There are only a handful of legal botulinum toxin products in the UK - of which Botox is one.
But cosmetic treatments are largely unregulated, with anyone allowed to inject products like fillers and toxins without any medical training.
Cheap, illegal products imported from overseas are easily available.
'It's the Wild West'
Dr Steven Land runs Novellus Aesthetics clinic in Newcastle upon Tyne. He worked for decades as an emergency medicine doctor before moving into aesthetics.
He says he has been warning health officials of an outbreak for years.
"It's the Wild West," Dr Land told Sky News.
"Because anyone can do this, there is a lack of knowledge around what is legal, what's not legal, what is okay to be injected.
"These illegal toxins could have 50 units, 5,000 units or rat poison - there could be anything in there."
Dr Land showed us messages that he says he gets on a weekly basis, from sellers trying to push him cheap, unlicenced products.
They advertise "limited time offers" and cheap bundles on toxins imported from overseas. He calls them "drug dealers".
"They are preying on the lack of knowledge among non-medical practitioners," he says.
Consultations on how to regulate the aesthetics industry have been ongoing for years - but so far, no changes have been introduced.
The UK government now says it does plan to regulate certain procedures, but it's not said how it will do this, or when.
"What will it take?" Nicola says. "One of the women we were with did almost die - she had to be resuscitated."
Nicola's beautician has stopped responding to her messages, so she says she still has no idea what the product was "or how much of it is in me".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Edinburgh University's ‘skull room' highlights its complicated history with racist science
Hundreds of skulls are neatly and closely placed, cheekbone to cheekbone, in tall, mahogany-framed glass cabinets. Most carry faded, peeling labels, some bear painted catalogue numbers; one has gold teeth; and the occasional one still carries its skin tissue. This is the University of Edinburgh's 'skull room'. Many were voluntarily donated to the university; others came from executed Scottish murderers; some Indigenous people's skulls were brought to Scotland by military officers on expeditions or conquest missions. Several hundred were collected by supporters of the racist science of phrenology – the discredited belief that skull shape denoted intelligence and character. Among them are the skulls of two brothers who died while studying at Edinburgh. Their names are not recorded in the skull room catalogue, but cross-referencing of matriculation and death records suggests they were George Richards, a 21-year-old medic who died of smallpox in 1832, and his younger brother, Robert Bruce, 18, a divinity scholar who died of typhoid fever in 1833. Exactly how the Richards brothers' skulls came to be separated from their bodies, recorded as interred in the South Leith parish church cemetery, is unknown. But they were almost certainly acquired by the Edinburgh Phrenological Society to study supposed racial difference. Researchers believe their case exemplifies the challenging questions facing the university, which, it has now emerged, played a pivotal role in the creation and perpetuation of racist ideas about white superiority and racial difference from the late 1700s onwards – ideas taught to thousands of Edinburgh students who dispersed across the British empire. University records studied by Dr Simon Buck suggest the brothers were of mixed African and European descent, born in Barbados to George Richards, an Edinburgh-educated doctor who practised medicine on sugar plantations and who owned enslaved people – possibly including George and Robert Bruce's mother. Edinburgh Phrenological Society's 1858 catalogue records the skulls (listed as No 1 and No 2) as having belonged to 'mulatto' students of divinity and medicine. 'It can be assumed that the racialisation of these two individuals as 'mulatto' – a hybrid racial category that both fascinated and bewildered phrenologists – is what aroused interest among members of the society in the skulls of these two students,' Edinburgh's decolonisation report concludes. The brothers' skulls are among the roughly 400 amassed by the society and later absorbed into the anatomical museum's collection, which now contains about 1,500 skulls. These are held in the Skull Room, to which The Guardian was granted rare access. Many of these ancestral remains, the report states, 'were taken, without consent, from prisons, asylums, hospitals, archaeological sites and battlefields', with others 'having been stolen and exported from the British empire's colonies', often gifted by a global network of Edinburgh alumni. 'We can't escape the fact that some of [the skulls] will have been collected with the absolute express purpose of saying, 'This is a person from a specific race, and aren't they inferior to the white man',' said Prof Tom Gillingwater, the chair of anatomy at the University of Edinburgh, who now oversees the anatomical collection. 'We can't get away from that.' The Edinburgh Phrenological Society was founded by George Combe, a lawyer, and his younger brother, Andrew, a doctor, with roughly a third of its early members being physicians. Both were students at the university, and some Edinburgh professors were active members. Through its acquisition of skulls from across the globe, the society played a central role in turning the 'science' of phrenology, which claimed to decode an individual's intellect and moral character from bumps and grooves on the skull, into a tool of racial categorisation that placed the white European man at the top of a supposed hierarchy. George Combe's book, The Constitution of Man, was a 19th-century international bestseller and the Combe Trust (founded with money made from books and lecture tours promoting phrenology) endowed Edinburgh's first professorship in psychology in 1906 and continues to fund annual Combe Trust fellowships in the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities. Phrenology was criticised by some of Edinburgh's medical elite for its unscientific approach. But some of its most vocal critics were nonetheless persuaded that immutable biological differences in intelligence and temperament existed between populations, a study by Dr Ian Stewart for the university's decolonisation report reveals. These included Alexander Monro III, an anatomy professor at the University of Edinburgh medical school, who lectured 'that the Negro skull, and consequently the brain, is smaller than that of the European', and Robert Jameson, a regius professor of natural history, whose lectures at the university in the 1810s included a hierarchical racial diagram of brain size and intelligence. Despite the fact that phrenology was never formally taught at Edinburgh, and its accuracy was heavily contested by Edinburgh academics, the skull room, which is closed to the public, was built partly to house its collection by the then professor of anatomy Sir William Turner, when he helped oversee the construction of its new medical school in the 1880s. Among its reparatory justice recommendations of Edinburgh's investigation is that the university provide more support for the repatriation of ancestral remains to their original communities. This, Gillingwater suggested, possibly underplays the complexities involved – even for cases such as the Richards brothers. He regards the circumstantial evidence in their case as 'strong' but says it does not meet the forensic threshold required for conclusive identification. 'From a legal perspective, it wouldn't be watertight,' said Gillingwater. 'I would never dream of returning remains to a family when I didn't know who they definitely were.' Active engagement surrounding repatriation is taking place in relation to several of the skulls from the phrenology collection; more than 100 have already been repatriated to their places of origin. But each case takes time building trust with communities and in some cases navigating geopolitical tensions over which descendent community has the strongest claim to the remains. 'To look at perhaps repatriation, burials, or whatever, it's literally years of work almost for each individual case,' said Gillingwater. 'And what I found is that every individual culture you deal with wants things done completely differently.' Many of the skulls will never be identified and their provenance is likely to remain unknown. 'That is something that keeps me awake at night,' said Gillingwater. 'For some of our skulls, I know that whatever we do, we're never going to end up with an answer.' 'All I can offer at the minute is that we just continue to care for them,' he added. 'They've been with us, many of them, for a couple of hundred years. So we can look after them. We can care for them. We can treat them with that dignity and respect they all deserve individually.'
Daily Mirror
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'I've played football with broken leg - my heart scare on plane didn't worry me'
Stuart Pearce infamously broke his leg but played on in 1999 (Image: Jamie McDonald /Allsport) Severe chest pains and a searing heart rate at 30,000 feet is enough to traumatise anybody. Yet, for Stuart Pearce, the former England captain affectionately known as 'Psycho', there was no out-of-body experience nor life-changing lesson to be learned. 'Terminator' may have been a more suitable nickname for Pearce, who has a history of treating debilitating pain as a mild inconvenience. In March, before hopping on a flight from Las Vegas to London, the ex-Manchester City and Nottingham Forest defender felt increasing pain within his chest. Not to make a fuss, he planned to sleep it off during his journey back across the pond. The pain did not ease and before he knew it, the plane was diverting to Newfoundland, Canada, where he would spend five days in hospital. A virus had caused his heart rate to soar to 155 beats per minute, a hugely dangerous and life-threatening speed. In hospital, his heart was stopped and then restarted to bring its speed back to normal levels. But despite the most terrifying of all health scares taking place at the worst possible moment, Pearce told Mirror Football that his old school mentality helped him through. He said: "I am very matter-of-fact, to be honest with you. "Even at the time, because my family have got no medical history of heart problems, I almost went through with a, 'Right, I'm in your hands. Get on with it. What do you need me to do?' mentality. "I'm very matter-of-fact as a person. I've always been like that. It has served me well to be fair. I do not overthink things. That's been the case. Pearce opened up about his heart scare in March (Image: Richard Pelham - The FA/The FA via Getty Image) "I've probably tried to use it, when I can, to help other people, if you like, to make sure they get themselves checked out regularly. I've got the League Managers' Association (LMA), which I am a member of. They go through a lot of medical checks. "I had a heart check last summer as well. Regularly, I get checked up as well anyway. I know I am on top of these things. I'd like to turn round and say, because it would be a better story, that I have had a life-changing experience, but I am not wired that way." Barely a fortnight after his huge health scare, Pearce was back to work, commentating on England's narrow 2-0 victory over Albania. He has never been one to wallow in his own pain. Even a broken leg was not enough to stop him from finishing a half of football. Stuart Pearce was back commentating barely two weeks after his scare (Image: 2025 Crystal Pix/MB Media) In September 1999, playing for West Ham against Watford at the start of the Premier League campaign, Pearce went in for a characteristically hard challenge against Micah Hyde. The bruising and powerful nature of the challenge gave the 78-cap ex-England international a limp for the rest of the match. In Pearce's mind, it was no drama. 'Just run it off,' he said to himself. He came out of the challenge assuming he had broken his shin pad. He had actually broken his leg. "I went in for a challenge and I thought my shin pad had cracked, because I had heard a cracking noise," he said. "But it was my bone, rather than my shin pad. Stuart Pearce's toughness was iconic during his playing career (Image: Phil Cole/ALLSPORT) "I fractured my tibia just before half-time. I came to the side of the pitch. I hadn't realised. I knew it was painful, but you don't realise that, near enough, the bone has gone right through. "I tried to ice it at half-time, not knowing, thinking it was just a bang on my shin bone. When I tried to run in the tunnel to loosen it up a little bit, I knew full well something was not quite right at that stage when the adrenaline stopped pumping. "We all have a slightly different pain threshold, and when you are involved in football, sometimes, bizarrely, you can get away with doing things you couldn't in everyday life. I put mine down to a little bit of ignorance and not knowing that my shin bone was broken." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sky Sports discounted Premier League and EFL package Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle ahead of the 2025/26 season, saving members £192 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more. Sky will show at least 215 live Premier League games next season, an increase of up to 100 more.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hospitals are meant to cure and care for our loved ones, not destroy their quality of life
Among the daily cascade of statistics about the state of the NHS lie, as we all know, individual human stories and for some a quiet rage about how hospitals meant to cure and care for patients are destroying their quality of life. Last weekend, we 'celebrated' my older brother's 82nd birthday in a nursing home. Not where he or we had planned to spend it. In early April, he went into a West Midlands hospital with an infection, shortly afterwards diagnosed as pneumonia. He was in a four-bed section of a ward which appeared fairly well-staffed. But despite numbers, it's difficult to do one's job properly or competently when there's a dominant culture of not caring. A father of three and formerly a successful business owner, my brother has had dementia for several years now but, prior to his admission, he had a good quality of life. The pub one day or night a week for a zero beer with old friends and new, who made a fuss of him, meals out, and two days a week at dementia day care. Supported by a number of privately paid part-time carers, my sister-in-law cared for him so well, and he tucked into his food and watched his beloved sport on TV. So, what happened to all that? After four weeks in an NHS hospital, my brother was finally discharged, cured of pneumonia but unable to walk, doubly incontinent and having lost quite a lot of weight. He was not taken to the toilet but kept throughout in 'nappies'. My sister-in-law frequently had to tell staff when his bed was soaking wet. He lost weight because meals were deposited in front of patients – if you were able-bodied you ate, if not, or confused with dementia, the meal just sat there before it was taken away. Only one male nurse we saw made any attempt to help patients eat. Physio was initially offered but only when he was still very ill with pneumonia. When well enough, we asked for physio but were told he hadn't engaged. So, no physio, despite protests. He now sits in a wheelchair in what is an excellent nursing home paid for by his wife, after she discharged him, but the life he had is gone forever. Precious time was wasted at the hospital as unworkable home care packages were proposed. Having fractured her spine last summer lifting my brother from a fall and also recovering from an NHS treatment that has – at least temporarily – worsened her health, my sister-in-law can no longer care for him at home in the state he is now in. It's more than fortunate that she has the funds (for now) to pay for a nursing home. So many others have no choice but to be in the hands of cash-strapped councils. I've deliberately not shared my brother's name to protect his dignity and privacy, nor identified the hospital as a formal complaint will be made. I know that my brother's plight is not unique. But how can we ensure that the elderly and vulnerable, unable to speak for themselves, are not robbed of their mobility, dignity and quality of life as a result of such a short hospital stay. I'm angry and sad in equal measures, and determined to warn others who are older and liable to require hospitalisation, to beware. Your NHS may have some nasty surprises in store. Meanwhile, Secretary of State, it's too late for my brother, but what are you going to do and when to ensure that NHS hospitals are places of safety and prolong rather than shorten a decent quality of life?
