logo
Some Ontario mayors against communities' financial incentives to attract doctors

Some Ontario mayors against communities' financial incentives to attract doctors

Several Ontario mayors have been calling on the province to ban financial incentives municipalities use to lure in doctors, saying the recruitment tactic is harming communities that can't pony up the cash – especially those in rural and northern regions.
But Sault Ste. Marie Mayor Matthew Shoemaker is going even further, suggesting the federal government should outlaw the practice from 'coast to coast.'
'I think it should be banned across the country actually,' he said in a recent interview.
Shoemaker said his city needs 40 more doctors, including 18 to practise family medicine, and while it does offer a moving allowance of up $10,000, it is not in a position to compete with municipalities that are offering doctors tens of thousands of dollars to relocate.
'We think incentives are bad and we don't agree with them, and so we're not at this point supportive of getting into a competition on incentives because it is a competition we will lose,' he said.
Shoemaker said he asked Ontario's health minister to intervene and stop the practice during a meeting they had last August. But he said there seems to be no appetite for such a move in Ontario unless there is 'more widespread acceptance of banning of incentives' across the country.
'We don't want to become the place that is having all its doctors taken away from us,' he said.
A Ministry of Health spokesperson said the government has made big investments to connect more Ontarians with doctors, but didn't directly respond to a question on whether it would consider banning municipalities' financial incentives.
Shoemaker isn't the only one raising concern over the use of incentive-based programs to address Ontario's doctor shortage.
Todd Kasenberg, the mayor of North Perth, is also encouraging the province to ban cash incentives, which he calls a 'mistake.'
'We've entered an arms race and typically there aren't any winners in an arms race,' he said in an interview.
Kasenberg said around 3,000 of 17,000 people in his town north of London, Ont., are currently without a family doctor. With expected retirements in the next few years, the doctor shortage will be severe if officials can't recruit fast enough.
'So it's a substantial issue and met with a lot of frustration in the community, a lot of anxiety,' he added.
He said the town is expected to welcome four medical residents from Western University this year. Council approved spending $50,000 to provide housing support for those residents, even though Kasenberg said he was personally 'uncomfortable' with the move.
He hopes the recruits will stay in town beyond their residency period.
London Mayor Josh Morgan and Peterborough Mayor Jeff Leal have also publicly criticized municipalities' financial incentives for doctor recruitment.
Ontario's long-standing shortage of primary care providers affects millions of patients in every corner of the province, but advocates say rural communities are hit harder because they have fewer hospitals and walk-in clinics.
Experts have long warned that hefty financial incentives offered to doctors are widening the health-care access gap between poorer rural towns and richer urban centres.
Some say while the incentives might work, particularly in recruiting new graduates and medical residents who have education loans to repay, they don't serve to retain doctors in those communities.
'I think it is much more effective to be able to, from a retention standpoint, to support new grads by helping them to manage their schedule, add work slowly, avoid the risk of burnout,' said Dr. Sarah Newbery, a family physician in Marathon, Ont., a rural community 300 kilometres east of Thunder Bay.
'If they're too busy from the get-go, they will not be easy to retain.'
Newbery knows a thing or two about retention – she was one of six young physicians who moved to Marathon nearly three decades ago and ended the town's chronic doctor shortage.
At that time, Marathon was about to lose its only emergency department and the fate of the entire hospital was up in the air. The local physician recruitment committee even had burlap sacks ready to cover the hospital signs on the nearby highway.
'It was probably the most underserviced community certainly in the province, maybe in the country,' Newbery said.
She said the town gave the entire group $10,000 in bonuses — a little over $1,600 each — and housing support that included two years of free rent for some. But those incentives were not a deciding factor for Newbery and her partner to stay in Marathon for 29 years.
She said what kept that group of physicians in town was a collective commitment to provide better care for the community as well as an understanding of a healthy work and life balance. Marathon is home to six physicians now, and has only one doctor vacancy at a time when other rural communities are in a health-care crisis.
Instead of offering cash bonuses, Newbery suggested the money should be invested in making towns more welcoming and appealing to doctors in the long run.
Around 525,000 Ontarians who live in rural areas have no access to primary care, and that number is increasing four times faster compared to urban centres, according to data provided by the Rural Ontario Municipalities Association.
Christy Lowry, the association's chair, said improving access to health care, recruiting physicians and medical workers, and making sure local emergency rooms remain operational are 'top priority' for the association.
'All of those pieces are part of what we're focused on right now, and we can see how the lack of these services are negatively impacting our communities and the well-being of our communities,' she said.
Lowry, who is also the mayor of Mississippi Mills, a rural community east of Ottawa, said while her town has a modern hospital with 'tremendous service,' the shortage of primary care providers is a problem for residents, some of whom are travelling as far as Kingston to see their doctors.
The association estimates Ontario municipalities are spending nearly half a billion dollars on health care annually.
'Property tax dollars should be going to core municipal priorities. They were never designed to pay for health services,' Lowry said in a recent interview.
'The problem is there's a shortage. (We) don't have enough, so it becomes this competition between one community and the next.'
In northern communities, more than 350 doctors — including more than 200 family physicians — are needed to fill current vacancies, and that number is much higher if retirements expected over the next five years are factored in, according to the Ontario Medical Association.
The association's former president, Dr. Dominik Nowak, said that's 'unacceptable.'
The shortage had led to fierce competition for physicians.
'There are winners and losers when we have a situation like this and oftentimes the communities that can't afford to recruit and retain are northern and rural communities,' he said last month before his tenure ended.
Nowak said while municipalities should help create a welcoming environment for doctors and their families, ultimately it is the province's job to ensure communities have proper access to health care.
'It's a symptom of a larger problem,' Nowak said of incentive-based programs. 'The larger problem is that family practice is no longer seen as a viable career choice for new graduates.'
The Ministry of Health said the province has added 15,000 doctors and increased the number of family physicians by 10 per cent since 2018.
Ministry spokesperson Ema Popovic said the government is adding close to 1,500 family doctors in rural and northern areas as part of two different programs, which include bringing in foreign-trained doctors and providing education funds for students interested in working in those communities.
She said Ontario aims to connect everyone in the province to a primary care provider by 2029 as part of a $1.8-billion investment.
The province recently said there will be 'significant investments' in the Rural and Northern Physician Group Agreement primary care model. There will also be a new program called the Rural Emergency Medicine Coverage Investment Fund, which is meant to ensure appropriate doctor staffing levels year-round, and it replaces a now-expired temporary program that incentivized doctors to fill those shifts in rural and northern ERs.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 8, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is the air quality so bad? What to know about the health dangers of wildfire smoke
Why is the air quality so bad? What to know about the health dangers of wildfire smoke

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why is the air quality so bad? What to know about the health dangers of wildfire smoke

In addition to hearts and lungs, wildfire smoke may mess with the human brain, emerging research suggests. Fine particulate matter carried in wildfire smoke can enter the brain via the bloodstream, causing inflammation and oxidative stress, a condition resulting from too many cell-damaging molecules called free radicals and not enough antioxidants to mop them up, one theory holds. Recently, scientists have linked exposure to wildfire smoke to increased risks for impaired cognitive function, memory loss, greater odds of being diagnosed with dementia and an increase in emergency department visits for anxiety, depression, psychotic episodes and other mental-health problems. Plumes of smoke from Prairie wildfires that have forced the evacuation of thousands of people from their homes led to air quality advisories issued for large swaths of the country Friday, with Environment Canada messages covering British Columbia, the Prairies and most of Ontario and Quebec, the Montreal Gazette reported. More toxic than other sources of pollution, wildfire smoke can cause a range of health effects, from mild coughs, itchy eyes and headaches to dizziness, wheezing, chest pains, asthma attacks, shortness of breath and heart palpitations. And when heat and poor air quality combine, the health impacts are reached that much sooner, said Dr. Anna Gunz, a pediatric intensive care doctor at Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre and associate professor at Western University's Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry. While those at the doorstep of fires are most vulnerable, the fine particulates in wildfire smoke can travel 1,000 kilometres or more. The National Post spoke to Gunz to help unpack how wildfire smoke can impact physical and mental health. This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity and length. We have over 40 years of air pollution health data and so some of this is grounded in the same principles. We love the smell of campfires. But even the smoke that we breathe by a campfire contains lots of particulates that are actually really bad for us. It's not stuff that we're supposed to be breathing. When we think about wildfires, it's not just wood that's been cut from trees that you maybe know. It's everything else that's burning — pesticides, herbicides, metals. Even allergens and fungus. Because it moves so far, you don't need to be right next to a wildfire to be affected. It's high concentrations for shorter periods of time, but it is ubiquitous. Part of the problem with being away from the wildfire is that people don't necessarily realize the air might be bad. It can be really deceiving. And then you have the people who are near the fires who've been evacuated or are at risk of evacuation. And so, the fear, the trauma, the risks of PTSD and other emotional things. People are stressed. I'm always thinking about children and women and those who are vulnerable (such as) Indigenous folks who are disproportionately displaced by wildfires every year and removed from their community. The first contact we have with smoke is our eyes, our mucus membranes, and our upper airways. If we think about breathing in smoke and where it goes next, it goes to our large airways and those are the airways that are affected by asthma. So, certainly the people at highest risk of becoming ill, or more ill and coming into hospital, are anyone with puffers. Asthma, absolutely. But people with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), cystic fibrosis and lung issues are going to have a harder time breathing. Your eyes and your upper airways and mucus membranes are going to see the larger particles of irritants, and they're going to start reacting to those larger particles. And then the things we can't smell or see, or taste are these small micro-particles, and that's what gets absorbed through our lungs and into our blood stream. And it causes a huge inflammation in the body. That's at least the biological reason why we think that the other things we see in terms of heart and brain health are noted. There's been a lot of research looking at trying to understand the mechanisms in the pathways in your blood vessels that could lead to this. Our blood vessels travel in our brains and in our hearts. Even though we think about heart attacks and stroke differently — they present very differently — ultimately what is happening is your small blood vessels that are either supplying your heart or your brain can become clogged. The lining of our blood vessels is called the endothelium, and it's this really complex place where there are these active living cells. (Endothelial function helps control how well blood is balanced in terms of clotting and how thin it is.) One theorized mechanism is that (exposure to wildfire smoke) activates different inflammatory pathways that affect your endothelium. There is less long-term neural data right now around wildfires. (However, one 10-year study of more than one million people in southern California found persistent exposures to wildfire smoke increased the risk of dementia more than other forms of air pollution. Another group found that wildfire smoke exposure during the 2020 California wildfires was associated with higher odds of subsequent emergency visits for mental health conditions. Inhaled particulate matter, the researchers said, can reach the brain, potentially causing inflammation, oxidative stress and damage to the brain's blood vessels.) When it's hot, you also get secondary air pollutants, like ozone. The heat and the air interact to create more pollution. Anyone with a chronic illness, the elderly and children are always at higher risk. If it's smoky outside, shut the windows, turn on the AC. Know what the air quality is and understand that it changes at different times of the day. If you're going to be outside, try to plan according to air quality (people can check the federal Air Quality Health Index or special air quality statements or advisories for their area). If you're going to be doing something that has more exertion and you're going to be breathing faster, like exercise, better to do that when the air quality is better. An N95 mask can help filter a number of these particles. If you know some kids (with asthma or other lung conditions) are going to be triggered (by the smoke), make sure that the care for the lungs is really under control heading into wildfire season. (ER visits for asthma spiked across Ontario during the 2023 Canadian wildfires.) For people who are living near evacuation zones where they know this happens and they talk about 'go bags,' it's important to think about medications. Ask your doctor to prescribe in such a way that you can have stashes of medicines in your 'go bag' so that if you're evacuated you still have access to them. National Post What we know about the wildfires burning in Canada and sending smoke to the U.S., U.K. Canadian wildfire smoke causes 'very unhealthy' conditions in American Midwest and reaches Europe Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here.

CORRECTING and REPLACING Majority of Ontarians Want Provincial Government to Prioritize Spending on Public Hospitals Than Private Clinics: New Poll
CORRECTING and REPLACING Majority of Ontarians Want Provincial Government to Prioritize Spending on Public Hospitals Than Private Clinics: New Poll

Business Wire

time2 days ago

  • Business Wire

CORRECTING and REPLACING Majority of Ontarians Want Provincial Government to Prioritize Spending on Public Hospitals Than Private Clinics: New Poll

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The media conference time should be 10:00 am instead of 9:30 am. The updated release reads: MAJORITY OF ONTARIANS WANT PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT TO PRIORITIZE SPENDING ON PUBLIC HOSPITALS THAN PRIVATE CLINICS: NEW POLL OCHU-CUPE media conference at 10:00 am on Monday to release full findings of new Nanos poll on privatization Just over 10 days after the recent Ontario budget allocated $280 million for expansion of surgeries and diagnostic tests in private clinics while restraining hospital funding, a new poll shows that 73 per cent of Ontarians want the government to prioritize investments in public health care. The Nanos poll conducted in May surveyed over a thousand Ontarians about privatization of hospital services and their perception about staffing in public hospitals. The poll was commissioned by CUPE's Ontario Council of Hospital Unions (OCHU-CUPE), which will be releasing a supplementary report on privatization at a media conference at Queen's Park on Monday morning. :gv/cope491

Majority of Ontarians Want Provincial Government to Prioritize Spending on Public Hospitals Than Private Clinics: New Poll
Majority of Ontarians Want Provincial Government to Prioritize Spending on Public Hospitals Than Private Clinics: New Poll

Business Wire

time2 days ago

  • Business Wire

Majority of Ontarians Want Provincial Government to Prioritize Spending on Public Hospitals Than Private Clinics: New Poll

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Just over 10 days after the recent Ontario budget allocated $280 million for expansion of surgeries and diagnostic tests in private clinics while restraining hospital funding, a new poll shows that 73 per cent of Ontarians want the government to prioritize investments in public health care. The Nanos poll conducted in May surveyed over a thousand Ontarians about privatization of hospital services and their perception about staffing in public hospitals. The poll was commissioned by CUPE's Ontario Council of Hospital Unions (OCHU-CUPE), which will be releasing a supplementary report on privatization at a media conference at Queen's Park on Monday morning. :gv/cope491

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store