Trump fires Democratic member of nuclear energy safety commission
In a Monday post on LinkedIn, Christopher Hanson said that Trump had fired him from the independent commission that regulates nuclear power safety.
'Late on Friday, President Trump terminated my position with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission without cause, contrary to existing law and longstanding precedent regarding removal of independent agency appointees,' Hanson said.
Hanson was notified of his termination through an email that was sent on Friday evening. The email did not contain any information about why he was being let go.
Previously, the commission had a 3-2 Democratic majority. Commissioners are appointed by the president and serve five-year terms.
Hanson, despite being a Democrat, was actually nominated by Trump in 2020.
A White House spokesperson defended his firing in a written statement.
'All organizations are more effective when leaders are rowing in the same direction. President Trump reserves the right to remove employees within his own Executive Branch who exert his executive authority,' said spokesperson Anna Kelly.
In a separate statement, the NRC acknowledged that Hanson is no longer with the agency but did not provide additional information.
'We can confirm that former Chair and Commissioner Christopher T. Hanson's service on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ended Friday, June 13. The NRC has functioned in the past with fewer than five commissioners and will continue to do so,' the agency said.
The move comes as the White House has also sought to push Democrats out of other independent commissions and boards, including the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
While presidents typically appoint members to these panels, they operate independently from any given administration, unlike other federal agencies whose appointees answer directly to the president.
A judge ruled last week that Trump's firing of three Democrats from the CPSC was illegal.
Hanson, in his LinkedIn post, said that he had been working to 'prepare the agency for anticipated change in the energy sector, while preserving the independence, integrity, and bipartisan nature of the world's gold standard nuclear safety institution.'
'It has been an honor to serve alongside the dedicated public servants at the NRC. I continue to have full trust and confidence in their commitment to serve the American people by protecting public health and safety and the environment,' he added.
The firing also comes as the Trump administration seeks to overhaul the nuclear safety agency. The president signed an executive order in April that called on the NRC to reconsider its safety standards, lamenting that they are are too stringent.
That order also called for a shorter timeline for environmental reviews and a quadrupling of the nation's nuclear power capacity by 2050.
Safety advocates criticized Hanson's firing.
'President Trump's firing of Christopher Hanson from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is only his latest outrageous move to undermine the independence and integrity of the agency that protects the U.S. homeland from the types of nuclear power plant disasters that devastated the former Soviet Union and Japan,' said Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, in a written statement.
'Hanson is a dedicated public servant and a strong supporter of the NRC's public health and safety mission. The loss of such a highly knowledgeable and fair-minded individual will imperil the public from coast to coast as the White House continues to compromise the safety and security of the U.S. nuclear fleet,' Lyman added.
—Updated at 1:41 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Among Gen Z Hits Second Term Low
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Support for President Donald Trump among Generation Z voters has plunged to its lowest level since he returned to the White House, according to new polling. The latest CBS/YouGov survey, conducted between July 16-18 among 2,343 adults, found just 28 percent of voters aged 18 to 29 now approve of Trump's performance, while 72 percent disapprove—a net approval rating of -44, down from -20 in early June and -12 in late April. Morning Consult's latest poll, conducted between July 18-20 among 2,202 registered voters, also put Trump's approval rating among Gen Z at an all-time low, with 71 percent disapproving of his job performance, compared with just 24 percent who approve of it. That gives him a net approval rating of -47. President Donald Trump addresses the crowd as he prepares to sign the GENIUS Act, a bill that regulates stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency, in the East Room of the White House, Friday, July 18, 2025,... President Donald Trump addresses the crowd as he prepares to sign the GENIUS Act, a bill that regulates stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency, in the East Room of the White House, Friday, July 18, 2025, in Washington. More Alex Brandon/AP Why It Matters In the 2024 election, Trump made inroads with young voters, narrowing the Democrats' traditional lead among Gen Z—a group that has typically leaned left in recent cycles. According to AP VoteCast, voters ages 18 to 29 supported Kamala Harris over Trump by just 51 percent to 47 percent. By comparison, in 2020, Joe Biden carried the same age group by a much wider margin, winning 61 percent to Trump's 36 percent. Now, that shift appears to be reversing among a generation that had showed signs of warming to Trump's populist messaging. What To Know The CBS/YouGov data showed that the collapse in support for Trump among Gen Z voters has been both sharp and steady. By late February, it had slipped to 51 percent, with disapproval at 49 percent—a modest but narrowing lead. That equilibrium held through March. But April brought a dramatic downturn, with approval plunging to 43 percent by mid-month and 44 percent by April 25. Disapproval climbed in parallel, hitting 57 percent and 56 percent, respectively. By June 6, Trump's approval stood at just 40 percent, and by mid-July, support among Gen Z cratered at 28 percent—the lowest of his second term to date. Gen Z Turns on Trump Over Economy and Inflation The data also reveal an accelerating erosion of confidence in Trump's handling of core policy issues—especially among a generation hit hard by economic precarity and rising living costs. On the economy, Gen Z voters gave Trump a net rating of +4 in late February. That number fell to zero in March, -26 in early April and -42 by July 18. Discontent over inflation has grown even more severe. In February, Trump's net inflation approval rating was -10. By April, it had dropped to -38. As of July 18, it sits at -46, meaning fewer than one in four Gen Z voters likely approve of his handling of the issue. It comes as annual inflation rose 2.7 percent in June, up from 2.4 percent in May, according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The latest polling also sheds light on the growing breadth of disapproval among young voters. Nearly half (49 percent) of Gen Z respondents say Trump's policies are responsible for the current state of the economy, while just 14 percent blame Biden's policies. Sixty-two percent now believe the economy is getting worse, up from 48 percent in June. And more than half (58 percent) now say Trump's policies have made them personally worse off financially. When asked about specific economic concerns, 70 percent of Gen Z voters say Trump is not focusing enough on lowering the cost of goods and services. Seventy-two percent say he is focusing too much on tariffs, which many blame for rising prices. Food costs continue to be a major source of frustration, with 68 percent saying grocery prices are still rising under Trump's second term. Immigration Crackdown Backfires Among Young Voters Trump's immigration crackdown has also lost favor. After briefly climbing into positive territory in March (+2), Trump's immigration approval fell to -16 in April, -12 in June, and -40 in the most recent survey. Throughout his second term, Trump has aggressively expanded immigration enforcement—launching mass deportation operations, increasing raids in sanctuary cities and reviving thousands of old deportation cases. Unlawful crossings at the southern border hit a historic low last month, and Trump has secured billions in additional funding for border security and expanded enforcement operations. His administration has also dramatically scaled up detention capacity, allocating $45 billion to expand ICE facilities and construct large-scale temporary camps, including a facility in Florida nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz." But while Trump has continued to push the hardline immigration agenda that helped him win support in 2024, new polls indicate that backing for those policies is fading across other demographic groups. Gallup polling this month shows that 30 percent of Americans now say immigration levels should be reduced, down from 55 percent in 2024. Support for maintaining or increasing immigration has risen across the board, including among Republicans. More broadly, the number of Americans who view immigration as a "good thing" has reached an all-time high of 79 percent, the same poll shows, reversing a steady decline during Joe Biden's presidency and surpassing sentiment levels from Trump's first term. But among Gen Z, the backlash extends beyond economic and immigration policy. According to the YouGov/CBS polling, 71 percent of Gen Z voters disapprove of Trump's signature legislative package, the "Big Beautiful Bill Act," which critics say prioritizes tax cuts for the wealthy while slashing safety-net programs. And in one of the sharpest rebukes yet, 84 percent disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files—the highest disapproval on that issue among any age group.
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
RNC chair Michael Whatley to run for Senate in North Carolina with Trump's support
Lara Trump, who the president had previously asked to run, has decided to remain as host of her weekly show on Fox News. She is expected to back Whatley, with whom she co-chaired the RNC last year, and the two will likely appear together in the near future, according to the people, who were granted anonymity to discuss the plans in advance. A public announcement is expected in the next week to 10 days, they said. Trump is optimistic that Whatley, who ran the state party in North Carolina before becoming RNC chair, has the knowledge of the state, the national profile and the network of relationships to mount a strong campaign to replace Tillis, who announced his retirement last month after opposing the sweeping domestic policy agenda bill backed by the president. Whatley was elected RNC chair in March 2024 and led the party alongside Lara Trump to sweeping victories up and down the ballot in last year's elections. Republicans believe Whatley's connections with donors will be an asset in what will likely be one of the most expensive races in next year's elections. 'The president feels Whatley has earned his shot,' said one of the people familiar with his plans. Trump is expected to announce Whatley's replacement at the RNC around the time he announces his Senate campaign. Democrats are targeting North Carolina as a potential pickup opportunity in a map that otherwise favors Republicans. Cooper, the popular former two-term governor, is expected to launch his campaign as soon as Monday. Trump is aware the North Carolina seat will be 'an uphill battle for any Republican,' one person said, and recognizes that Cooper will be a tough opponent. Trump's endorsement of Whatley will likely prevent a messy primary in a state Trump won in the past three presidential elections. North Carolina Rep. Pat Harrigan has previously said he would endorse Lara Trump if she decided to run, while Rep. Richard Hudson has ruled out a Senate bid.
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
This Medicare change is giving hospitals heartburn
Hospitals found an unpleasant surprise buried in a proposed 913-page Medicare payment rule last week: a Trump administration plan to speed up — by a decade — the recovery of $7.8 billion in improper cuts to facilities' discount drug reimbursement. Why it matters: The change comes out to over $1 billion less than expected in Medicare payment next year, with more reductions going forward. Reduced Medicare payment would be a double whammy, hitting just as sweeping changes to Medicaid are expected to put new financial pressures on facilities. "It's piling on," Maureen Testoni, CEO of 340B Health, which advocates on behalf of hospitals that participate in the discount drug program, told Axios. Facilities that rely on these federal programs are "definitely going to reach unsustainability." Some industry groups are already threatening to sue to halt the plan if it's finalized, saying it punishes hospitals for a mistake that Medicare itself made between 2018 and 2022. The new timeline for clawbacks would jeopardize hospitals' ability to care for patients in need, Testoni said in a statement. Follow the money: The clawback stems from a Supreme Court ruling that overturned a nearly 30% cut the first Trump administration made in payments to safety-net providers in the 340B federal discount drug program, after research showed some could profit inappropriately off the program. Medicare repaid $9 billion to make the affected hospitals whole early last year. The problem was that Medicare budgeting anticipated future savings from the 30% cut boosted pay for hospital outpatient services other than dispensing drugs. To avoid adding to total Medicare spending, the Biden administration devised a plan to claw back $7.8 billion in increased reimbursements from hospitals over 16 years. Now, the administration wants to reduce that timeline by a decade, arguing the quicker process would make the burden on hospitals more closely reflect the benefits they previously received. A more drawn-out process could also be complicated by hospital closures, it said. That translates into a bigger annual clawback for hospitals already operating on tight margins. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services also notified hospitals last week that it plans to conduct a survey early next year on their costs for acquiring drugs, including rebates and discounts that hospitals receive under the federal 340B discount drug program. The notice doesn't explicitly say that the survey will be used to justify future cuts to hospitals' reimbursement. But industry executives say that's the subtext, especially in light of the 2022 Supreme Court decision. Between the lines: Hospital participation in 340B has grown significantly over the past two decades. Nonprofit and public hospitals that qualify for the program say it enables them to provide charity care. But critics say it's gotten too big and charge that some hospitals abuse the program. Conservative think tanks that have the Trump administration's ear, like Paragon Health Institute, have recommended overhauling the way Medicare pays for discounted drugs. What they're saying: The American Hospital Association hinted it could sue the administration if it moves forward with accelerated clawbacks. "The proposed recoupment is both illegal and unwise, and it should not be finalized," Ashley Thompson, AHA's senior vice president of public policy analysis and development, said in a statement. The Association of American Medical Colleges also said that speeding up the clawbacks "will have catastrophic effects on patients nationwide." What to watch:"We expect significant pushback in the comments to this proposed rule and that the final rule may be less aggressive," Chris Meekins, managing director at Raymond James and health official in the first Trump administration, wrote in an analyst note.
