&w=3840&q=100)
UN demands accountability in Ukraine peace talks amid soaring civilian toll
An explosion of a drone lights up the sky over the city during a Russian drone and missile strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine. Reuters
The United Nations emphasised on Tuesday that any peace negotiations on Russia's war in Ukraine include full responsibility for the conflict's litany of crimes, coming after the bloodiest month for civilians since May 2022.
Volker Turk's appeal comes the day after US President Donald Trump warned Moscow that it would face significant new economic sanctions if the war was not ended within 50 days.
Trump also announced preparations to provide arms to Kyiv through NATO.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In recent weeks, Trump has been more frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has escalated assaults rather than stopped them.
'An immediate ceasefire is needed now to end this unbearable suffering,' Liz Throssell, a spokeswoman for Turk's office, told a media briefing.
'Work on a lasting peace, in line with international law, must intensify - a peace that ensures accountability for gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law.'
Rather than being sidelined or overlooked, 'any move towards ceasefire, towards peace - accountability must be at its heart', she added.
Surging civilian casualties
Throssell said Turk wanted any negotiations to focus in the immediate term on ending attacks that affect civilians and protecting the rights of people in occupied territory.
They should also seek to return forcibly transferred or deported children, establish humanitarian corridors across the line of control and an bring end to the torture and ill treatment of prisoners of war and other detainees, she said.
Russia launched the full-scale invasion of its neighbour in February 2022.
Moscow has unleashed record waves of drone and missile attacks over the past few weeks, with the number of Ukrainian civilians killed or wounded in June hitting a three-year high, according to UN figures, with 232 people killed and 1,343 injured.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'July has brought no respite for civilians in Ukraine,' said Throssell.
So far this month at least 139 civilians have reportedly been killed and 791 wounded, she said, citing the 'intense and successive waves of missile and drone strikes' launched by Russian forces.
'Intense and sustained attacks using explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas are likely to have indiscriminate impacts and as such raise serious concerns as to their compliance with international humanitarian law,' said Throssell.
The UN human rights office has so far been able to verify and document at least 13,580 civilians killed and 34,115 wounded since the Russian invasion began but acknowledges that the full figures will be far higher.
Attacks on healthcare
Meanwhile Jarno Habicht, the World Health Organization's representative in Ukraine, said civilian casualties 'almost doubled' in the second quarter of 2025 compared to the first.
He said the WHO had recorded 2,504 attacks on healthcare since the start of the war, involving 212 deaths and 768 injuries.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The WHO records attacks but does not attribute blame as it is not a criminal investigations body.
'That means that healthcare is not a safe place for the patients and healthcare workers – and it's a violation of humanitarian law,' said Habicht.
He also sounded an alarm on 'problem' behaviours growing during the war – heavy drinking among adults, and new tobacco products used by youths.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Coup in Ukraine? Russia claims US-UK planning to oust Zelensky and replace him with former Ukrainian Army chief
Political context and anti-corruption controversy Resetting Kiev-West relations and aid continuity Live Events Background on Valery Zaluzhny (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service ( SVR ) has accused the United States and the United Kingdom of orchestrating a secret plan to remove Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and install former Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Valery Zaluzhny , as the new president, reported TASS According to the SVR, a clandestine meeting was held in an Alpine resort involving high-level Ukrainian officials Andrey Yermak (head of Zelensky's presidential office), Kirill Budanov (chief of Ukraine's Defense Ministry intelligence), and Valery Zaluzhny himself, alongside US and UK representatives. During this meeting, the Western allies purportedly decided to support Zaluzhny's candidacy for the SVR alleges that Yermak and Budanov quickly agreed ('snapped a salute') to this decision after securing promises from the US and UK to allow them to retain their current influential positions and have their interests taken into account in future Ukrainian personnel to Russian intelligence as reported by TASS, this secret arrangement sheds light on recent political maneuvers within Ukraine, notably Zelensky's controversial attempts to restrict the powers of local anti-corruption agencies. The SVR claims that these moves were engineered by Yermak to clear the political field for Zaluzhny's subsequent rise and provided a pretext for Western powers to paint Zelensky's administration as authoritarian, thereby justifying plans to remove him from power in the name of defending attempts to curb independent anti-corruption bodies had sparked protests in Ukraine and criticism from Western governments, which contributed to political instability. Following backlash, Zelensky even submitted a bill reversing the curtailment to reinforce the powers of these watchdogs, though with conditions such as security vetting of employees six months SVR asserts that the decision to replace Zelensky with Zaluzhny was framed as a necessary step to 'reset' Ukraine's relations with Western partners, particularly Washington , and to ensure continued military and financial aid amid Ukraine's ongoing conflict with officials question the democratic legitimacy of a top-level political decision made in secret at a foreign resort, asking Ukrainians if this is the democracy, independence, and self-determination they dreamed Zaluzhny served as Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces until early 2025 and currently acts as Ukraine's ambassador to the United Kingdom. He is credited with significant military leadership during Ukraine's resistance in the ongoing war. The SVR claims that both Western countries and certain Ukrainian officials see Zaluzhny as a preferable successor to official statements have been issued by the US, UK, or Ukrainian governments to confirm or deny the SVR's allegations.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump dumps 25% tariff on India from Friday, plus penalty for buying Russian oil
NEW DELHI: US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25% tariff on all goods imported from India, along with an unspecified penalty, from Aug 1 after the two countries failed to reach an interim trade deal, triggering nervousness among exporters. After making several claims over the last four months of having got India to agree to slash tariffs, Trump took to social media to announce the stiff duties and linked the action to India's high trade surplus with the US and purchase of Russian oil and arms. "Also, they (India) have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine - all things not good! India will therefore be paying 25%, plus a penalty for the above, starting Aug 1," Trump posted on Truth Social. The US president had earlier announced a "reciprocal tariff" of 26% on India. He later paused it, but left a 10% baseline tariff on all countries. Trump's proposed penalty has complicated the calculations for Indian businesses. Over the last three months, he has managed to get other trading partners such as the European Union, Japan, Britain and Vietnam to open up their markets for American goods in return for lowering the tariffs, something he could not do with India due to its reluctance to offer concessions on farm and dairy products. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ultra Lux 4BHK homes at 7 Mahalaxmi from 10.81 Cr* 7 Mahalaxmi, Runwal Group Enquire Now Undo Within the govt there was clarity that it would not settle for a sub-par deal that did not provide for adequate tariff cuts in the US for Indian textiles, leather and footwear and lower-end auto parts. Trump announcement seen as bid to mount pressure on India to agree to US demands President Trump managed to get other trading partners such as EU, Japan, Britain and Vietnam to open up their markets for US goods in return for lowering tariffs, something he could not do with India due to its reluctance to offer concessions on farm and dairy products. Within govt there was clarity that it would not settle for a sub-par deal that did not provide for adequate tariff cuts in the US for Indian textiles, leather and footwear and lower-end auto parts. The Trump administration's argument that it did not have the legislative mandate to revert to reducing tariffs to zero, as is the case with most trade agreements, did not find traction with Indian negotiators, who were asked by the leadership to leverage the large and growing market offered by India. During the negotiations, India had indicated its willingness to buy larger quantities of LNG, fertiliser and defence equipment from the US, but the demands kept increasing. Trump's repeated attempt to link the Operation Sindoor ceasefire to his offer for a good trade deal only complicated matters for him. Over the last few weeks, there was also an attempt to prepare industry for possible imposition of tariffs. While talks for the proposed trade deal will continue, the announcement is seen as a move to mount pressure on India to agree to American demands. In the meantime, businesses fear that the uncertainty over the penalty will make buyers reluctant to place orders, some of which may flow to other countries. Countries like Vietnam, which have negotiated lower levies, may hurt India. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Trump's 25% Tariff Bomb On India Explained: How It Impacts Trade, GDP, Oil And Defence Links
New Delhi: India has just been hit by a 25% tariff from the United States. Announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, the decision affects billions in exports. The news comes ahead of an important round of trade negotiations between the two countries. A penalty is also on the horizon. The reason? India's defence and energy trade with Russia. This latest action is seen as part of Trump's 'Liberation Day' trade strategy, designed to restructure trade arrangements in favour of the United States. The White House has been focusing on countries with significant trade surpluses and rigid non-tariff barriers, and India now finds itself among those targeted. In a post on Truth Social, Trump conveyed frustration over what he considers to be excessively high tariffs imposed by India and restrictive trade conditions. He also pointed to India's continued defence and energy imports from Russia, something he views as counterproductive, especially given the international demand for an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump added that starting August 1, Indian goods would face a 25% tariff, along with an additional penalty linked to the Russia factor. Although specific details of that penalty have not so far been released by the White House, U.S. officials indicated that it is meant to signal displeasure with India's growing reliance on Russian imports, particularly oil and military hardware. Impact on India's Export Economy India exports close to $87 billion worth of goods to the United States each year. The new tariff rate affects multiple key sectors, including pharmaceuticals, seafood, petrochemicals, leather, textiles and gems and jewellery. Industry experts have said the development marks a serious challenge. Agneshwar Sen from EY India, as quoted by The Times of India, stated that the tariff hike was unfortunate, especially considering the growing strategic relationship between New Delhi and Washington in recent years. He highlighted that certain export categories, particularly marine products, would feel the impact almost immediately. Talking to the daily, agricultural economist Ashok Gulati expressed concern over how this would affect India's shrimp industry. He suggested that the move highlighted unpredictability in Washington's approach and warned that India's textile exports would also face headwinds. He believes other countries like Ecuador might gain ground in the U.S. market due to lower tariff barriers and logistical advantages. GDP Growth Under Pressure According to Garima Kapoor of Elara Capital, as cited by TOI, the 25% tariff, if sustained over the year, could reduce India's GDP growth by as much as 20 basis points. She observed that it remains unclear how many Indian export categories would be exempted from the full tariff or charged at different rates. For instance, products like steel, automobiles and pharmaceuticals may see differentiated treatment. However, she warned that if pharma ends up included in the 25%, it could significantly hurt exports, considering the U.S. accounts for over 30% of India's pharmaceutical shipments. That said, Kapoor also emphasised the value of patience over urgency. She believed that a rushed deal requiring India to compromise on its agriculture or dairy sectors would have triggered deeper, long-lasting political and social consequences. In her view, a more comprehensive and well-balanced agreement, even if finalised later in the year, would serve India's long-term interests far better. New Delhi's Response, Diplomatic Stance India has acknowledged the U.S. president's remarks and has begun reviewing the implications. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry has issued a statement indicating that while the comments had been noted, New Delhi remains focused on reaching a mutually beneficial agreement. It reiterated India's commitment to protecting the interests of farmers, MSMEs and entrepreneurs, while ensuring the national interest remains paramount. Where India Stands Compared to Others India's tariff rate of 25% places it higher than most other U.S. trading partners. Japan and the European Union have secured rates as low as 15%, while countries like Vietnam and Indonesia face tariffs around 20%. Only China, at 30%, has been subjected to a higher rate than India. Trade analysts believe India's export competitiveness could be affected, especially in categories like textiles and electronics. However, some believe the impact on certain industries may be limited. Ajay Srivastava from the Global Trade Research Initiative told TOI that Indian pharmaceutical exports, which largely consist of generic drugs, might not suffer much despite the 25% duty, especially when compared to high-cost and branded European medicines that have lower tariff rates. He also said that India's position in smartphone exports remains relatively strong, with the United States importing largely from China and India and China's 30% tariff not offering a clear advantage. Temporary Setback or Lasting Policy Shift? Government officials in New Delhi are treating the tariff hike as a possible interim measure. Sources indicated that discussions were continuing and that both countries had already completed five rounds of talks. A sixth round is scheduled for late August, when a U.S. delegation is expected to visit India. Officials remain hopeful that a preliminary trade deal could be finalised by September or October. Vijay Chauhan of Deloitte India, as cited by the daily, stated that Indian negotiators had remained firm in safeguarding national interests and that the upcoming meeting in New Delhi might be a turning point. He stressed that the August 25 visit by U.S. trade representatives would be closely watched. The Road Ahead With tariffs now in place and more penalties expected, India's exporters face turbulence in the months ahead. However, both sides continue to engage. Whether the August-end discussions can shift momentum remains to be seen. Indian officials and industries, for now, are recalibrating their strategies, waiting for what could be a decisive phase in India-U.S. trade ties.
