A timeline of the US-China tariff and trade spat since President Trump took office this year
WASHINGTON (AP) — Shortly after President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, he launched a tariff war against China, as part of a broader implementation of import taxes on goods from several dozen countries as Trump seeks to reset the foundations of global trade.
Beijing retaliated, and the tariffs on each other escalated to a level that was considered a trade embargo, bringing the two sides to the negotiating table in Geneva in May. Both sides rolled back their tariffs, but tensions flared up over nontariff barriers such as export controls.
China tightened foreign shipments of critical minerals, and the U.S. imposed more export controls on advanced technology and threatened to revoke visas for Chinese students. Trump and Xi had a phone call on June 5, before senior officials from the two governments met in London on this week to reach a 'framework' to move forward. Here are the key moments in this year's trade spat and walk-backs.
Feb. 4, 2025
New 10% tariffs on all Chinese imports to the U.S. come into effect. The levies are meant to pressure Beijing to do more to stop the illegal flow of synthetic opioids. China retaliates the same day by announcing a flurry of countermeasures, including duties on American coal, liquefied natural gas and agricultural machinery.
March 4, 2025
Additional 10% tariffs on all Chinese goods will go into effect, also related to opioid trafficking. China responds with additional tariffs of up to 15% on imports of key U.S. farm products, including chicken, pork, soy and beef, and expanded controls on doing business with key U.S. companies.
April 2, 2025
On Trump's so-called tariff 'Liberation Day,' he announces additional 34% duties on all Chinese imports, alongside tariffs on goods from countries around the world. The sweeping tariffs are to come into effect April 9.
April 4, 2025
China announces a tit-for-tat 34% tariff on U.S. goods and other retaliatory moves including more export controls on rare earth minerals, and files a lawsuit at the World Trade Organization.
China also suspends imports of sorghum, poultry and bonemeal from several U.S. companies, adds 27 firms to lists of companies facing trade restrictions, and starts an anti-monopoly probe into DuPont China Group Co.
April 7, 2025
In response to China's 34% tariff, Trump announces an additional 50% tariff on China.
April 9, 2025
China responds by raising the tariff on U.S. goods to 84%. Citing a 'lack of respect,' Trump threatened to further raise tariffs on China to 125%.
April 10, 2025
The White House administration clarifies that the tariff on Chinese goods would be 145%. That includes the 20% duty Trump has put on China for its role in the production of fentanyl.
April 11, 2025
China hits back by raising the tariff on U.S. products to 125%.
May 12, 2025
Following a two-day trade talk in Geneva, the United States and China agree to slash their massive recent tariffs. The U.S. drops the 145% tariff to 30%. China agrees to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10%.
May 28, 2025
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announces plans to 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinse students, including those with connection to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' Reports also have emerged that the White House has paused exports of jet engine and semiconductor technology to China.
June 5, 2025
Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping speak on the phone and announce an upcoming round of trade talks.
June 11, 2025
Following a two-day talk in London by senior American and Chinese officials, Trump says the U.S. will get a 'total of 55% tariffs', and China is getting 10%. Trump also says China will be supplying rare earths to China, and the U.S. will welcome Chinese students to American colleges and universities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Trump thanked California National Guard before it arrived in L.A.
Social Sharing At 2 a.m. Sunday, U.S. President Donald Trump posted to social media congratulating the work of California's National Guard in response to immigration raid protests in Los Angeles. In fact, the guards only arrived in the city later that morning, according to several news reports. "Thank you to the National Guard for a job well done!" Trump wrote at 2:41 a.m. ET. Just after noon ET (9 a.m. PT), the U.S. Northern Command posted on X that 300 of the California National Guard 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) soldiers were positioned near federal properties at three locations in the greater Los Angeles area — far fewer than the 2,000 soldiers Trump vaunted he would deploy. The discrepancy has prompted reports from U.S. media outlets that Trump and his administration's claims of protest violence have been overblown. MSNBC's Jen Psaki hosted a segment on the contrast between what the federal government had been saying and what has really happened on the ground. "Trump is insisting that this massive escalation in force is completely necessary," Psaki said, also noting that National Guard troops were only reported to have arrived in Los Angeles at 11 a.m. Sunday, more than eight hours after Trump's posted thanking them. Trump deployed California's National Guard without getting consent from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, prompting the governor to later sue the federal government for its decision. When did the Los Angeles protests start? The protests in Los Angeles began Friday evening at federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents had detained more than 40 people — including children — following raids across the city, according to ABC News. The Los Angeles Police Department said Friday on X that a "small group of violent individuals are throwing large pieces of concrete" and that it was deeming the gathering "unlawful." Officers in riot gear were then seen throwing tear gas canisters to disperse some crowds. WATCH | Trump tests boundaries of his power: Trump tests boundaries of his power with troops in L.A. 2 days ago Duration 1:33:19 NBC senior correspondent Jay Gray joins Power & Politics from a confrontation between protesters and National Guard troops deployed by President Donald Trump in Los Angeles, as California's governor accuses Trump of the 'acts of a dictator.' Auditor General Karen Hogan says the estimated cost of Canada's F-35 fighter jet program has gone from $19 billion in 2022 to $27.7 billion in 2024, partly because the Defence Department relied on outdated information. Plus, a former Canadian ambassador to Saudi Arabia and an international affairs expert discuss whether Canada was right to invite controversial international players to the G7 summit next week. Protests, as well as the looting of a gas station in Paramount, Calif., continued that day and into Saturday — when Trump decided to federalize the National Guard. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth applauded the decision on X Saturday, calling the protests a "huge national security risk." Newsom responded that federal government help in preventing violence at the protests was unnecessary and would only lead to escalation. What happened after the National Guard arrived? Sunday afternoon the situation appeared to escalate case when, according to the Los Angeles Times, officers fired tear gas and less-lethal rounds at protesters outside a federal detention centre, where the guards were posted, though it's unclear whether they were the ones to exercise force or local law enforcement. Later that day, protesters streamed onto a highway, blocking traffic. But the Times reported clashes soon died down. Sunday evening, though, Trump called protesters "violent, insurrectionist mobs," in a post on Truth Social. The Times wrote that "Trump administration officials have seized on the isolated incidents of violence to suggest wide parts of L.A. are out of control." Psaki highlighted that, meanwhile, an estimated 300 people have been detained in Los Angeles ICE raids since protests began Friday. Californians say protests have largely been peaceful and led by people whose family members were taken into custody by immigration agents at their workplaces. A retired teacher, Jose Gallegos, told USA Today he attended protests in Paramount on Saturday and was struck by a rubber bullet shot in rounds by law enforcement. "We don't have guns. All we have is prayers and feathers," he told the news outlet. Escalation beneficial for Trump: experts Legal scholars and democracy watchers say it is politically advantageous for Trump to exaggerate the amount of violence tied to the immigration protests because it is one of the issues the president has broad support for. "I don't think the prospect of calling out the National Guard is in any way sincerely motivated by a fear of a loss of public order," said John Carey, a professor of government at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire and the co-founder of Bright Line Watch, a group monitoring threats to American democracy. "We have a long and proud tradition of military remaining neutral and removed from politics," Carey said. "And this administration, I don't think, is committed to that." WATCH | California to sue Trump administration: California to sue Trump administration over National Guard deployment to L.A. 3 days ago Duration 3:09 California will file a lawsuit against U.S. President Donald Trump over his deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, the state attorney general said on Monday, arguing that the federal administration did so without authorization from Gov. Gavin Newsom and against the wishes of local law enforcement. Trump accused state leaders of being 'afraid to do anything' about protests over immigration raids that roiled the city over the weekend. According to Kim Lane Scheppele, a Princeton professor studying new autocracies, National Guards are a kind of protection for states against possible federal overreaches. They were created based on the Second Amendment, guaranteeing each state's right to a militia. Their troops are roughly equivalent in number to federally-operated military units, such as the Marine Corps — 700 of which were also deployed to L.A. — Scheppele explained. "You don't want it to turn into civil war … but at least you'd have kind of evenly matched sides. It would allow the governors to be able to say no [to federal overreach], backed by a kind of military force," the professor said. At issue is whether Title 10 of the U.S. Code — the legal mechanism Trump used to deploy the Guard — requires the president to consult with a state governor before federalizing their troops and whether the governor can refuse.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
North Korea says it has repaired its damaged destroyer and launched it in the water
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korea says it has repaired its damaged second destroyer and launched it in the water. North Korea's Korean Central News Agency said Friday that it launched the warship off the east coast of the country the previous day, with the presence of leader Kim Jong Un. KCNA cites Kim as saying the country's two destroyers built this year, including one launched on Thursday, will play a big role in improving the North Korean navy's operational capabilities. Last month, North Korea said the ship was damaged in a failed launch, sparking fury from Kim, who has vowed to build a stronger navy to cope what he calls escalating U.S.-led threats against his country.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Judge promises quick ruling over Trump's use of National Guard in Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge said Thursday that he plans to rule quickly on whether President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by deploying the California National Guard in Los Angeles against the governor's wishes. 'This country was founded in response to a monarch, and the Constitution is a document of limitations. I'm trying to figure out where the lines are drawn,' U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said before a packed courtroom.
