Critics are sounding the alarm on U.S. management of Canada's nuclear labs. Here's why
OTTAWA — As Canada is pledging to move away from the United States in the defence sector, critics are warning the federal government it might want to take a closer look at a Crown corporation's recent decision to award a contract to a U.S.-based joint venture for the management of the country's nuclear laboratories for possibly the next 20 years.
Article content
On June 12, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) announced that Nuclear Laboratory Partners of Canada Inc. — a partnership with three primary joint venture partners and one key subcontractor — had been selected to manage Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL). Those include mainly Chalk River Laboratories, the birthplace of the CANDU reactor.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The management contract is valued at $1.2 billion per year on average, for six years, but could be extended up to a total of 20 years based on performance indicators.
Article content
Article content
Even though AECL's bidding process began in 2023 — long before U.S. President Donald Trump was elected to a second term and started threatening Canada's sovereignty — sources familiar with the matter are questioning why AECL chose to work with firms mainly based in the U.S. to manage Canada's sensitive technologies in the nuclear sector.
Article content
'Given the current circumstances in Canada-U.S. relations, I think it's troubling that a contract of this magnitude would be awarded to a U.S.-based consortium,' said one of the sources who spoke to the National Post on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
Article content
'Now, Chalk River labs are going to be managed by American firms that are deeply involved in the American military and defence industrial complex on the nuclear side,' they added.
Article content
Article content
Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, who served as assistant deputy minister for Energy Technology and Programs at Natural Resources Canada, was just as surprised to hear about the contract: 'Why on Earth do we not have the skill set to do this in Canada?'
Article content
Article content
'If this government is really serious about protecting our vulnerabilities and building capacity in Canada and strengthening Canadian companies… why would they farm out the management of our precious technology, especially something as unique as nuclear?' added McCuaig-Johnston, now a senior fellow at the University of Ottawa.
Article content
Despite its name, Nuclear Laboratory Partners of Canada Inc. is composed mostly of U.S.-based partners. It will be spearheaded by Virginia-based BWXT — an important supplier to the U.S. Defence Department. The other partners are Amentum — also based in Virginia — and Kinectrics Inc. — a company based in Toronto but bought by BWXT earlier this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
TDSB pauses plans to rename schools as education mininster says changes a waste of taxpayer money
The Toronto District School Board is pausing its plans to change the name of three schools. The move comes as Ontario's education minister said renaming the schools is a waste of taxpayer money. A provincial bill set to pass this fall would give the minister sweeping powers to veto any changes. CBC's Michelle Song has more.
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
Hydroponic farmer, Ottawa Mission tackle food insecurity under the glow of LED lights
A pair of new farms are coming to Ottawa, though it may be hard to find them if you are looking for a sprawling land of crops. Rather than wearing work shirts out in the sun, the farmers at these operations will be wearing white lab coats under the beam of LED lights. The new farms are part of a joint project between the Ottawa Mission and Growcer, an Ottawa-based company specializing in the construction of hydroponic vertical farms. The new project was announced at Invest Ottawa on Thursday. Growcer's vertical farms grow leafy greens and various vegetables year-round in climate-controlled buildings resembling a standard ship cargo container. The company was founded a decade ago by University of Ottawa students Alida Burke and Corey Ellis, with the mission to address food insecurity in Canada's North. Since then, Ellis estimates they have launched 120 projects, most of which are within First Nations reserves and communities. Ellis says the decision to focus on Ottawa, however, came after Mayor Mark Sutcliffe visited one of their farms. "The mayor challenged us ... since we're based here in Ottawa, to do work in our own backyard and to partner with local charities to address that crisis," Ellis said. Addressing rising food insecurity According to the Ottawa Food Bank's 2024 hunger report, roughly one in four households in the city are facing food insecurity. The Ottawa Mission is one of a number of shelters helping to address this issue with their mobile food truck. A donour to the food truck program introduced the Ottawa Mission to Growcer. "Our programs are growing, the food truck program, the number of people we're feeding under the roof of the Ottawa Mission, the demand for our food supply is unprecedented," said Peter Tilley, CEO for the Ottawa Mission. "To have a program like this where we can get a sustainable, reliable source of leafy greens was just such a fit for us." The new project will be installed at Area X.O, near the intersection of Woodroffe Avenue and West Hunt Club Road in Nepean, in the coming weeks. Ellis says the project will focus on five key crops, including different types of lettuce alongside spinach, kale and arugula. End of summer harvest The first crop is expected to be ready by the end of the summer, with the produce going to the Mission's various meal programs. Those involved with the project say the two farms combined will be capable of producing over 9,000 kilograms of leafy greens per year. The farms will also offer training opportunities for students within the Ottawa Mission's Food Services Training Program, allowing them to help harvest the greens once the farms are operational. "A lot of our students are newcomers to Canada and they have no idea about farming, some of them don't have any idea where the produce they eat comes from," said Ric Allen-Watson, better known as Chef Ric, who founded the training program over two decades ago. Plans to expand Ellis says he hopes that this is only the start of Growcer's work in Ottawa, looking to build an additional 12 farms throughout the city over the next year. They are currently in talks with a number of local food banks and charities throughout the city, though Ellis did not specify which ones. "Bringing farms into the city is all about reminding people where their food comes from, and making the produce you get far tastier, more cost effective, more sustainable and frankly, it lasts way longer in your fridge." Sutcliffe is hopeful these farms will be replicated in neighbourhoods across the city as the project expands. "My understanding is this is something they can replicate in any neighbourhood in the city, and it doesn't take a lot to set up one of these facilities and then to start producing food for the local food bank or a local school food program." The project in Ottawa was helped in part by a donation from the Royal Bank of Canada to the Ottawa Community Foundation.
CBC
39 minutes ago
- CBC
Classified briefing leaves U.S. Senators split over damage done by strikes on Iran
Social Sharing American Senators emerged from a classified briefing Thursday with sharply diverging assessments of U.S. President Donald Trump's bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, with Republicans calling the mission a clear success and Democrats expressing deep skepticism. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, came to Capitol Hill to give the classified briefings, which were originally scheduled for Tuesday. Many Republicans left satisfied, though their assessments of how much Iran's nuclear program was set back by the bombing varied. Sen. Tom Cotton said a "major blow" and "catastrophic damage" had been dealt to Iran's facilities. "Their operational capability was obliterated. There is nobody working there tonight. It was highly effective. There's no reason to hit those sites anytime soon," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican. Democrats remained doubtful and criticized Trump for not giving Congress more information. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the briefing "raised more questions than it answered." Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy said the strike appears to "have only set back the Iranian nuclear program by a handful of months." "There's no doubt there was damage done to the program," said Murphy, but "allegations that we have obliterated their program just don't seem to stand up to reason." "I just do not think the president was telling the truth when he said this program was obliterated," he added. WATCH | Hegseth defends damage to Iranian nuclear facilities: Hegseth defends U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, citing 'resounding success' 7 hours ago Duration 6:05 U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said Thursday that U.S. President Donald Trump's 'decisive military action' ended the '12-day war' between Israel and Iran. The conference follows reports suggesting the damage was not as extensive as the Trump administration had been claiming. The session came as senators weighed their support for a resolution affirming that Trump should seek authorization from Congress before launching more military action against Iran. A vote on that resolution could come as soon as Thursday. Democrats and some Republicans have said the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress. They also want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorized the attacks. A similar briefing for House members will be held Friday. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. They were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. "You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated — choose your word. This was an historically successful attack," Hegseth said at a Pentagon briefing Thursday. Trump pushes back on leaked report saying U.S. strikes did not destroy Iran nuclear sites 1 day ago Duration 5:33 U.S. President Donald Trump is doubling down on his assertion that Iran's nuclear program was destroyed by U.S. strikes. 'I believe it was total obliteration,' he said. His comments followed reports on Tuesday that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months. On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were "completely and fully obliterated." Gabbard posted on social media that "new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed." She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would "likely take years to do." Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been "severely damaged." He cited new intelligence "from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years." Most Republicans have defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. "The bottom line is the commander-in-chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president," Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans, including some of Trump's staunchest supporters, are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. "I think the Speaker needs to review the Constitution," said Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican. "And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war." While Trump did not seek approval, he sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, which occurred Saturday between 6:40 p.m. and 7:05 p.m. ET, or roughly 2:10 a.m. on Sunday in Iran.
