Who Is Francesca Gino? Harvard University Fires Star Professor for Fabricating Research Used in Studies on 'Dishonesty'
Harvard University has fired a professor after finding out that she had fabricated research used in studies related to dishonesty. Francesca Gino, a star business professor at the Ivy League school, was officially fired from her position last week after Harvard administrators notified the business faculty of their decision, according to GHB.
The university launched an investigation into Gino's research back in 2023 after at least three data analysts—Uri Simonsohn, Leif Nelson, and Joe Simmons—shared what they claimed was proof of extensive academic misconduct in at least four studies Gino had co-authored. The three analysts also said that they "believe that many more Gino-authored papers contain fake data."
Honestly Dishonest
Gino had been a rising star at Harvard, with her behavioral research on cheating, lying, and dishonesty receiving widespread media attention over the past ten years. However, scrutiny over her work began with a 2012 study she co-authored, which claimed that asking people to sign an honesty pledge at the beginning of a form, rather than at the end, led to more truthful answers.
That particular study was retracted in 2021 due to apparent data manipulation by another researcher involved in the project, which was based on three separate lab experiments.
Several years later, an internal review concluded that Gino had fabricated data to support her findings in at least four of her published studies.
According to The Daily Beast, Harvard had not stripped a professor of their tenure in decades and offered no further comment on the matter.
When the investigation began in 2023, Gino responded on her personal website, firmly rejecting the accusations made against her.
"There is one thing I know for sure: I did not commit academic fraud. I did not manipulate data to produce a particular result," it reads.
"I did not falsify data to bolster any result. I did not commit the offense I am accused of. Period."
After allegation started to spread, Gino was placed on administrative leave. The journal Psychological Science also withdrew two of her published articles, saying that the decision was based on recommendations from the Research Integrity Office at Harvard Business School (HBS).
In both instances, the journal noted that an independent forensic firm hired by HBS had found "discrepancies" between the final published data and earlier versions from Gino's behavioral research.
Completely Exposed
Separately, Harvard requested the withdrawal of a third study published by Gino in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and according to the Financial Times, the journal's publisher planned to pull the article in its September 2023 edition.
The two papers recently withdrawn by Psychological Science included a 2015 study titled "The Moral Virtue of Authenticity: How Inauthenticity Produces Feelings of Immorality and Impurity" and a 2014 study called "Evil Genius? How Dishonesty Can Lead to Greater Creativity."
The 2020 paper published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, which is now set to be retracted, was titled "Why Connect? Moral Consequences of Networking with a Promotion or Prevention Focus."
The study "Evil Genius" included five separate lab experiments involving human participants, who were given chances to act dishonestly by exaggerating their performance on certain tasks, followed by assessments of their creativity.
According to the original abstract, the research claimed that "acting dishonestly leads to greater creativity in subsequent tasks."
In August 2023, Gino fired back at the university and filed a $25 million lawsuit, alleging she was the victim of a "smear campaign." The 100-page complaint, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, accused Harvard and the three data analysts of defaming her by spreading false accusations of academic misconduct.
"I want to be very clear: I have never, ever falsified data or engaged in research misconduct of any kind," Gino said.
In her lawsuit, Gino argued that any irregularities in the spreadsheets could have been caused by research assistants manually transferring data from paper forms—a method that is inherently susceptible to human mistakes.
Gino's lawsuit further claimed that Harvard conducted an unjust and biased investigation into the data fraud accusations. She alleged that the university "overlooked evidence that could have cleared her" and introduced a new policy for handling academic misconduct cases that was enforced solely in her situation.
Once a prominent figure in behavioral science, Gino had received numerous awards and widespread media attention for her popular research. She was also one of Harvard's highest-paid professors, earning over $1 million a year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
Harvard urges federal judge to unfreeze US$2.5b of funding blocked by White House
The legal battle between Harvard University and US President Donald Trump's administration is becoming more entangled. The Ivy League university has urged a federal judge to unfreeze US$2.5 billion of funding blocked by the White House. It has called the block illegal and a violation of free speech and regulatory rights. Toni Waterman reports.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
The world's strongest currency is also super-competitive
AMID all the talk about whether the United States is keen to devalue the mighty dollar as one way to revive American manufacturing, it is worth noting that the dollar is not the world's strongest currency and has not been for decades. That title goes to the Swiss franc, and the mighty franc has done nothing to undermine Switzerland's competitiveness. The world's richest major economy has both a strong currency and a strong manufacturing base. The Swiss franc has been the top-performing currency over the past 50 years, 25 years, 10 years and five years. It is near the top even over the past year when some of the more beleaguered currencies have staged a comeback against the dollar. Nothing can compare for durable strength. Historic highs Yet, Switzerland also defies the assumption that a strong currency will undermine a nation's trading prowess by making its exports uncompetitive. Its exports have risen and are near historic highs both as a share of Swiss gross domestic product (75 per cent), and as a share of global exports (near 2 per cent). The global conversation has become unduly obsessed with currency valuations, which are just one of the factors that shape a nation's competitive position. Like Germany and Japan in their heydays, Switzerland has gained a reputation for goods and services of such high quality that the rest of the world is willing to pay a currency premium for the 'Made in Switzerland' label. Despite its lingering reputation as a haven for illicit fortunes, the country's economy has long shown extraordinary dynamism and competitive range. For more than a decade, it has dominated a UN ranking of the most innovative economies, both for the resources it puts into innovation – for example through practical university education and research and development – and for its returns on these investments. It generates more than US$100 in GDP per hour worked – that's more productive than any of the other 20 largest economies. Its decentralised political and economic system encourages the rise of small enterprises, which account for over 99 per cent of Swiss companies. It also has a large share of globally competitive businesses in sectors from pharmaceuticals to luxury goods. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Harvard's Growth Lab ranks Switzerland number one among major economies for the 'complexity' of its exports, a measure of the advanced skills needed to produce them. And its exports range from chocolates and watches to medicines and chemicals – belying the notion that strong currencies kill factories. At 18 per cent of GDP, its manufacturing sector is one of the largest among developed economies. Over half its exports are 'high-tech' – more than double the US level. As advanced goods are more expensive, this has helped Switzerland keep its current account in surplus, averaging more than 4 per cent of GDP since the early 1980s. Income from trade is recycled into significant investments abroad. The country now runs a net international investment surplus of more than 100 per cent of GDP, which helps it resist external shocks. This is the opposite of the US, with its heavy deficits in the current account and net investment. If Switzerland has a weakness, it is a huge run-up in private debt as a share of GDP. Yet, unlike the US and many other European countries, it does not have a large population of zombie companies – which earn too little to pay even the interest on their debts. All-weather economy Quietly, the Swiss have built an all-weather economy. The franc has appreciated steadily whether the dollar was rising or falling, and whether the global economy was in recession or recovery. They just seem to understand how to stay competitive. In 2015, the franc surged on a shift in central bank policy and manufacturers responded by moving even more sharply to sophisticated exports, which are less sensitive to currency shifts. Many policymakers think the east Asian 'miracles' devalued their way to prosperity. Undervalued exchange rates did help countries from South Korea to China grow their manufacturing export bases rapidly. But other factors including infrastructure investments and opening to foreign capital played a bigger role. Meanwhile, the importance of exchange rate valuations faded as they moved up the development curve. Developed economies need to compete more on quality than on price. For them, devaluation can backfire by encouraging domestic producers to focus on making cheaper goods. The Swiss lesson for nations such as the US is that a cheap currency is no fix for a broken manufacturing sector. FINANCIAL TIMES
Straits Times
4 days ago
- Straits Times
Universities seek to lure US-bound students amid Trump crackdown
Japan's Kyoto University is among the institutions that are considering schemes to accept students from the US. PHOTO: KYOTOU_NEWS/X TOKYO - Universities around the world are seeking to offer refuge for students impacted by US President Donald Trump's crackdown on academic institutions, targeting top talent and a slice of the billions of dollars in academic revenue in the United States. Osaka University, one of the top ranked in Japan, is offering tuition fee waivers, research grants and help with travel arrangements for students and researchers at US institutions who want to transfer. Japan's Kyoto University and Tokyo University are also considering similar schemes, while Hong Kong has instructed its universities to attract top talent from the United States. China's Xi'an Jiaotong University has appealed for students at Harvard, singled out in Mr Trump's crackdown, promising 'streamlined' admissions and 'comprehensive' support. Mr Trump's administration has enacted massive funding cuts for academic research, curbed visas for foreign students - especially those from China - and plans to hike taxes on elite schools. Mr Trump alleges top US universities are cradles of anti-American movements. In a dramatic escalation, his administration last week revoked Harvard's ability to enrol foreign students, a move later blocked by a federal judge. Masaru Ishii, dean of the graduate school of medicine at Osaka University, described the impact on US universities as 'a loss for all of humanity'. Japan aims to ramp up its number of foreign students to 400,000 over the next decade, from around 337,000 currently. Jessica Turner, chief executive of Quacquarelli Symonds, a London-based analytics firm that ranks universities globally, said other leading universities around the world were trying to attract students unsure of going to the United States. Germany, France and Ireland are emerging as particularly attractive alternatives in Europe, she said, while in the Asia-Pacific, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, and mainland China are rising in profile. Switching schools Chinese students have been particularly targeted in Mr Trump's crackdown, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday pledging to 'aggressively' crack down on their visas. More than 275,000 Chinese students are enrolled in hundreds of US colleges, providing a major source of revenue for the schools and a crucial pipeline of talent for US technology companies. International students - 54 per cent of them from India and China - contributed more than US$50 billion (S$64 billion) to the US economy in 2023, according to the US Department of Commerce. Mr Trump's crackdown comes at a critical period in the international student application process, as many young people prepare to travel to the US in August to find accommodation and settle in before term starts. Ms Dai, 25, a Chinese student based in Chengdu, had planned to head to the US to complete her master's but is now seriously considering taking up an offer in Britain instead. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said, requesting to be identified only by her surname for privacy reasons. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.' Students from Britain and the European Union are also now more hesitant to apply to US universities, said Tom Moon, deputy head of consultancy at Oxbridge Applications, which helps students in their university applications. He said many international students currently enrolled at US universities were now contacting the consultancy to discuss transfer options to Canada, the UK and Europe. According to a survey the consultancy ran earlier this week, 54 per cent of its clients said they were now 'less likely' to enrol at an American university than they were at the start of 2025. There has been an uptick in applications to British universities from prospective students in the US, said Universities UK, an organisation that promotes British institutions. It cautioned, however, that it was too early to say whether that translates into more students enrolling. Reputational effects Ella Ricketts, an 18-year-old first year student at Harvard from Canada, said she receives a generous aid package paid for by the school's donors and is concerned that she would not be able to afford other options if forced to transfer. 'Around the time I was applying to schools, the only university across the Atlantic I considered was Oxford... However, I realised that I would not be able to afford the international tuition and there was no sufficient scholarship or financial aid available,' she said. If Harvard's ability to enrol foreign students is revoked, she would most likely apply to the University of Toronto, she said. Analytics firm QS said overall visits to its 'Study in America' online guide have declined by 17.6 per cent in the last year – with interest from India alone down over 50 per cent. 'Measurable impacts on enrolment typically emerge within six to 18 months. Reputational effects, however, often linger far longer, particularly where visa uncertainty and shifting work rights play into perceptions of risk versus return,' said QS' Turner. That reputational risk, and the ensuing brain drain, could be even more damaging for US institutions than the immediate economic hit from students leaving. 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study,' said Caleb Thompson, a 20-year-old US student at Harvard, who lives with eight international scholars. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
