Inaccurate koala 'mass slaughter' claims spread online
"LABOR mass slaughtered over 1,000 endangered Koalas in Victoria last week," reads part of a Facebook post shared on May 3, 2025.
" experts were not consulted. Gov agencies need to work with wildlife experts to ensure the best outcomes for our native animals."
The post was shared as polls opened in with voters deciding between incumbent Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's centre-left Labor Party and challenger Peter Dutton's conservative coalition (archived link).
"A vote for Labor, Greens or any party that preferences Labor is a vote for more native wildlife massacres," the post adds above a picture of two dead koalas lying on a blue tarp.
Image
Screenshot of the misleading Facebook post taken May 22, 2025
on Facebook and X weeks after of koalas had been euthanised after a lightning strike sparked a bushfire in Victoria's Budj Bim National Park (archived here and here).
"They are a national treasure. This is an abomination," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "This government has an agenda to destroy our wildlife and their habitats."
The social media posts, however, make no mention of the fire or its impact on the koalas and contradict statements from Victoria's Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA).
'Kindest course of action'
The agency said the fire burnt 2,200 hectares, including a large area of manna gum canopy which is one of the main food sources for koalas in the park (archived link).
have limited ability to flee fire zones and are vulnerable to burns and respiratory system injuries from heated air and smoke, it said.
Euthanasia "was the humane action to take to prevent further suffering," , DEECA's chief biodiversity officer, told AFP in a May 20 email.
He explained an aerial assessment was conducted because of the terrain, remote location of the koalas, and safety risks, and this approach was "informed by an experienced vet and some of Australia's leading wildlife welfare ethics experts".
Todd added that an assessment conducted by a wildlife vet "showed that all koalas assessed and euthanised by the aerial team during the trial were in very poor health and would have continued to suffer in a deteriorating state of welfare if they had remained alive".
Wildlife Victoria, a non-profit organisation that provides emergency service across the state, also told AFP: "It is not appropriate to have wildlife suffering for weeks."
"It is sadly the outcome that in the aftermath of bushfires there is often substantive loss of wildlife life," the organisation said in a May 20 email, adding they were not involved in DEECA's consultation process though they were "briefed on what was happening".
"Euthanasia is often the kindest course of action for wildlife that are burnt and suffering extensive injuries."
Misused photo
A reverse image search on Google found the picture used alongside the misleading posts was taken more than a decade earlier for a National Geographic story (archived link).
The edition is titled "Racing to Rescue Koalas" and the photo is credited to Joel Sartore.
Image
Screenshot comparison of the misleadingly shared image (left) and the National Geographic photo from its May 2012 edition (right)
Sartore, who is also a National Geographic Explorer, told AFP on May 20: "I can confirm that the photo... is a cropped version of a photo I took while on assignment for National Geographic."
He said he took the photo in October 2011 for a larger story "about volunteers in Queensland who were working to rescue and rehabilitate trapped or injured koalas".
His photo shows over a dozen koalas who were all killed by cars or dogs in a single week (archived link).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Blame social media? Murder in French Riviera town follows online hate speech
In France, outrage over the 53-year old who posted five times to Facebook before and after killing his Tunisian neighbor and who also targeted two Kurdish asylum seekers. Posts included a call to 'go get them wherever they are' and to vote for Marine Le Pen's National Rally. It was enough for it be treated as a terror case and for the conservative right interior minister to make the trip to the French Riviera town of Puget-sur-Argens. How much of the blame for the real-life attack goes to the virtual world? As US tech platforms downsize fact checking and content moderation on their site, the European Union finds itself in a bind. Its Digital Services Act needs enforcement and reinforcement, say anti-racism advocates. But it's also locked in wide-ranging trade negotiations with a United States whose vice-president clearly states that Europe's biggest challenge is 'the threat within' of assault on free speech and censorship of Maga-world ideas. Does Europe have what it takes to define and defend the free exchange of ideas while preventing the phones in our pockets from becoming bullhorns for hate?
AFP
5 hours ago
- AFP
Digitally altered photo misleads on Trump's response to South Korea presidential election
"As soon as [Lee Jae-myung] was inaugurated as president, 'Yoon Again' was spotted on Trump's cellphone," reads part of a Korean-language Facebook post shared on June 5. "It means President Yoon is still the only leader Trump accepts." A photo attached to the post appears to show US President Donald Trump holding up a phone with "Yoon Again" displayed on its screen; the slogan was adopted by impeached president Yoon Suk Yeol's supporters who believe his removal from office was illegitimate (archived link). The posts were shared a day after Lee won South Korea's snap presidential election by a large margin, ending months of political unrest triggered by Yoon's imposition of martial law and subsequent impeachment (archived link). Image Screenshot of the misleading Facebook post, captured on June 5, 2025 The same doctored image and claim were widely circulated in Facebook groups backing Yoon and other conservative figures in South Korea, as well as on far-right forum Ilbe. "President Trump will correct the results of South Korea's presidential election as he seems to have watched it closely," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "Trump is the only ally to President Yoon still standing, let's put our trust in him." As of June 6, Trump had not called the new South Korean president, with analysts saying any further delay may signal reluctance on the US president's part to engage with the new leader (archived link). The circulating image, however, has been altered. Doctored phone screen A keyword search found the circulating image was altered from a photo taken by AFP photographer Saul Loeb on May 30 at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, as Trump disembarked from Air Force One. Trump's phone lock screen in fact shows a picture of the president pointing forwards, not a message of support for Yoon. The date displayed on the phone screen also reads "May 30" -- four days before South Korea's presidential election. Image Screenshot comparison of the altered image shared on Facebook (left) and the AFP photo (right) According to reports by MSNBC and Euronews, the image of Trump's phone screen was widely discussed on social media, with his supporters praising the president and his critics calling him "self-absorbed" (archived here and here). Another photo taken by Loeb also shows Trump's phone screen did not display a message of support for Yoon. AFP has debunked multiple false claims about Trump's supposed opinion on South Korea's impeached president.
France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Taliban hang up Kalashnikovs to pen memoirs of Afghan war
A flood of books has been written, mostly from a Western perspective, about the war between the US-led forces that invaded Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks until the Taliban's return to power in 2021. But in the years since, a proliferation of writings by Taliban figures -- praising their exploits and the achievements of the "Islamic Emirate" -- is now the reigning narrative in Afghanistan. "No matter what foreigners have written... they have largely ignored the reality of what happened to us and why we were forced to fight," author Khalid Zadran told AFP. A member of the Haqqani network -- long viewed as one of the most dangerous militant factions in Afghanistan -- he now serves as the spokesman for the capital's police force. In his 600-page tome in Pashto published in April, he recounts US incursions in his home province of Khost, his childhood steeped in stories of soldiers' "atrocities", and his desire to join the Taliban in the name of his country's "freedom". "I witnessed horrific stories every day -- mangled bodies on the roadside," he writes in "15 Minutes", a title inspired by a US drone strike he narrowly escaped. Muhajer Farahi, now a deputy information and culture minister, penned his "Memories of Jihad: 20 Years in Occupation" to "state the facts", he said. "America, contrary to its claims, has committed cruel and barbaric acts, destroyed our country with bombs, destroyed infrastructure, and has sown discord and cynicism between nations and tribes," he told AFP from his office in central Kabul. Little attention is paid in either book to the thousands of civilians killed in Taliban attacks -- many of them suicide bombings that entrenched fear across the country for nearly two decades. Farahi insists the Taliban "were cautious in saving civilians and innocent" lives, while criticising fellow Afghans who collaborated with the pro-Western police as a "stain" on the country. Rights groups accuse the current Taliban authorities of widespread abuses -- particularly against women and girls, who the United Nations say are victims of what amounts to "gender apartheid". In his book published in 2023, Farahi claims the Taliban attempted to negotiate -- in vain, he insists -- with the United States over the fate of Osama bin Laden, whose capture or death Washington demanded after his plane hijackers killed around 3,000 people in the September 11, 2001 attacks. Bin Laden, the leader of Al-Qaeda, who had been based in Afghanistan, was killed by US forces in Pakistan in 2011. American 'bloodthirsty dragon' "It was clear... that the Americans had already planned the occupation of Afghanistan," writes Farahi in the English version of his book, which has been translated into five languages. In the wake of the September 11 attacks, Afghans thought it would "have nothing to do with our country", he continues, but soon realised that Afghanistan would face "punishment". For 20 years, the war pitted Taliban militants against a US-led coalition of 38 countries supporting the Afghan Republic and its forces. Tens of thousands of Afghans died in the fighting and in Taliban attacks, as did nearly 6,000 foreign soldiers, including 2,400 Americans. For Farahi, the war reflects the West's desire to "impose its culture and ideology on other nations". His disjointed journal mixes battlefield memories with polemical chapters railing against the American "bloodthirsty dragon". The book "reveals the truths that were not told before because the media, especially the Western media, presented a different picture of the war", he said. According to him, the "mujahideen", or holy warriors, despite being far less equipped, were able to rely on their unity and God's aid to achieve victory. New front Only a few of the new wave of Taliban books have been autobiographies, which appeal to an audience seeking to understand the war "from the inside", according to Zadran. His book, initially 2,000 copies in Pashto, sold out quickly and another 1,000 are in the works -- along with a Dari-language version, he said. Many chapters mention Bowe Bergdahl, the US soldier held hostage for five years by the Haqqani network. He recounts treks through the mountains along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border to move him between hideouts, efforts to convert him to Islam and conversations about his girlfriend back in the United States. Both accounts end in 2021, before the transformation of the fighters who moved from remote mountain hideouts to the carpeted offices of the capital. There, their battle has turned diplomatic: the Taliban are now fighting for international recognition of their government. "The war is over now," Farahi said, "and we want good relations with everyone" -- even with the "bloodthirsty dragon".
