
SC orders protection of Bihar girl who fled abusive forced marriage
The Supreme Court on Wednesday stepped in to protect a 16-year-old girl from Bihar who alleged she was forcibly married to a man twice her age and later subjected to abuse, as it ordered protection to the girl and her friend who helped her escape the marriage and now faces a kidnapping charge.
A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan directed the Director General of Police, Bihar, and the Delhi Police Commissioner to ensure the safety of both the girl and her friend. They were also asked to provide them with emergency contact numbers to be used in case of any exigency.
The girl approached the court through her friend, seeking annulment of the marriage under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and protection from any coercive action. Her petition said she had taken her Class 10 board exams when she was married off on December 9, 2024, under pressure from her family. The groom, a civil contractor aged about 33, allegedly insisted on the marriage as repayment for financial support extended to her family.
The plea said she was immediately sent off with her husband after the ceremony and was not allowed to return home, despite promises that she could come back in two days. Her in-laws repeatedly told her that they wanted a child and that too much money had been spent on the wedding to reverse it. The plea said the girl, who dreams of becoming a teacher or a lawyer, was told she would not be allowed to continue her studies.
The petition alleged repeated physical and emotional abuse by the husband, especially after she resisted physical intimacy. She remained in a state of distress until mid-January 2025, when her maternal uncle persuaded her in-laws to let her visit her parental home.
Even there, the girl claimed, her requests to terminate the marriage and pursue her education were ignored. On March 31, 2025, she left her home and sought help from her friend. After much persuasion, he agreed to accompany her to Varanasi. The two have been on the run since, fearing for their lives.
The plea said the husband has made public threats, declaring in their village that he would kill the girl and 'happily go to jail' for it. Her mother filed a kidnapping case against the friend in Patna's Piplawan Naubatpur police station, allegedly concealing the fact that her daughter had already been married.
'The petitioner fears she will be killed if apprehended or forced to return,' said the plea, urging protection from any coercive police action until the case is fully adjudicated.
Taking note of the threat to the minor's safety, the Supreme Court issued its protective directions and is expected to hear the matter in July. While the police chiefs have been directed to submit status reports in the matter before the next hearing, the court also sought responses from the girl's mother and the civil contractor, who have been named as parties to her petition in the court.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
SC grants protection to minor girl forced into marriage, issues notice to Bihar, Delhi police
New Delhi, June 18 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Wednesday stepped in to protect a 16-year-old girl from Bihar who alleged she was forcibly married to a man twice her age and subjected to repeated abuse. The court directed both the Bihar Director General of Police and the Delhi Police Commissioner to ensure her safety, along with that of her friend who helped her escape the marriage and now faces kidnapping charges. A bench comprising Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan issued the directions while hearing a petition filed by the girl through her friend. The petition sought annulment of the marriage under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and protection from any coercive action by the police. The girl, who had just appeared for her Class 10 board examinations, was allegedly married off on December 9, 2024, under pressure from her family. The man she was married to, a 33-year-old civil contractor, reportedly demanded the marriage as repayment for financial support extended to the family. According to the plea, the girl was sent to live with him immediately after the ceremony and was denied return to her parental home. She alleged that her in-laws pressured her to bear a child and blocked her from continuing her education. The petition further claimed that she was subjected to emotional and physical abuse, especially after she resisted sexual advances. In January 2025, her maternal uncle managed to bring her back to her parents' home temporarily. However, her pleas to terminate the marriage and resume her studies were ignored. On March 31, 2025, the girl fled her home with the help of a friend and has been on the run since, fearing for her life. The petition revealed that her husband made public threats to kill her, reportedly saying he would 'happily go to jail' for it. Her mother subsequently filed a kidnapping case against her friend at Piplawan Naubatpur Police Station in Patna, allegedly concealing the fact that the girl had been married off. The petition emphasised the urgency of the situation fearing that she would be killed if apprehended or forced to return. She urged the Court to protect her from police action until the matter is fully adjudicated. Taking note of the threat to the minor's life, the Supreme Court ordered both Bihar and Delhi Police to provide the girl and her friend with emergency contact numbers for immediate assistance and to ensure their security. The court also directed the police chiefs to submit a status report before the next hearing and issued notices to the girl's mother and the civil contractor husband, who have been named as parties in the case. The matter is scheduled for further hearing in July.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Despite SC relief, distributor reluctant to release 'Thug Life' in Karnataka
A day after the Supreme Court ordered the release of Thug Life in Karnataka, the Karnataka distributor for Thug Life has said that he will not release the movie. The distributor Venkatesh Kamalakar has been quoted by the Indian Express as saying that the movie has not done well even in Tamil Nadu. He also said that for any movie to well when it comes to gross collection, the first two weeks are important. "I will not release the movie, and I have many reasons. I bought the Karnataka distribution right, and today, if any movie has to earn money, it happens only within two weeks. It has been more than two weeks since the movie was released, and it has not done well even in Tamil Nadu," Venkatesh Kamalakar was quoted as saying by the Indian Express. Thug Life was released in all centres, except in Karnataka, on June 5, 2025 The release of the Kamal Hassan-starrer was stalled in Karnataka following outrage over the actor's remark that "Tamil was born out of Kannada." The Supreme Court on Tuesday came down heavily on the Karnataka government for the stalling of the movie in the state. While directing that the film be screened in the state the Supreme Court noted that mobs and vigilante groups cannot be allowed to take over the streets.


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Supreme Court Slams Madras HCs Arrest Order Of Tamil Nadu ADGP Jayaram In Abduction Case
The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed shock over an order of the Madras High Court that had directed Tamil Nadu Police to 'secure and take action' against now-suspended Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) H.M. Jayaram in connection with the abduction of an 18-year-old teenager. A Bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan was hearing a special leave petition (SLP) filed by the senior IPS official seeking a stay on the impugned Madras High Court directive. As per the SLP filed before the apex court, there was absolutely no material on record warranting his custodial interrogation, and the 'arbitrary and prejudicial directions' were issued without due process, infringing his fundamental right to equality before the law and protection of life and personal liberty. During the course of the hearing, the Justice Bhuyan-led Bench also raised eyebrows over the order issued by the Tamil Nadu Home Department on Tuesday, suspending ADGP Jayaram. 'He is a senior police official. Where is the question of suspending him when he has joined the investigation? You cannot do this. This is very demoralising,' it remarked. Posting the matter for hearing on Thursday, the apex court asked Tamil Nadu's counsel to seek instructions on the withdrawal of the petitioner's suspension. Pertinently, the state's government submitted before the top court that the petitioner was not arrested since he joined the investigation. On Monday, Tamil Nadu Police took ADGP Jayaram into custody as he exited the Madras High Court premises, and was immediately taken to Thiruvalangadu police station for interrogation. He was questioned for nearly six hours by the investigating officer, during which his formal statement was recorded as well. The senior IPS official is accused of facilitating the abduction of a minor boy by allegedly providing his official vehicle to a gang involved in forcibly separating a couple. The abduction case centres around a complaint lodged by a woman named Lakshmi, whose elder son had married a woman from Theni district against her family's wishes. The couple reportedly went into hiding, fearing retaliation. In an attempt to locate the couple, members of the woman's family, allegedly aided by hired men, barged into Lakshmi's home and abducted her younger son in their absence. The boy was later found abandoned near a hotel, injured and traumatised. Subsequent investigation revealed that an official car linked to ADGP Jayaram was allegedly used in the abduction, prompting the Madras High Court to take direct, immediate action against the senior IPS official. On Tuesday, the matter reached the Supreme Court, and a bench of Justices Bhuyan and Manmohan agreed to hear the SLP on June 18. Jayaram's lawyer said: "Yesterday, an ADGP rank officer was arrested on the direction of the Madras High Court. The SLP has been filed today at 10 a.m. Kindly list the matter for urgent hearing." Advocates Aditya Kumar Choudhary, Sandeep Pandey, Vel Murugan, Venkatesh Mohanraj and Rajesh Singh Chauhan are representing the petitioner before the apex court.