Community feedback sought on proposed 3.3 per cent City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder rates hike
Community feedback is sought on a proposed maximum 3.3 per cent rate-in-the-dollar and minimum payment increase for Kalgoorlie-Boulder residents next financial year, with some councillors expressing a desire to see the figure reduced before it is adopted.
At Monday night's meeting, councillors unanimously endorsed the proposed rates model — which includes an overall rates revenue yield increase of 5.01 per cent — for public submissions up to June 10.
The City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder expects the proposed 2025-26 rates revenue yield to be $35,822,553 compared to the current financial year revenue of $34,112,213.
The agenda item report tabled at the meeting said this was equivalent to a 3.3 per cent increase to the rate-in-the-dollar and minimum payments.
The report said this increase was necessary to meet the anticipated revenue requirements for the 2025-26 budget, addressing the changing economic conditions across the city.
It said the proposed hike was below the Local Government Cost Index June forecast of 3.6 per cent but above the CPI rate of 2.8 per cent.
Mayor Glenn Wilson welcomed community feedback on the proposal to be considered before a rates model was adopted at a future meeting, but stressed the 3.3 per cent was the maximum increase to be considered by the city.
He said rates accounted for a quarter to a third of the city's revenue, with government grant funding making up a significant portion as well.
'Community expectations of what council should be delivering is quite high,' Mr Wilson said.
'Balancing that up with a figure that is the least impactful as possible to our residents and ratepayers had been key for these conversations to the point where council have instructed staff to look at mechanisms that we could have at our disposal — which we already do for hardship payments — and to make sure that we're only putting up the minimum to help those who are finding it difficult.'
Cr Carla Viskovich, who moved the motion on Monday night, said the city had 'ambitious goals', including plans to renew ageing infrastructure, and she looked forward to the council continuing to be transparent with the community about how rates funding was used.
While ultimately supporting the motion, Cr Terrence Winner said he was not committing to the 3.3 per cent figure 'completely'.
'At this point in time, we as a council are very well aware, and it has been discussed around the table on numerous occasions, that most people are hurting at the moment with the cost-of-living pressures and financial instability,' he said.
'I think we need to continue to explore ways to support our community through this time; by keeping our belts tight we can keep any increases as low as possible and charge those with greater capacity more, while reviewing city expenditure to keep in line with community capabilities, expectations and community growth.
'Our community wants to see that if we are investing money into projects and programs that we're getting great outcomes in delivering these projects.'
Cr Nardia Turner said her hope was for the rate increase to be reduced when the issue returned to council.
The report to council also noted an anticipated 3 per cent increase in operating expenditure for 2025-26 and an expected $77 million in capital works.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
Labor is 'gaslighting the Australian people' on unrealised capital gains tax proposal, Geoff Wilson warns
Labor is 'gaslighting the Australian people' by claiming its proposed super tax will impact a small sliver of the population, a leading fund manager has warned as the government and the Greens close in on a deal. The Albanese government's controversial plan to double the tax rate on funds in super accounts above $3m and hit unrealised gains could soon be legislated. Labor has claimed the tax will hit just 80,000 super accounts, however, Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson, who has launched a petition opposing the plan, said by forcing Aussies to pay taxes on paper gains it will hinder investment in Australia. 'Both Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers - and probably most of the government - are gaslighting the Australian people by saying: 'Look, this will only impact a very small percentage of people that pay the additional tax',' Mr Wilson told Sky News. 'That's correct, but what it'll do is actually impact about how $4.2 trillion in superannuation is invested. 'We anticipate that the money will come out of self-managed super funds (SMSF), which is about $1.1 trillion, and billions of that will go into the housing market and push house prices up . ' He cautioned Aussies who use their SMSF as a low tax investment vehicle will be discouraged from funding projects and businesses in the Australian market. 'People won't want to take risk on their superannuation in in the self-managed super funds,' Mr Wilson said. 'The angel investors and the startups and the small companies in Australia that find it hard to raise capital, particularly at this point in time - that tap's going to be turned off.' He pointed to the taxing of unrealised gains in Norway that drove investment out of the country despite initial expectations it would bring in millions. 'It was only for the ultra-wealthy, they thought they were going to raise $150 million,' Mr Wilson said. 'Instead of raising that, they were minus half a billion.' He also noted the capital gains tax hike in the United Kingdom which resulted in the government taking in 10 per cent less capital gains tax revenue. 'People change their behaviour,' Mr Wilson said. 'We've done economic models, we think it'll be negative to the tune of $94.5 billion on the Australian economy.' Alongside taxing unrealised gains, Labor's super tax has drawn criticism for its failure to index the $3m threshold over time. The Greens want Labor to lower the threshold to $2m and index it to the rate of inflation. New analysis from the Financial Services Council shows that under Labor's plan more than half a million Aussies currently in the workforce will be captured by the tax. Of those impacted, more than 200,000 are currently under 30, while 135,000 are between 30 and 34 and 65,000 are between 35 and 39. The number of impacted taxpayers greatly drops off for Australians 40 and over. The Greens' proposal would hit more than 200,000 Aussies currently in the workforce and is more evenly spread across the age ranges. Financial Services Council CEO Blake Briggs urged Labor to listen to feedback from consumers, industries and economists on how the tax will impact future generations. 'The superannuation industry recognises the government has the capacity to force the new tax through the Parliament with the support of the Greens, but encourages the two parties to take a more constructive and consultative approach,' Mr Briggs said. 'The Financial Services Council encourages the Government to consult on options that would not unfairly target future generations of Australian superannuation consumers and undermine confidence in our retirement system by introducing a new, contentious tax on unrealised capital gains.'
Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
‘Every worker': Number of Aussies hit by unrealised gains tax in next 30 years revealed
Wilson Asset Management Founder Geoff Wilson reveals the number of Australians in the next 30 years who will be hit by the unrealised gains tax. 'Now, effectively without the indexation, we have done some numbers, and within the next 30 years, 8.1 million or more than half of the working population will be over that $3 million mark,' Mr Wilson told Sky News host Peta Credlin. 'Without indexation, eventually every worker will be paying tax on unrealised gains, so they will be paying tax on a profit that may never eventuate.'
Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
‘Things have to be changed': Economists urge Labor to reconsider unrealised tax scheme
Wilson Asset Management Chairman Geoff Wilson says Labor's tax on unrealised capital gains will have a 'negative economic impact' as its purpose is to try and get superannuation back to its primary purpose of retirement funds. 'It is very beneficial for people who've got large sums in superannuation, they get a disproportionate benefit than the average Australians,' Mr Wilson told Sky News Australia. 'The trillions of dollars that's in superannuation, that's meant to be long-term investments … that won't happen anymore. 'This isn't the way to do it.'
