logo
Coalition calls for Senate inquiry after Labor backflips on US beef exports ban

Coalition calls for Senate inquiry after Labor backflips on US beef exports ban

Sky News AU28-07-2025
The Coalition wants a Senate inquiry into the government backflip to allow US beef exports into Australia, citing the 'concerning' timing of the decision amid stalled tariff negotiations.
Labor has rejected claims the link to ongoing tariff discussions, stating the decision follows a lengthy review undertaken by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, which found new tracing protocols eliminated risks posed by beef sourced from Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US.
However Nationals Leader David Littleproud says an inquiry is required to give 'assurance' that 'Labor isn't sacrificing our high biosecurity standards'.
The probe would look at the threat of importing beef which has potentially been exposed to diseases, the risk assessment taken by the government, standards and protocol for US beef imports and the risk posed by future outbreaks.
'The timing of this decision, just as the Prime Minister seeks to obtain a meeting with the US President, is concerning,' Mr Littleproud said.
'Our biosecurity cannot be a bargaining tool. The protocol outlining the import conditions, only released today, provide little detail on the science and the traceability requirements.'
Nationals senator Matt Canavan said an inquiry was needed to 'fully understand the urgency and advice behind the government's decision'.
'It's imperative we understand what impact Labor's decision will have on Australia's reputation as having the world's best and safest beef,' he said.
'Our biosecurity standards are world-leading and our beef producers deserve to know whether they are being sacrificed at the political alter.'
Speaking during question time on Monday, Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said Labor had 'not compromised on biosecurity at all, in any way, shape or form,' and said Mr Littleproud a former agriculture minister, would be aware of the review processes.
'He would know about the industry engagement that has occurred throughout this process,' she said.
'The other thing that he would know is that the US and Australia traceability systems are equivalent and that the decision has been taken based on science … and of course all food imported into Australia must be safe and compliant with our food standards.
'The member opposite would know that the department's security assessment is done in the usual manner as it is done for every other imports into this country.'
This comes after Trade Minister Don Farrell mistakenly said US President Donald Trump had directly asked Mr Albanese to remove the ban on US beef exports.
Moments later Mr Albanese clarified that the issue was not directly raised in either of the three phone calls he's had with Mr Trump.
Instead, he said Mr Trump had made the statement during his Liberation Day tariff announcement.
Announcing the levies, which hit a 10 per cent levy on general Australian imports in April, Mr Trump singled out Australia's treatment of US beef.
Originally published as Coalition calls for Senate inquiry after Labor backflips on US beef exports ban
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese backs Victorian push to legislate right to work from home
Albanese backs Victorian push to legislate right to work from home

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese backs Victorian push to legislate right to work from home

Victoria's push to enshrine the right to work from home in law has been endorsed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who said workplace changes were often met with allegations of chaos that did not materialise. Speaking in Melbourne on Tuesday to promote the opening of a new urgent care clinic in Melbourne's western suburbs, the prime minister was for the first time asked about Victoria's plan to legislate the right to work from home at least two days a week when possible. Legal experts have questioned whether the state can enforce this right, having surrendered industrial relations powers to the Commonwealth, while some business groups have argued the move would take flexibility away from employers and their workers. Albanese said Allan's working-from-home stance matched the views of the federal government. 'Jacinta Allan, as Victorian premier, she's putting forward her views,' he said. 'I've got to say it's consistent with our views, which are that working from home is something that's important, something that Australians voted for, something that Peter Dutton tried to clamp down on, and Australians responded accordingly.' During the 2025 election campaign, the Coalition backtracked on a proposal to force federal public servants to return to the office five days a week as it began to slide in the polls and MPs reported a backlash from voters who incorrectly thought Dutton intended to force every worker back into the office. Loading Albanese said Victoria could take 'whatever action they want', and the premier was responding to community sentiment that flexible work helped workers and employers. 'Every time an industrial relations change is proposed, we hear suggestions that somehow this will undermine things,' he said.

Twelve judges resign from literary awards after fellowship sinking
Twelve judges resign from literary awards after fellowship sinking

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Twelve judges resign from literary awards after fellowship sinking

An independent review into the roles of the library and minister began last month, and will report back to the board by September 30. What they said Responding to questions from Labor's Leeanne Enoch, State Librarian Vicki McDonald said of the 36 judges lined up for the Queensland Literary Awards, to be announced next month, 12 had resigned since Wyld's award was rescinded. 'We have not had the number of judges resign previously,' McDonald, who has been in the role for nine years, said. Langbroek, facing questions himself, stood by the decision to issue a legal direction to the library not to hand over the award on state-funded premises to someone 'appearing to justify terrorism'. 'Let me make it very clear … that I'm not questioning the skill, expertise and knowledge of [judging] panel members. What we're talking about here is the circumstances in which a fellowship was withdrawn under my direction,' he said. Asked if he would rule out intervening in any other awards, Langbroek said he would take similar action in future 'if it's deemed necessary' and said if people 'choose not to be judges again, we will find other judges'. Another perspective Wyld told Guardian Australia in May that her X post bore no relevance to her manuscript on the Stolen Generations that originally garnered her the fellowship. Loading 'I probably could have worded it less emotional,' Wyld said. 'It was mostly me being really devastated at the Albanese government's approach to the whole [Gaza] situation.' The Australian Society of Authors said in May it intended to write to Langbroek and Premier David Crisafulli to 'call for a strong stance on freedom of expression and independent arts funding processes'. What you need to know Enoch also used the hearing to question QPAC chief executive Rachel Healy about the $175 million New Performing Arts Venue – to be known as the Glasshouse Theatre after a recent public poll – and the original plan to name it after a prominent First Nations figure. Healy told the hearing that the QPAC board was invited by the then Arts Department director-general in August 2023 to 'provide advice on the name of the new theatre'. Healy confirmed the board made a recommendation to the department in March 2024 featuring 'a range of names' but that the name of activist and poet Oodgeroo Noonuccal 'stood out' in the view of the board's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advisory committee. The board was then advised in April that public consultation process would be undertaken for the name. While respondents could make their own suggestions, the only pre-selected options were Glasshouse, Lantern, Watershed and Russell. Healy said the decision to not include Noonuccal's name in this list was 'a matter for the department and for the minister'.

Twelve judges resign from literary awards after fellowship sinking
Twelve judges resign from literary awards after fellowship sinking

The Age

time11 minutes ago

  • The Age

Twelve judges resign from literary awards after fellowship sinking

An independent review into the roles of the library and minister began last month, and will report back to the board by September 30. What they said Responding to questions from Labor's Leeanne Enoch, State Librarian Vicki McDonald said of the 36 judges lined up for the Queensland Literary Awards, to be announced next month, 12 had resigned since Wyld's award was rescinded. 'We have not had the number of judges resign previously,' McDonald, who has been in the role for nine years, said. Langbroek, facing questions himself, stood by the decision to issue a legal direction to the library not to hand over the award on state-funded premises to someone 'appearing to justify terrorism'. 'Let me make it very clear … that I'm not questioning the skill, expertise and knowledge of [judging] panel members. What we're talking about here is the circumstances in which a fellowship was withdrawn under my direction,' he said. Asked if he would rule out intervening in any other awards, Langbroek said he would take similar action in future 'if it's deemed necessary' and said if people 'choose not to be judges again, we will find other judges'. Another perspective Wyld told Guardian Australia in May that her X post bore no relevance to her manuscript on the Stolen Generations that originally garnered her the fellowship. Loading 'I probably could have worded it less emotional,' Wyld said. 'It was mostly me being really devastated at the Albanese government's approach to the whole [Gaza] situation.' The Australian Society of Authors said in May it intended to write to Langbroek and Premier David Crisafulli to 'call for a strong stance on freedom of expression and independent arts funding processes'. What you need to know Enoch also used the hearing to question QPAC chief executive Rachel Healy about the $175 million New Performing Arts Venue – to be known as the Glasshouse Theatre after a recent public poll – and the original plan to name it after a prominent First Nations figure. Healy told the hearing that the QPAC board was invited by the then Arts Department director-general in August 2023 to 'provide advice on the name of the new theatre'. Healy confirmed the board made a recommendation to the department in March 2024 featuring 'a range of names' but that the name of activist and poet Oodgeroo Noonuccal 'stood out' in the view of the board's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advisory committee. The board was then advised in April that public consultation process would be undertaken for the name. While respondents could make their own suggestions, the only pre-selected options were Glasshouse, Lantern, Watershed and Russell. Healy said the decision to not include Noonuccal's name in this list was 'a matter for the department and for the minister'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store