Crime that funds classrooms
The sellers of illegal cigarettes are, according to the SA Revenue Service, posing a significant threat to the fiscus because of their avoidance of duties and value added tax.
That's why a conviction of such a seller – and accompanying hefty fine – is something to be welcomed.
But, the Evander Regional Court went a step further this week in imposing a further punishment which will have a direct social benefit.
Uptown Superstore was fined R600 000 – but must also buy 504 durable, quality double-seater desks for four schools in the area.
ALSO READ: Company found guilty of illicit cigarette trade, fined R600k and ordered to buy desks for schools
The company has three months to comply with the court judgment.
Major-General Nico Gerber, provincial head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, was a master of understatement in calling it 'an interesting sentence…' But was spot-on when he added: 'The community is benefiting from this sentence and it will definitely assist the next generation in their needs for a better education.'
We suggest that other courts take judicial notice of that sentence and consider imposing similar punishments.
A crime which affects the community – and smuggling does that by taking tax revenue away from where it could be spent improving lives – should have some sort of payback which helps the community.
NOW READ: Vodacom scores ConCourt win over Please Call Me inventor Nkosana Makate
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
20 hours ago
- The Citizen
Daily Lotto results: Saturday, 2 August 2025
Tonight's jackpot is R600 000! Here are your winning Daily Lotto results for 2 August 2025. Get the Daily Lotto results as soon as they are drawn on The Citizen. Daily Lotto results for 2 August 2025: The winning Daily Lotto numbers will appear below after the draw. Usually within 10 minutes of the draw. You might need to refresh the page to see the updated results. 00, 00, 00, 00, 00. Next DAILY LOTTO jackpot is estimated at R600,000! PLAY NOW or on the Mobile App. Players must be 18 years or older, play responsibly. ITHUBA is the proud operator of the National Lottery. — #PhandaPushaPlay (@sa_lottery) August 1, 2025 How to play Daily Lotto in SA? If you are buying a ticket in-store: Pick up a betslip in any lottery store. Choose five numbers between 1 and 36 or ask for a Quick Pick. Entries cost R3 each. You can play a max of R150, but you are allowed to play multiple boards. Select how many consecutive draws you wish to enter, up to a maximum of 10. Leave blank for a single draw. Take your betslip to the teller to pay for your ticket. Write your details on the back of your ticket in case you need to claim a prize. If you do not sign your ticket and you lose it, anyone can use it to claim the prize. If you are playing online: Set up a lottery account here and make a deposit to pay for tickets. Choose five numbers from 1 to 36 or select 'Quick Pick' to generate a random set. Repeat this on as many boards as you want to play. Decide whether to enter a single draw or multiple draws. Confirm and pay for your entry. What time is the Daily Lotto draw? The Daily Lotto draws take place shortly after 9:30pm every evening, and tickets can be bought until 8:30pm. Is there a winner every day? Yes. The jackpot prize money is guaranteed to be given away even if no one matches all five numbers. When this happens, the jackpot is split between everyone who matches two or more numbers. Visit and go to the How to Play Daily Lotto section to learn more.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Lucky Montana's R15 million tax battle with Sars heats up
Prasa's former chief executive Lucky Montana is facing a R15 million tax bill from the SA Revenue Service. Image: File uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) MP and former Passenger Rail Agency of SA (Prasa) chief executive Lucky Montana faces a tax bill of over R15 million by the SA Revenue Service (Sars). Sars has also launched proceedings to have him sequestrated. The tax collection entity applied to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria last month to strike out several allegations made by Montana. According to Sars, allegations in about seven paragraphs were identified as objectionable matter. A defiant Montana on Saturday said the battle is far from over and is likely to end in the Constitutional Court. "On July 21, I filed an application in the high court to rescind the original default judgement obtained by Sars in 2022, without my knowledge. "This led us to the current situation. In addition, we have taken the decision to appeal the recent judgment. This is but one battle in a much broader legal fight. Until these two matters are finalised by the courts, the battle is not over," Montana explained. In his replying affidavit, Montana accused Sars of arrogant conduct that disregards legitimate objections and denies him constitutional rights to administrative justice and fairness. Judge Etienne Labuschagne found the allegations to be irrelevant and vexatious. Montana also accused Sars of maladministration and abuse of power and of indulging in a witch hunt against him, motivated by a political agenda. In addition, he contended that Sars persisted in pursuing false claims that he bought properties to the value of R36m in order to 'nail' him. He alleged that Sars was part of a dirty campaign of an unidentified Johannesburg firm of attorneys to target persons like him by pursuing false allegations. Other allegations include Sars breaking into his house and acting like a criminal gang. Judge Labuschagne said all these allegations are scandalous and vexatious and were also not relevant. In its response to Montana, Sars argued that it is prejudiced by such allegations and that not only are the allegations scandalous, vexatious or irrelevant, but the entity has no right to respond. Additionally, it faces institutional reputational harm, to the detriment of the tax administration scheme in South Africa if such allegations are not struck out. Sars succeeded in having the allegations struck out, with Judge Labuschagne also awarding the revenue service costs of the strike application out are to be paid on a punitive scale of attorney and client, including the costs of two counsels, where so employed. "I am satisfied that Sars has established a right to strike out the above material identified in its strike out notice. "The allegations are emotive and intemperate, unsupported by facts and constitute gratuitous abuse. They are irrelevant to the issue of whether this court should condone the late filing of an answering affidavit," the judge found. He said while the court is mindful not to stifle robust debate such allegations fall to be deprecated as irrelevant, unhelpful and calculated to harm and that such conduct warrants a punitive cost order. The judge added that Montana's answering affidavit was due in the sequestration proceedings on April 26 last year but since then, he has failed to file it or to indicate in papers when it would be filed.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Apex Court's surprise ruling extends Makate's Please Call Me Battle
Nqolokazi Nomvalo ss Head of Legal: Operations at Life Healthcare Group. Image: Supplied FOR nearly two decades, South Africans have watched the legal saga between Vodacom and its former employee, Nkosana Makate, unfold like a courtroom drama with no final act. The latest twist, a unanimous Constitutional Court judgment handed down on Thursday, has reignited public interest and legal debate. In a development that stunned many legal observers and defied predictions of finality, the apex court has remitted the case back to the Supreme Court of Appeal. It will now be reconsidered by a freshly constituted bench. This move injects fresh uncertainty into a saga long believed to be approaching its conclusion. But what does this mean, and why does it matter? It is important to clarify that Makate's original idea was a simple yet powerful proposition: a mobile user with no airtime should be able to 'buzz' another user, prompting them to call back. Vodacom, recognising the creativity, developed the concept into the now-famous "Please Call Me" free message. This version allowed for costless transmission and universal utility. That difference matters, especially when assessing the various compensation models, which have ranged from employee-equivalent remuneration to revenue-sharing frameworks. The Supreme Court of Appeal had previously affirmed the Gauteng High Court's decision in Makate's favour and went further, controversially substituting its own compensation formula and awarding Makate 5 to 7.5 percent of Please Call Me revenue. Vodacom challenged this ruling, arguing that the SCA overstepped its bounds as an appellate court, particularly because Makate had not lodged a cross-appeal. The Constitutional Court, being the highest court in the land, granted Vodacom leave to appeal and upheld its challenge. Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, writing for a unanimous bench in what is widely regarded as his swan judgment before retirement, agreed. The Constitutional Court held that the SCA had impermissibly ventured into terrain that required a cross-appeal and had disregarded the true issues before it. This resulted in a failure of justice, specifically a breach of Vodacom's right to a fair public hearing as guaranteed under section 34 of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court has directed that the case return to the SCA, where a different panel of judges will now consider it afresh. It marks a rare judicial reset in a case that has already passed through every major court in the country. The legal significance of this moment cannot be overstated. The Constitutional Court has reinforced the boundaries of appellate authority and revived critical scrutiny around the quantum of fair compensation. The referral order compels the SCA to take a fresh look, with a new bench and a sharper lens, at the determination originally made by Vodacom's CEO. That figure was R47 million, reached after extensive modelling and expert input. It followed a failed negotiation between Makate, who proposed R20.2 billion, and Vodacom, which offered R10 million. Makate has challenged the CEO's determination as woefully low, especially in light of the widespread success of the Please Call Me service. Beyond the courtroom, this case has come to represent the struggle for equitable recognition of intellectual contributions, especially by employees in corporate ecosystems. The 'Please Call Me' litigation has gripped the public imagination. It's not just because of the staggering figures involved. It speaks to something profoundly South African: the courage to claim one's voice and the power of innovation born in unlikely places. As the legal process restarts again, one hopes that the eventual outcome will honour not just the merits of law but the deeper values it serves—justice, fairness, and transformative equity. That would be a fitting tribute to Justice Madlanga's legacy of principled clarity and constitutional fidelity. (Nomvalo is Head of Legal: Operations at Life Healthcare Group. She began her career in corporate litigation and commercial law at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc. Her expertise also encompasses traditional arts, heritage preservation, transformation, and the promotion of women's and children's rights. Her views don't necessarily reflect those of the Sunday Tribune or Independent Media) SUNDAY TRIBUNE
