How homegrown satellites can take India's defence to next level
Chethan Kumar
TNN
May 26, 2025, 15:15 IST IST
Operation Sindoor showed what satellite intelligence can do. Now, India is racing to build a network big enough to protect every inch of its land, sea and sky
They were the unseen heroes, invisible but vigilant eyes in the sky during Operation Sindoor. Cartography satellites (Cartosats), radar imaging satellites (Risats), and Earth-observation satellites (EOSs) played a key role in the precision hammering of Pakistan's air defence systems and air bases.
That has driven home the importance of having more such silent sentinels in space in the era of high-tech warfare.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Meteorite that hit home in US this summer is older than earth, researchers say
A meteorite that crashed into a home in Atlanta, Georgia, is older than our planet Earth, according to a scientist who examined a fragment of the space rock. 'This particular meteor that entered the atmosphere has a long history before it made it to the ground of McDonough, and in order to totally understand that, we actually have to examine what the rock is and determine what group of asteroids it belongs to,' said Scott Harris, a researcher in the UGA Franklin College of Arts and Sciences' department of geology. Harris examined 23 of the 50 grams of meteorite fragments recovered from a piece the size of a cherry tomato that struck a man's roof like a bullet and left a dent in the floor of the home outside Atlanta. 'It belongs to a group of asteroids in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter that we now think we can tie to a breakup of a much larger asteroid about 470 million years ago,' Harris says. 'But in that breakup, some pieces get into Earth-crossing orbits, and if given long enough, their orbit around the sun and Earth's orbit around the sun end up being at the same place, at the same moment in time.' The geologist used optical and electron microscopy to determine that the rock was a chondrite, a type of meteorite that originated in the early solar system and is rich in carbon, water, and clay materials. In fact, according to NASA, chondrites are the most abundant type of stony meteorite. Harris said that scientists at the University of Georgia, along with colleagues from Arizona State University, plan to submit their findings to the Nomenclature Committee of the Meteoritical Society. They have proposed naming the space rock the McDonough Meteorite, reflecting the name of the Georgia city where it struck the Earth. The University of Georgia said the meteorite studied by Hariss and the team , was the the 27th meteorite recovered in the history of the state, and was among the sixth witnessed fall. 'This is something that used to be expected once every few decades and not multiple times within 20 years,' Harris said. 'Modern technology in addition to an attentive public is going to help us recover more and more meteorites.' Over the years, scientists have sought to understand the role of meteorites in the formation of the solar system. Earth formed roughly 4.5 billion years ago. In its infancy, it was bombarded by meteorites, comets, and other material from space. In June, the American Meteor Society received reports of a fireball that streaked across the southeastern U.S. sky in broad daylight. NASA confirmed that the meteor entered Earth's atmosphere during the Bootids meteor shower, a relatively minor celestial event occurring in the last week of June. Around the same time, a resident of Henry County, Georgia, reported that a rock, now identified as the McDonough Meteorite, crashed through their ceiling, according to the National Weather Service in Peachtree City. The object broke through the roof and ceiling before cracking the flooring inside the home. 'I suspect that he heard three simultaneous things. One was the collision with his roof, one was a tiny cone of a sonic boom and a third was it impacting the floor all in the same moment,' Harris said. 'There was enough energy when it hit the floor that it pulverized part of the material down to literal dust fragments.'
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
India's cyber doctrine has an ambitious vision, but there are implementation challenges
On August 7 this year, the Chief of Defence Staff of India, General Anil Chauhan, released the Joint Doctrine for Cyberspace Operations. The unveiling of this declassified document represents India's formal acknowledgement that future warfare will be as much about bytes as bullets. While the doctrine articulates laudable strategic ambitions, its success will ultimately depend on addressing several practical challenges that need to be discussed, explored and harmonised. The doctrine's core premise — that cyber threats transcend traditional service boundaries — reflects hard-learned lessons from global conflicts. The 2007 cyber attacks on Estonia, which paralysed the nation's digital infrastructure, demonstrated how adversaries could achieve strategic objectives without firing a single shot. Similarly, the 2010 Stuxnet attack on Iran's nuclear facilities showed how cyber operations could achieve kinetic effects, blurring the lines between digital and physical warfare. India's own experience reinforces this reality. The 2020 Mumbai power grid attack, allegedly linked to Chinese hackers, illustrated how critical infrastructure vulnerabilities could be exploited during military tensions. Not to miss the recent info war using digital media and cyber attacks during Operation Sindoor. The doctrine's emphasis on 'threat-informed planning and real-time intelligence integration' acknowledges cyber warfare's unique characteristics. Unlike conventional military operations that follow established patterns, cyber attacks can emerge from state actors, criminal networks, or lone hackers with equal destructive potential. The 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack, which affected over 300,000 computers globally within days, exemplifies how rapidly cyber threats can escalate beyond traditional containment strategies. However, the doctrine's most ambitious goal — achieving true jointness in cyberspace — faces significant structural obstacles. The Indian military's historical tendency toward service-specific cultures runs deep. Each service has developed distinct procurement systems, operational protocols, and technological preferences over decades. The Army's focus on tactical cyber capabilities, the Navy's emphasis on maritime domain awareness, and the Air Force's space-cyber integration represent fundamentally different approaches to the same domain. Consider the ongoing challenges with India's Defence Cyber Agency, established in 2019. Despite its mandate to coordinate tri-service cyber operations, reports suggest that resource allocation, operational authority, and intelligence sharing still remain non-optimal. The doctrine's success will require overcoming these institutional barriers that have proven resistant to reform efforts. The US offers a cautionary tale. Despite establishing Cyber Command in 2009, American forces still struggle with inter-service coordination in cyberspace. The complexity of integrating Army network operations, Navy information warfare, and Air Force cyber capabilities has required constant organizational adjustments. If the world's most technologically advanced military faces such challenges, India's path toward cyber jointness will likely be even more complex. The doctrine's emphasis on human capital development reveals perhaps its most critical vulnerability. India faces a severe cybersecurity talent shortage, with industry estimates suggesting a deficit of over 10 lakh skilled professionals. The military's ability to compete with private sector salaries and work conditions for top cyber talent remains challenging but not impossible. This challenge is compounded by the specialised nature of military cyber operations. Unlike traditional military skills that can be developed through established training programs, cyber warfare requires continuous adaptation to evolving threats. The half-life of cybersecurity knowledge is measured in months, not years, requiring unprecedented investment in continuous learning and development. The doctrine's call for 'indigenous cyber capabilities' also raises practical concerns about India's technological ecosystem. While initiatives like the more than decade old National Cyber Security Strategy emphasize self-reliance, India's cybersecurity industry remains heavily dependent on foreign technologies and expertise. Building truly indigenous capabilities would require massive investments in research and development, with uncertain timelines for operational readiness. No doubt many start-ups have come up but they are mostly acquired by deep pocket foreign IT giants. The doctrine's analysis of international approaches, while informative, may oversimplify complex realities. China's cyber doctrine, for instance, isn't just about 'comprehensive national power' — it reflects a fundamentally different relationship between state and society. China's ability to mobilise private sector cyber capabilities through national intelligence laws has no equivalent in India's democratic framework. Similarly, the Russian model of leveraging 'non-state actors' for strategic objectives operates within a governance structure that tolerates criminal cyber activities when they serve state interests. India's approach to cyber deterrence must account for these fundamental differences in political systems and strategic cultures. The US model of 'persistent engagement' has also faced criticism for its potential to escalate conflicts and blur attribution lines. India's adoption of similar approaches could complicate its relationships with neighbors and create new vulnerabilities in an already complex regional security environment. Despite these challenges, the doctrine represents necessary progress in India's cyber evolution. Its public release serves important strategic communication purposes, signaling serious intent while maintaining operational ambiguity. However, several critical gaps require urgent attention. First, the doctrine lacks specific timelines and resource commitments for implementation. Without concrete benchmarks, it risks becoming another aspirational document rather than an operational blueprint. Second, the integration of civilian cybersecurity infrastructure with military operations remains underexplored. Given that most of India's critical infrastructure operates in the private sector, effective cyber defence requires unprecedented civil-military cooperation. Finally, the doctrine's deterrence strategy needs clearer articulation. Unlike nuclear deterrence, cyber deterrence operates in a domain where attribution is often uncertain and escalation dynamics are poorly understood. Translating doctrinal ambitions into operational capabilities, therefore, will require sustained political commitment, significant resource allocation, and institutional reforms that extend far beyond military structures. The writer, a defence and cyber security analyst, is former country head of General Dynamics
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
Op Sindoor success linked to Bengaluru's innovation: PM
Bengaluru: Prime Minister Narendra Modi today emphasised Bengaluru's critical role in India's Defence technology and the Make in India mission, linking the city's vibrant tech ecosystem and talented youth to the success of Operation Sindoor. The operation, which involved striking terrorist camps deep inside enemy territory and swiftly overpowering Pakistan's forces, has been hailed as a demonstration of India's growing military prowess powered by indigenous technology and innovation. Addressing a gathering at the inauguration of the Bengaluru Metro Yellow Line and the foundation laying of Phase 3, PM Modi praised the contributions of Karnataka's youth to Defence manufacturing and technology, underlining how Bengaluru is emerging as a crucial hub not only for IT but also for high-end Defence production. He called upon Karnataka's talent pool to lead the vision of an 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' (self-reliant India) in the tech sector. 'The success of Operation Sindoor is a testament to the strength of our technology and Defence capabilities built on the foundation of Make in India,' said the Prime Minister. 'Bengaluru's youth and Karnataka's industrial ecosystem have played a major role in this achievement.' The Prime Minister described Bengaluru as a city deeply rooted in tradition and culture but simultaneously poised at the forefront of progress and innovation. He paid tribute to the city's founder, Nadaprabhu Kempegowda, highlighting his vision of a city that balances heritage with develop
