Skellig Michael boat trips dispute resolved in High Court
The High Court dispute over boat trips to Skellig Michael has been resolved.
Mr Justice Garrett Simons was told on Tuesday that the parties had reached a settlement and a hearing date for the main case in the dispute next month could be vacated.
Advertisement
Earlier this month, the judge granted an application by the Office of Public Works (OPW) to lift an automatic suspension on landing at the Unesco heritage site and former monastic island which was also used as a film location for the Star Wars movies, The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi.
It meant that boat trips to the island off the Kerry coast could begin for the summer 2025 season immediately.
Annual landing permits issued by the OPW for mid-May to September were automatically suspended when two unsuccessful bidders for the licences brought a High Court challenge to the decision.
The OPW then had to apply to the court asking that the stay be lifted pending hearing of the substantive challenge.
Advertisement
The unsuccessful bidders, Atlantic Endeavour Ltd and SMBT Ltd trading as Skellig Michael Boat Trips, disagreed with the OPW interpretation of the legal effect of the automatic suspension.
They contended that there are a number of mechanisms open whereby landing permits might legitimately be granted to the successful tenderers for the balance of the 2025 season, while preserving their own right to challenge the allocation of landing permits for the 2026 and subsequent seasons.
Mr Justice Simons, following a hearing, ordered the stay be lifted.
He said his judgment entailed no finding whatsoever on whether the outcome of the tender process allows the OPW to confine the right to land passengers to the 15 successful tenderers for a five year period.
Advertisement
Ireland
90 arrests made during Donegal International Rally...
Read More
The proper interpretation of the request for tender and associated documentation, and the legal consequences of the tender process, remain open for debate at the trial of the action, he said.
On Tuesday, David Dodd BL, for Atlantic and SMBT, said the matter had been resolved and a hearing date for July could be vacated. He said his clients were very happy with the outcome especially in light of the judge's decision earlier this month.
The OPW had agreed to pay his side's costs.
The judge struck out the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ivanka Trump's son steals show as family arrive for Jeff Bezos' wedding in Venice
Watch as Ivanka Trump arrives in Venice for Jeff Bezos ' lavish wedding to Lauren Sanchez. Ms Trump, along with her husband Jared Kushner and three children, were spotted boarding a water taxi in the Italian city on Tuesday (24 June). Their son Joseph was filmed waving to reporters from the back of a boat as the family headed towards the star-studded multi-day wedding. The upcoming nuptials have also been subject to protests from groups including Greenpeace and No Space for Bezos, who have unfurled banners across the city to object against Amazon CEO's lavish affair.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Relief for Britain's car industry as it is confirmed Trump tariffs will be cut from 27.5% to 10%
Britain's car industry has been given a boost after it was confirmed that US tariffs will be cut from Monday next week. Donald Trump has signed an executive order, taking effect on June 30, which means the sector will escape the levies being imposed on car makers in other countries. Jaguar Land Rover and Aston Martin will face charges of 10 per cent rather than 27.5 per cent – though that is still higher than the pre-Trump level of 2.5 per cent. It is also thought a deal on aerospace – which will see firms such as Rolls-Royce go back to exporting to the US tariff-free instead of facing a levy of 10 per cent – will come into force on Monday. But the steel industry – part of the original agreement – has been left in limbo with agreement on a zero tariff deal yet to be reached. Mike Hawes, boss of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said: 'It's not as good as the 2.5 per cent we had – but it's a damn site better than 27.5 per cent.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Unfair march of tech giants: Google and Amazon are suffocating Britain, says ALEX BRUMMER
Google has embedded itself in all our lives. It is difficult to imagine a world without the instant information from its AI-enabled search engine. But like much of 'big tech', Google is an Indian giver. Few of its services come for free and its layering of searches, by payment rather than merit, is invidious. A recent estimate by Press Gazette put Google UK income from searches at £15billion. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is perturbed about the way in which Google ranks businesses. If, like this writer, one is seeking to replace a lost car key, the firm which miraculously comes up first on the search is the outfit that paid most for the 11.10am slot on a Monday morning. The CMA's boss Sarah Cardell, who escaped Rachel Reeves' cull of regulators, perceives this advantage to be against the public interest and wants to designate Google as a firm with 'strategic market status'. The change would give the authorities the right to intervene in search services to encourage innovation. Tech titan: Alphabet-owned Google accounts for 90% of searches in the UK in a monopoly rivalling Standard Oil of New Jersey at the start of the 20th Century Alphabet-owned Google accounts for 90 per cent of searches in the UK in a monopoly rivalling Standard Oil of New Jersey at the start of the 20th century. Rightly, the regulator wants to simplify access so there are more choices of search engines. Cardell also recognises the lack of transparency when it comes to deploying published information from news sources. Attitudes in 21st-century Britain and the US bear little resemblance to those of a century ago. Trust-busting and taking on the overwhelming power of big corporates and the wealthy was a core driver for President Teddy Roosevelt. In the US, billionaires are in charge and efforts at taming Silicon Valley are seen as unpatriotic. Efforts by France, the EU and others to challenge the domination of Silicon Valley are viewed by the Trump White House and Congress as an assault on US tech hegemony. Britain finds itself with a big dilemma. Our major retailers and owners of intellectual property correctly see Google, Amazon, Microsoft and their ilk as destroyers. They undermine the High Street, vacuuming up UK tech innovators such as Deep Minds (owned by Google), weaken creative opportunities for gaming gurus and undermine news organisations. The desperation to bring in new investment from the digital giants suppresses the opportunity for UK pioneers to prosper, win financial backing and develop Britain's own Silicon Valley. Only yesterday, Sir Keir Starmer's government was heralding a new dawn for investment in Britain when Amazon announced that it is to invest some £40billion in new state-of-the-art fulfilment centres, new delivery stations and much else. That's all hunky-dory but the risk is that the more tech and delivery-enabled Amazon becomes, the more difficult it becomes for retailers to compete, hurting our already denuded high streets and traditional skilled shopping jobs. The resentment might be less were the tech giants bigger corporate taxpayers. Elaborate measures to avoid tax mean direct contributions to the exchequer are limited. The kindness of some strangers we could do without. Gold rush It is easy to forget that Andrew Bailey is more economic historian, with a PhD to show for it, than economist. The past has much to teach us. A century has passed since Bailey's esteemed predecessor Montagu Norman, with the support of the Chancellor Winston Churchill, shackled sterling to gold at the optimistically robust exchange rate of $4.86. As Bailey noted yesterday, Norman went 'full Trump' in his diaries writing 'GOLD STANDARD' in capital letters. John Maynard Keynes argued at the time that the consequence was a loss of flexibility, preventing the economy to adjust to economic shocks. The result was deflation, stagnation, and lost jobs. Yet the allure of bullion shows no sign of abating as viewers of The Gold, the latest TV adaptation of the 1983 Brink's-Mat robbery, would attest. A survey by the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum finds central banks are back in the bullion game with plans to increase holdings by $5 trillion over the next one-to-two years. Will they never learn?
