The IEC's journey towards e-voting in South Africa
Last Thursday, the Electoral Commission of South Africa in KwaZulu-Natal hosted a stakeholder session with academia on e-voting.
Image: Electoral Commission of South Africa/ Facebook
The Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) has decided to try e-voting again, and it is now in the policy-making stage.
IEC senior manager in the office of the CEO, Dr Victor Shale, said the commission not only seeks to deliver on the procedural aspect of elections, but it also seeks to deliver on the substantive value of elections.
Therefore, the commission tries to be at the forefront of innovation.
'We want to make sure that elections add value to democracy,' Shale said.
Where is the IEC now regarding e-voting?
Shale said that having undertaken significant work since 2013, the IEC is now in the policy-making phase.
He said that policy begins when identifying an issue.
'Whether we like it or not, digital technology in elections is inevitable. We are using digital technology in elections, in one way or the other,' Shale said.
He said they have done research and continue to do research. They also read and familiarise themselves with comparative studies throughout the globe. They now know what is there.
Shale explained that because they are a public institution, a policy development process ought to be comprehensive and thoroughly consolidated.
He said that from last Thursday's stakeholder session with the academia on e-voting, they will be able to identify policy options, followed by the policy adoption, where they will need to clearly define the structure, systems and regulations pertaining to e-voting.
'So we are in a process, making very steady progress towards a desired goal,' Shale said.
He added that in policy-making, you have to consistently evaluate the performance of adopted policy systems and structures.
Shale said these are some of the considerations they have: Legislative review
Public education
Infrastructure development
Training
Piloting
Shale clarified that they have been working on e-voting since 2013, however, it is not something you can put together and do.
'You take time, you test systems, you make sure that everything is working,' Shale said.
What next?
Shale said the commission continues public consultations and public dialogues, which have been happening since March. This phase is expected to end by September.
He said that following consultations, the resulting outputs will be reviewed.
Shale said that the commission anticipates that by March 2026, it will be in a position to draft a green paper. This will be followed by formal legislative processes until it becomes a policy, maybe then causing electoral reform in terms of amending the Electoral Act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Nigeria slaps Meta with $290m in fines for invasive practices
Found guilty of data sharing and other invasive practices, the parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram was issued with a $290-million penalty. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, was recently hit with three fines totalling more than $290-million in Nigeria. The fines were imposed by Nigeria's Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, the Nigerian Data Protection Commission and the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria. Meta was accused of invasive practices against data subjects and consumers in Nigeria. The company denied the allegations and has challenged the fines in court. What are the violations for which Meta has been fined? The trouble began on 4 January 2021 when WhatsApp updated its privacy policy to introduce mandatory data-sharing with Facebook (now Meta) and its subsidiaries. The main change allowed WhatsApp to share user business interaction data with Facebook for marketing and advertising purposes. The updated policy did not include an opt-out provision. It was a 'take it or leave it' policy. In other words, if users did not consent to the updated terms, they would no longer be able to use WhatsApp. This triggered a Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission investigation into Meta, conducted jointly with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission. The probe was conducted from May 2021 to December 2023. Meta has allegedly not complied with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission, and failed to appoint a Data Protection Compliance Organisation. That's an entity licensed to assist data controllers and processors in achieving compliance with Nigeria's data protection regulations. It has not submitted its mandatory Nigeria Data Protection Regulation reports for two consecutive years. Nigeria is the most populous country on the continent, with about 236 million people. It has about 107 million internet users. The most used social media platforms at the end of 2024 were WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and Telegram. Meta owns WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram and has threatened to pull Facebook and Instagram services from the country. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has said quitting Nigeria won't absolve Meta of its liability. Facebook has about 51.2 million users in Nigeria, while Instagram has about 12.6 million. What have regulators found against Meta? The investigation uncovered several violations. These included: Unauthorised data sharing: Meta was found to have shared Nigerian users' personal data without their consent. This included cross-border transfers and storage, violating the Nigeria Data Protection Commission and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act. Discriminatory practices: Meta allegedly treated Nigerian users differently from those in other jurisdictions with similar regulations. Meta offers stronger privacy protections in the European Union because of the General Data Protection Regulation. Nigerian regulators have highlighted this double standard. Denial of data self-determination: The company was accused of denying Nigerian users the right to control how their data is used, compelling them to accept exploitative privacy policies. Abuse of market dominance: The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission said the company abused its dominant market position to enforce unfair privacy policies. Tying and bundling: Meta was found to have engaged in tying and bundling practices, which are considered anti-competitive. Tying occurs when a company requires customers to buy a secondary product or service as a condition of buying a primary product or service. For example, if Meta required users to accept Facebook's terms and automatically enrol in WhatsApp or Instagram services (or allow data sharing across them) to use Facebook, then that could be considered tying. This is because it can limit consumer choice, stifle competition and force people to accept products or terms they don't want. Bundling occurs when a company sells multiple products or services together as a package, or makes it difficult to buy them separately. For example, Meta might bundle multiple services such as Facebook, Instagram and Messenger in such a way that users must accept a single privacy policy that covers all, even if they only use one service. This can shut out smaller competitors and prevent users from choosing alternatives. After remediation efforts failed, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission issued its final order in July 2024. It imposed a $220-million fine along with penalties from other agencies, bringing the total to $290-million. In addition to the fine, the commission has ordered Meta to comply with Nigerian laws and cease practices it described as the 'exploitation' of Nigerian consumers. After completing its inquiry, the agency shared its findings with Meta. The company proposed a 'remedy package'. But the commission rejected this as inadequate. What made Meta vulnerable to such fines? Meta has failed to localise its data practices. It appears dismissive of Nigerian sovereignty and regulatory authority. For example, Meta has been transferring Nigerian users' data overseas without protecting them as required by Nigeria. Meta's annual revenue in Nigeria is between $200-million and $300-million. But many Nigerians in the diaspora use Facebook and Instagram to communicate with people inside the country. Revenue from those users is likely to raise the figure considerably. The company has faced similar sanctions for data violations worldwide, including a $1.4-billion fine in Texas and a $1.3-billion fine in Europe. It has also been penalised in India, South Korea and Australia. What are the implications of the fines? Meta now faces heightened scrutiny from Nigerian regulators. It will have to adhere to local data protection and consumer rights laws. This includes appointing a Data Protection Compliance Organisation and submitting audit reports as stipulated by the Nigerian Data Protection Regulation. The fines and regulatory measures may also compel Meta to reassess its operations in Nigeria. It might adjust its services to align with local laws. Meta has also been ordered by the courts to reimburse the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission $35,000 for the cost of the investigation. And it has been told to take the following measures: Reinstate the rights of Nigerian users to determine the control and use of their data without losing functionality or deleting the application; Set its privacy policy to comply with data protection laws in Nigeria; Stop sharing WhatsApp users' information with other Facebook companies and third parties until users have actively consented to this; Revert to the data sharing practices adopted in 2016, including establishing an opt-in screen; Terminate the tying and transfer of data without consent; and Add a visible link on its platforms for Nigerian users, leading to educational content about the risks of manipulative and unfair data practices. These videos will be developed in collaboration with approved NGOs and academic institutions. Other social media entities operating in Nigeria will be watching closely to see what is required. How dependent is Nigeria on these social media platforms? Many Nigerian businesses and entrepreneurs use Facebook and Instagram for marketing, customer engagement and sales. The platforms offer cost-effective advertising and direct communication channels with many customers. These platforms also provide valuable analytics on customer behaviour, content performance and demographics. Businesses use these services to refine their marketing strategies and make data-driven decisions. Content creators in Nigeria use Facebook and Instagram to build audiences, monetise content and collaborate with brands. The African creator industry, valued at £2.4-billion in 2024, is expected to continue to grow significantly. The music genre Afrobeats has also gained popularity across Nigeria and globally with the assistance of these platforms. Nigeria's ecosystem of homegrown and African social media platforms is growing, offering local alternatives to global giants such as Facebook and Instagram. While none match their scale, platforms including Crowwe, ChatAfrik and Nairaland are making strides in content sharing, chat, forums and business promotion. The information and communications technology sector contributed about 20% to Nigeria's real gross domestic product in the second quarter of 2024. The rapid expansion of the digital technology industry in recent years highlights its strong potential to stimulate economic growth. Nigeria's digital economy has also seen significant growth because of increased internet access and mobile usage. DM First published by The Conversation. Tolu Olarewaju is an economist and lecturer in management at Keele University. Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada is a professor of entrepreneurship at Kingston University.
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Elon Musk drops Donald Trump/Epstein files bomb
Elon Musk and Donald Trump had a rather public breakup on X today, and now it's gone even deeper. In a gobsmacking development on Thursday, Elon Musk has opened up an almighty can of worms involving the 45th and 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Tesla CEO Musk claims that Trump is in the Epstein files. The world's wealthiest and most powerful men are no longer besties, clearly. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk said on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Meanwhile, Tesla shares fell by 8% on Wall Street on Thursday following the spat. Tesla CEO Elon Musk listens as US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on 30 May 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency, announced he would leave his role in the Trump administration to refocus on his businesses. Image: AFP Let us know by leaving a comment below or sending a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Also, subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
2 suspects arrested in connection with murder of IFP deputy chief whip
2 suspects arrested in connection with murder of IFP deputy chief whip Police have made a breakthrough in the murder investigation of IFP Deputy Chief Whip Khethamabala Sithole and have arrested two suspects. The Witness reports that a task team established to probe Sithole's death made the arrests this week. Police spokesperson Colonel Mavela Masondo says the two suspects have been charged with two counts of attempted murder, following the incident which took place at Buyafuthi hostel in Katlehong last Saturday. 'The team brought in three people for questioning. Two of them, aged 30 and 32, were linked to the incident, while the third person was released. More arrests are expected as the investigation continues. 'The suspects will be appearing [in] the Palmridge Magistrate's Court today,' Masondo says. Masondo says Sithole was killed by the suspects on Saturday evening in Katlehong, Gauteng. 'It was reported that unknown men opened fire on the group of people gathered for a meeting. Sithole was declared dead on the scene while two more people were taken to hospital with gunshot injuries.' Provincial secretary Alco Ngobese was also injured in the shooting and is receiving treatment. IFP national spokesperson Mkhuleko Hlengwa described Sithole as 'a hard-working servant leader of the people and our country'. Sithole joined the IFP in his youth and served in various party structures, including as IFP Gauteng provincial chairperson. The EFF in Gauteng said, earlier in the week, the death may have been politically motivated and slammed political intolerance. 'Political killings are unacceptable and undermine our democracy. We therefore condemn all acts of political violence and urge all parties to show maximum tolerance and respect for opposing views. Democracy must be built on peace, not violence.' The Good Party also shared its condolences. 'Violence has no place in our democracy. May his soul rest in peace.' The ANC also paid tribute to Sithole on Sunday. 'We condemn this brutal act and call for urgent intervention by law enforcement to bring the perpetrators to justice,' the ANC said. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
