Illegal Sky Sports streaming sites hit by huge police raid with two people arrested in major crackdown
Officers stormed three properties and arrested two people suspected of being involved in the operation.
1
The operation was used to show Sky channels
Credit: Getty
Detectives from the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) at City of London Police executed search warrants at two residential addresses in Oldbury, as well as a data centre located in Cheltenham during the early hours of July 3.
They seized seven pieces of server tech alleged to have been used to distribute the content.
It's believed that the latest crackdown effort has caused major disruption to a number of pirate services, police said.
A 30-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of running the illegal streaming service.
Read more about Sky Sports
And a 32-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of distributing material infringing copyright and receiving criminal property.
Police believe the pair received "significant profits" from running the operation.
"This activity should serve as a reminder that PIPCU will pursue criminals who seek to profit from illegal streaming and disrupt their operations," said Detective Constable Daryl Fryatt, from City of London Police.
"This is a crime that diverts funds away from the creative and entertainment industries, money that supports thousands of technical and support staff.
Most read in Tech
"At the same time, it exposes end users to the risks of data theft, fraud and malware."
Experts have repeatedly warned users that using
IPTV Crackdown
The main concern is fraud.
One victim previously told The Sun that
"There were all sorts of transactions on my bank account for quite a large amount of money which were on various times and various dates for different amounts," he said.
"It's scary really, they attempted thousands."
A
And criminal operators are even threatening to turn up at people's houses to install them.
"We are extremely grateful to the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit for taking this action against a significant pirate operation," said Matt Hibbert, Group Director of Anti-Piracy at Sky.
"We will continue to work alongside the police and industry partners to tackle piracy and disrupt the criminal networks behind it.
"This action helps to keep consumers safe from the serious risks that piracy can pose to devices and personal property."
The man and woman have since been released under investigation.
RISKS FROM ILLEGAL STREAMING AND DOWNLOADS
People streaming content illegally are at risk of fraud and other dangers when using dodgy TV devices.
But that's not the only possible consequence.
They can slow down your broadband connection and affect other gadgets around your home too.
"Illegal streaming isn't just unsafe, it's actively harmful," said Liz Bales, CEO of the British Association for Screen Entertainment (BASE), and The Industry Trust for IP.
"Devices used for piracy are often infected with hidden malware, leading to crashing apps, severely disrupted performance, and compromised home networks.
"This puts personal data and entire households at risk."
Image credit: Getty
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
5 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Pictured: Irishman who has to pay Sky €600,000 over 'dodgy box' operation
This is the Wexford man who is set to pay Sky up to €600,000 in damages and costs over his operation of a 'dodgy box' streaming service. David Dunbar agreed to pay the broadcaster some €480,000 in damages and at least €100,000 in costs when his case was heard at the High Court in Dublin on Tuesday. Mr Dunbar consented to judgment against him after opting not to defend the civil case, brought by Sky UK Limited over his infringement of the broadcaster's copyright. But he declined to comment when the Irish Mirror called to his home in Wexford on Wednesday, a day after the hearing. He told us: 'No comment.' And he added: 'Don't bother coming back here again, under advice from my solicitor. It is still a legal matter ongoing.' Mr Dunbar faces further sanction for being in contempt of court, having breached orders aimed at preserving evidence of his copyright infringement and orders freezing his assets, among other directions. A suite of sanctions are open to the court, including imprisonment. Mr Dunbar, with an address at Manor Crescent, Roxborough Manor, Co Wexford, was previously described by Sky as a 'top-level' copyright infringer who may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating an illegal streaming service. The broadcaster alleged that Mr Dunbar provided thousands with access to its copyrighted broadcast material since 2018. On Tuesday, Mr Justice Mark Sanfey was informed that Mr Dunbar was consenting to various reliefs sought by Sky arising from his copyright infringement. The judge said there was no doubt of Mr Dunbar's copyright infringement, and ordered that he pay €480,000 in damages to Sky. Mr Dunbar must also pay the broadcaster's legal costs, the judge ruled, of about €100,000. The judge also granted various permanent injunctions against Mr Dunbar, including an order restraining him from ever operating an Internet Protocol television service, or IPTV - the technology behind 'dodgy box' services. Mr Justice Sanfey reserved his judgment on an attachment and committal motion moved by Sky over Mr Dunbar's breach of several court orders. David Dunbar pictured with Mirror reporter Michael O'Toole at his home in Wexford on Wednesday. Photo: Jim Campbell The court heard that Mr Dunbar did not comply with various orders granted to Sky aimed at gathering evidence of his wrongdoing. This included a refusal to comply with an Anton Piller order, which allows for entry to private premises for the purposes of seizing evidence. Theo Donnelly BL, appearing for Sky and instructed by Philip Lee LLP, submitted that Mr Dunbar engaged in clear breaches of court orders. He submitted that the court orders were explained to Mr Dunbar in layman's terms by an independent solicitor who called to his house on foot of the Anton Piller order. Despite this, he did not allow the solicitor to enter his premises, and proceeded to destroy evidence of his copyright infringement, among other breaches, Mr Donnelly submitted. Counsel said it was hard to see how Mr Dunbar could have engaged in a more 'clear and knowing' contempt of the court orders. It is Mr Dunbar's case that when the orders were explained to him by his legal representatives, he realised the seriousness of the matter. Following this, he said he sought to comply with the court's orders, the court heard. Sky brought High Court proceedings against Mr Dunbar. Photo: Chris Radburn/PA Wire Darren Lehane SC, for Mr Dunbar and instructed by Dodd Solicitors, said his client was acknowledging his contempt of court. In considering sanction for his contempt, Mr Lehane asked the court to take into account Mr Dunbar's speedy consent to a judgment against him in default of defence. Mr Donnelly said he believed Mr Dunbar's case has not been referred to An Garda Síochána, but said he had not taken specific instruction on the matter. The case returns next month. For more of the latest breaking news from the Irish Mirror check out our homepage by clicking here.
Irish Daily Mirror
30-07-2025
- Irish Daily Mirror
Man ordered to pay total of just under €600k to Sky over 'dodgy box' operation
A Co Wexford man must pay €480,000 in damages to Sky after conceding a High Court action taken by the broadcaster and telecommunications giant over his operation of a 'dodgy box' streaming service. David Dunbar consented to judgment against him after opting not to defend the civil case, brought by Sky UK Limited over his infringement of the broadcaster's copyright. Mr Dunbar faces further sanction for being in contempt of court, having breached orders aimed at preserving evidence of his copyright infringement and orders freezing his assets, among other directions. A suite of sanctions are open to the court, including imprisonment. Mr Dunbar, with an address at Manor Crescent, Roxborough Manor, Co Wexford, was previously described by Sky as a 'top-level' copyright infringer who may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating an illegal streaming service. The broadcaster alleged that Mr Dunbar provided thousands with access to its copyrighted broadcast material since 2018. On Tuesday, Mr Justice Mark Sanfey was informed that Mr Dunbar was consenting to various reliefs sought by Sky arising from his copyright infringement. The judge said there was no doubt of Mr Dunbar's copyright infringement, and ordered that he pay €480,000 in damages to Sky. Mr Dunbar must also pay the broadcaster's legal costs, the judge ruled, about €100,000. The judge also granted various permanent injunctions against Mr Dunbar, including an order restraining him from ever operating an Internet Protocol television service (IPTV). IPTV is the technology behind 'dodgy box' services. Mr Justice Sanfey reserved his judgment on an attachment and committal motion moved by Sky over Mr Dunbar's breach of several court orders. The court heard that Mr Dunbar did not comply with various orders granted to Sky aimed at gathering evidence of his wrongdoing. This included a refusal to comply with an Anton Piller order, which allows for entry to private premises for the purposes of seizing evidence. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Theo Donnelly BL, appearing for Sky and instructed by Philip Lee LLP, submitted that Mr Dunbar engaged in clear breaches of court orders. He submitted that the court orders were explained to Mr Dunbar in layman's terms by an independent solicitor who called to his house on foot of the Anton Piller order. Despite this, he did not allow the solicitor to enter his premises, and proceeded to destroy evidence of his copyright infringement, among other breaches, Mr Donnelly submitted. Counsel said it was hard to see how Mr Dunbar could have engaged in a more 'clear and knowing' contempt of the court orders. It is Mr Dunbar's case that when the orders were explained to him by his legal representatives, he realised the seriousness of the matter. Following this, he said he sought to comply with the court's orders, the court heard. Darren Lehane SC, for Mr Dunbar and instructed by Dodd Solicitors, said his client was acknowledging his contempt of court. In considering sanction for his contempt, Mr Lehane asked the court to take into account Mr Dunbar's speedy consent to a judgment against him in default of defence. Mr Donnelly said he believed Mr Dunbar's case has not been referred to An Garda Síochána, but said he had not taken specific instruction on the matter. The case returns next month. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Irish Examiner
29-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
Man must pay Sky €480,000 in damages for ‘dodgy box' copyright infringement
A Co Wexford man must pay €480,000 in damages to Sky after conceding a High Court action taken by the broadcaster and telecommunications giant over his operation of a 'dodgy box' streaming service. David Dunbar consented to judgment against him after opting not to defend the civil case, brought by Sky UK Limited over his infringement of the broadcaster's copyright. Further sanctions open to the court Mr Dunbar faces further sanction for being in contempt of court, having breached orders aimed at preserving evidence of his copyright infringement and orders freezing his assets, among other directions. A suite of sanctions are open to the court, including imprisonment. Mr Dunbar, with an address at Manor Crescent, Roxborough Manor, Co Wexford, was previously described by Sky as a 'top-level' copyright infringer who may have earned up to €450,000 a year from operating an illegal streaming service. The broadcaster alleged that Mr Dunbar provided thousands with access to its copyrighted broadcast material since 2018. On Tuesday, Mr Justice Mark Sanfey was informed that Mr Dunbar was consenting to various reliefs sought by Sky arising from his copyright infringement. The judge said there was no doubt of Mr Dunbar's copyright infringement, and ordered that he pay €480,000 in damages to Sky. Mr Dunbar must also pay the broadcaster's legal costs, the judge ruled, about €100,000. The judge also granted various permanent injunctions against Mr Dunbar, including an order restraining him from ever operating an internet protocol television service (IPTV). IPTV is the technology behind 'dodgy box' services. Mr Justice Sanfey reserved his judgment on an attachment and committal motion moved by Sky over Mr Dunbar's breach of several court orders. The court heard that Mr Dunbar did not comply with various orders granted to Sky aimed at gathering evidence of his wrongdoing. This included a refusal to comply with an Anton Piller order, which allows for entry to private premises for the purposes of seizing evidence. 'Clear breaches' of court orders Theo Donnelly, appearing for Sky and instructed by Philip Lee LLP, submitted that Mr Dunbar engaged in clear breaches of court orders. He submitted that the court orders were explained to Mr Dunbar in layman's terms by an independent solicitor who called to his house on foot of the Anton Piller order. Despite this, he did not allow the solicitor to enter his premises, and proceeded to destroy evidence of his copyright infringement, among other breaches, Mr Donnelly submitted. Counsel said it was hard to see how Mr Dunbar could have engaged in a more 'clear and knowing' contempt of the court orders. Defendant's speedy consent to judgment It is Mr Dunbar's case that when the orders were explained to him by his legal representatives, he realised the seriousness of the matter. Following this, he said he sought to comply with the court's orders, the court heard. Darren Lehane, counsel for Mr Dunbar and instructed by Dodd Solicitors, said his client was acknowledging his contempt of court. In considering sanction for his contempt, Mr Lehane asked the court to take into account Mr Dunbar's speedy consent to a judgment against him in default of defence. Mr Donnelly said he believed Mr Dunbar's case has not been referred to An Garda Síochána, but said he had not taken specific instruction on the matter. The case returns next month.
