logo
New federal data shows Maine's foster care population grew at the fastest rate in the nation

New federal data shows Maine's foster care population grew at the fastest rate in the nation

Maine's foster care population grew at a higher rate than any other state between 2019 and 2023, new federal data shows.
It was one of just six states that increased its foster care population during that five-year period, according to a Maine Monitor analysis of data from the federal Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS).
AFCARS published data for fiscal year 2023, the most recent year for which data is available, in May, showing that Maine removed children from their families because of abuse and neglect at one of the highest rates in the country.
In 2023, Maine was more likely to remove children than all but five other states: West Virginia, Alaska, Montana, Kentucky and South Dakota. That year, Maine removed 4.14 children per 1,000 living in the state, about 75 percent higher than the national rate of 2.4 children per 1,000.
While Maine's foster care population increased 17 percent between 2019 and 2023, the most in the nation, the national foster care population fell nearly 20 percent.
More recent data from Maine's Department of Health and Human Services, however, shows the state foster care population has declined since reaching a 20-year high last fall.
Maine's child welfare system includes DHHS, the Attorney General's office, which represents the department in court, the attorneys who represent parents and the judges who preside over child protection cases.
Within DHHS, the Office of Child and Family Services (OFCS) oversees child protective cases and the removal of children. In an interview, OFCS Director Bobbi Johnson said the growth of Maine's foster care population was due in part to higher than average rates of cases involving substance abuse, a lack of attorneys to represent parents and a dearth of behavioral and mental health support services, which has 'resulted in a lack of reunification services.'
Johnson, who became the office's director in early 2024, also attributed the increase to several highly publicized deaths of children known to DHHS in late 2017 and early 2018. Those tragic deaths prompted legislative changes and policy shifts, as well as an increase in reports to the department.
The phenomenon is not unique to Maine. Research has suggested media coverage of child deaths can prompt increases in the number of children entering foster care and decreases in the number adopted or reunited with their families, as caseworkers take a 'better safe than sorry' approach.
Johnson said the department is working with organizations that study the science of children's safety as it adjusts its approach to be less 'reactive.'
She expressed a desire to improve the system and staff knowledge instead of 'saying the system is not working effectively and everything needs to be changed, which I think tends to be what you see in jurisdictions where there are child fatalities.'
Some still see an issue, however.
'We continue to be in a place in our state where we are almost solely focused on these tragedies and criticism of the child welfare agency's response; that has an impact on decision-making at many levels, which can lead to more kids coming into care,' Melissa Hackett, a policy associate with the Maine Children's Alliance, said in an email.
Poverty vs. neglect
The federal data shows that two-thirds of the children Maine put in foster care in 2023 were placed there because of neglect, which is higher than the national average.
In recent years, there has been a growing consensus nationwide that in many cases, removing children from homes can result in more long-term harm than leaving them there and connecting families with services, such as mental health and substance use treatment, behavioral supports and financial resources. This movement is linked to the idea that child welfare agencies often accuse parents of neglect when the root issue is poverty, and could be addressed by putting supports in place rather than removing a child.
Earlier this week, Governor Janet Mills signed legislation into law that changed the state's definition of child neglect, creating an exception for parents who can't provide necessities because they are unable to afford them. More than half of U.S. states have adopted similar statutes. The department supported the change.
But some lawmakers and advocates in Augusta argued that the bill didn't go far enough. They argue the state is unnecessarily separating families and paying for foster care, lawyers and court time instead of addressing the symptoms of poverty. They argue the state is opening too many cases, making it harder to identify those that are particularly dangerous.
'The system we have now is not designed to effectively keep children safe,' Alica Rea from the Maine ACLU testified before a legislative committee in April. 'Instead, the system puts parents, especially single mothers, in the impossible situation of having to overcome poverty in order to stop being monitored and to reunite with their children, without providing them with the resources necessary to do so.'
Not everyone shares this perspective. According to Maine's child welfare ombudsman, the state is not removing children from homes quickly enough.
'Since 2019, the trends that my office has seen do not show that the Department is taking too many children into state custody,' Christine Alberi wrote in an email. 'The Department has often delayed taking children into custody too long after multiple investigations or safety plans.'
Alberi said the department's reaction after 2018 included 'a much higher level of risk aversion' that was 'not a model for child welfare practice.'
This included reinvestigating cases sent to the Alternative Response Program (which is often where low severity cases are referred) and ending out-of-home safety planning, which resulted in more children entering custody, Alberi said.
'Many changes were needed but instead of refocusing on proper practice, the Department did too much too quickly,' Alberi wrote.
Declining numbers
Data suggests Maine's foster care surge may be receding.
The number of children entering state custody increased from 820 to 1,246 between 2017 and 2019, a 50 percent rise. But in the next five years, entries into the system fell 15 percent to 1,054 in 2023.
Despite the lower level of children entering the system, the overall foster care population continued to grow until well into 2024, as the number of children exiting the system, due to adoption or reunification with parents, was lower than the number of children entering.
While federal data is lagging, Maine's child welfare dashboard has more current numbers. They show that the foster care population continued to increase from 2023 to 2024. In July, the number of children in state care hit a 20-year high of 2,579.
But that total has been declining since, dropping to 2,290 in April.
Johnson sees the decline as 'a positive movement.'
She attributed the decline to more adoptions (Maine has a higher rate of children leaving the system through adoption than the national average) and efforts to identify barriers to either adoption or reunification. She also credited investments in the state's behavioral health system, which allow families to get help before removal is needed, Johnson said.
'Building out the infrastructure of prevention within our state is really critical,' she said.
___
This story was originally published by The Maine Monitor and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence
FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence

Although mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. incorrectly argued they are ineffective to justify the Department of Health and Human Service's recent decision to cancel $500 million in government-funded research projects to develop new vaccines using the technology. The longtime vaccine critic said in an X video posted Tuesday evening that mRNA vaccines do not adequately prevent upper respiratory infections such as COVID-19 and the flu, advocating instead for the development vaccines that use other processes. COVID-19 is the only virus for which real-world data on mRNA vaccine effectiveness is currently available, as mRNA vaccines for other diseases, including the flu, are still under development. The two scientists whose discoveries enabled the creation of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 won a Nobel Prize in 2023 for their work. Kennedy's claim ignores how mRNA vaccines work, according to experts. They prevent against severe infection and death, but cannot completely prevent an infection from occurring in the first place. Plus, years of research supports the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines that use mRNA technology. Here's a closer look at the facts. KENNEDY: 'As the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' THE FACTS: His claim is contradicted by scientific evidence. Countless studies show that vaccinated individuals fare far better against COVID-19 infections than those who are unvaccinated, while others have estimated that COVID-19 vaccines prevented millions of deaths during the global pandemic. The mRNA vaccines do not prevent respiratory diseases entirely, experts say. Rather, they can prevent more serious illness that leads to complications and death. For example, an mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 may prevent an infection in the upper respiratory tract that feels like a bad cold from spreading to the lower respiratory tract, where it could affect one's ability to breathe. 'A vaccine cannot block a respiratory infection,' said Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious diseases physician and clinical associate professor at Stanford University School of Medicine. 'That's never been the standard for a respiratory virus vaccine. And it's never been the expectation, and it's never been that realistic.' He called Kennedy's claim 'misguided.' Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University, had a similar outlook. 'Vaccinations don't have to be neutralizing, meaning that you're not going to get COVID,' he said. 'But the important part of a vaccination is that they reduce hospitalization and death. And a reduction in hospitalization and death is proof of an effective vaccine.' Vaccines have traditionally required growing viruses or pieces of viruses called proteins and then purifying them. Then a small dose of the vaccine is injected to train the body how to recognize when a real infection hits so it's ready to fight back. But this method takes a long time. The mRNA technology speeds up the process and allows existing vaccines to be updated more quickly. The 'm' in mRNA stands for messenger because the vaccine carries instructions for our bodies to make proteins. Scientists figured out how to harness that natural process for vaccines by making mRNA in a lab. They take a snippet of the genetic code that carries instructions for making the protein they want the vaccine to target. Injecting that snippet instructs the body to become its own mini-vaccine factory, making enough copies of the protein for the immune system to recognize and react. Scott explained that mRNA vaccines are not a 'magic force field' that the immune system can use to block an infection, as it can't detect whether a virus is nearby. It can only respond to a virus that has already entered the body. In the case of COVID-19, this means that the virus could cause an upper respiratory tract infection — a cold, essentially — but would be significantly less likely to cause more severe consequences elsewhere. Myriad studies on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have been published since they first became available in late 2020. Although protection does wane over time, they provide the strongest barrier against severe infection and death. For example, a 2024 study by the World Health Organization found COVID-19 vaccines reduced deaths in the WHO's European region by at least 57%, saving more than 1.4 million lives since their introduction in December 2020. A 2022 study published in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases found that nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year. Researchers used data from 185 countries to estimate that vaccines prevented 4.2 million COVID-19 deaths in India, 1.9 million in the United States, 1 million in Brazil, 631,000 in France and 507,000 in the United Kingdom. The main finding — that 19.8 million COVID-19 deaths were prevented — is based on estimates of how many more deaths than usual occurred during the time period. Using only reported COVID-19 deaths, the same model yielded 14.4 million deaths averted by vaccines. Another 2022 study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, reported that two mRNA vaccines were more than 90% effective against COVID-19. Operation Warp Speed, the federal effort to facilitate the development and distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine, began under the first Trump administration. 'What I don't understand is why is President Trump is allowing RFK Jr. to undermine his legacy that led to a medical intervention that literally saved millions of lives?' Coller said. 'Why is Trump allowing RFK to undermine U.S. leadership in biomedical research and drug development?' ___ Find AP Fact Checks here: Solve the daily Crossword

Pete Buttigieg Listed These 4 Ways The Trump Admin Is Making Americans' Lives "Worse," And It's So Simple Yet So True
Pete Buttigieg Listed These 4 Ways The Trump Admin Is Making Americans' Lives "Worse," And It's So Simple Yet So True

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pete Buttigieg Listed These 4 Ways The Trump Admin Is Making Americans' Lives "Worse," And It's So Simple Yet So True

Former secretary of transportation Pete Buttigieg is being applauded online for his recent, simple breakdown on all the ways Donald Trump's chosen cabinet is negatively impacting Americans' lives. While sitting down for NPR's Morning Edition, Pete insisted that Democrats need to change their approach if they want to reach voters. "We do have to look at what we're doing that makes it hard to hear what we have to say," he told host Steve Inskeep. "Too often we talk in terms that are academic. When we're talking about deeply important things, like freedom and democracy, we still have to have a way of talking about it that relates to how everyday life is different." Related: As an example, Pete shared ways our "everyday life is different and worse" under Trump's presidency, because, as he said, "When you have an autocrat in power, he can get away with appointing incompetent people over very important things in our lives." To start, he said, "Right now we have the secretary of defense — in charge of defending the American people — who was accidentally texting military strike information to journalists." This, of course, is in reference to reporting from the Atlantic that claimed the magazine's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was mistakenly added to a Signal group chat where former Fox & Friends Weekend host, now Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, discussed sensitive war plans. "We have the person in charge of American public health, who is a quack who doesn't believe in medicine, and now measles is on the rise in America," he continued. Here, Pete is referring to Health Secretary RFK Jr., who commonly and vocally questions the safety of vaccines and even suggested the measles vaccine causes autism in children. Now, 20 years after measles was declared to be eliminated in the United States, outbreaks are popping up around the US as the public grows skeptical of vaccines under the new administration. Related: "We have a secretary of education — in charge of your kid's educational well-being — who has spoken about the importance of 'A1,' which means she does not understand that the acronym is AI, which means she does not understand the most important development affecting education in our lifetimes." Education Secretary Linda McMahon — yes, the former CEO of WWE — confused AI technology with A1, the name of a popular steak sauce. While speaking at a summit in April, McMahon said, "A school system that's going to start making sure that first graders, or even pre-Ks, have A1 teaching in every year. That's a wonderful thing!" Pete continued, "We have a secretary of homeland security who sat on funding and did not allow it to go to Texas during the floods for at least two days for no good reason." Finally, we have Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who reportedly decided to enact a rule requiring her personal sign-off on any grant or contract over $100,000. The move was heavily criticized amid the deadly flooding in Texas earlier this year, as some argue the signature delayed getting aid to those who needed it. Related: "So these things do affect you," Pete concluded. "Not for academic reasons, but because of what happens when you have a loss of accountability. Those are the kinds of things I think we need to talk about before anybody can hear us." A clip of Pete's simple yet effective explanation was shared to X, formerly known as Twitter, where it garnered over 1.7 million views and over 1,000 comments. By and large, people are calling Pete's breakdown "brilliant." One person said, "This breakdown of the incompetence of the administration is simple yet brilliant. And the reality of how they're affecting peoples' REAL lives is heartbreaking and infuriating." "Last thirty seconds should be mandatory listening," another agreed. "The loss of accountability over trumps horrible yes men stooge picks for cabinet undeniably makes your life worse as an American. It isn't up for debate." Others called Pete "the best communicator in US politics"... Related: ...and insisted, "This is who We The People employ!!!" Talks like this have made Pete a favorite amongst voters looking to the future of the Democratic Party. And even some abroad. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Potential connection between air quality in the Mon Valley and student absenteeism
Potential connection between air quality in the Mon Valley and student absenteeism

CBS News

time21 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Potential connection between air quality in the Mon Valley and student absenteeism

Experts are examining the potential connection between air quality in the Mon Valley and student absenteeism. Could the empty desks in Clairton's classrooms be linked to what's happening in the air outside? A new study attributes air pollution in the Mon Valley to school absenteeism. "They're missing school and they're falling behind their classmates," said Dr. Deborah Gentile, medical director of Community Partners in Asthma Care and author of the study. "It can have an impact on them getting into post-secondary education for anything really, trades versus college, and even impact their likelihood of getting a good-paying job in the future." U.S. Steel's Clairton Coke Works is less than 1 mile from Clairton's K-12 school building, where Gentile's 2020 study found one in every five kids had developed asthma, three times higher than the national rate. Using that data, Gentile now details how absenteeism spiked after days of high particulate pollution, called PM2.5. "A day or two later, we saw in a day following PM2.5 increases, we saw a 21% increase in the risk of these children missing school because of asthma," Gentile said. In a statement, U.S. Steel said the study is full of "spurious claims leading to what appears to be predetermined and questionable conclusions aimed at making headlines." The steelmaker calls Gentile's data "stale" — health records gathered from 2015 to 2018 predate U.S. Steel's shutdown of four coke batteries and tens of millions of dollars in newer pollution controls, which it says have dramatically reduced emissions, putting the plant in attainment of federal particulate standards. But the Allegheny County Health Department has continued to cite and fine U.S. Steel for exceedances in sulfur dioxide, and another study might argue that even greater emission reductions could reduce cases of childhood asthma. "We obtained the health data before for the community surrounding the Shenango plant, which is in the Ohio River, right near Pittsburgh," Dr. George Thurston said. Thurston, a medical doctor and professor of environmental medicine at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, looked at Neville Island's air pollution and emergency room data before and after the Shenango Coke Works closed. "In there, among the respiratory, a very decisive drop in pediatric emergency department visits to hospitals right immediately after the closure," Thurston said. In the month after the plant closed on Jan. 6, 2016, the number of pediatric emergency room visits for asthma plummeted by 41 percent compared to the month before. "I wasn't expecting a drop so large that you can just look at visually and see," Thurston said. And when kids are in the emergency room dealing with their asthma, they are not in the classroom, and the NYU study could be a lesson for Clairton. "The results of our study would be very applicable to the Clairton communities, and very useful, I think, to understand that if the Clairton plant were to reduce its emissions, then it's highly probable, I would say certain, that there would be health benefits to the community around it," Thurston said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store