logo
Will Thailand's deep south ever see lasting peace?

Will Thailand's deep south ever see lasting peace?

Time of India21-05-2025
Will Thailand's deep south ever see lasting peace?
Since January 2004, Thailand's deep south has seen ongoing conflict between Thai military forces and separatist groups seeking greater autonomy.
The violence is largely confined to the country's three southernmost provinces, Narathiwat, Pattani and Yala - home to a Muslim Malay majority in the predominantly Buddhist nation.
The region, located along the Thai-Malaysia border, has seen over 23,000 violent incidents, leading to more than 7,000 deaths, according to Deep South Watch, a local think tank.
The Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN), the dominant separatist group, has been implicated in attacks targeting civilians, including Buddhist monks and schoolteachers, according to Human Rights Watch.
Deadly attacks escalate conflict
Between January and early May this year, 38 violent incidents were recorded, almost as many as in all of 2024.
Don Pathan, a Thailand-based security analyst, points to two attacks as key escalations.
The first came after Thailand's National Security Council and the BRN failed to reach a Ramadan ceasefire agreement in March, after which Thai Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai insisted that all violence must stop before talks resume.
The BRN responded with a March 9 attack on Narathiwat's Sungai Kolok District Office, wounding 12 people and killing two volunteer defense officers.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now
5minstory.com
Undo
The second major incident came after the April 18 killing of senior BRN member Abdulroning Lateh, which saw the insurgents escalate beyond the rules of engagement in conflict by targeting civilians.
A brutal attack came on May 2 when a gunman shot dead at least three people in a residential area of Narathiwat province, including a 9-year-old girl, a 75-year-old man and a 76-year-old blind woman.
In response, Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra deployed more troops to the region to bolster security.
Last week, Deputy PM Phumtham Wechayachai said that the Thai government is willing to engage in peace talks.
Thaksin vows to achieve peace
Tita Sanglee, an associate fellow at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, believes both politicians' efforts are symbolic rather than practical.
"Paetongtarn and Phumtham's peace efforts are more symbolic than substantive. We all know that the situation on the ground is not really conducive to peace," she told DW.
"Phumtham's stance, at least early on, was quite tough. He was basically saying, 'we won't engage in talks unless the BRN proves its legitimacy by ending violence on the ground'."
"I see this largely as a way to shift scrutiny onto the insurgents and ultimately to shield the young and inexperienced prime minister," Sanglee said, suggesting that controlling the narrative seems to be the government's priority.
Thaksin Shinawatra, who was Thai PM when the insurgency renewed in 2004, has also become involved to help find a solution.
He visited the region in February and said that he expects to see a complete end to the unrest by next year.
What is Malaysia's role in finding peace?
Thailand's ruling Pheu Thai party, which is strongly influenced by Thaksin, has since faced pressure to act.
Tita said the former PM's pledge has pushed the government to respond.
"In light of Thaksin's public pledge to end the Deep South's unrest by next year, there's a real need for the Pheu Thai government to demonstrate that it is taking the issue seriously and is actually doing something," she told DW.
Thaksin is an informal adviser to ASEAN chair Anwar Ibrahim, who is also the prime minister of Malaysia, which has been urged to take a greater role in peace efforts.
The last official meeting about a peace solution between Thai government representatives and the BRN was in June 2024.
But in a post on social media this month, Paetongtarn said Malaysia is now crucial for any upcoming rounds of peace talks.
Anthony Davis, a Bangkok-based security analyst, said Malaysia could have more of an impact on reducing the hostilities.
"The Malaysians could arguably be doing more in terms of reining in BRN. Some elements almost certainly knew in advance that a Ramadan offensive was coming and apparently did nothing to head it off," he told DW, adding that Malaysia's role as "facilitator" limits its actions.
"There are also questions as to how far PM Anwar is focused on the Patani issue and whether he could afford the domestic political blowback of hard-knuckle moves against BRN leadership inside Malaysia when ultimately this is a Thai problem," he added.
Don Pathan believes Thailand should look at the BRN proposal, rather than relying on Malaysia.
"Malaysia is not exactly an honest broker; Malaysia is a stakeholder. The country shares the same border and the same religious and cultural similarities as the Malays of Patani," he told DW.
Pathan suggested that the Thai government should take seriously the BRN's counterproposal made in February, which included "setting up a negotiating team, releasing political prisoners, and allowing international observers to monitor a ceasefire."
"The BRN has said it is willing to negotiate under the Thai Constitution. BRN and the Patani Malays are willing to be part of the Thai state. But it has to be on their terms," he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alaska summit: Ride in the Beast, ‘productive' talks but 'no deal' on Ukraine - 10 takeaways from Donald Trump-Putin's high-stakes meet
Alaska summit: Ride in the Beast, ‘productive' talks but 'no deal' on Ukraine - 10 takeaways from Donald Trump-Putin's high-stakes meet

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Alaska summit: Ride in the Beast, ‘productive' talks but 'no deal' on Ukraine - 10 takeaways from Donald Trump-Putin's high-stakes meet

The meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson in Anchorage was a tightly choreographed encounter. The two leaders greeted each other with extended handshakes on a red carpet, shared the US presidential limousine known as 'The Beast,' and watched B-2 stealth bombers and fighter jets fly overhead. After roughly two-and-a-half hours of talks with senior aides present, they gave brief joint remarks to cameras but took no questions from reporters. Despite the warm gestures, the summit produced no concrete agreement. Trump said, 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to,' but later acknowledged, 'We didn't get there,' adding, 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Former national security adviser John Bolton judged the balance plainly: 'Trump did not lose, but Putin clearly won,' and that 'Trump didn't come away with anything, except more meetings. ' Putin, for his part, spoke of an 'understanding' and suggested further contact between the two leaders. Putin back on the global stage After years of diplomatic isolation following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Vladimir Putin's visit to US soil and his public meeting with the US president marked a visible return to prominence. The coverage noted that it had been about a decade since Putin last visited the United States for a major presidential summit. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo On arrival, he received ceremonial honours, applause and staged optics that Russian outlets used to show him standing beside the American president. The event gave Moscow material to present at home that Putin was again a central actor in global affairs, even though many European capitals remain cautious or opposed to his policies. No deal reached Both presidents described the meeting in positive terms, but no formal agreement or signed deal emerged. Trump said: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to,' and later added, 'We didn't get there.' He also told reporters, 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Putin said he and Trump had reached an 'understanding' on Ukraine and that they 'hope that the understanding we have reached will... pave the way for peace in Ukraine,' but neither side announced concrete, binding measures at the summit. Red carpet reception and military flyovers Putin was greeted with a red carpet, and US military aircraft flew overhead as the two presidents arrived at the tarmac. Reporters described a B-2 stealth bomber and F-22s or F-35s passing as the leaders processed, images that were emphasised in the coverage. Trump applauded as Putin emerged, and the staged arrival — motorcades, flags and a formal welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson — underscored the ceremony surrounding the encounter. Friends reunited? On the tarmac and in public remarks the two men projected warmth. Trump said: "The meeting was a very warm meeting between two very important countries — and it's very good when they get along. I think we're pretty close to a deal. Now look, Ukraine has to agree to it." The pair exchanged extended handshakes, smiles and informal conversation on camera, with Putin at one point offering, in English, 'next time in Moscow,' to which Trump replied that 'that's an interesting one' and that 'I could see it possibly happening. ' A shift from normal protocol The summit was arranged and shaped quickly; officials acknowledged a different pace from usual summit diplomacy. Trump had suggested the meeting was something of 'a feel-out meeting' and had said he might walk out quickly if it went poorly, but he did not. With aides present rather than a traditional, heavily prepared two-party negotiation, the encounter departed from the multimonth planning that normally precedes meetings between heads of state. A planned one-on-one encounter did not materialise. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the previously planned one-on-one would instead be 'a three-on-three discussion including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff.' Putin attended with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov. The late alterations to who would be in the room and on stage were part of the summit's improvised character and were widely reported in the run-up to the leaders' meeting. A swipe at Biden Putin claimed that he would not have invaded Ukraine if Donald Trump had been in office, a pointed remark made after their nearly three-hour summit in Alaska. 'That's a big mistake today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then, there will be no war — and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be, so I can confirm that,' Putin said. He added, 'I think that, overall, me and President Trump have built a very good business-like [relationship]. ' Trump, who has long argued the war began under President Biden's watch, did not directly respond to Putin's comment but reiterated his stance: 'This isn't my war. This is Biden's war. Biden screwed this up…' Speaking time was lopsided In the joint appearance Putin spoke for about eight minutes and thirty seconds, while Trump spoke for just under four minutes. Putin used his time to outline Russia's messaging and to thank Trump for the 'friendly' tone of their conversation; Trump's shorter remarks reiterated his view of constructive dialogue and his hope for progress that would include Ukraine's agreement. Tariff relief in sight? Before his meeting with Putin, Trump said that he might consider imposing tariffs on countries buying Russian oil—though not immediately. 'Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well," he added. Trump claimed that earlier tariffs on India's Russian oil imports influenced Moscow's decision to engage. 'When you lose your second largest customer, and you're probably going to lose your first largest customer, I think that probably has a role," he said. India, however, denied halting oil purchases and criticised U.S. tariffs as "unjustified and unreasonable." Ukraine excluded from the summit process Ukraine did not participate in the talks. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in advance and after the meeting that Kyiv was excluded and urged strong US support: 'It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America.' He added in later remarks that 'Everyone wants an honest end to the war. Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to end the war,' and warned: 'The war continues and it continues precisely because there is no order, nor any signals from Moscow, that it is preparing to end this war. ' What's next? Both presidents signalled further contact. Trump closed his remarks saying, 'we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.' Putin had offered 'next time in Moscow.' In a post-summit interview Trump said he would call Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them and noted he was holding off on immediate new sanctions: 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now,' though he added he 'may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something. '

Louisiana sues Roblox game platform over child safety
Louisiana sues Roblox game platform over child safety

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Louisiana sues Roblox game platform over child safety

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills San Francisco, Aug 16, 2025 -The US state of Louisiana has filed a lawsuit accusing Roblox of facilitating the exploitation of children, prompting the online game platform to reject the claim as "untrue" on Friday.A lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill contends that Silicon Valley-based Roblox facilitates distribution of child sexual abuse material and the exploitation of minors."Roblox is overrun with harmful content and child predators because it prioritizes user growth, revenue, and profits over child safety," Murrill maintained in a lawsuit charges Roblox with "knowingly and intentionally" failing to implement basic safety controls to protect 82 million people use Roblox daily, with more than half of them being younger than 18 years of age, according to the suit."Any assertion that Roblox would intentionally put our users at risk of exploitation is simply untrue," the company said Friday in a posted response to the filing."No system is perfect and bad actors adapt to evade detection," the company added, stressing that it works "continuously" to promote a safe online environment on the Roblox online gaming and creation platform was founded in 2004 and allows users to play, create and share virtual is one of the most popular online platforms for children, "offering a vibrant world of interactive games, imaginative play, and creative self-expression," according to the nonprofit Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI).A FOSI guide available at its website "walks parents through the basics of Roblox, the ways children commonly engage with it, and how to use built-in features like content filters, chat settings, and screen time controls" for announced major safety upgrades late last year, introducing remote parental controls and restricting communication features for users under FOSI endorsed the changes at the time, its chief saying Roblox was taking "significant steps toward building a safer digital environment."

Louisiana sues Roblox game platform over child safety
Louisiana sues Roblox game platform over child safety

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Louisiana sues Roblox game platform over child safety

Getty Images San Francisco, Aug 16, 2025 -The US state of Louisiana has filed a lawsuit accusing Roblox of facilitating the exploitation of children, prompting the online game platform to reject the claim as "untrue" on Friday. A lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill contends that Silicon Valley-based Roblox facilitates distribution of child sexual abuse material and the exploitation of minors. "Roblox is overrun with harmful content and child predators because it prioritizes user growth, revenue, and profits over child safety," Murrill maintained in a release. The lawsuit charges Roblox with "knowingly and intentionally" failing to implement basic safety controls to protect 82 million people use Roblox daily, with more than half of them being younger than 18 years of age, according to the suit."Any assertion that Roblox would intentionally put our users at risk of exploitation is simply untrue," the company said Friday in a posted response to the filing."No system is perfect and bad actors adapt to evade detection," the company added, stressing that it works "continuously" to promote a safe online environment on the Roblox online gaming and creation platform was founded in 2004 and allows users to play, create and share virtual is one of the most popular online platforms for children, "offering a vibrant world of interactive games, imaginative play, and creative self-expression," according to the nonprofit Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI).A FOSI guide available at its website "walks parents through the basics of Roblox, the ways children commonly engage with it, and how to use built-in features like content filters, chat settings, and screen time controls" for announced major safety upgrades late last year, introducing remote parental controls and restricting communication features for users under FOSI endorsed the changes at the time, its chief saying Roblox was taking "significant steps toward building a safer digital environment." Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. 3 years on, Akasa's next challenge: Staying in the air against IndiGo's dominance Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs. As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 25% in 1 year Logistics sector: Be tactical in the face of head & tailwinds; 6 logistics stocks with an upside potential of over 30% These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 20% return in 1 year, according to analysts

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store