Woman fined over £400 by her council for flytipping for strange reason
Tyler Marie Richards employed them to remove a pile of 20 bin bags from her property in Bridge Street, Tonypandy.
The mountain of waste included a plastic kennel, 15 of general rubbish, four recycling bags, a cardboard box and a pile of general loose garbage.
But she was left horrified when she was tracked down after the sea of waste was discovered strewn across the residential area of Penrhys in Ronda Cynon Taf.
Ms Richards then failed to engage with Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council's enforcement officers - and the local authority decided to take court action against her, WalesOnline reports.
And she was fined £120 alongside clean-up costs of £255.51 and a victim surcharge of £48 after she was found guilty of failing to control her waste and committing an offence under Section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
In total she was fined a stunning £423.51 - despite not fly-tipping any rubbish herself.
But the furious council blasted Ms Richards furiously telling the newspaper that 'fly-tipping will not be tolerated, ever'.
Councillor Ann Crimmings said: 'There is never an excuse to blight our, towns, lanes, streets and villages with waste, and we will find those responsible and hold them to account.
'If your waste is fly tipped, you could be fined along with the individual or company you paid to remove it.
'We will use every power available to us to hold those accountable for their actions.'
Official figures recently suggested flytipping in England has risen to its highest level in almost 20 years.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed vowed to toughen up enforcement after reported cases of illegal dumping passed 1.15million in 2023-2024.
The figure is an increase of six per cent from the 1.08million the previous year and the highest level in the six years since the current method for reporting was brought in.
The statistics also revealed a year-on-year fall in the number of fixed penalty notices issued for flytipping and a decline in the number of court-issued fines.
Analysis of the data revealed London as a major hotspot, with eight boroughs in the top 10 local authorities for overall dumping and the highest proportion by population.
The London Borough of Croydon was said to be the flytipping capital of the UK with 35,470 recorded incidents, according to an analysis of government data published covering the period from April 2023 to March 2024.
Across England, the scourge of fly-tipping represnted a 6.2 per cent increase on the previous year and the second consecutive annual rise recorded.
Nottingham and Liverpool were also included in the top 10, with other places towards the highest levels being Birmingham and Bradford.
Last year some 60 per cent of cases involved household waste, with 688,000 incidents of illegally dumped rubbish from homes - ranging from black bags of waste to the contents of shed clearances, furniture, carpets and DIY.
The most common places for flytipping to occur were on pavements and roads, accounting for 37 per cent of incidents.
Almost one third, or 31 per cent, of incidents were the size of a small van load.
And another 28 per cent amounted to the equivalent of a car boot or less of rubbish.
Meanwhile, four per cent were the size of a tipper lorry load or bigger.
Large flytipping incidents have cost £13.1million for local authorities to clean up, research showed.
Mr Reed has said: 'Flytipping is a disgraceful act which trashes communities and its increase is unacceptable. Communities and businesses shouldn't have to put up with these crimes.
'This Government will crack down on fly tipping and punish rubbish dumpers, forcing them to clean up their mess.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pregnant mother, 39, who launched a brutal attack on a 'random' pensioner at a FUNERAL walks free from court
A pregnant mother-of-three who launched a brutal attack on a pensioner during a funeral wake, leaving the 65-year-old victim hospitalised and with life-changing injuries, has walked free from court. Danielle Oliver, 39, threw herself at Belinda Stickland without warning inside the Conservative Club in Splott, Cardiff, during a family funeral on June 9 last year. The assault was so severe that it left the pensioner with fractured ribs, breathing difficulties and a lasting diagnosis of emphysema. Cardiff Crown Court heard how Ms Stickland had to be rushed to hospital and kept in for nine days, during which doctors drained fluid from her lungs. She later said the violent and prolonged attack had changed her life 'in every way'. Prosecutor Kirsten Murphy described how the unprovoked attack was caught on CCTV, which showed Oliver looking up from her phone before launching herself at the older woman near the bar. Once on the ground, Stickland was left helpless as Oliver continued to gesture menacingly, prompting bar staff to intervene and drag her out of the venue. In court, Ms Stickland's harrowing victim impact statement revealed the true cost of the assault. 'I was attending the funeral of a close friend on the day I was assaulted. It changed my life in so many ways. It took my sparkle away,' she said. 'I am now a shell of a person, Oliver was a stranger to me, and yet now she is woven into the fabric of my everyday. 'I used to go out and enjoy my life and speak to my neighbours but now I can't leave the house. I feel it is too unsafe.' Addressing her attacker directly, she asked: 'What if you had killed me? What if you had left my children without their mother? What if you had left my grandchildren without their nan? 'I don't just live with the physical injuries, I continue to live with the mental trauma. I am no longer me.' Judge Simon Mills said the footage made clear just how 'heavily' the victim had fallen. He said: 'Any idea that a single blow to the face doesn't do any harm is completely wide of the mark. You could today have been facing prosecution for manslaughter. 'I have heard you are surprised by the seriousness of your victim's injuries. 'Well, I'm afraid in the job that I do, I see all of the time how momentary acts of violence have very serious consequences and sometimes fatal consequences. 'Once you lay your hands on someone else in such a way, then the consequences can be truly catastrophi,c and they arguably have been in this case.' He added: 'I am not going into the background of why you made the decision you did. You were pregnant at the time and I'm aware your medication had to be adjusted. 'An issue was brought to your attention which caused you to make completely the wrong decision.' The court heard Oliver, of Braunton Avenue in Llanrumney, had two prior convictions but none considered aggravating. She was arrested four days after the attack and remained largely uncooperative in the interview, answering 'no comment' to all questions before eventually admitting to assault occasioning grievous bodily harm. Defending Oliver, Dan Jones, said she did not intend to cause such serious harm and cited her responsibilities as a single parent, including care for a child with specific needs. The court also heard that medication changes during her pregnancy may have contributed to her state of mind. Judge Mills handed down a 66-week prison sentence, suspended for two years. Oliver must complete a 10-day rehabilitation programme and was handed a five-year restraining order banning any contact with her victim. The judge opted not to impose compensation, citing Oliver's financial limitations. Outside court, Ms Stickland's daughter, Jinaise, said the family was ready to move forward after two years of waiting. 'My mother is 65 now and shouldn't have had to put up with this. 'The puncture has given her emphysema. My mother is already closer to the coffin than most, and she shouldn't have to have anyone wanting to put her in there any sooner by assaulting her.'
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Radical measures are vital to avoid collapse of justice system
Since the Covid-19 pandemic, crown courts have been in an ever-worsening crisis, buckling under the weight of an enormous backlog of cases. The Ministry of Justice recently announced that it has soared to 77,000, well over double the level in 2019. And it is set to soar further, with some experts predicting it will rise above 100,000. One of the principal ingredients of justice, timeliness, is being lost: hundreds of trials have been delayed until 2029. The viability of the criminal justice system is under threat. The courts system is close to collapse. Something has to give. Enter Sir Brian Leveson, a former Court of Appeal judge, who was tasked by the government with finding ways to tackle the courts crisis. Sir Brian's proposals, published on Wednesday, are nothing if not radical. They include the possible abolition of juries for a host of offences, including assault, harassment and complex fraud cases. He has also mooted the increased use of other forms of remedy such as cautions to divert cases away from the courts. Sir Brian admits that he does not 'rejoice' in the eye-catching proposal to remove juries in some instances but argues that his plan is 'absolutely essential' if the courts system is to avoid collapse. Even if his proposals are adopted, he warns that the backlog will persist for five years. Were juries to be cut out from some trials, it would be the most significant shake-up of the criminal justice system in England and Wales in a century. When considering this, it is worth noting that the vast majority of criminal cases are already heard by magistrates, something that is not widely recognised. There is a balance to strike in order to maintain public confidence. Juries have long been regarded as 'the jewel in the crown' of British justice, an essential right in serious cases. Yet this expectation must be balanced against the chaos afflicting the system: Sir Brian emphasises that delay lessens the chance of a fair trial. It is welcome to see that the proposals echo the recent findings of The Times Crime and Justice Commission, which call for a new type of intermediate court to clear the backlog. Sir Brian's suggestion that a judge and two magistrates preside over hearings of less serious offences mirrors one of the commission's proposals. Many trials could be speeded up from several days to a few hours, creating more capacity in court for jury hearings. This new court would focus on cases involving a maximum sentence of two years, lower level crimes such as theft, criminal damage and some forms of assault. Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, should act swiftly on this proposal. Some lawyers believe the criminal justice system was mishandled during the pandemic. It certainly would have been easier to scrap juries entirely but ministers made the morally correct decision to keep them despite the backlog created. That decision also contributed to the prison capacity crisis, thanks to 17,000-odd people in England and Wales still languishing on remand. Ms Mahmood should be aware that in the immediate term, any shift towards more magistrate cases may witness a brief rise in pressure on the prison system as cases are rapidly processed by the courts. Unsurprisingly, these reforms have not been universally welcomed by the legal profession. Some lawyers fear they mark a clear shift away from the ancient tradition of jury trial — the first such hearing in England took place more than 800 years ago. These fears must be allayed. Despite such challenges, this country's justice system retains the respect of much of the world. It faces acute pressures but they must be placed in a broader context. Curtailing a fundamental right in order to deal with short-term capacity issues is one thing. But it would be a mistake if Sir Brian's proposals marked the beginning of the decline of the jury system. Men and women in serious cases should have the right to be tried by their peers.
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Police investigate sex abuse claims against men linked to Church
A convicted bishop and a former vicar of the Church in Wales are being investigated by detectives over allegations of historical sexual abuse, the BBC can people have told BBC Wales Investigates about abuse being ignored at the crisis-hit Church and have called for an independent Bishop of Swansea and Brecon Anthony Pierce, jailed for child sexual abuse earlier this year, faces fresh historical sex abuse allegations while a former vicar is also being investigated by South Wales Church in Wales have said they were "profoundly sorry" and apologised to "anyone who has suffered or been let down by failings." Warning: This story contains graphic descriptions of sexual assaultThe BBC investigation found concerns about Pierce were reported to Church officials in 1986 - 13 years before he became Bishop of Swansea and Brecon - but nothing was victim has waived his right to anonymity to speak out and questions how a "predator" was allowed to become a Bishop when serious concerns had been raised about him. It is the latest controversy to hit the Church in Wales after the Archbishop of Wales retired last month after two critical reports highlighted safeguarding concerns where "sexual boundaries seemed blurred" at his north Wales diocese of who sang with the Bangor Cathedral choir also told the BBC there had been a "binge drinking culture".Although there is no suggestion the former archbishop behaved inappropriately. the church's representative body said there must be a "change in leadership, procedures and governance in the diocese of Bangor".BBC Wales understands the current police investigation is looking into historical sexual abuse allegations against Pierce, as well as a former vicar of the Church in alleged victims, from across Wales whose allegations span decades, have told BBC Wales Investigates they want an independent inquiry into the Church in Wales abuse. Alisdair Adams was 18 and at University College Swansea, now Swansea University, when he first met Pierce who was a parish priest in the city in the 1980s. "He invited me to his house for dinner to see how we could work together and gave me lots of white wine and no food," said Alisdair, now said Pierce moved to sit on the arm of the sofa before the lights went out suddenly."He grabbed me and pulled me into him and held me tightly," he added. "I could feel his erect penis through his brown nylon trousers." 'He was the predator and we were the prey' Alisdair said he left immediately and reported the incident to a Methodist said he was invited to speak to the Anglican campus chaplain and said two other students were interviewed that day about Pierce. BBC Wales Investigates has spoken to Mark Dickey-Collas, who was also interviewed. He said he was also invited to Pierce's house and offered alcohol before the lights went out and Pierce came onto said the chaplain reported his concerns to the Church and Pierce was banned from campus and university Church in Wales said it was not aware of the report but confirmed it was undertaking enquiries into how it responded at the time. Pierce continued as a priest and worked as chaplain at Swansea's Singleton Hospital. He became Bishop of Swansea and Brecon in 1999, and met the then Prince Charles, now King Charles, while he was on a visit to Swansea in admitted five charges of indecent assault against a boy under the age of 16 between 1985 and 1990 and was sentenced to four years and one month in March. "I'm dumbfounded as to why this man with allegations swirling around him in 1985 and 1986 was allowed to be employed by the church," Alisdair told BBC Wales Investigates."And they promoted him to Bishop. He was a predator and we were the prey and the Church did nothing about it."The Church is currently holding a review into claims "senior figures" were aware of a separate allegation of abuse against Pierce in 1993 which was not passed to police until becoming Bishop, Pierce was in ultimate charge of Church safeguarding in his diocese. Ruth, not her real name, told BBC Wales serious allegations she made about a choirmaster were not acted on by says Brecon Cathedral choirmaster David Gedge assaulted her on a choir exchange to Ireland in 2001 when she was 17 years old."He suggested we go for a walk," said Ruth, who was a chorister at the cathedral. "He held my arm and turned me round and kissed me. In that moment I felt just kind of shattered." "He put his hand underneath my top and was touching me. He talked about his wife and as he was talking about this his hands were moving and he put his hands down my trousers and into my pants. "All of this was happening whilst I was really frozen."She said she was scared to report the abuse initially, but eventually did two years later to try and protect other choristers. 'The Church allowed my abuser to have more opportunities' Pierce was Bishop of Swansea and Brecon at the time - and Ruth says he did Church in Wales admitted there was no record of action against Mr Gedge in 2003 and any decisions about the case would have been made by Gedge continued to work with children in the choir for four years before retiring. "Anthony Pierce did not abuse me, but he allowed my abuse to go unaccounted for and for my abuser to have many more opportunities to do the same thing," said Ruth."I don't know how many other people are without justice because Anthony Pierce stopped their case from moving forward - maybe to protect his friends, maybe to take the eyes off him."Ruth said she went to the police in 2012 after the lack of action by the Church. BBC Wales Investigates has seen police documents that say Mr Gedge admitted holding Ruth's hand, taking her for a walk and talking to her about intimate details of his life but he denied assaulting Director of Public Prosecutions in Ireland said there appeared to be substance to Ruth's allegations but it was unlikely a prosecution would be Gedge was prevented from holding any role in the Church after 2012. He died in priest Graham Sawyer started working in Pontypool in south Wales in 2003 when he raised concerns about Darren Jenkins, a youth leader and lay reader - someone who can preach and take services. 'I was told I should be very careful about reporting abuse' "I was worried about the inappropriate touching," he said. "It didn't appear sexual, it was hugging."As a former sexual abuse victim himself, Graham tried to raise the alarm."I was told that I should be very careful or I'd end up in court," he said he went to the police after he became concerned at the lack of action by the Church in Wales and left Pontypool for Australia. Jenkins was jailed in 2006 for raping a 16-year-old boy five said cases like Pierce's show "the culture has not changed". "Whenever there's a problem, they will close ranks and ignore. If that doesn't work, they would attack you with great ferocity," he told BBC Wales Church in Wales is a separate body to the Church of England and both have separate safeguarding departments to protect vulnerable people including has written to Welsh politicians urging them to call on the Senedd to hold an independent Church in Wales has been subject to two independent safeguarding reports to date - the Historic Cases Review in 2009 and the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA) which started in Welby stepped down as the Archbishop of Canterbury in 2024 after a damning report into a prolific child abuser associated with the Church of IICSA panel member has questioned if the Church in Wales has done enough since that report and thought there should be an external review into the Church. "We did make it very clear that there were quite a lot of significant gaps and operational shortcomings," Professor Sir Malcolm Evans told the BBC."But there doesn't seem to have been a broad-ranging discussion as to the future in Wales as there has been in the Church of England. What we now need is that level of discussion, reflection, and action." Church in Wales promise culture review The Church in Wales has apologised and told the BBC that an external safeguarding audit of all cathedrals in Wales would be commissioned as well as a review into its culture. "There is no place in the Church for abuse, misconduct or concealment," a Church in Wales spokesman said."We are determined that the issues identified will be fully addressed and practices improved so that all church members, and the wider society, can have confidence that the church is, as it should be, a safe and supportive environment for all."The Church added its complaints handling process is now more independent, professional and robust and it is committed to continuous information and support about any issues raised in this story contact the BBC Action reporting by Michela Riva
