logo
EXCLUSIVE Inside the sleepy Lake District town torn apart by mosque row: Neighbours turn on each other in bitter split over £2.5m Islamic centre plan

EXCLUSIVE Inside the sleepy Lake District town torn apart by mosque row: Neighbours turn on each other in bitter split over £2.5m Islamic centre plan

Daily Mail​30-06-2025
It's a usually sleepy small town on the edge of the Lake District but the tourist trade invariably passes it by so Dalton-in-Furness rarely commands any national attention.
But suddenly this historic Cumbrian market town of just 8,000 residents finds itself bitterly divided - with a number of increasingly angry protests making waves.
The issue that has sparked this abrupt change of mood is the proposed construction of the 'South Lakes Islamic Centre' - a three-storey mosque currently taking shape on its outskirts.
What began as a simple planning application by a group of Muslim doctors based at nearby Barrow-in-Furness hospital this week led to far-right protesters and counter-protesters waving placards and flinging insults at each other.
The £2.5million project, which proposes to cater for some 50 Muslim medical staff and their families, has triggered outrage among some residents, while others have rallied to defend it as a symbol of tolerance and progress.
Sheila McLarnon, 77, a chiropodist who has lived in Dalton for decades, has banned customers from discussing the mosque at her home clinic, located a stone's throw away.
She accused some locals opposing its construction of racism.
Mrs McLarnon said: 'I'm disappointed in the attitude of people round here and it comes down to racism.
What began as a simple planning application by a group of Muslim doctors based at nearby Barrow-in-Furness hospital this week led to far-right protesters and counter-protesters waving placards and flinging insults at each other
'I'm a chiropodist. I've got a clinic here at the house and I won't let my patients say negative things about it because they'll come in and say, "What about the bloody mosque then?"
'One man even said, "Oh, it's just going to be a bomb-making factory".
'That is the kind of thing they've decided is going to come to Dalton and it's obviously just nonsense.
'There are legitimate concerns about parking and access, but sadly this area is quite racist and I think that's the root of it.'
Husband Gerry, 77, a retired police officer, added: 'We are committed Catholics and nobody's ever tried to stop us going to church. I think it's just a minority making the trouble.'
The South Lakes Islamic Centre say the building will serve Muslim families who currently must make the 100-mile round trip to the nearest masjid in Lancaster.
They say its construction has faced repeated obstacles – including local suppliers allegedly refusing to deliver materials.
The debate over the mosque, built outside of the boundaries of the Lake District National Park, has pitted neighbours against each other.
Near to the mosque, a man, who did not want to give his name, said: 'People are falling out over this. There are neighbours who don't speak to each other anymore, because they've been called racist.
'These are people who have been friends for years. All falling out over a b****y mosque. I think it's daft. It's getting built and we all need to get on.'
In recent days, protestors have turned out waving Union Jacks and Knights Templar flags outside the construction site. Their demonstrations were matched by counter-protests from anti-racism groups.
Among those in the town to oppose the development was businessman Gary Peaker, 54.
He said he was perplexed as to why the mosque was being sited in Dalton - two-and-a-half miles from the General Hospital in neighbouring Barrow-in-Furness.
He claimed the 'majority' of people in the town were against the development and accused council officials of failing to properly consult.
Planning permission was granted in December 2022 after 30 representations were made, and construction began earlier this year.
Mr Peaker said: 'Dalton is a tiny little town with an even smaller contingent of people who would actually go there.
'Yet this mosque is three storeys - it's huge. It's an absolute eyesore.
'I feel sorry for the people who have their houses nearby because it's going to wipe thousands off the value of those houses.
'There are plenty of buildings in Barrow that could have been repurposed, rather than building it here.
'People here feel that they've been excluded from the planning process. They want to see the building work stop and the planning application fully reviewed.'
The South Lakes Islamic Centre charity said the new building would serve both the local Muslim community and visiting tourists.
It will also allow 'professionals, business communities and other trade workers who will need basic prayer, burial, teaching and community facilities'.
A neighbour, who asked not to be named, accused the centre of going beyond what it had initially planned to build.
She said: 'When it first started, we got a little flyer through the door. It read: "Hello, brothers, we want to buy this land".
'Well, we thought it was a joke, to be honest. I've got nothing against a mosque but what is being built is just way out of proportion.
'From what we know, there were three better sites nearer the hospital in Barrow and the council rejected them all because they didn't want the mosque in Barrow.
'And so they've shoved it into Dalton and in completely the wrong place.
'This is a busy road. There's been so many people killed on this road over the years. Where are all these cars going to park?
'The council has just been so secretive and duplicitous. Getting any answers out of them has been impossible.
'I am very grateful for the Muslim doctors and the nurses, very grateful. But this is in the wrong spot.'
Sarah Coltherd, 29, a care worker, said she disagreed with those campaigning against the mosque.
She said of the protesters: 'They're happy to have a Muslim doctor look after them in hospital – they've got no problem with that.
'Why is it a problem allowing them to have somewhere to pray? They completely have the right to practice their religion.'
Linda Greaves, 75, said she believed there was a 'racial element' to opposition of the mosque.
She added: 'It's being built and it's going to happen and I think people just need to get on with it.
'They're not going to stop work now. Everyone's got their own opinions on it. I think there's probably a racial element to it.
'But, personally, I have no issue. It's not going to affect me.'
Passing the mosque, a jogger who asked not to be named, said he was ashamed of the far-right protests, which he said were composed of 'people bussed in from outside' rather then locals.
He said: 'Normal Muslims are the same as normal Christians. They are peaceful people who put their families first and are law-abiding.
'I feel sorry for the neighbouring houses because, sadly, I don't think this an issue that will go away.
'It can't be nice living there in relatively expensive houses and having trouble on your doorstep. They're the people I feel sorry for.'
In late March, the representative for South Lakes Islamic Centre alleged there had been delays in the delivery of material to the site due to negative coverage on TV.
In a YouTube video, a representative from the organisation said work to pour concrete into the foundations had been 'delayed' and that 'local suppliers have refused to deal with us'.
'The concrete, which was supposed to come this week, has been delayed because of the GB News coverage,' the video alleged.
'It's just the challenges we face; it's a difficult area to build, but we are progressing very quickly.'
The spokesman claimed some quarries had also 'declined' to give stones to the centre.
Construction for the place of worship has continued since the alleged delays.
Residents have previously voiced their concerns over social media for the construction of the mosque.
One said: 'Absolute monstrosity in the Lake District.'
Another said: 'Absolutley DISGUSTING * total blot on the landscape * totally unwelcome * how on earth has this been passed in planning.'
One other resident said: 'There's goes the beautiful Lake District - with a huge building plonked there.'
Mandy Penellum, secretary of Barrow's Trades Council, is among those to have voiced support for the Islamic Centre.
She said previously: 'There is a narrative here that's been perpetuated - that the Islamic Centre's not welcome - and that's not everybody's view by any stretch of the imagination.
'We've always been a welcoming and tolerant community here and people have come out to show that. You only have to look at Furness General Hospital, with staff from all over the world - it's important everybody has a space to worship.
'The centre is also going to be an asset for community use and I think it's really important that people understand that and acknowledge the fact that we're all human beings, we all have a right and a space to pray.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Increased betting tax would be a hurdle that horse racing may not overcome
Increased betting tax would be a hurdle that horse racing may not overcome

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Increased betting tax would be a hurdle that horse racing may not overcome

The Treasury is currently consulting over plans to replace the existing structure of online gambling duties, which is comprised of three bands, to a catch-all Remote Betting and Gaming Duty. At present, there is a 15 per cent duty, but there are grave concerns that the government-induced changes could see it brought into line with the rate of tax on games of chance, such as online casino and slot machines, which is six per cent higher. Economic analysis commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority showed that the sport could lose £66m in income through the levy, media rights and sponsorship because bookmakers would be likely to respond by offering inferior-value prices and reduce budgets for such things as marketing and advertising. Horse racing is a sport that is part of the very fabric of British culture. Its two codes, Flat and National Hunt have been supported by monarchs and other royals for centuries. It also courted Sir Keir Starmer, who last September became the first serving Prime Minister since Sir Winston Churchill to attend the St Leger. Now, similar to one of the PM's current political allies, it has had a change of heart and is taking a more combative approach. Racing draws in more spectators annually than every other sport in the nation, except football. It provides jobs for more than 85,000 people. If betting tax levied on the sport is raised, it's been estimated that 2,752 of those jobs will be lost in the first year alone, and this could become an ever-decreasing cycle. As a show of strength and to underline the gravity of their concerns, the whole of the industry has committed to a one-day strike on 10 September, when racing is scheduled to take place at Carlisle, Kempton Park, Lingfield Park and Uttoxeter. For an industry that has so often taken a 'softly, softly' approach to such matters and wanted to keep respective governments onside, it's akin to throwing away the painstakingly prepared form book and, instead, tossing a coin. Will the 'heads' count in the sport be forced to reduce or will ministers turn 'tails' and elect to preserve the status quo? James Hutchinson, the managing director at Ripon racecourse, is clear on why the sport is right to take such action: 'It's important that we get across this message that the current proposals for this betting duty tax will have an enormous effect on British racing and the income into British racing and therefore the amount of money that it raises in terms of levy and the return therefore to racecourses and the return of prize money to owners and trainers. 'From our point of view as a small independent racecourse, we need to be seen to be a strong industry that can support all of its constituent parts and this potential change is going to put many of those at risk and that's not something we want to see. 'I'm in support of the action that's being taken because by doing so we will hopefully be getting across and extremely strong message to government that we feel very strongly about this and the industry is prepared to go to those sort of lengths to show what it means and the effect it could have if the changes take place.' 'I don't think there's any other sporting industry that could be as dramatically affected by the sort of change that the government is proposing.' James Hutchinson, managing director at Ripon racecourse Isn't this, however, racing people expecting the sport to be treated as a special case purely because of its history? Hutchinson disagrees. 'I don't think it's necessarily a special case other than the fact that it has huge heritage. It's been an important part of the culture and the colour of the nation. 'Over five million people go racing every year and to introduce this huge increase could have a major negative impact on the industry. It could effect the amount of racing, the amount of people going racing and it would be a huge loss to the country. 'I don't think there's any other sporting industry that could be as dramatically affected by the sort of change that the government is proposing.' Those involved in the sport are clear about the financial damage that could be inflicted and are similarly unified in their action, although all four tracks that miss out on racing on that date have been offered an alternative fixture on the calendar by the BHA, by way of compensation for those individual events. The government must act in the best interests of a sport that has given the nation great service since before there was a Prime Minister. It should get this enquiry overturned before the provisional result stands, scrap any plans to increase its tax burden and leave this piece of the fabric of our society unfrayed.

New proposed powers to control dangerous dogs in Jersey
New proposed powers to control dangerous dogs in Jersey

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

New proposed powers to control dangerous dogs in Jersey

Changes could be introduced in Jersey to control dogs which are "considered to be dangerous", according to the island's constables have made draft amendments to the Dogs (Jersey) Law 1961 which, if approved, will mean owners of certain breeds, such as the XL Bully, must register them with the States rules about owning XL Bully dogs were introduced across the UK and, since 1 February 2024, it has been a criminal offence to own one without an exemption constables' proposed amendments would include a requirement to neuter the "dangerous dog" and keep it muzzled in a public place. 'Public safety' Officials said owners would not be allowed to breed, sell or give such dogs proposed scheme would also provide that the owner and any person in control of a dog in a public place must be aged 18 or over, they differs from England and Wales, where a person aged 16 and over may be an States Veterinary Officer (SVO) said it was aware of a number of dogs that could fall within the definition of a dangerous dog, officials said, but there were currently no powers to control ownership or to impose conditions to enhance public safety."The Jersey registration scheme will require the SVO to maintain a register of dangerous dogs and it will be an offence to own a dangerous dog unless it is registered with the SVO," it draft law has not been approved yet, but it is aimed at modernising the rules and giving police powers to deal with dangerous dogs. Chief Vet at the States Susana Ramos previously said improvements were needed to the law so that restrictions could be imposed on imports of dangerous dogs when coming from outside Ramos said the current law was "old and not fit for purpose anymore".She added: "The idea of the new law is to allow us to act."The law will give us a little substance to do better than we currently do."

Boomers behaving badly: Why the over-60s are the wildest generation
Boomers behaving badly: Why the over-60s are the wildest generation

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Boomers behaving badly: Why the over-60s are the wildest generation

Gransnet, the popular social networking site for grandparents, is aflame. Not with disputes over how to roast a chicken or subdue a pack of feral toddlers, but with the question of whether joining Palestine Action is morally acceptable or not. And this, rather than student unions or the bars of Dalston in east London, is the place to be debating it, as baby boomers take up the cause of an organisation that was banned under terror legislation last month. New figures from the Met Police reveal that of the 532 people arrested for supporting Palestine Action in London earlier this month, the average age was 54 but the largest group was people in their 60s (147 arrests), closely followed by 97 arrests of those in their 70s. Twentysomethings, long thought to be the natural foot soldiers of protest, trailed in third place with just 54 arrests. 'It's important to remember these people came of age in a period obsessed with social justice,' says Bobby Duffy, an academic and author of The Generation Myth: Why When You're Born Matters. 'They had the spirit of May 1968, [a period of civil unrest in] France, behind them, and experienced regular protests against the status quo in the UK and US. Retirement also gives you more time – there's a squeezed middle of people too busy with work, children, mortgages and ageing parents to look outward. But when you're young and when you're old, you have the space to focus on what you really care about.' Patricia, 75, has spent decades on the picket line protesting against nuclear weapons and the Iraq war, and for abortion rights and marriage equality. Joining Palestine Action, she believed, would have been the logical next step. 'We're the right people to be doing it,' she says. 'I'm not planning to become a lawyer or travel to America, so the worst-case scenario of a criminal record doesn't really affect me.' But in the end it was her millennial children that intervened. 'My daughters were so upset by the idea I might be arrested that I reconsidered.' Increasingly, we are all having to upend our notions that protest is the preserve of idealistic undergraduates. Many of the marches against Donald Trump have seen retirees outnumber students, while the Extinction Rebellion protests have been almost as thick with grey hair as pink. Who could forget the photographs of a then 60-year-old Emma Thompson perched on a boat in Oxford Circus a few years ago? 'I have often said that baby boomers are going to fundamentally reshape what ageing looks like,' says Jennifer Ailshire, a professor of gerontology at the University of Southern California. 'We had the stereotype of a grandma knitting or an old fellow gardening because we have associated ageing with frailty and ill-health and a lack of ability to be out in social spaces. Boomers are the first generation in the history of the world to have really benefited from new medical interventions and advice on how to stay fitter for longer, and as a result a great number feel younger and seem younger than those who came before them.' Duffy agrees that health is the largest reason for this culture-changing shift. 'Life expectancy in the UK is now over 80; for many, that means a second act spanning decades,' he says. Another important factor is wealth. 'This generation of retirees has far more disposable income than any other. They benefited from rising house prices, golden economic conditions, generous final-salary pensions and free higher education. That creates the means to have an unusual level of freedom.' The third is attitudes. 'This is the post-war generation that drove changes in gender equality, sexual behaviour and individual freedom,' says Duffy. 'They're distinct from their parents in almost every social measure so it's no wonder they are approaching old age with a very different mindset.' This last point is evidenced by the fact that boomers are wilder in their politics – and their pleasures. This is in comparison to both the silent generation and (somewhat shamingly for anyone under 40) their own adult children. Around Britain, millennials and older Gen Zs – who have largely moderated their drinking and swapped clubbing for 6am yoga classes – are quietly watching their parents' social calendars and holiday plans completely outpace their own. Lucy, 33, now refuses to have dinner with her parents during the week. It's not because she is too busy, or because she has too much on to leave work on time. It's not even because they live too far away – after they retired, her parents sold the family home in Wimbledon and bought a two-bedroom flat in Bloomsbury so they could be closer to the best restaurants and bars in the capital. 'I can't see my parents because I can't take the hangovers at my desk the day after,' says Lucy. 'My friends and I tend to stick to one or two drinks, or we meet up to exercise if it's a Monday or Tuesday, but my parents ply me with cocktails and wine and when I refuse they joke about me being pregnant. I love them to bits but I've realised I need to limit my time with them to weekends. They're just too much for me.' This isn't just anecdotal. Baby boomers now drink more alcohol than any other age group, according to figures from the now defunct Public Health England. Studies show that three in 10 boomers drink five days or more a week, while less than 1 per cent of Gen Z does the same. 'Alcohol drinking is incredibly generational,' says Duffy. 'It's about what you were socialised into, but also other changes: it is more difficult and more expensive for young people to get alcohol, whereas boomers were brought up on the idea that going out means drinking. Back then, there was massive sponsorship of big events by alcohol companies, and the advertising of alcohol was embedded everywhere; now young people tend to associate heavy drinking with health problems.' As for going out, Ailshire argues that boomers have always been a particularly social generation. 'Younger adults today have far less time for leisure, and the idea of a single-earner household has almost completely gone out the window,' she says. As a result, millennials are struggling to pay childcare bills and mortgages, and simply don't have the money for babysitters and restaurants. Similarly, those in cities often don't have space in their houses for dinners and parties. 'Then there is the fact that phone addiction eats up so much of younger generations' free time,' says Ailshire. 'It all adds up to a picture where over-60s are socialising much more than those coming up behind them.' And where drinking goes, other traditionally 'bad' behaviours often follow. The over-65s have experienced a 20 per cent rise in STIs in the UK in the last five years, while in Australia, a government report this year found that alcohol, tobacco and drug use among the over-60s had doubled in a decade. Globally, the pattern repeats itself. In France, Les Papy Boomers have become a political force, organising environmental protests from Marseille to Paris. In the US, the 'Raging Grannies' have made headlines for turning up at demonstrations in feather boas and floppy hats, singing protest songs rewritten to target companies in the fossil fuel industry. In Japan, a wave of 'silver start-ups' has seen retirees launching fashion brands, dance studios and even underground nightclubs. Boomers, in other words, are not quietly retiring to potter around the garden and watch Midsomer Murders. And while younger generations may be physically fitter and more socially progressive on paper, they are finding it difficult to match the heady mix of financial freedom and healthy, work-free years their parents are clearly benefiting from. What remains to be seen is whether this is a generational anomaly – the final flourish of a cohort born into a rare period of post-war prosperity who went on to dominate the culture of nearly every decade they have been adults in – or whether it is the new template for ageing in the 21st century. 'I think sadly this is unique to the boomers,' says Ailshire, who was born in 1981. 'I just don't think we will be able to retire at the age baby boomers have, and nor will many of us have the same level of wealth when we are no longer working. The boomers are the aberrant generation – and I'm not confident that the concept of a wild retirement will endure much beyond them.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store