
Ending Isolation review – a takedown of solitary confinement by incarcerated co-authors
'My father came from Russia, so I'm an immigrant's son,' he said. 'I can't live with these raids. I need to do something about it.'
Recently, 'doing something' has meant putting the finishing touches on a new book, Ending Isolation: The Case Against Solitary Confinement, which Kupers co-authored with three others.
Out on 4 September from Pluto Press, the book is an exhaustively researched takedown of solitary confinement: the practice of isolating an incarcerated person for hours, days, weeks or even years in a cell all their own. It's a practice long decried by experts including Kupers, but despite their repeated warnings, researchers and advocates generally agree that anywhere between 75,000 and 80,000 people are locked in solitary confinement in the US on any given day. The true number could be much higher, and as the book points out, 'there is no evidence that solitary confinement actually reduces violence. Instead, there are research findings that point strongly to the opposite conclusion, that solitary confinement worsens the problem of violence, both within prisons and in the public.'
Considering this, Ending Isolation is a vital, systematic dismantling of every possible argument one could use to justify solitary confinement. The book covers everything from the history of solitary, the disturbing overlaps between sexual assault and isolation practices, and a deep dive into who gets 'sent to the hole' (spoiler alert: it can be any prisoner at any time for the vaguest reasons that more than often defy logic).
The chapters feature narratives from people who have lived through torturous isolation, which makes for a mentally fraying read that feels, at times, like you're peeking behind a curtain in a room where you're not meant to be.
'Most people who go to solitary confinement are broken by the experience,' Kupers said in an interview with the Guardian. 'They have what I've termed the decimation of life skills. They become unlearned in terms of how to relate to others, and in terms of the prison environment, they then get into more trouble when they get out of segregation.'
Kupers' insights are based on decades of interviews with people who have experienced solitary confinement in America's prisons. His latest book offers the in-depth psychiatric research Kupers has previously delivered in five other books and hundreds of articles – only this time he's joined by three co-authors, including two people who are currently incarcerated.
Chris Blackwell, an award-winning journalist currently serving a decades-long sentence in Washington, kicks off the book with an engaging prologue recounting how he endured his first stint in solitary confinement at the age of 12. The experience 'solidified my distrust for authority figures forever and drove me into a deep hate for 'the system''.
He has now spent most of his life as part of that system. By age 18, he'd been arrested more than 20 times. After killing a man during a drug-related robbery ('an act I would never be able to repair', he writes) Blackwell received the 45-year sentence he is currently serving. More solitary confinement awaited, too.
'Nothing is worse than becoming a target in prison,' he writes in the prologue. 'I refused to comply with what I felt was a constant abuse of power, and guards refused to allow me to rebel without punishment for my actions.'
Even after years in isolation, Blackwell says he is still struggling to understand the impact those experiences had on him. But he knows the good he offers – his writing, his advocacy – is in spite of solitary confinement.
Kupers says Blackwell is representative of a large proportion of prisoners: 'He didn't have murder in his mind,' but he committed a terrible crime that will haunt him – and others – for the rest of their lives. When they started working together on this book, Kupers realized that if circumstances were different, he and Blackwell would have been close friends. He admires his intellect, the grassroots organization Blackwell helped co-found from behind bars, and the harrowing essays and incarceration accounts Blackwell has published in the Appeal, the New York Times, the Washington Post and many other outlets.
'He happens to be behind bars and therefore his life is very limited and restricted,' Kupers said. 'But it's amazing what he's done given those limits.'
It was Blackwell who recruited Kupers to co-author the book alongside himself and Deborah Zalesne, a law professor at the City University of New York. Together, Blackwell and Zalesne had the personal testimonies and legal foundation covered; they needed Kupers to add the mental health angle. He does so convincingly, detailing how solitary confinement, especially when it's prolonged, can cause severe anxiety, panic, sleep problems, psychotic behavior and severe post-traumatic stress disorder. Many people 'sent to the hole' develop a compulsion for self-harm, and Kupers says this shouldn't surprise anyone.
'Prolonged solitary confinement is torture,' he writes.
These repeated insights, while necessary, aren't the main draw of the book. Rather, it's the contributions of people such as Kwaneta Harris, Ending Isolation's fourth and final co-author.
Harris is an incarcerated writer whose work has helped shed light on the crisis of sexual assault in prisons.
'I used to think there was a timeline for when people lost their minds in solitary confinement. Six months, two years, maybe five. I was wrong. The descent into madness doesn't follow a schedule. Even now, back in medium-security, I wake up some mornings thinking I'm still in that cell,' she writes.
Those passages, coupled with reams of research, leave no doubt that solitary confinement constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The question, then, is if the practice will ever end.
'There's a split in correctional authorities,' Kupers said. 'Probably around half think that solitary confinement is a very bad idea.'
In Donald Trump's second term, Kupers is concerned about the advent of places like Alligator Alcatraz.
'This book is representative of this finding that ending solitary confinement is strategically extremely important in the context of what Ice is doing, for instance, and the emergence of a police state,' Kupers said. 'If we required that people who are behind bars are entitled to the civil and human rights, which they are by law entitled to, if we gave them those rights, including due process, that would massively change what's going on right now.'
Kupers adds: 'If we continue to treat people like monsters, that is exactly what they will become.'
Ending Isolation: The Case Against Solitary Confinement comes out on 4 September from Pluto Press. The book's release date coincides with the launch of a nationwide bus tour hosted by Unlock the Box.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Karoline Leavitt rips into New York Times reporter after giving major update on Trump-brokered Putin and Zelensky talks
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt ripped into press coverage of Donald Trump's Russia-Ukraine peace talks. She also confirmed that Russia 's Vladimir Putin agreed to a one-on-one meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, saying it's a major step toward a Trump-brokered peace deal. Leavitt criticized the media's coverage of the president's summit with Putin in Alaska on Friday and White House talks with Zelensky and European leaders on Monday. The president excused himself after a meeting with Zelensky and the other world leaders on Monday to call Putin to fill him in on progress. The president revealed Tuesday morning in an interview on Fox & Friends that he felt it would be 'disrespectful' to make the call in the middle of the meeting with Zelensky and the European leaders. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and others visited the White House to try and broker a deal between Russia and Ukraine. But Leavitt turned on a reporter from the New York Times who questioned why the president didn't take the call with Putin in the same room with the other leaders. 'If the point is to get everybody on the same page, why wouldn't Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room?' asked New York Times reporter Shawn McCreesh. 'So it would be disrespectful to do that. Why is it disrespectful?' he asked. 'With all due respect, only a reporter from the New York Times would ask a question like that, Sean,' Leavitt shot back. Leavitt also revealed that Putin had officially agreed to a one-on-one meeting with Zelensky after his conversations with Trump. The announcement was a welcome clarification from the White House as the Kremlin has remained elusive about exactly what Putin promised the president of the United States. When a reporter asked to confirm Putin's 'promise' to do a meeting with Zelensky in the coming weeks, Leavitt replied, 'He has, and I just answered that question for you.' Trump indicated on social media Monday night that he spoke with Putin and the pair of them agreed to begin the process to set up a bilateral meeting. 'At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelensky,' the president wrote. The Russians were less transparent. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov appeared to slow-walk the timing of the meeting in an interview, describing the process as 'step by step, gradually, starting from the expert level and then going through all the necessary stages.' Leavitt scolded the press for their negative coverage of the president's meeting with Putin, arguing it was so 'highly productive' that it prompted Zelensky and other world leaders to fly to Washington, D.C., immediately to discuss the details. She said that Trump 'learned a lot' during his meeting with Putin and the importance of open dialog between both the Ukrainians and the Russians. Leavitt excoriated former President Joe Biden for pushing an 'America last foreign policy' that did not leave the option for peace open in the conflict. 'President Trump rejected that failed approach, and instead, over the last seven months, has relentlessly pursued peace throughout his second term,' she said. The president said earlier Monday, he wanted Putin and Zelensky to have a bilateral meeting to solve the war and make assurances to bring about peace, and even rebuild a relationship with each other to negotiate a peace. 'It takes, in this case, two to tango, they have to have a relationship otherwise we're just wasting our time,' he said.


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Epping ruling creates practical and political pain for Home Office
The High Court judgment granting a temporary court injunction to prevent asylum seekers from being housed at a hotel in Epping will be a political and practical headache for the the Home Office has less than a month to find alternative accommodation for the asylum seekers housed at Epping's Bell hope – though perhaps not the expectation – is that Tuesday's judgement doesn't set a council has to return to court in the autumn and it is possible the temporary ban on housing asylum seekers will not be made the Home Office's lawyers have acknowledged that this is more than a local difficulty on the outskirts of Greater London. They have said that the decision could "substantially impact" the government's ability to house asylum seekers in hotels across the use of hotels has halved from 402 at their peak to 210 now but some contracts are in place until 2029, and pressure will grow on ministers to find alternative accommodation at a greater pace than although the number of asylum seekers in hotels fell by 6,000 in the first three months of the year, 32,000 this practical re-housing headache could escalate into a political migraine. The Home Office lawyers had suggested preventing the use of the Epping hotel "runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests".The Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has praised what he described as the bravery of the local community and expressed his hope that Epping would provide inspiration to others across the certainly is not advocating violent demonstrations but even a profusion of peaceful protests elsewhere would still require an increase in public-order are concerns in government that this, in turn, could draw resources away from other crime fighting Mr Farage's colleague Richard Tice has said Reform-run councils will urgently explore taking legal action similar to EppingThe shadow home secretary Chris Philp said he would welcome other councils following Conservative-controlled Epping's council in Hertfordshire, also Conservative controlled, has said it will be doing just that. There is a wider political cost to the government asylum seekers were housed in Epping's Bell Hotel under the last Conservative government – although moved out in 2024 – the publicity around the legal challenge has enabled opposition politicians to focus on the government's record on immigration and government has pledged to no longer use hotels by the end of this parliament, but questions are now being raised about whether they are proceeding quickly enough, and whether they are doing enough to prevent asylum seekers arriving by irregular routes in the first all this maintains the spotlight on what is a politically toxic topic for ministers.


The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Maine police officer detained by Ice agrees to leave US
A Maine police officer arrested by immigration authorities has agreed to voluntarily leave the country, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) said on Monday. Ice arrested the Old Orchard Beach police department reserve officer Jon Luke Evans, of Jamaica, on 25 July, as part of the agency's effort to step up immigration enforcement. Officials with the town and police department have said federal authorities previously told them Evans was legally authorized to work in the US. An Ice representative reached by telephone told the Associated Press on Monday that a judge has granted voluntary departure for Evans and that he could leave as soon as that day. The representative did not provide other details about Evans's case. Evans's arrest touched off a dispute between Old Orchard Beach officials and Ice. The police chief, Elise Chard, has said the department was notified by federal officials that Evans was legally permitted to work in the country, and that the town submitted information via the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)'s E-Verify program before Evans's employment. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of homeland security, then accused the town of 'reckless reliance' on the department's E-Verify program. E-Verify is an online system that allows employers to check if potential employees can work legally in the US. The town was aware of reports that Evans plans to leave the country voluntarily, Chard said on Monday. 'The town reiterates its ongoing commitment to meeting all state and federal laws regarding employment,' Chard said in a statement. 'We will continue to rely on the I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification form and the E-Verify database to confirm employment eligibility.' Ice's detainee lookup website said on Monday that Evans was being held at the Donald W Wyatt detention facility in Central Falls, Rhode Island. However, a representative for Wyatt said Evans had been transferred to an Ice facility in Burlington, Massachusetts. Ice officials did not respond to requests for comment on the discrepancy. It was unclear if Evans was represented by an attorney, and a message left for him at the detention facility was not returned. Ice officials said in July that Evans overstayed his visa and unlawfully attempted to buy a firearm. The Maine news outlet WMTW reported Monday that Evans's agreement to a voluntary departure means he will be allowed to leave the US at his own expense to avoid being deported.