Latest portrait of ‘orange' Trump that will be hung in the White House is revealed
Deputy Assistant to the President Sebastian Gorka unveiled the artwork just hours after Trump hosted leaders from across Europe in hopes of finding a path to peace in Ukraine.
The new painting shows a non-smiling Trump striding between a row of American flags, wearing a trademark navy suit and red tie combo set to a luminous burnt orange backdrop.
'One of the new @WhiteHouse paintings of President @realDonaldTrump,' Gorka wrote on X Monday evening. 'More to come.'
The artist behind the painting, who paid for it and its placement in the White House, was not immediately apparent.
On Monday, as nine leaders of European nations and NATO posed for their 'family photo' in the Grand Foyer ahead of a multilateral meeting in the East Room, Trump showed off another new artwork.
Flanked by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to his right and French President Emmanuel Macron to his left, Trump pointed to a large painting depicting a bloodied president pumping his fist in Butler, Pennsylvania, last summer, after he survived an assassination attempt.
'That was not a good day,' he said. 'That was not a great day. See the picture.'
The portrait joins an array of new paintings hung on the White House walls since Trump returned to office in January.
In April, the president hung a striking new portrait of himself in the East Wing area with his face painted with the American flag. The picture was wedged between portraits of former first ladies Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush.
A month later, the president unveiled a piece in the West Wing that features him alongside former GOP presidents Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan, in front of an American flag.
Trump, however, is notoriously particular about his depiction in paintings and portraits hanging in public institutions.
The president flew into a fit of rage in March, demanding that a portrait of himself painted by artist Sarah Boardman be removed from the Colorado Capitol building. Trump peddled a conspiracy theory that it was 'purposely distorted' in an alleged petty plot orchestrated by Colorado Governor Jared Polis.
The White House has donated a portrait of Trump to the Colorado Capitol to replace one that the president hates.
The Independent has contacted the White House for more information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Account tied to Trump nominee posted conspiracy theories about Epstein, the 2020 election and Covid, report says
A social media account tied to President Donald Trump 's controversial pick to take over the Bureau of Labor Statistics has a history of posting various far-right conspiracy theories – the latest eyebrow-raising report to emerge about what is often a nonpartisan nominee. Last week, Trump announced he would nominate Erwin John 'EJ' Antoni III, the chief economist at The Heritage Foundation, the conservative group that created Project 2025, to replace former BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer. A surface-level review of Antoni, 37, shows that he is a loyal Trump supporter who has aligned himself with the current administration's ideals – contributing to Project 2025, bashing former president Joe Biden's record, and even being a 'bystander' at the January 6 attack on the Capitol. But a more in-depth look at Antoni's history online indicates that a now-deleted X account, which once used Antoni's name, posted theories about Jeffrey Epstein's death, Covid-19's origins, and the validity of the 2020 presidential election, according to WIRED. A website archive of the account 'PhDofbombsaway,' shows that it used the name 'Dr. Erwin J. Antoni III,' 'Dr. J.,' as well as 'Dr. Curtis LeMay,' – an apparent reference to the Air Force general largely credited with planning and executing mass bombings on Japan during World War II, as well as advocating for nuclear weapon usage. The account's profile picture was of a fiery mushroom cloud, not unlike the one associated with nuclear weapon detonations. 'All or nothing. Do it die,' the account posted in late November 2020 in response to a tweet encouraging Republicans to stand up to 'fraudulently mailed machines.' The account consistently re-posted false claims about election fraud and theories about stolen ballots from prominent accounts. On January 5, 2021, hours before the attack on the Capitol, the account posted a reference to violence in the Bible while responding to a tweet from Trump in which he encouraged Republicans to 'fight.' 'Samson has his arms around the temple pillars, and although he may not survive, he will bring it all down on his enemies,' it posted, referring to the story of Samson receiving strength from God to rise up against his enemies. Last week, photos of Antoni outside the Capitol on January 6 circulated online. The White House confirmed Antoni was present as a 'bystander' who wandered over to see coverage of it on the news. Other posts from the account indicate the person running it was ingrained in far-right rhetoric and conspiracy theories. In November 2019, the account responded to a person theorizing about Epstein's death by suicide, claiming, 'Epstein didn't kill himself.' That theory was widely circulated among far-right communities online and continues to be a central part of concerns about government transparency around Epstein. Later that month, the same account replied to a tweet that seemed to make a sexual innuendo about former vice president Kamala Harris with its own. 'She does her best work when life brings her to her knees,' the account wrote. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Antoni declined to comment to Wired. While the account has since been deleted, Antoni remains present online with an X account that mostly posts Trump-aligned views of the economy or economic data. But his nomination has been subject to criticism even before NBC News reported his presence at the Capitol, or Wired reported about his alleged former X account. The president previously fired McEntarfer, a career civil servant, after expressing dissatisfaction with the BLS's job numbers reports. Trump insinuated, without evidence, that McEntarfer had manipulated the numbers to make the president look bad because the figures did not line up with Trump's rhetoric about the economy. Some economists and lawmakers have expressed concern that Trump's new nominee could be more inclined to alter BLS numbers to appease the president. While there is no rule about who may be the BLS commissioner, they are typically expected to be nonpartisan, given that the BLS is an independent fact-checking arm of the Department of Labor. Upon announcing Antoni's nomination, the president vowed that his nominee would 'ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE.' Antoni previously tweeted, calling for a 'better' way to collect and disseminate BLS data and criticizing the current method of doing so. Antoni's nomination will require Senate confirmation. So far, at least two Democratic senators have called for the Senate to reject Antoni's nomination.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Justice Department investigating DC police over Trump allegations of ‘fake' crime data
The Department of Justice is reportedly investigating whether Washington, D.C. officials manipulated crime data after Donald Trump accused the capital city of creating 'fake crime numbers' to undermine his federal takeover. On his Truth Social account on Monday, Trump accused D.C. officials of manipulating data to create a 'false illusion of safety.' 'This is a very bad and dangerous thing to do, and they are under serious investigation for so doing!' Trump wrote. Last week, the president declared what he called a 'crime emergency' to justify his administration taking control of the city's Metropolitan Police Department while deploying National Guard troops and federal law enforcement agents into the city's streets, claiming that the White House must 'rescue' the city from 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' He claimed the city is overrun with 'bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,' though reports of violent crime in the city have plummeted, along with national downward trends of violent crime rates. The capital city 'was the most unsafe 'city' in the United States, and perhaps the World,' he wrote on Monday. 'Now, in just a short period of time, it is perhaps the safest, and getting better every single hour!' Despite the administration's claims that crime is 'out of control' in D.C., the data shows the opposite: 2024 saw the lowest violent crime rates in the capital in more than 30 years, while reports of violent crime within the first seven months of 2025 have plunged 27 percent from last year. Homicides are down 11 percent, according to city data. Those rates mirror national downward trends, according to FBI crime data released during Trump's administration.
Daily Mirror
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
What happens next as Donald Trump plans Putin-Zelensky talks over Ukraine war
Donald Trump has claimed to be organising a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky in an attempt to reach a peace deal. The Mirror looks at what could happen next Keir Starmer said today European and US leaders are drawing up "robust" plans to defend Ukraine if a peace deal is struck with Moscow. Less than 24 hours after crunch White House talks, the Prime Minister and French President Emmanuel Macron chaired a meeting of the 'Coalition of the Willing'. Earlier this year Mr Starmer insisted that Britain is prepared to put boots on the ground and planes in the air in the event of a deal to end the three-year conflict. After the meeting wrapped up, A No10 spokesman said the PM had told those on the call "there was a real sense of unity and shared goal of securing a just and lasting peace for Ukraine" during meetings with President Trump. READ MORE: Donald Trump issues Putin 'VERY severe consequences' warning if Ukraine war doesn't end The PM also said the Coalition's military planning teams will "meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended". Here The Mirror looks at what could happen next. What happened at the White House? European leaders flanked Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch talks at the White House on Monday evening in an unprecedented show of unity. Donald Trump updated them on the US-Russia summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday where the Russian tyrant was given the red-carpet treatment. European allies had feared a repeat of the Ukrainian wartime leader's first visit to the Oval Office back in February where he was ambushed by Mr Trump and Vice President, JD Vance. But Monday's high-stakes meeting was a far more cordial affair with promises of further talks. Keir Starmer left the White House saying there had been a 'real significant breakthrough' in security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal. The Prime Minister also said there had been 'real movement' on the next stage of negotiations. What happens next? One of the key takeaways from Monday's meeting was Mr Trump's claim to be brokering a one-to-one meeting between Ukraine's Zelensky and Mr Putin. If the meeting goes ahead - and it's a big if - it will only be the second time the pair have met and the first since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine back in February 2022. READ MORE: The German Chancellor has suggested the meeting could take place within two weeks - but there has been no public commitment from the Kremlin so far. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, has suggested they should meet in a 'neutral country' and said he was pushing for Geneva, in Switzerland. The US President has then proposed a 'trilateral' meeting to follow - between the United States, Russia and Ukraine to discuss next steps. What did the 'Coalition of the Willing' discuss? European leaders are busy at work on military planning in the event of a peace deal. A group of 30-plus nations - the Coalition of the Willing - have signed up to help defend Ukraine if a deal is struck. Its aim is to act as a deterrent for future attacks from Moscow. Keir Starmer has previously said he is willing to put UK troops on the ground and planes in the sky as part of any peacekeeping force in Ukraine. On Tuesday, the Prime Minister and Mr Macron updated the countries on talks at the White House as they chaired a meeting of the group. During the meeting Mr Starmer said military planning teams will soon meet with US teams to 'strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees' to Ukraine. What is the US prepared to do? European allies have long insisted the US is vital to guaranteeing Ukraine's security. Donald Trump swerved a question in the Oval Office on Monday on whether the US would be willing to put boots on the ground in Ukraine to help secure any peace deal. He suggested on Tuesday the US would offer air support to Ukraine, bragging that there was no other country with the 'kind of stuff we have'. Will there be a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv? Downing Street has always insisted Putin has never been serious about the prospect of peace. That appeared evident when Moscow's drones and missiles rained down on Ukraine - even as European leaders met at the White House to discuss the possibility of an end to three-year war. Reports also suggested Putin's price for peace would be for Ukraine to hand over land the Kremlin does not occupy - something Mr Zelensky has dismissed. The US President himself said on Tuesday it is 'possible he [Putin] doesn't want to make a deal'. The coming weeks will be crucial but it is clear European leaders are pushing to ramp up sanctions to turn the screws on Moscow's war machine once again if talks collapse.
