logo
Silicon Valley-backed California city project pitches plan for manufacturing hub

Silicon Valley-backed California city project pitches plan for manufacturing hub

The Guardian19-07-2025
The chief executive of 'California Forever', a Silicon Valley billionaire-backed project to build a new city on tens of thousands of acres of California farmland, has announced plans to develop a manufacturing site within the future town for defense, energy, robotics, aerospace and transportation companies.
Speaking at the Reindustrialize summit in Detroit, Jan Sramek called the proposal the 'Solano Foundry'. The 2,100-acre site would be located on the more than 65,000 acres in Solano county that the tech billionaires began purchasing in 2017 but have yet to develop.
'It's time to bring back 'designed in California, made in California',' Sramek wrote in a social media post announcing the plan. 'Silicon Valley earned its name because chips were once made here alongside code. By bringing R&D and manufacturing back together, Solano Foundry restores that magic, in a new home for frontier tech. California is back.'
In early 2024 – after the New York Times revealed that tech billionaires such as LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and venture capitalist Michael Moritz were behind California Forever – the group submitted a ballot initiative that would have asked voters to approve their building a new city on the land. Soon after, they withdrew the initiative, deciding to instead seek approval through the county's standard processes for negotiating and executing a development agreement.
Then, this March, the group announced that it planned to build a shipbuilding hub on the land it had acquired near the Sacramento River, which feeds into the San Francisco Bay. Soon after, Donald Trump signed an anticipated executive order to revitalize the shipbuilding industry in the US.
The 'Solano Foundry' would similarly appeal to Trump's desires to revitalize American industry.
Sramek echoed the president's language in his social media post. 'Silicon Valley made its name in hardware,' he wrote. 'But we offshored to China, and broke that model. And now it's Shenzhen and Guangzhou that lead drones and robotics.'
Andreas Lieber, the Foundry's general manager, told KQED the plan will rebuild the middle class by bringing manufacturing jobs back to the United States. 'You cannot really operate as a country if you're only doing service jobs and basically outsource your middle class,' he said. 'And then you're not building anything anymore.'
A white paper that California Forever published, in collaboration with real estate company JLL, predicts that the Foundry will 'create at least 35,000 manufacturing jobs and 5,000 warehousing jobs'. It also featured quotes supporting the project from powerful voices in Silicon Valley.
'California Forever's approach for their Solano Foundry is not the California I know, but it's the California I want to know,' said former Intel executive Bob Swan.
Solano county residents are more skeptical.
'There are sites that can accommodate industries such as this that do not require… the development of an entire new community to make this happen,' Nate Huntington of Solano Together, a coalition of community members opposed to the project, told KQED. 'Many of the things that they put out [are] to create hype and potential attraction to this project, but some of those things fade.'
In his social media post, Sramek toted the community tech billionaires hope to build alongside the Foundry: 'To actually re-industrialize, we need industrial ecosystems, where R&D, production, and training are located within amazing places to live.' Located '40mins from Napa, 2.5 hours from Tahoe,' he added, the city will have capacity for more than 175,000 new homes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schumer on the ropes: Weak Trump responses see Democratic leader suffer worst-ever slide in polls
Schumer on the ropes: Weak Trump responses see Democratic leader suffer worst-ever slide in polls

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Schumer on the ropes: Weak Trump responses see Democratic leader suffer worst-ever slide in polls

If he can't make it here, can he make it anywhere? A new poll from Siena College shows that half of New Yorkers do not like how Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is handling the second Donald Trump presidency. The survey finds that 50 percent of New Yorker state voters have an unfavorable opinion of Schumer — who has served in the Senate since 1999 and became minority leader in 2017 — and just 38 percent have a favorable opinion of him. Schumer faced considerable criticism from many in his party in March after he voted for a stopgap spending bill that Republicans jammed through the Senate despite a majority of the Senate Democratic caucus and all but one House Democrat voting against it. In the days leading up to the vote and even after, numerous Senate Democrats voiced their strong opposition despite the fact that voting against it would lead to a government shutdown. And many Democrats mocked Schumer for seeming out of touch and geriatric after he led a fairly milquetoast protest in front of the Treasury Department in February chanting, 'We will win.' In the spring, he received even more criticism when he told CNN's Dana Bash on State of the Union that he'd sent a 'very strong letter' with 'eight very strong questions' that even had the journalist near rolling her eyes. The polling represents the 74-year-old Schumer's lowest numbers since he became a senator, according to Siena College, which has tracked his approval back since February 2005. Prior to his time in the Senate, he served in the House of Representatives for 18 years. During his time as majority leader, Schumer held together a tenuous coalition of 50 Democrats in the first two years of Joe Biden's presidency, passing Covid-19 relief legislation, the first major piece of gun legislation in almost 30 years, an initiative to promote the manufacturing of semi-conductors in the United States and the Inflation Reduction Act, Biden's signature climate and health care law. During the next two years, Schumer focused heavily on confirming Biden's judicial nominees. But many Democratic voters see him as ill-equipped to stand up to Trump. In January, 45 percent of New Yorkers had a favorable opinion of him and 41 percent had an unfavorable opinion of Schumer. The decline in favorability appears to come from a drop among Democrats and residents of New York City. In January, 68 percent of Democrats had a favorable opinion of him, with 23 percent of Democrats having an unfavorable opinion of him. But his favorable number among Democrats dropped to 49 percent and 39 percent of Democrats have an unfavorable opinion of him. Schumer also seemed to see a decline in support in his hometown of New York City. In January, 55 percent of New York City residents had a favorable opinion of him and 35 percent had an unfavorable opinion of him. Now, 39 percent of residents of New York City have a favorable opinion of him and 46 percent have an unfavorable opinion of Schumer. One of the few groups where his approval increased came among Jewish voters. Earlier this year, Schumer released a book about antisemitism and he remains an outspoke supporter of Israel even as many in his party continue to criticize the war being prosecuted against Gaza by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In Januaty, 45 percent of Jewish New Yorkers had a favorable opinion of him and 47 percent had an unfavorable opinion of him. Now, 52 percent of Jewish New Yorkers have a favorable opinion of Schumer and 43 percent have an unfavorable opinion of him. Schumer does not face re-election until 2028, when there will be another presidential election. Democrats face long odds to retake the Senate in 2026 and are hoping to flip states like North Carolina and Maine as they pray for miracles in Ohio, Texas and Iowa. But many have hoped that a more progressive Democrat like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the democratic socialist congresswoman who represents the Bronx and Queens, will stage either a primary challenge or run if Schumer retires.

‘Petty or racist': Ex White House photographer rips Trump for ‘hiding' Obama portrait and bucking tradition
‘Petty or racist': Ex White House photographer rips Trump for ‘hiding' Obama portrait and bucking tradition

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Petty or racist': Ex White House photographer rips Trump for ‘hiding' Obama portrait and bucking tradition

Barack Obama's official White House photographer has hit out at Donald Trump's decision to 'hide' the portrait of the former president, questioning whether the motives for the shake-up were 'petty or racist.' Pete Souza, who served under Obama and former president Ronald Reagan, said that breaking a longstanding tradition of where presidential portraits are hung was 'pretty petty,' and suggested that Obama lived in the president's head 'rent free.' It comes after reports at the weekend that White House staff had moved the portraits of three former presidents — including Obama — to a staircase where visitors now cannot see them. Obama's portrait was moved to the top of the Grand Staircase, an area that is restricted to the president's family, Secret Service and select staff, according to CNN. In an Instagram post Tuesday, Souza shared a photo of Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama descending the staircase, with portraits of presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and Harry S. Truman visible in the background 'Petty or racist?⁣' he began his caption. Souza went on to describe the ⁣'longstanding protocol/tradition' of where the portraits of former Presidents are hung. The most recent ones, he said, are displayed in the Grand Foyer, then the Cross Hall, then the Grand Staircase, in that order. The order is such that visitors during the White House public tours can see the most recent Presidents. Other portraits, like Lincoln and Washington, are displayed prominently in the State Dining Room and East Room. Souza also noted that, in keeping with this, during the Obama administration the portraits of presidents Bush and Clinton hung in the Grand Foyer, while portraits of presidents Reagan, Carter, Ford and Kennedy were hung along the Cross Hall. ⁣ 'According to CNN, the current occupant of the Oval Office has moved the portrait of President Obama from the Grand Foyer (where it should be) to that hidden area at the top of the Grand Staircase,' he wrote. 'Why was this done? Was it because President Obama lives rent free in the current occupant's head? I'd say that's pretty petty.⁣ Or could there be another reason?⁣' As well as his role as White House photographer for Reagan and Obama, Souza worked nine years for the Chicago Tribune 's Washington, D.C. bureau and as a freelancer for National Geographic and Life magazines. He has also earned widespread recognition for several famous photos, including the May 1, 2011 scene in the Situation Room where Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and other officials watched updates on the mission to kill Osama Bin Laden. Trump's decision to move the portrait of Obama comes as tensions rise between the two men, with Trump baselessly accusing Obama of 'treason' and posting AI-generated fake videos depicting Obama's arrest. Obama has called the claims he orchestrated an attempted 'coup' against Trump as 'outrageous' and branded it an 'attempt at distraction' by Trump amid his failure to release the controversial Epstein files.

Trump goes ballistic on top Democrat after seeing 'irrefutable proof' he tried to take him down in leaked plot
Trump goes ballistic on top Democrat after seeing 'irrefutable proof' he tried to take him down in leaked plot

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump goes ballistic on top Democrat after seeing 'irrefutable proof' he tried to take him down in leaked plot

Donald Trump ripped into one of his longtime Democratic opponents claiming he leaked classified information to damage him, and he wants the Department of Justice to investigate. 'Just out, irrefutable proof that Adam Shifty Schiff 'approved plan to leak classified information to damage Donald Trump,'' the president wrote on Truth Social Wednesday. He was reacting to reports about a whistleblower alleging that California Sen. Adam Schiff hatched a plan to leak classified intelligence to damage Trump shortly after he first took office in 2017. The whistleblower claims Schiff personally authorized a plan to selectively leak damaging information about Trump to the media during the FBI 's investigation into the president's possible ties to Russia. Later in the day, at an event at the Kennedy Center, the president slammed Schiff again. 'I told him (Putin), you know, they got this phony investigation going on. Russia, Russia, Russia. Totally phony, created by Adam Schiff,' the 79-year-old recounted. 'Shifty Schiff and Hillary Clinton and the whole group of them ... made it very dangerous for our country,' the president continued. 'I'm looking at Pam, because I hope something's going to be done about it,' he added. 'Now we've learned all the stuff that's come out over the last two months is incredible, through intelligence. And hopefully something's gonna happen with it.' A spokesperson for Schiff hit back at the allegations in a statement to the Daily Mail. 'Kash Patel's latest smear against Senator Schiff is absolutely and categorically false, and is just the latest in a series of defamatory attacks from the President and his allies meant to distract from their plummeting poll numbers and the Epstein files scandal,' they said. 'These baseless smears are based on allegations that were found to be not reliable, not credible, and unsubstantiated from a disgruntled former staffer who was fired by the House Intelligence Committee for cause in early 2017, including for harassment and potentially compromising activity on official travel for the Committee.' New testimony revealed in FBI documents shows that a career Democrat intelligence official believed Schiff's leaking to the press was 'illegal' and 'treasonous,' according to documents first reported by Just the News. 'When working in this capacity, [redacted staffer's name] was called to an all-staff meeting by SCHIFF,' the FBI report said. 'In this meeting, Schiff stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. Trump. Schiff stated the information would be used to indict President Trump.' The whistleblower gave the testimony at the FBI's St. Louis field office in 2023. However, according to the outlet, the whistleblower had told FBI officials in Washington as early as 2017 about Schiff's plot. The whistleblower reportedly said during the meeting, 'this would be illegal and, upon hearing his concerns, unnamed members of the meeting reassured that they would not be caught leaking classified information,' the report states. According to the testimony, Schiff believed he would be saved from prosecution due to the Constitution's speech and debate clause. The statute protects members of Congress from legal action for actions taken during their legislative work. It is unclear whether Attorney General Pam Bondi is working on charges related to Schiff's plan to leak classified material. Meanwhile, the DOJ is investigating Schiff for mortgage fraud allegations after Trump accused the senator of improper filings, allegations Schiff has said are 'political retaliation.' Bondi has appointed Ed Martin, the former interim US District Attorney for Washington, DC, as 'special attorney' to probe Schiff and others.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store