Hainault attack: I'm not a hero, says officer slashed
A police officer who confronted Marcus Monzo after he murdered schoolboy Daniel Anjorin with a samurai sword in Hainault, east London, last year says he does not see himself as a hero.Inspector Moloy Campbell engaged in face-to-face fighting with Monzo - receiving a slash wound to his hand as he tried to disarm him.But he said his team of officers are "undoubtedly heroic" for their actions in stopping the attack.Recalling the confrontation in April 2024, Insp Campbell told the BBC: "It's a natural instinct: fight or flight, and in that moment it was fight. There was emotion after the event and after it all died down, but there was no fear."
He added: "And I don't think there was much fear from anyone actually, because they're police officers and are expected to take action and that's hard drilled into them and they did it well."The series of attacks started at 06:45 BST on 30 April 2024, when Monzo drove a van into a 33-year-old pedestrian, Donato Iwule, and then chased him, slashing him in the neck.Monzo then turned his attention to Daniel, 14, who was walking down the residential street he lived on, wearing his school PE kit and headphones, unaware of his presence. Monzo fatally wounded him with a 60cm (24in) sword.He later entered a nearby home where a couple and their four-year-old daughter were asleep.Monzo, 37, is being sentenced on Friday at the Old Bailey after being found guilty of murdering Daniel, as well as attempted murder and wounding.Insp Campbell said his only thought on the morning of the attack - as he was called to the scene and then heard that his colleague, PC Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield, had been stabbed by Monzo - was determination. "The only feeling I had was the need to complete what had to be done, which was disarming Mr Monzo and ultimately the preservation of life."
Insp Campbell and his colleagues ran towards Monzo and appeared to have him cornered by a set of garages.The officer said Monzo "was slashing at me, and I was hitting him, and my baton hit his sword mid-air and we clipped each other."He went across the top of my chest and cut off part of my body worn camera and I made small contact with him but not enough to cause any real concern for him. "I could see that he had real determination in his eyes. We then went back at each other and hit each other and at that point the blade came down my arm, cutting my fleece and then nicking my hand on the way out. "I looked down at my hand and I could see the inside of it and my thumb was hanging down."Former delivery driver Monzo managed to run away but the officers eventually found him a short distance away, fired a number of Tasers and managed to arrest him.
The trial was told about the bravery of the officers on that day but Insp Campbell, who tried to return to tackling Monzo, despite his severe injury, brushed off the suggestions he had been heroic. "I think anyone considering themselves a hero is distasteful, so I wouldn't consider myself a hero. Whether I consider other officers heroes is something very different, and I absolutely do."But he was clear he thinks his officers showed heroism every day and Hainault was no different to the bravery they normally displayed.Insp Campbell said protecting the public and preventing death and injuries were what officers were here to do and he was prepared to put his life on the line to do his job.Paying tribute to Daniel Anjorin's family, the officer said he had only got upset in the hospital, when he had discovered the schoolboy had died.
Henry De Los Rios Polania, who protected his wife and four-year-old daughter after Monzo burst into their bedroom while they were asleep, said the attack has impacted his whole life.Speaking to the BBC, Mr De Los Rios Polania said Monzo kept asking them if they believed in God. At first they both said yes, but a second time his wife said no. "That's the moment when he grabbed the sword with both his hands and tried to cut the head off Carolina. So when I saw his intentions I was like I can't let this happen, he's going to kill us in there. So I tried to pick up the sword with my own hands." He suffered severe wounds to his hand and has had to have three operations and faces two more.
The IT engineer revealed Monzo only stopped when their four-year-old daughter started crying and said "mama" and "papa". "He stepped back because he wasn't expecting the little one in the room, and he just pointed the sword towards my little one's face, and then Carolina's and then to me and he said 'I'm just going to let you live because of your little one.'"Mr De Los Rios Polania said he has spent the last year unable to work, just trying to recover. "All I can say is, I'm surviving," he said.Giving evidence in court, he said he was initially scared to see Monzo again but had managed to remain calm and the defendant looked away from him, refusing eye contact.The bravery he displayed to keep his family safe was, he feels, nothing compared to others. "If people want to call me a hero because I managed to protect my family, then they're most welcome. But the real heroes are the police and the NHS. Those are the real heroes because they saved my life. Because if it wasn't for them, I don't think I would be here."Monzo, of Canning Town, east London, will be sentenced for the murder of Daniel Anjorin; the attempted murder of Sindy Carolina Arias, PC Mechem-Whitfield, and Mr Iwule; the wounding of Insp Campbell and Mr De Los Rios Polania; aggravated burglary, and two weapon possession charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
Mylo Capilla: Body found in search for 13-year-old boy believed to have entered the River Tees
A body has been discovered in the search for a missing 13-year-old boy thought to have entered the River Tees. A major operation was under way on Friday to find Mylo Capilla, as police appealed for information. The 13-year-old boy was last seen at around 9pm on Thursday in an area known as the "Muddies" in the Teeside town of Ingleby Barwick, near the River Tees. Cleveland Police said on Friday evening that a boy's body had been found. "Very sadly, police and partner agencies searching the river for 13-year-old Mylo Capilla at Ingleby Barwick have found the body of a boy," officers said. "Whilst formal identification has yet to take place, Mylo's parents have been informed and they continue to be supported by specially trained officers. "All our thoughts are with Mylo's family and friends as well as with the wider community at this extremely difficult time." Earlier, police said they thought Mylo had gone with his friend to the river near Ramsey Gardens and entered the water. An extensive search was carried out, involving specialist teams using a police drone and dogs. Officers also had support from Cleveland Fire Brigade, National Police Air Service, as well as marine and mountain rescue teams. The Muddies was described by one local as a large area stretching along the riverbank and was a known place for children and young people to play.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Record number of rare hen harriers killed or missing in the past five years, RSPB warns
Record numbers of hen harriers have been killed or gone missing under suspicious circumstances in the last five years, according to the RSPB. The protected bird species is one of the rarest in the UK, known for their acrobatic 'skydancing' courtship display over the uplands, such as Forest of Bowland in Lancashire and the Yorkshire Dales. A total of 102 the protected birds of prey were illegally killed or went missing between 2020 and 2024 – mostly in areas where grouse shooting takes place, the RSPB says. Some hen harriers were shot and their chicks being stamped on, while others were poisoned or illegally trapped, according to the charity. In Scotland, grouse moors are licensed, and conservationists have repeatedly pressured Westminster governments to do the same. When Labour was in opposition, it indicated that it would consider licensing grouse shooting in England. MPs are due on Monday to debate calls for a ban on driven grouse shooting after a petition launched by campaign group Wild Justice attracted more than 100,000 names. But in its response, the government said it had no plans for a ban. It said: 'Well-managed grouse shooting can be an important part of a local rural economy, providing direct and indirect employment.' The RSPB's report, called Hen Harriers in the Firing Line, highlights a strong overlap between deaths of the bird of prey and the extent of grouse moors. A recent study of illegal killings found that survival rates were unusually low, with birds surviving for an average of just 121 days after leaving the nest. Persecution accounts for 75 per cent of deaths in birds aged between one and two years. Hen harriers, a red-listed species that breeds in Britain's uplands, is the most persecuted bird of prey in the UK for its population and numbers are heading towards local extinction, the wildlife charity says. Numerous studies confirm that illegal killing limits their recovery. But no one in England has ever been convicted of killing one because most kills happen in remote areas and a criminal burden of proof near-impossible to secure, campaigners say. James Robinson, of the RSPB, said: 'This species will not recover until the criminal activity stops, and for this to happen we need regulation of the grouse shooting industry – specifically the introduction of a licensing system for shoots in England, so estates proven by the police and Natural England to be linked to raptor persecution would lose their licence to operate.' Andrew Gilruth, chief executive of the Moorland Association, disputed the RSPB report, saying the data has been assembled without independent checks and that the allegations 'poison perceptions of gamekeepers'. The British Association for Shooting and Conservation said the report presented 'unproven allegations as evidence'. Its statement said: 'Proposals for a licensing system based on a civil burden of proof risk punishing the law-abiding without due process. 'Instead, we support constructive, evidence-led solutions such as Natural England's Hen Harrier Action Plan.' A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokesperson said: "Hen harriers are a rare and precious feature of our national landscapes. 'It's why through our work with the National Wildlife Crime Unit, the Hen Harrier Taskforce is using innovative technology such as drones and specialised detection dogs to help tackle illegal persecution.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
William and Harry's former private secretary: 'Protect our courageous SAS soldiers or we will lose them forever'
Last summer I went back to Hereford for the funeral of a friend from 30 years ago. He had died climbing, which is what he loved most, apart from his family, his friends and his country. Other than a mesmerising twinkle in the eye and dark good looks, he didn't stand out as anything special on a crowded street. For he was a humble man: Kind, selfless and quietly confident. He had a drive within him to help others, particularly the vulnerable, the picked-upon and those living in fear of their lives. Normal traits, in fact, for a soldier of the Special Air Service. So much has been written about the SAS, so many films made, so many reality-TV botch-ups of our actions and even our selection processes. Apart from one or two post-war accounts written by early veterans, I recognise none of the recent fictional stereotypes in my friend the climber or anyone else I came across in my eight years in the regiment. At the wake after the funeral in Hereford, the regiment's home, I was buttonholed by George Simm, my Squadron Sergeant Major, Regimental Sergeant Major and benevolent scourge. Almost all the old friends I met with him were being persecuted for their brave actions in Northern Ireland many decades ago. They were phlegmatic, facing the storm as they've faced it before, but their courage could not conceal the sense of betrayal they felt. I left angry. It is an abhorrent injustice. Though bound by the SAS strict code of discretion, I can at least use the four unchanging principles of our founder David Stirling to tell you the reality of what I saw during my time. First, the principle that seemed so effortless to everyone but me (though I hope others may have felt the same): 'The unrelenting pursuit of excellence.' I have never known – nor will I again – such consummate professionalism as in the SAS. Within its ranks are some of the finest soldiers in the world, jacks-of-all-trades who have proved they can meet any threat – except perhaps the one they now face from lawfare, the threat from within. Next came 'the highest standards of self-discipline'. Physical and organisational, but especially moral. An oft-quoted line is that we would never transgress morally on operations because to do so would be to lower ourselves to the base level of our enemies, blowing our credibility and decimating our ability to achieve our mission. While this may be true, it is secondary. What guides SAS soldiers is the urge to do right by the innocent folk we have been sent to protect – as in Northern Ireland, where the SAS arrested more terrorists than they ever killed – and to do right in the eyes of our comrades and the British people. That might sound overly idealistic, pompous even, but it is how many of us felt. Some of us in the regiment did not even vote in general elections. This was not idleness and certainly not some petulant statement. It was because we had implicit faith in our system of parliamentary democracy, and in what Britain stood for in the world. To have voted would, in some way, have compromised that. We were there to do the will of the Government – any government – and not take party-political sides. That, of course, was when we believed the Government had our backs. Stirling insisted upon 'a classless but not a rank-less society', based on pure merit and no social preferment. We all did the same selection – officers and men – which meant that we had complete faith in one another. To reap the benefits of an egalitarian structure such as the SAS, as with any other successful human enterprise, still requires leadership and a rank structure. But, as a commander in the regiment, what I learnt very early on was that I was not always the leader. To have had me telling the climber what to do on a cliff-face would have been, literally, sheer lunacy. He was the leader then... and so on. Finally, Stirling recognised that hubris was the surest route to ruin. So, his quartet closes with a call for 'humility and humour'. Recognising that success in the past does not guarantee success for the future is often the most difficult of the principles to obey. But it is perhaps the most critical. The urgency with which SAS soldiers fought the temptation to be complacent and strove to remain ahead of our country's enemies simply astounded me. It still does. While an unforgivable conceit, I am going to add a fifth principle: 'Decency'. Three of my children have SAS god-fathers. They weren't picked for their extraordinary skills – hardly transferable – but because the moral compass of each is welded at true north. Enough said. It seems to me that the British have a decision to make. Either we move to protect our SAS soldiers – as they have protected us – or we do nothing and lose the SAS. In capability and character, this is a strategic asset that no other country has and which – any day now – the British people might sorely need. This is why I wholeheartedly support the Daily Mail's campaign to protect our veterans.
