Exclusive Survey: Planners Face Rising Costs and Uncertainty Amidst Trump Policy Shifts
New research by Skift Meetings shows that planners are grappling with the effects of Trump Administration policies on their events — with 9 out of 10 expressing concern about rising costs due to tariffs.
Skift Meetings' exclusive survey of 103 meeting professionals* paints a picture of a confusing and challenging landscape for meeting planners as they adjust to new Trump Administration policies. While for some it's business as usual, others are experiencing rising costs from tariffs, cancellations in industries affected by government cuts, fewer international attendees willing to travel to the U.S., and concern about the impact of immigration policies on hotel staffing.
Almost a third of respondents (29%) have already changed the location of this year's meetings or incentive trips due to geopolitical conditions. When asked if they are considering changing locations for future events, 39% said yes, 21% were unsure, and 37% said no.
Tariff Impacts
Rising costs are plaguing the vast majority of planners: When asked about the main concerns impacting their jobs right now, 90% said potential cost increases and 66% said potential recession. A full 82% said they expect meeting costs to increase in 2025–2026 because of the tariffs.
Respondents also reported cost increases on promotional products and incentive gifts, combined with an increase in the length of time it takes to receive goods.
Certain Industries Hit Hard
Government meetings, academic and scientific meetings, and those with international attendees have been hardest hit. Said one anonymous planner: 'The government meetings industry has disappeared.'
Kyle Jordan, director of meetings at INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, said that while he anticipates 10-15% lower attendance this year because 35% of his attendees come from outside of the U.S., 'As an academic-focused organization, we anticipate seeing a bigger hit to our domestic attendance in 2026 as universities shore up funding for potential long-term court battles.'
International Attendees Staying Home
International attendees now face a combination of visa challenges and concerns about border access and safety. 'Our international members have informed us that traveling to the U.S. for a conference is currently not in the cards,' said an anonymous planner. 'Many of our members have lost funding, and are having to cut back conference attendance. Overall, our registration pace is much slower than it has been the last three years.'
Mark Phillips, chief operating officer at LamontCo, said he has seen international attendance at U.S. meetings drop by 30% or more, 'especially those where the air tickets have not yet been purchased.'
As cross-border tensions have increased, plans for inbound meetings from Canada are getting nixed. Of those respondents with Canadian clients or divisions in Canada who were planning to meet in the U.S. this year, 18% have already changed their plans and 15% were considering doing so.
Hotel Staffing Concerns
Another concern among planners is the potential effect of immigration policies on hotel staffing, including kitchen help, housekeeping, and banquet servers. More than two-thirds of respondents (72%) said they expect hotel staffing to be impacted in 2025–2026, while 15% were unsure and 13% did not foresee any impact.
State of Confusion
A number of respondents, including LamontCo's Phillips, said they expected more regional meetings as a result of the falloff in international attendance. Other impacts mentioned by respondents included scaling back on using 5-star properties; looking for much lower rates than in the past; longer lead times for sourcing and contracting; challenges for students and attendees of color getting needed support to attend certain meetings; and tradeshow exhibitor cancellations.
Even for those planners who said they are not feeling any impact from Trump Administration policies, Tim Barrett, senior director, global meetings at Destination South, summed up the current state of confusion being felt by many respondents: 'It's chaotic, especially the whiplash of one day to the next and the differing totals and/or start dates.'
TOP 7 PLANNER CONCERNS
(ranked by percentage of respondents)
Potential cost increases (90%) Potential recession (66%) Entry challenges for incoming international attendees (57%) Job security (45%) Challenges with bringing U.S. groups internationally (44%) Challenges for LGBTQ+ attendees (28%) Pregnant attendees requiring emergency care (15%)
*Methodology: Skift Meetings' email survey of meeting planners was conducted between May 9 and June 9, 2025, resulting in 103 usable responses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Consultant on trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden says he has no regrets
LACONIA, N.H. (AP) — A political consultant told a New Hampshire jury Wednesday that he doesn't regret sending voters robocalls that used artificial intelligence to mimic former President Joe Biden and that he's confident he didn't break the law. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, has long admitted to orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before New Hampshire's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors allege, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who faces decades in prison if convicted of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, said his goal was to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. He said his goal wasn't to influence an election, because he didn't consider the primary a real election. At Biden's request, the Democratic National Committee dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC. At the time the calls went out, voters were disenfranchised, he said. Asked by his attorney, Tom Reid, whether he did anything illegal, Kramer said, 'I'm positive I did not.' Later, he said he had no regrets and that his actions likely spurred AI regulations in multiple states. Kramer, who will be questioned by prosecutors Thursday, also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission but told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The robocalls appeared to come from a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, Kathy Sullivan, and told voters to call her number to be removed from the call list. On the witness stand earlier Wednesday, Sullivan said she was confused and then outraged after speaking to one of the recipients and later hearing the message. 'I hung up the phone and said, 'There is something really crazy going on,'' she said. 'Someone is trying to suppress the vote for Biden. I can't believe this is happening.' Months later, she got a call from Kramer in which he said he used her number because he knew she would contact law enforcement and the media. He also described his motive — highlighting AI's potential dangers — but she didn't believe him, she testified. 'My sense was he was trying to convince me that he'd done this defensible, good thing,' she said. 'I'm listening to this thinking to myself, 'What does he thing I am, stupid?' He tried to suppress the vote.'
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in LA protests, commander says
WASHINGTON — National Guard troops already have temporarily detained civilians in the Los Angeles protests over immigration raids , the commander in charge said Wednesday, but they quickly turned them over to law enforcement. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, also said about 500 of the National Guard troops have been trained so far to accompany agents on immigration operations . Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials.
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback
RALEIGH, N.C. — A bill to let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit cleared the North Carolina legislature on Wednesday, however the path to joining the majority of U.S. states with similar laws remains uncertain. The GOP-backed legislation faces a likely veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, as well as pushback from a handful of Republicans who voted against the legislation in the state House. House Speaker Destin Hall acknowledged those concerns after Wednesday's vote.
