Plastics 'crisis' is costing $1.5tn in global deaths and injuries, report says
Plastic production is on course to triple by 2060, less than 10% of it is recycled, and around 8,000 megatons now pollute the planet, according to a review of recent studies published Sunday by The Lancet.
This causes harm at every stage of its lifecycle: from the extraction of fossil fuels and production, to its use by humans and eventual disposal into the environment, the British publication said.
'Plastics are a grave, growing, and under-recognised danger to human and planetary health,' it said. 'Plastics cause disease and death from infancy to old age' and are 'contributing to climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss.'
These harms 'fall disproportionately upon low-income and at-risk populations,' it added.
This is the latest dire warning by experts about the ubiquity and threat posed by plastic, which journal called 'the defining material of our age.' After decades of scientists warning about plastic being found in the oceans and rivers, microplastics are now being discovered inside humans — including in breast milk and brain tissue.
Sunday's release marked the start of a new monitoring system called 'The Lancet Countdown on health and plastics,' which it says will track political attempts to combat the problem.
It was launched to coincide with the latest and final round of talks in Geneva, Switzerland, where 175 countries are trying to forge the world's first Global Plastics Treaty.
Campaigners hope the talks, starting Tuesday through Aug. 14, will result in mandatory targets for reducing plastic production. A group of countries, including China, Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, have so far opposed these measures, instead lobbying for increased plastic recycling instead.
According to The Lancet, such petrochemical giants are a 'key driver' of spiraling plastic production, as they pivot their businesses toward plastic in response to the global decline in demand for fossil energy.
Different plastics are made from up to 16,000 chemicals, which 'enter the human body via ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption,' often from food and drink containers and packaging, the study said.
Unborn babies, infants and young children are 'especially at risk,' with harms including miscarriage, physical malformations, reduced cognitive function and diabetes, it said. For adults, the risks include cardiovascular disease, stroke and cancer.
'Given the considerable gaps in knowledge of plastic chemicals, it is reasonable to conclude that the full extent of these chemicals' harms to health is underestimated and that the burden of disease currently attributed to them is undercounted,' it added.
The Lancet quoted one study estimating the global costs of these diseases as $1.5 trillion.
'It is now clear that the world cannot recycle its way out of the plastic pollution crisis,' The Lancet said. 'Control of the plastics crisis will require continuing research coupled with the science-driven interventions — laws, policies, monitoring, enforcement, incentives, and innovations.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cardiologists Swear By This 2-Minute Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure
Cardiologists Swear By This 2-Minute Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure originally appeared on Parade. When you go to your yearly check-up at the doctor's office and find out you have high blood pressure, you might feel concerned. High blood pressure can cause an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, kidney problems, eye problems and even dementia, among other health concerns. The good news is? Working to lower your blood pressure doesn't have to be some huge, life-changing, time-consuming feat. In fact, according to a 2023 study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, one short bout of exercise can lead to changes in months, and cardiologists back this up. The exercise in question: wall sits. 🩺SIGN UP for tips to stay healthy & fit with the top moves, clean eats, health trends & more delivered right to your inbox twice a week💊 How Wall Sits Can Lower Blood Pressure Sounds pretty random, right? Parade asked cardiologists to explain how it works—and their answers were fascinating. 'Holding a wall sit isometrically squeezes the big thigh muscle without joint movement,' says , a preventive cardiologist with Baptist Health South Florida. ('Isometrics' are exercises that constrict a particular muscle.) 'That brief 'muscle-clamp' temporarily narrows blood flow, then triggers a rebound widening of the arteries and, over weeks, trains blood vessels to stay more relaxed at rest.' Related: Whether You're Dealing With High Blood Pressure or Want to Avoid It in the Future, Here Are the 25 Best Foods to Eat Want to understand further what's going on behind the scenes? , an interventional cardiologist and regional chief medical officer at VitalSolution, says the physiological mechanisms underlying those effects include improved autonomic regulation (aka increased parasympathetic and reduced sympathetic activity), reductions in resting heart rate and decreased total peripheral resistance. In other words—and on a very basic level—it relaxes your body, in a way. Doing wall sits to lower your blood pressure is a pretty effective option, too, when you look at the numbers. According to the study, doing wall sits (for as long and as often as suggested, which we'll get into below) can lower the systolic number (the first number) by eight and the diastolic number (the second number) by four. Related: Want to Prevent Heart Disease? A Huge Study Says This Is the Exact Blood Pressure You Should Aim For How Long and How Frequent Should Wall Sit Sessions Be? The study looked at meta-analysis research and clinical guidelines to determine the sweet spot for how long the wall sit 'should' be. The result: two minutes, or 120-second holds. Dr. Iluyomade explains this length is long enough to work, but short enough to avoid heart rate spikes and knee strains. 'Longer durations may increase discomfort and reduce motivation, potentially impairing adherence and performance,' Dr. Kalra study suggests doing four of those two-minute holds with equal rest in between. If that sounds too daunting, that's okay—do what you can. 'If you're not there yet, build up with shorter holds, but the eventual goal is four full rounds of two minutes each,' Dr. Iluyomade far as frequency goes, the recommendation is three sessions a week for four to twelve weeks. Then, you can go down to one to two sessions a week. Just keep going. 'Long-term adherence is crucial for sustained blood pressure control, as discontinuation leads to reversal of benefits,' Dr. Kalra says. Other Ways To Lower Blood Pressure Of course, wall sits alone won't cure high blood pressure concerns. The cardiologists also recommend the following: 150 minutes of brisk walking or cycling a week Regular aerobic and dynamic resistance exercise Eating lots of produce, potassium-rich foods and not too many high-sodium foods Getting seven hours of quality sleep Limiting alcohol Practicing stress-relieving habits, such as box breathing and mindfulness If necessary, taking medication and blood pressure checks at home Related: This Arm Position Gives the Most Accurate Blood Pressure Reading, New Study Finds When it comes to lowering your blood pressure, the steps you need to take are similar to the ones you would take for other health concerns: Add nutritious food into your diet, exercise, reduce stress levels, get enough sleep and the list goes on. But if you're looking for one, quick movement that leads to results and is backed by both cardiologists and research, may we suggest a few wall-sit sessions? Up Next:Sources Dr. Adedapo Adeyinka Iluyomade, MD, a preventive cardiologist Dr. Nishant Kalra, MD, an interventional cardiologist High blood pressure (hypertension), Mayo Clinic Exercise training and resting blood pressure: a large-scale pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, British Journal of Sports Medicine Cardiologists Swear By This 2-Minute Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure first appeared on Parade on Aug 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Eating too many French fries could increase risk of Type 2 diabetes: Study
Apparently, there is such a thing as too many French fries. And it's also not just about the amount of fries you could be eating in one sitting but also how many times a week you consume the tasty taters a week that could increase an individual's risk of developing Type 2 diabetes. According to a study published in the British Medical Journal, eating three or more servings of fries each week can increase the chance of developing the chronic condition by 20%, while eating fries five times a week can increase the chance by 27%. 'Our findings underscore that the association between potato intake and type 2 diabetes risk depends on the specific foods used as replacement,' the researchers said. 'The findings also align with current dietary recommendations that promote the inclusion of whole grains as part of a healthy diet for the prevention of type 2 diabetes.' The researchers did note that eating similar amounts of potatoes cooked other ways — boiled, baked or mashed, for example — does not substantially increase the risk, only reducing it by 5%. 'The high starch content of potatoes, leading to a high glycemic index and load, combined with possible loss of nutrients and possible health risks resulting from various cooking methods, could contribute to adverse health outcomes,' the study explains. More than 22,000 cases of Type 2 diabetes were documented during the 37-year time period. RECOMMENDED VIDEO 'Potatoes can be part of a healthy diet, but it's how we prepare them that makes the difference,' Dr. Kawther Hashem, a lecturer in public health nutrition at Queen Mary University of London and not involved with the study, told the Guardian. 'Boiled, baked or mashed potatoes are naturally low in fat and a source of fibre, vitamin C and potassium,' Hashem continued. 'But when we deep fry them into French fries, especially in large portions and with added salt, they become less healthy with their high-fat, salt and calorie content that's much more likely to contribute to weight gain and increase the risk of type 2 diabetes.' For the study, an international team of researchers examined the diets of more than 205,000 adults in the United States who had their eating habits documented every four years between 1984 and 2021. Sink your teeth into this: Red meat again linked to Type 2 diabetes risk Dark chocolate may lower risk of developing Type 2 diabetes SYRON: Misleading diabetes ads on social media pose a serious health risk 'Not all potatoes are created equal,' lead author Seyed Mohammad Mousavid, a research fellow at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, told NBC News. 'Even a small amount of french fries, less than one serving in the week, is associated with a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes.' Replacing potatoes with whole grains, on the other hand, lowers the risk of diabetes by 8%, and if grains are eaten instead of fries specifically, that cuts the risk by 19%. White rice, however, had a stronger association with diabetes.
Buzz Feed
2 days ago
- Buzz Feed
Common Historical Facts That Are Myths Debunked
You've probably heard that Victorians invented the vibrator to treat women for "hysteria," right? Yeah… that's not really true. Vibrators were a hand-cranked massage device that doctors used to treat a number of issues, including hysteria, but they were likely only used on the back and neck, and they were used on both men and women. Also, despite what we often assume, Victorians weren't totally clueless about female sexuality, so they weren't secretly handing out orgasms under the guise of medicine. This is mostly a modern myth, as the whole vibrator story really took off thanks to a 1999 book and later a movie that ran with the idea! Similarly, the idea that all Victorians were buttoned-up prudes isn't true. Sure, they had strict social rules and didn't exactly lead with their feelings, but behind closed doors, they were just as curious and passionate as people are today. There was actually a ton of interest in sex, desire, and the human body, and you could buy things like sex toys and erotic books. Michelangelo's David has always been a work of art; however, it wasn't always housed in a museum. From 1504 (the year it was completed) to 1873, the statue was outdoors, in front of the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence, Italy. It was moved indoors to the Galleria dell'Accademia to help protect it from deteriorating. A copy of David was placed in its original outdoor location in 1910 and is still there today. It turns out rats might not be the real villains behind the bubonic plague (the one that wiped out somewhere between 25 and 50 million people in Europe during the 14th century). It was believed that the disease was transmitted by fleas that lived on rats, which then spread the plague to humans. But newer research suggests the story is a bit different. Studies now point to human fleas and lice (the kind living in people's hair and clothing) as the more likely culprits. In other words, it wasn't just rats skittering through the streets spreading the disease; it was people unknowingly passing it to each other through their own bodies and belongings. The study also points out this makes more sense, too: the way the plague spread so quickly from person to person doesn't quite match how a rat-based outbreak would behave. Paul Revere never said, "The British are coming!" to warn the American colonists. First off, he didn't ride alone. Revere was part of a network of riders that included William Dawes and Samuel Prescott, who also helped spread the warning. Secondly, yelling, "The British are coming!" wouldn't have made much sense, since most colonists at the time still considered themselves British. He likely said something more specific, like, "The regulars are out" or "The troops are marching." Napoleon and his troops did not shoot off the Sphinx's nose with cannonballs. In fact, sketches of the Sphinx without a nose existed long before Napoleon ever set foot in Egypt. Most historians believe the nose was deliberately chiseled off sometime in the 14th century by a Sufi Muslim, who saw the Sphinx as a symbol of idolatry and wanted to destroy it. You may have heard the story that when people saw the 1896 short film L'Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat, or Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat — which shows a train pulling into a station — they panicked and ran out of the theater, thinking the train was coming straight at them. Well, it's more than likely not true. Most film historians think the tale is exaggerated or completely made up, possibly added later to hype up how "new and shocking" cinema was at the time. Additionally, given that it was in black and white and had no sound, people knew what they were looking at. Albert Einstein never flunked math as a kid. In reality, Einstein was actually very good at math from a young age. By the time he was 12, he was teaching himself algebra and geometry, and he was working through college-level material by his early teens. There is a misconception that medieval food was bland and boring. On the contrary, people in the Middle Ages actually used a ton of spices in their cooking. Spices like cinnamon, cloves, nutmeg, pepper, saffron, and ginger were incredibly popular, especially among the wealthy. In fact, spices were so prized that they were often more expensive than meat, and some were even used like currency. And for those who couldn't afford spices, they would flavor their meals with herbs and local seasonings when they could. Spartans didn't fight in bare-chested or nude (that would literally put them at risk of dying easily). In reality, Spartan warriors wore armor, including bronze helmets, breastplates, and greaves. The whole "ripped guys charging into battle wearing nothing but capes and sandals" thing comes from art created over the centuries and movies, like 300, that were more focused on showing off idealized human bodies than sticking to what ancient soldiers actually wore. White Star Line, the company that owned the Titanic, never said the ship was "unsinkable." In reality, some promotional materials described it as "practically unsinkable," which is a big (and important) difference. That phrasing reflected confidence in the ship's design, not a guarantee. But after the disaster, the story shifted, and people believed that it had been marketed as "unsinkable." The whole idea that the Ancient Romans had vomitoriums, special rooms to go vomit during lavish feasts so that they could keep eating, is a huge myth. As this article points out, it was likely a single linguistic error, as it sounds like our modern word for vomit. It actually referred to the passageways in amphitheaters, theaters, and stadiums that allowed crowds to "spew out" quickly after a show or event. The word comes from the Latin vomere, meaning "to discharge" or "to gush forth," but it had nothing to do with food or purging. George Washington didn't have wooden teeth. He did have dentures, but they were made from a mix of materials like ivory, human teeth, and gold, but not wood. Also, wood wouldn't have been used to make dentures at the time. The wooden teeth rumor likely started because the ivory in his dentures stained over time, which would have given them a wooden appearance. Marilyn Monroe's iconic, breathy performance of "Happy Birthday, Mr. President" at JFK's 45th birthday might seem like a spontaneous, flirtatious stunt. However, it was far from a last-minute PR gimmick. In reality, Marilyn had been asked to perform at the star-studded event months in advance (as it was put together by her friend, and the president's brother-in-law, actor Peter Lawford). Marilyn took it seriously and spent hours rehearsing in the days leading up to the event. The term "UFO" didn't come from the 1947 Kenneth Arnold Mount Rainier sighting or the Roswell incident (the first two big UFO stories in the US); in fact, they used the terms flying disks or saucers. It was actually coined by the US Air Force in 1952, as a more technical and neutral way to describe any unknown object, covering everything from balloons and aircraft to, yes, possibly alien crafts. The idea was to keep things neutral and grounded in observation, not speculation. Most 19th-century cowboys didn't wear those oversized, "10-gallon" cowboy hats you see in Westerns. In fact, our association with cowboys wearing 10-gallon cowboy hats comes from Western movies from the 1920s. Early cowboys were more likely to wear bowler hats, sombreros, or whatever sturdy headgear they could get their hands on. The bowler was especially popular as it stayed on during windy rides and didn't get in the way. The wide-brimmed Stetson, which we now think of as the cowboy hat, didn't become common until the late 1800s, when it started catching on for its practicality and sun protection out on the range. And lastly, Walt Disney was not cryogenically frozen. In reality, Walt was cremated two days after his death in 1966. His ashes were placed in an urn and interred at the family mausoleum in Forest Lawn Memorial Park in Glendale, California (photo of the mausoleum below). According to Snopes, rumors of his body being frozen started almost immediately after his death, because it coincided with the rise of cryonics as a concept, and it was further spread by two discredited biographies that were published in the '80s and '90s. In 1972, Walt's daughter Diane did set the record straight, and wrote, "There is absolutely no truth that my father, Walt Disney, wished to be frozen. I doubt that my father had ever heard of cryonics."
