US judge halts plan to transfer Oak Flat land for contested Arizona copper mine
PHOENIX (AP) — A U.S. district judge on Friday temporarily halted the federal government's plans to transfer land in eastern Arizona for a massive copper mining project amid protest by Native American groups that consider the area sacred.
Apache Stronghold and its supporters have been fighting for years to stop the transfer of Tonto National Forest land known as Oak Flat to Resolution Copper. Meanwhile, the company has touted the economic benefits for the region and says it's worked with Native American tribes and others to shape the project.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan said halting the land transfer would merely delay the production of copper and jobs and revenue to Arizona if it's ultimately upheld. On the other hand, he said Apaches would lose legal access to an ancestral, sacred site if the transfer proceeded.
He said the balance of equities 'tips sharply' in favor of Apache Stronghold. He granted an injunction that will be in place until the U.S. Supreme Court resolves an appeal to reconsider a decision from a panel of judges that refused to block the land transfer for the mine.
Logan, however, denied Apache Stronghold's request to have the injunction extend beyond the Supreme Court's resolution of the case.
'We are grateful the judge stopped this land grab in its tracks so that the Supreme Court has time to protect Oak Flat from destruction," Wendsler Nosie Sr. of Apache Stronghold said in a statement Friday.
A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling simply maintains the status quo and anticipates the U.S. Supreme Court will decide soon whether to take up the case.
The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land transfer was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014.
President Donald Trump in his first administration released an environmental review that would trigger the land transfer. Former President Joe Biden pulled it back so the federal government could consult further with tribes.
Then, the U.S. Forest Service in April announced it would forge ahead with the land transfer, prompting Apache Stronghold's emergency appeal.
Apache Stronghold sued the U.S. government in 2021 under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, an area dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans dedicate some funding to courts, workforce agency, ag, but Democrats say it isn't enough
'The focus here is going to be on basically keeping our food safe and preventing disease from spreading,' Sen. Howard Marklein said at a press conference. (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) Republicans and Democrats on the Wisconsin Joint Finance Committee were divided Tuesday about the amount of money the state should invest in several state agencies including the Department of Workforce Development, the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the Department of Agriculture Trade and Consumer Protection. Republicans on the committee said they were making strategic and realistic investments in priority areas, while Democrats said Republicans' investments wouldn't make enough of an impact. The first divisive issue came up when the committee considered the budgets for Wisconsin's courts. Democrats proposed that the state provide an additional $2 million and 8 new positions for the creation of an Office of the Marshals of the Supreme Court that would provide security for the Court. Rep. Tip McGuire (D-Kenosha) and Sen. Kelda Roys (D-Madison) said the need for the office has increased recently due to the number of threats the judges and justices are facing. 'Given the role that they play in our judiciary in order to be impartial, we shouldn't want them to be in danger or to fear for their safety or to have any outward pressures on them that would influence the case,' McGuire said. 'I believe it's important for the cause of justice. I believe it's important for the cause of safety.' Roys noted the inflammatory language that members of the Trump administration have used when talking about judges and justices, noting that Republicans have passed legislation before to help protect judges. She also noted that former Juneau County Circuit Court Judge John Roemer was targeted and murdered at his home in 2022. 'It is really frightening… and the Supreme Court has made this request over numerous years because they understand better than any of us do what it's like to try to serve the public in this critically important but increasingly dangerous role,' Roys said. 'I am much less interested in putting people in prison after they have murdered a judge than I am in preventing our judges from being attacked or killed, so, this seems to me a tiny amount of money to do a really important task to protect the third branch of government and particularly our Supreme Court.' Republicans rejected Democrats' motion. Committee co-chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that the Wisconsin Capitol Police are tasked with protecting visitors, employees, legislators, the Court and anyone else in the building. 'They do a good job and continue to provide top-notch work here at the Capitol as part of security for everyone who works here,' Born said. The committee also voted 13-3 with Andraca joining Republicans to allocate an additional $10 million each year to counties for circuit court costs. The committee took action on portions of the budget for the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), giving a boost to he agency's Meat Inspection Program and Division of Animal Health. 'The focus here is going to be on basically keeping our food safe and preventing the disease from spreading,' committee co-chair Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) said. The Meat Inspection Program got an additional $2.7 million and two additional positions under the proposal approved by the committee. The program works to ensure the safety and purity of meat products sold in Wisconsin, including by inspecting the livestock and poultry slaughtering and processing facilities that are not already inspected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The Division of Animal Health would get three additional employees that would be funded with about $500,000. According to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Wisconsin has 233 official meat establishments and 70 custom meat establishments that require state inspection. Roys said the proposal 'falls far short of what is needed,' noting that agriculture is a major economic driver in Wisconsin and the industry is under pressure due to actions being taken by the Trump administration. The USDA recently terminated its National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection, which had been in place since 1971, and the administration has considered ending most of its routine food safety inspections work. 'That kind of uncertainty is exactly why we need to step up our work at the state level,' Roys said, adding that she hopes that Republicans 'consider funding at the appropriate level what our farmers…deserve.' Marklein noted that the committee's work on DATCP's part of the budget is not completed yet. 'This is a program that's had a shortfall year over year,' Andraca said, adding that she hopes 'members of this committee are vegetarians.' 'If there's one place that I wouldn't cut, it would probably be in meat inspection. If we're looking at places to take a little off the edge, food safety is not one of them, particularly in a time where we have avian flu and other diseases breaking out,' Andraca said. The committee also voted along party lines to invest additional funds in programs administered by the Department of Workforce Development, including $6 million in youth apprenticeship grants, $570,000 in early college credit program grants, $250,000 for the agency's commercial driver training grant program and $250,000 for the workforce training grants. Democrats had suggested that the committee dedicate $11 million for the youth apprenticeship program, which provides an opportunity for juniors and seniors in high school to get hands-on experience in a field alongside classroom instruction, but Republicans rejected it opting to put a little more than half of that towards the program. Andraca said the program is important for allowing youth to 'try out new skills and new jobs' and train to fill positions in Wisconsin and that the $6 million investment makes it seem like the program is 'pretty much getting gutted.' The program has steadily grown annually over the last several years at an estimated rate of 16%, although, according to the LFB, the number of additional students each year has declined going from a high of 1,923 additional students in 2022-23, to 1,703 more in 2023-24, and 1,430 in 2024-25. Andraca noted that the program currently operates on a sum certain model, meaning that there is a specific amount of money available and the size of a grant could vary depending on participation and available funds. If there is continued growth of 16% then the grant sizes could shrink. A sum sufficient model (which Democrats wanted) would mean that the agency's spending on the program isn't capped by a specific dollar amount. Sen. Romaine Quinn (R-Birchwood) noted that the grants for students would likely grow from an average of about $900 currently to about $1,000 under the Republican proposal. 'This motion [is] at $6 million and $100 per award over the last budget, but we're supposed to believe it's gutting the program,' Quinn said. 'Welcome to the People's Republic of Madison where stuff like that happens a lot; $6 million in new money is a lot of money to most people but obviously the other side, it's gutting the program,' Born said, responding to Quinn. 'At some point when you're building a budget, you have to figure out a way to afford it, be reasonable in your investments, so maybe that's why we don't view a $6 million investment as gutting because we're trying to live within our means.' The committee approved $2.3 million to support the new Wisconsin History Center in downtown Madison for 2025-26 and $540,800 and six positions annually starting in 2026-27. Construction on the museum, which will be operated by the Wisconsin Historical Society, started in April and its opening is set for 2027. The Historical Society had requested the one-time funding of $2.3 million in 2025-26 as well as ongoing funding of $1.7 million annually — more than double the amount the committee approved — starting in 2026-27 to help with operational costs, including security, janitorial and maintenance services. It said without ongoing funding from the state it wouldn't be able to open and maintain the museum. It also said that it was not anticipating needing to request additional funding for the museum operations in future budget cycles if the request is funded. The committee also approved an additional $562,000 in one-time funding across the biennium for security and facilities improvements for the Historical Society's facilities and collections and $157,000 to cover estimated future increases in services costs. But the committee decreased funding for the Historical Society by $214,000 for estimated fuel and utilities costs. A law, 2023 Wisconsin Act 73, overhauled alcohol regulation in Wisconsin and created a new Division of Alcohol Beverages under the Department of Regulation tasked with preventing violations of the new laws. Republicans on the committee approved a motion to recategorize nine general DOR positions and over $900,000 to the Division of Alcohol Beverages to help with enforcement. It also transferred an attorney to the division and added $456,000 in funding for two more positions in the Division of Alcohol Beverages. Democrats said that Republicans on the committee were 'nickel and diming' the Department of Revenue with its proposal given that it recategorizes already existing positions rather than creating new ones. 'I do appreciate some of the efforts involved in this motion,' McGuire said, adding that he noticed there were 10 positions that were moved around. 'That seemed odd to me,' McGuire said. 'Were their feet up on their desk? They weren't collecting taxes at school time, or what were they doing? We want to be able to give the Department of Revenue tools they need to succeed, and frankly, the tools they need to provide resources to the state to make sure that everyone's on an even playing field so we can fund the priorities' of the state. The GOP proposal passed on a party-line vote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska group seeks to turn state's 12-week abortion ban into total one
An anti-abortion group is trying to revive the issue with a new ballot initiative seeking to ban abortion outright with no exceptions. Shown is the 2024 Walk for Life in Lincoln. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Last year, Nebraska voters approved putting a ban on abortions after the first trimester into the state constitution, with exceptions for the life of the mother, rape and incest, instead of adopting a competing proposal that would have left the decision between a woman and her 'treating health care practitioner.' It was a unique choice for Nebraska voters, as the only state where voters faced opposing abortion-related proposals in 2024. Nebraska joined two other states, Florida and South Dakota, in rejecting ballot initiatives seeking to expand abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, a ruling that governed reproductive rights for nearly half a century. But an anti-abortion group is trying to push harder with a new ballot initiative for 2026 seeking to ban abortion outright with no exceptions. Choose Life Now is trying again after failing to get enough signatures for a similar ballot initiative in 2024. Ballot initiative organizers seeking to amend the Nebraska Constitution must gather signatures from at least 10% of Nebraska voters. The signatures must include 5% of registered voters in at least 38 of the state's 93 counties. Choose Life Now filed its paperwork to collect a new round of signatures in January — the same month as the original Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973. 'We do not consider this a political issue but rather a human rights issue,' said David Zebolsky, co-chair of Choose Life Now. During its kick-off event, organizers called the ballot initiative a 'spiritual battle' to stop the 'culture of death' that comes with abortions. The group said it plans to gather signatures with help from churches around the state and other forms of outreach — including a table at the Nebraska State Fair. 'We know that with evangelization and education we will see increasing support,' Zebolsky said. 'And with God, anything is possible.' The language in the proposed ballot initiative is fairly simple, by design. It says, 'A preborn child is a person at every stage of development, beginning at fertilization. Wherever under Nebraska law the term 'person' is used or implied, it shall include such a child.' The initiative also crosses out the voter-adopted constitutional language limiting legal abortions to the first trimester. Zebolsky said the ballot language was crafted in a way that it 'would integrate easily into the existing state constitution and legislative statutes and be strong to withstand future legal challenges.' The Choose Life Now's quest for a total ban on abortion in Nebraska echoes national Christian advocacy organizations and some Republican members of Congress advocating for a nationwide ban. President Donald Trump, on the campaign trail in 2024, vowed to veto any total federal abortion ban, though the Trump administration recently rescinded a Biden-era policy that requires hospitals to provide emergency abortions to women whose health is in danger, including in states that restrict or ban abortion. The national GOP has softened its stance on abortion since the Dobbs decision, as bans became unpopular with the public. On the state level, Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen has said he would prefer a total abortion ban. Regardless, political optics don't matter to those behind the latest ballot initiative, they say, because it is the 'right thing' to do. 'We're called to do the right thing, in obedience to God,' said Teresa Fondren of Abolish Abortion Nebraska. 'We can rely on his providential power to handle the results.' Fondren, continuing a fight that nearly consumed two anti-abortion petition efforts in 2024, said the most significant opposition to the effort for a full abortion ban in Nebraska and in other states has been from 'major' pro-life organizations. Advocates for a total ban have criticized Nebraska Right to Life and others for backing the initiative that restricted abortion instead of banning it. During that 2024 campaign, Nebraska Right to Life and other advocates of putting some abortion restrictions into the constitution over the passage of a competing abortion-rights amendment argued that voters would not accept a total ban and some restrictions were better than none. Abortion-rights advocates at the time argued that the restrictions amendment put women's health and bodily autonomy at risk. They gathered signatures for a competing abortion-rights amendment that would've legalized abortion later into pregnancies. Executive Director of Planned Parenthood North Central States Andi Curry Grubb told Omaha NBC affiliate WOWT that Choose Life Now's renewed effort would fail again, because it does not reflect the values or will of Nebraskans. The constitutional amendment banning most abortions after the first trimester was backed by Nebraska Right to Life and Nebraska Family Alliance. Prominent anti-abortion politicians and conservative donors backed the Protect Women and Children campaign behind it, including the family of U.S. Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., and Tom and Shawn Peed, with Sandhills Global. Top donors for the failed abortion-rights amendment were former billionaire Michael Bloomberg and University of Nebraska Regent Barbara Weitz of Omaha. Typically, over the past decade, a successful petition effort in Nebraska could cost $1.5 million or more to gather signatures and campaign. Roughly a year ago, Rose Kohl, a Choose Life Now ballot sponsor, said the group's effort in 2024 had 'limited funding and virtually no paid circulators.' The anti-abortion group increased its funding by $9,496 last month, according to the latest state campaign finance records. The Choose Life Now campaign now has $11,772 cash on hand. It raised roughly $13,738 for its 2024 effort. The group has until next July to gather enough signatures and meet other requirements to get on the November 2026 ballot. 'It's on us, the people of God of Nebraska, to rise up and put a stop to it,' Kohl said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran executes man over 2022 anti-government protests
A man has been executed in Iran, three years after he was arrested during the nationwide anti-government protests in 2022, the judiciary says. Mojahed Kourkouri, also known as Abbas Kourkouri, was sentenced to death after being convicted of armed attacks and membership of a "rebellion group", according to the judiciary's Mizan news agency. He was accused of killing seven people, including nine-year-old Kian Pirfalak, during protests in the city of Izeh. Kian's family said he was killed by security forces, but authorities maintained that a "rioter" shot him. Amnesty International said Kourkouri was subjected to torture and that his trial was "grossly unfair". Kourkouri is the 11th person known to have been executed in relation to the protests, which were sparked by the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman who was detained by morality police in Tehran in September 2022 for allegedly wearing her hijab "improperly". Hundreds of people were killed and thousands detained in a violent crackdown by security forces, which portrayed the protests as "riots". Kourkouri was accused of opening fire on a car carrying Kian Pirfalak and his family in Izeh, in the south-western province of Khuzestan, at the height of the unrest that November. State authorities blamed "terrorist agents" for Kian's killing, and later arrested Kourkouri during an armed raid the following month, during which Kourkouri was shot and injured in the knee, human rights groups said. Kian's family has repeatedly said it does not think Kourkouri was involved in the boy's killing. At Kian's funeral, the boy's mother was overheard in a video telling mourners: "Hear it from me myself on how the shooting happened, so they can't say it was by terrorists, because they're lying." "Plainclothes forces shot my child. That is it," Zeynab Molaei said. Later that the day, she appeared to recant the remarks in a state TV interview, warning that they should "not be misused". She looked visibly distressed, prompting many on social media to warn that she might have been coerced. The judiciary's announcement that Kourkouri had been executed sparked condemnation among human rights groups. Amnesty International said Kourkouri's trial was unfair because he had been denied access to an independently chosen lawyer and his confessions, which were broadcast on Iranian state media, had been forced. It added that following his arrest, Kourkouri was held in solitary confinement and repeatedly subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including severe beatings. Kourkouri was initially sentenced in April 2023, but a judicial review of his case was filed to the Supreme Court in January 2024, Amnesty said. His conviction was later upheld and his sentence was sent for implementation later that year, it added. The director of the Oslo-based Iran Human Rights group, Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, said Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Iran's other leaders "must be held accountable for the extrajudicial killing" of Kourkouri, "as well as for the murders of Kian Pirfalak and thousands of other innocent people". "The international community must break its silence in the face of this tsunami of executions carried out by the Islamic Republic," he added. Kurdish human rights group Hengaw said at least 582 prisoners, including 19 political, religious, and security inmates, had been executed in Iranian prisons so far this year. The last person to be executed in connection with the 2022 protests was Reza Rasaei in August last year. The 34-year-old was sentenced to death in 2023 after what Amnesty called a "grossly unfair" trial that relied on forced confessions, which they said were "obtained under torture and other ill-treatment, including beatings, electric shocks, suffocation and sexual violence". Iranian authorities accused him of having a part in the death of a member of Iran's Revolutionary Guards during the protests - a charge Rasaei denied. He was executed in secret and his family was not given prior warning, Amnesty said. Iran executes protester with mental health condition 15 minutes to defend yourself against the death penalty Two boys shot dead by Iran security forces - sources
