US judge halts plan to transfer Oak Flat land for contested Arizona copper mine
PHOENIX (AP) — A U.S. district judge on Friday temporarily halted the federal government's plans to transfer land in eastern Arizona for a massive copper mining project amid protest by Native American groups that consider the area sacred.
Apache Stronghold and its supporters have been fighting for years to stop the transfer of Tonto National Forest land known as Oak Flat to Resolution Copper. Meanwhile, the company has touted the economic benefits for the region and says it's worked with Native American tribes and others to shape the project.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan said halting the land transfer would merely delay the production of copper and jobs and revenue to Arizona if it's ultimately upheld. On the other hand, he said Apaches would lose legal access to an ancestral, sacred site if the transfer proceeded.
He said the balance of equities 'tips sharply' in favor of Apache Stronghold. He granted an injunction that will be in place until the U.S. Supreme Court resolves an appeal to reconsider a decision from a panel of judges that refused to block the land transfer for the mine.
Logan, however, denied Apache Stronghold's request to have the injunction extend beyond the Supreme Court's resolution of the case.
'We are grateful the judge stopped this land grab in its tracks so that the Supreme Court has time to protect Oak Flat from destruction," Wendsler Nosie Sr. of Apache Stronghold said in a statement Friday.
A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling simply maintains the status quo and anticipates the U.S. Supreme Court will decide soon whether to take up the case.
The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land transfer was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014.
President Donald Trump in his first administration released an environmental review that would trigger the land transfer. Former President Joe Biden pulled it back so the federal government could consult further with tribes.
Then, the U.S. Forest Service in April announced it would forge ahead with the land transfer, prompting Apache Stronghold's emergency appeal.
Apache Stronghold sued the U.S. government in 2021 under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, an area dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Former ESPN host claims Trump wants to make America a 'Whiter nation'
Former ESPN radio host Dan Le Batard has long been critical of President Donald Trump and his immigration policies - his parents came to the U.S. from Cuba. During his show on Wednesday, Le Batard again spoke out against the policies while mentioning the protests in Los Angeles, claiming Trump wants to make the United States a "whiter nation." "Of course, everyone can agree, yes, illegal criminals in this country, yes, get them out of here. But wait a minute," "The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz." "Who gets to decide what's illegal and criminal when you're just going to violate the Supreme Court and democracy and the constitution and everything else in the name of, now you've got an armed militia that says every protest is dangerous. Even the peaceful ones. And you can frame it that way because the people are Brown." Le Batard added that it "feels like state militia (is) rubber-bulleting about just basic American freedoms." Jeremy Tache added, "This is a use of the military against our own people. If this was happening in any other country, we would be looking at that as one of the most horrifying things that could possibly happen." "This is exactly how it is that you circumvent what feels like American democracy to make sure that the others never unite like a union. You can always make them the others, and you'll always have white people on your side…" Le Batard continued. "Trying to make this country Whiter in a way that is overt, that is political, that is hateful, and allows you to keep the right to make all people other than you criminals based on whatever you make the laws, including just being Brown, not having a license or being a criminal, because you're 'just like all those other dirty Mexican rapists that we had to build a wall to keep out.'" "We can hide under the semantics argument of, well of course illegal people who are here committing crimes shouldn't be here," the former ESPN host added. "But that doesn't mean you should make all Brown people and Black people that." Los Angeles law enforcement has made dozens of arrests in the wake of days of protests and riots. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
DHS to send termination notice to 530K migrant Biden parolees
The Department of Homeland Security sent termination notices to Cubans, Haitians, Venezuelans and Nicaraguans after the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end the Biden-era parole program. The termination notices will be sent to some 530,000 people who came to the U.S. under the parole program, which granted entry for two years as well as work permits to anyone who could secure a U.S.-based financial sponsor. The move comes after the Supreme Court last month granted an emergency request to the high court allowing it to scrap the protections. In a release, the Trump administration blasted the program for allowing 'poorly vetted' migrants into the country. However, applicants were screened before arrival and also had to show they would be financially supported so they would not be a burden on U.S. taxpayers. 'The Biden Administration lied to America. They allowed more than half a million poorly vetted aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela and their immediate family members to enter the United States through these disastrous parole programs; granted them opportunities to compete for American jobs and undercut American workers; forced career civil servants to promote the programs even when fraud was identified; and then blamed Republicans in Congress for the chaos that ensued and the crime that followed,' DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. According to reporting from CNN, which obtained a copy of the planned notices, citizens of the four countries will be told their work permits are being revoked. 'If you do not leave, you may be subject to enforcement actions, including but not limited to detention and removal, without an opportunity to make personal arrangements and return to your country in an orderly manner,' the notice says, according to the outlet. The Biden administration pitched the parole program as a way to ease tension at the border, creating a pathway for those from countries most likely to seek asylum or cross at the southern border.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Supreme Court Could Cut Off Classroom Internet Connections
The Supreme Court has the cable cutter getty For almost thirty years, the E-Rate program has made internet connectivity available to schools and libraries across the country. Now the Supreme Court could decide to end that program. The program was authorized as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, with the FCC deciding to fund E-Rate through the pool of money collected from service providers for the Universal Service Fund. The idea was to increase internet connectivity for classrooms and libraries, particularly those serving low-income or rural populations. The USF also funds connectivity services for rural health care, remote communities, and low-income households. The effect was immediate. According to a Congressional Research Service report, the requests for E-Rate funding, amounting to $2,02 billion, outstripped the program funding immediately. The percentage of public schools with internet access, according to a U.S. Department of Education survey, went from 35% in 1994 to 95% in 1999. Over that same period, internet access in actual classrooms went from 3% to 63%. The program has allowed schools that could not have managed internet connectivity for their students, and that can be transformative (I taught at one such school). The challenge to that program comes from Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers' Research. It's an appeal of a decision from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that found in favor of Consumers' Research, a DC-based conservative advocacy group. The argument is laid out simply in the first paragraph of the decision: In the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Congress delegated its taxing power to the Federal Communications Commission. FCC then subdelegated the taxing power to a private corporation. That private corporation, in turn, relied on for-profit telecommunications companies to determine how much American citizens would be forced to pay for the 'universal service' tax that appears on cell phone bills across the Nation. We hold this misbegotten tax violates Article I, § 1 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has heard the case, which brought out a host of amicus briefs. The states of Alaska and Colorado argued that loss of internet access to its very rural population would be disastrous. Many groups representing schools, communities and libraries argued to overturn the Fifth Circuit decision. The National Leaguer of Cities made their plea: The potential loss of USF program benefits posed by the decision below would severely harm the economies of local communities and decrease the overall quality of life for local governments' residents. A less connected community is a less educated, less employed, and less healthy community. Briefs from a host of right-leaning groups like Americans for Prosperity, the National Taxpayers Union, and the New Civil Liberties Alliance all argue that the USF is unconstitutional. The language in these briefs is heated. 'The rule restores the Constitution's original meaning,' writes the ADF, 'at a time when it is sorely needed.' Advancing American Freedom invokes the founders and the abuse of 'taxation without representation.' A decision is expected in the nest few weeks. The impact of ending E-Rate programs would send shockwaves through classrooms across the country. At best, it would require Congress to restructure the entire funding mechanism for the program. At worst, it would cast thousands of districts serving rural and low-income students back out of the twenty-first century. Mark Walsh at Education Week says the court has signaled it is 'unlikely to upend' the program. School districts across the country are hoping he's correct.
