logo
Israel announces plan to retake Gaza City in escalation of war with Hamas

Israel announces plan to retake Gaza City in escalation of war with Hamas

7NEWS19 hours ago
Israel said early Friday that it plans to take over Gaza City in another escalation of its 22-month war with Hamas. The decision, taken after a late-night meeting of top officials, came despite mounting international calls to end the war and protests by many in Israel who fear for the remaining hostages held by Hamas.
Israel's air and ground war has already killed tens of thousands of people in Gaza, displaced most of the population, destroyed vast areas and pushed the territory toward famine. Another major ground operation would almost certainly exacerbate the humanitarian catastrophe.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had earlier outlined more sweeping plans in an interview with Fox News, saying Israel planned to take control of all of Gaza. Israel already controls around three quarters of the devastated territory.
The final decision, which came after Israel's Security Cabinet met through the night, stopped short of that, and may be aimed in part at pressuring Hamas to accept a ceasefire on Israel's terms.
It may also reflect the reservations of Israel's top general, who reportedly warned that it would endanger the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and further strain Israel's army after nearly two years of regional wars.
The military 'will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,' Netanyahu's office said in a statement after the meeting.
'There is nothing left to occupy'
Israel has repeatedly bombarded Gaza City and carried out numerous raids there, only to return to different neighborhoods again and again as militants regrouped. Today it is one of the few areas of Gaza that hasn't been turned into an Israeli buffer zone or placed under evacuation orders.
A major ground operation there could displace tens of thousands of people and further disrupt efforts to deliver food to the hunger-stricken territory.
It's unclear how many people reside in the city, which was Gaza's largest before the war. Hundreds of thousands fled Gaza City under evacuation orders in the opening weeks of the war but many returned during a ceasefire at the start of this year.
Palestinians were already anticipating even more suffering ahead of the decision, and at least 42 were killed in Israeli airstrikes and shootings on Thursday, according to local hospitals.
'There is nothing left to occupy,' said Maysaa al-Heila, who is living in a displacement camp. 'There is no Gaza left.'
'We don't want to keep it'
Asked in the interview with Fox News ahead of the Security Cabinet meeting if Israel would 'take control of all of Gaza,' Netanyahu replied: 'We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas (from) there.'
'We don't want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter,' Netanyahu said in the interview. 'We want to hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life.'
Israel's military chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, warned against occupying Gaza, saying it would endanger the hostages and put further strain on the military after nearly two years of war, according to Israeli media reports on the closed-door Security Cabinet meeting.
Hamas-led militants abducted 251 people and killed around 1,200 in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that triggered the war. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals but 50 remain inside Gaza, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive.
Almost two dozen relatives of hostages set sail from southern Israel toward the maritime border with Gaza on Thursday, where they broadcast messages from loudspeakers.
Yehuda Cohen, the father of Nimrod Cohen, an Israeli soldier held in Gaza, said from the boat that Netanyahu is prolonging the war to satisfy extremists in his governing coalition. Netanyahu's far-right allies want to escalate the war, relocate most of Gaza's population to other countries and reestablish Jewish settlements that were dismantled in 2005.
'Netanyahu is working only for himself,' Cohen said.
Palestinians killed and wounded as they seek food
Israel's military offensive has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals.
The United Nations and independent experts view the ministry's figures as the most reliable estimate of casualties. Israel has disputed them without offering a toll of its own.
Of the 42 people killed on Thursday, at least 13 were seeking aid in an Israeli military zone in southern Gaza where U.N. aid convoys are regularly overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds. Another two were killed on roads leading to nearby sites run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor, according to Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies.
GHF said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites on Thursday. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. The military zone, known as the Morag Corridor, is off limits to independent media.
Hundreds of people have been killed in recent weeks while heading to GHF sites and in chaotic scenes around U.N. convoys, most of which are overwhelmed by looters and crowds of hungry people. The U.N. human rights office, witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces have regularly opened fire toward the crowds going back to May, when Israel lifted a complete 2 1/2 month blockade.
The military says it has only fired warning shots when crowds approach its forces. GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired into the air on some occasions to prevent deadly stampedes.
Israel and GHF face mounting criticism
Doctors Without Borders, a medical charity known by its French acronym MSF, published a blistering report denouncing the GHF distribution system. 'This is not aid. It is orchestrated killing, ' it said.
MSF runs two health centers very close to GHF sites in southern Gaza and said it had treated 1,380 people injured near the sites between June 7 and July 20, including 28 people who were dead upon arrival. Of those, at least 147 had suffered gunshot wounds — including at least 41 children.
MSF said hundreds more suffered physical assault injuries from chaotic scrambles for food at the sites, and multiple patients with severely aggravated eyes after being sprayed at close range with pepper spray. It said the cases it saw were only a fraction of the overall casualties connected to GHF sites.
'The level of mismanagement, chaos and violence at GHF distribution sites amounts to either reckless negligence or a deliberately designed death trap,' the report said.
GHF said the 'accusations are both false and disgraceful' and accused MSF of 'amplifying a disinformation campaign' orchestrated by Hamas.
The U.S. and Israel helped set up the GHF system as an alternative to the U.N.-run aid delivery system that has sustained Gaza for decades, accusing Hamas of siphoning off assistance. The U.N. denies any mass diversion by Hamas. It accuses GHF of forcing Palestinians to risk their lives to get food and say it advances Israel's plans for further mass displacement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Dangerous': World reacts to huge Gaza move
‘Dangerous': World reacts to huge Gaza move

News.com.au

time4 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Dangerous': World reacts to huge Gaza move

Nations around the world on have reacted to Israel's plan to take complete control of Gaza. For US President Donald Trump, it's up to Israel to decide what to do next in the region — meaning Washington is offering quiet support for its ally's plans to expand the offensive in the war-wracked Palestinian territory. While numerous European and Arab capitals urged Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday to reconsider his decision to 'take control' of Gaza City, President Trump this week has effectively given the Israeli prime minister free rein — even if it means pushback from the international community. After nearly two years of devastating conflict, Israel's security cabinet approved Netanyahu's plan to 'defeat' Hamas, which triggered the war with its October 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel. Before Israel's announcement, when asked if he could support such a plan, President Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that he was focused on securing an increase in the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza to help starving Palestinians. 'As far as the rest of it, I really, I really can't say — that's going to be pretty much up to Israel,' President Trump said. Then on Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed that position, telling Catholic TV network EWTN, 'Ultimately, what Israel needs to do for Israel's security will be determined by Israel.' President Trump and Mr Rubio's comments speak volumes about the US strategy: since Israel-Hamas talks on a ceasefire in Gaza fell apart, Washington has broadly embraced Israel's views following US envoy Steve Witkoff's visit last week. Details of Mr Witkoff's meeting with Mr Netanyahu have not been made public, but it is hard to imagine that President Trump's emissary was not briefed on Israel's plans. While Washington has amped up the pressure on Israel to allow more aid into the Gaza Strip, it has also insisted that all Israeli hostages — dead or alive — be freed from Hamas captivity and the complete annihilation of the militant group. 'Our goals are very clear,' US Vice President JD Vance said Friday during talks with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy. 'We want to make it so that Hamas cannot attack innocent Israeli civilians ever again, and we think that has to come through the eradication of Hamas.' Since returning to the White House in January, President Trump has offered Israel iron-clad support, even while pushing for better humanitarian support. He seemed to throw in the towel on securing a ceasefire following repeated failed efforts at mediation, especially after talks crumbled late last month in Doha when Hamas refused a deal to free the hostages. Hamas still has 49 Israeli hostages abducted during the October 2023 attack, 27 of whom are presumed dead. The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee — who is prone to making eyebrow-raising statements — slammed all criticism of Israel's plans for Gaza. 'So Israel is expected to surrender to Hamas & feed them even though Israeli hostages are being starved?' Mr Huckabee wrote on social media. 'Did UK surrender to Nazis and drop food to them?' he said in response to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who called Netanyahu's approach 'wrong.' In his interview with EWTN, Rubio said 'as long as Hamas exists, particularly exists as an armed organisation, there will never be peace in Gaza.' Mr Rubio said he understood why the famine facing Palestinians in the territory was getting 'almost all the media coverage' but lamented what he called a lack of attention to the plight of the remaining Israeli hostages. In recent weeks, Washington has sharply criticised international initiatives to formally recognise a Palestinian state, led notably by French President Emmanuel Macron, warning that it emboldens Hamas not to give up. World reacts to Israel's huge Gaza move Nations around the world on Friday condemned Israel's plan to wrest control of Gaza City, saying it would only worsen the conflict and lead to more bloodshed. Here is a roundup of global reactions: UN: 'dangerous escalation' United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Israel's plan was a 'dangerous escalation' that risked worsening conditions for ordinary Palestinians. UN human rights chief Volker Turk said the plan must be 'immediately halted'. Israel should instead allow 'the full, unfettered flow of humanitarian aid' and Palestinian armed groups must unconditionally release hostages, he added. Diplomatic sources told AFP several countries had requested an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council over the Israeli plans. EU: 'consequences' for Israel ties 'The Israeli government's decision to further extend its military operation in Gaza must be reconsidered,' European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said on X. She called for a ceasefire, the release of all hostages and 'immediate and unhindered access' for humanitarian aid in Gaza. European Council president Antonio Costa warned that 'such a decision must have consequences' for EU-Israel ties. 'The situation in Gaza remains dramatic, and the decision by the Israeli government will only further worsen it,' he posted on X. Hamas: 'War crime' Hamas denounced the Israeli government's plan as 'a new war crime that the occupation army intends to commit against' Gaza and warned that the operation would 'cost it dearly'. Iran: 'Genocide' In Hamas's backer Iran, foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said Israel's plan was 'another clear sign of the Zionist regime's specific intention to ethnically cleanse Gaza and commit genocide against the Palestinians'. China: Gaza for Palestinians 'Gaza belongs to the Palestinian people and is an inseparable part of Palestinian territory,' a foreign ministry spokesperson told AFP. 'The correct way to ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and to secure the release of hostages is an immediate ceasefire.' Germany: arms exports cut Chancellor Friedrich Merz said it was 'increasingly difficult to understand' how the Israeli military plan would help achieve legitimate aims. 'Under these circumstances, the German government will not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice,' he added. UK: 'More bloodshed' 'This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said, adding that it would 'only bring more bloodshed'. France: 'Dead end' 'Such actions would constitute further serious violations of international law and lead to a complete dead end,' France's foreign ministry said in a statement posted to social media. 'They would undermine the legitimate aspirations of Palestinians to live in peace within a viable, sovereign and contiguous state, and pose a threat to regional stability.' Turkey: International pressure Turkey urged global pressure to halt the plan. 'We call on the international community to fulfil its responsibilities to prevent the implementation of this decision, which aims to forcibly displace Palestinians from their own land,' said a foreign ministry statement. Spain: 'Destruction and suffering' 'We firmly condemn the decision of the Israeli government to escalate the military occupation of Gaza,' said Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares. 'It will only cause more destruction and suffering.' He added that 'a permanent ceasefire, the immediate and massive entry of humanitarian aid, and the release of all hostages are urgently needed'. Saudi Arabia: 'Ethnic cleansing' The foreign ministry wrote on X that Riyadh 'categorically condemns its persistence in committing crimes of starvation, brutal practices, and ethnic cleansing against the brotherly Palestinian people'. Jordan: Palestinians' rights A statement issued by the Royal Court said King Abdullah condemned a move 'which undermines the two-state solution and the rights of the Palestinian people'.

Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza plan ignores criticism from inside and outside Israel
Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza plan ignores criticism from inside and outside Israel

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza plan ignores criticism from inside and outside Israel

Here are two things worth keeping in mind when trying to make sense of events in the Middle East. The first is that, while the dominant stories out of Gaza in Australia and much of the rest of the world have been starving children, and people being killed while lining up for insufficient food, this crisis has not been the framework in which the Israeli security cabinet has decided this week to pursue the total occupation of the coastal strip. Israel has instead been consumed by bitter divisions within Israeli society, and between its defence forces and cabinet. The debate in the Israeli media over Benjamin Netanyahu's plans to occupy Gaza have barely mentioned the fate of the two million people who live there. It has instead been about what the move would mean for the remaining 50 or so Israeli hostages (only about 20 of whom are believed to still be alive) and the capacity of an exhausted and stretched defence force to conduct such an operation which, apart from anything else, would leave it legally responsible for feeding and protecting two million Palestinian civilians. The second thing to keep in mind is that Israeli prime minister Netanyahu is one of the several world leaders now dominating global events who really don't give a stuff what the rest of the world thinks of their tactics. Such behaviour might seem par for the course from the head of a regime like that of Russian leader Vladamir Putin, but it is now an apt description for both Netanyahu — the leader of what the west used to say was the only democracy in the Middle East — and the US president, Donald Trump. Trump does care what some people think of him, but that mostly applies to the opinions of his domestic political base (and not even them all the time) rather than the rest of the world. Netanyahu certainly has generally acted in a way that seemed impervious to outside opinion. But it is not so much these leaders' lack of care about opinion that is the problem as what it implies about their behaviour. Netanyahu and Trump are happy to forge paths of behaviour which would once have been regarded as shocking by the rest of the world: from actions which have led Netanyahu and his government to be regularly accused of war crimes, to Trump's spectacular and erratic misuse of tariffs policy in pursuit of political ends against other countries to the detriment of both the US and global economy, as well individual allies, amongst other things. For months now, the Israeli prime minister has been ignoring increasing international criticism of his country's actions in Gaza: from the blocking of food and other aid; to a military approach that has seen more than 60,000 Palestinians killed; to the flat denials that starvation is a problem in the crowded coastal enclave. But in deciding late this week to push forward with a total occupation of Gaza — starting with a siege of Gaza City — Netanyahu is also ignoring the views of many of his own citizens, as well as the chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces. Netanyahu has long been accused by critics of sacrificing the lives, and return, of hostages for his broader territorial ambitions and for his own political survival. In what was reported by the Israeli media as a tense meeting earlier in the week, the Israeli army's chief of staff, General Eyal Zamir, told Netanyahu that the full occupation of Gaza was "tantamount to walking into a trap". He was reported as saying the offensive would endanger the lives of the remaining hostages, as well as the lives of soldiers exhausted by repeated deployments to Gaza. The families of hostages also believe a further push into Gaza would seal the fate of their loved ones, particularly after Hamas executed six hostages as the IDF closed in on their position late last year. Netanyahu is squeezed hard by the hard right members of his government — who have made clear they support Palestinians being expelled from Gaza, which would be resettled with Israeli settlers. The forced displacement of civilians is a war crime. If Israel was formally seen as an occupying power, it would have greater direct legal responsibilities for Palestinians: required to directly provide humanitarian assistance, rather than just facilitate it. The Israeli PM seems to be skirting around anything quite so blatant, with the plans — as outlined so far — a little too neatly involving only a "temporary" occupation ahead of his proposal for a coalition of unspecified "Arab forces" to run the enclave, and the suggestion that (around 800,00) civilians would be moved out of Gaza City, for their own safety, to humanitarian zones, and encouraged to do so by the establishment of aid centres outside the city while the IDF besieges Hamas fighters inside the city. "We don't want to keep it," Netanyahu told Fox News before the cabinet meeting. "We want to have a security perimeter, we don't want to govern it." Reuters quoted a Jordanian official quickly rejecting the idea, saying Arabs would "only support what Palestinians agree and decide on". "Arabs will not be agreeing to Netanyahu's policies nor clean his mess," the official was quoted as saying. There would have been a time when a proposal which so clearly defies the spirit, and almost certainly the letter, of international law would be challenged by the United States as the West's chief moral police officer. But these are not those times. The Netanyahu government's plans seem to extend a strategy already underway of wiping out any chance of Palestinians being able to create a viable state in Gaza and the West Bank. The West Bank is now broken up by extensive Israeli settlements. There is little left physically of Gaza and even less of any political structures on which to build an administration. Even if Trump was to have a change of heart and seek to aggressively intervene in the dispute with heavy sanctions or other actions against Israel, it is hard to see them being effective against an outcome Netanyahu is racing to make inevitable. Which only raises the question of how other countries — including Australia — can apply pressure to Israel. There were reports in the Israeli media that the rising international criticism from former allies has not gone entirely unnoticed within the Netanyahu government, and that that criticism was one of the factors being hotly debated within the cabinet during its marathon eight hour meeting to decide its next steps on Thursday night and Friday morning (Jerusalem time). But the very vagaries of just when and how Israel may prosecute this next stage in its war makes condemnation as difficult as trying to respond to Trump's ever changing tariff positions. Israel continues to deploy a mixture of dubious denials and lack of transparency on its actions to blunt international criticism. But its moves this week — which appear unlikely to either defeat Hamas or rescue Israeli hostages — only seem to further confirm that is not what this has all been about at all. Laura Tingle is the ABC's Global Affairs Editor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store