Sources: Iraq's CF rejects Election Law amendments amid tight timeline
Shafaq News/ The majority of Iraq's Shiite Coordination Framework (CF) factions have decided against amending the Election Law due to time constraints, sources within the bloc revealed on Thursday.
'Any amendments would need to be finalized by mid-April to allow the Independent High Electoral Commission sufficient time for implementation ahead of the general elections scheduled for October,' the sources told Shafaq News, adding that with less than two months remaining, such changes are deemed 'unrealistic.'
The sources also noted a lack of consensus among key political groups, including Kurdish and Sunni parties, regarding potential amendments. They warned that attempts to push for changes could extend the lifespan of the government and parliament, leading to prolonged political disputes that could last at least six months.
'Such delays would disrupt parliamentary work, hinder the political process, and potentially undermine the government's legitimacy,' they explained.
As for the proponents of amendments, the sources pointed out that they have sought to revise a clause allocating 20% of seats to candidates with the highest number of votes, regardless of party affiliation. 'The remaining 80% are distributed under the Sainte-Laguë method,' they clarified, describing this system as untested in Iraq.
The Parliamentary Legal Committee confirmed, in February, that no official proposals or drafts to amend the law have been submitted, either from the government, parties, political blocs, or members of parliament.
The proposed amendment to the Election Law and the shift to a multi-district system have recently stirred controversy in Iraq, especially as the elections approach.
A rift has emerged, some experts suggest, within the CF—an alliance of all Shiite political groups and factions in Iraq, except the Sadrist Movement—over the proposed amendment. According to our sources, the debate has divided the CF into three factions: one fears the amendment could jeopardize political stability, another remains undecided, and the third strongly supports the change.
Meanwhile, Kurdish forces reportedly maintain a neutral stance, while Sunni leaders deem the discussion premature.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Iraqi Defense Minister: Coalition presence in Syria "necessary"
Shafaq News/ Iraqi Defense Minister Thabit al-Abbasi on Friday said the presence of Global Coalition forces in Syria remains necessary, noting that Iraq's security is closely linked to stability in its neighboring country. In an interview with Al Arabiya, al-Abbasi confirmed that coordination with the US-led coalition remains intact, adding, 'Baghdad has not received any official notification regarding changes to the withdrawal schedule of coalition forces from either Syria or Iraq.' The minister stressed that the continued presence of US and coalition forces in Syria remains 'necessary to confront remnants of the terrorist organization, which still poses a cross-border threat.' Currently, around 2,500 US troops remain stationed in Iraq, with approximately 900 deployed in Syria. Discussions on the future of these forces have been ongoing for months.
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Syria reactivates key industrial facilities as economic rebuilding efforts intensify
Shafaq News/ The Syrian Ministry of Economy and Industry is moving forward with plans to rehabilitate and restart critical industrial plants, Hasan Al-Ahmad, Director of the Media Office at the Ministry, told Shafaq News. Al-Ahmad revealed that several major facilities have recently resumed operations, including the Hama Iron Plant and the Damascus Cables Factory, along with other strategic assets. 'These facilities are currently undergoing technical evaluations to assess their readiness for flexible and efficient investment models,' he said, adding that the goal is to maximize operational efficiency and ensure these assets contribute effectively to economic recovery. Supporting the national production, Al-Ahmad stressed, remains a cornerstone of Syria's industrial strategy. 'We want Syrian-made products to compete confidently in both domestic and international markets.' Regarding the Ministry's primary focus for the coming phase, it is 'to elevate the standards of the national industry, positioning it as a benchmark for quality and export potential.' This, he said, would help stimulate economic growth, create job opportunities, and strengthen public trust in local manufacturing. Syria's economy has been in a state of collapse since the outbreak of mass protests and civil conflict in 2011. A recent joint report by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and UNCTAD, published on January 25, 2025, and titled 'Syria at a Crossroads: Toward a Stable Transition Phase,' highlighted the challenges facing the Syrian economy and outlined scenarios for its potential recovery. According to the report, a recovery scenario assumes successful reconstruction efforts, governance reforms, and sufficient international aid, particularly in the fields of agriculture, industry, and energy. Under this model, Syria could regain up to 80% of its pre-war GDP by 2030, provided the country maintains an average annual growth rate of 13% over the 2024–2030 period. Even in this best-case scenario, per capita income would still reach only half of its 2010 level.
Iraq Business
3 hours ago
- Iraq Business
Baghdad and Erbil Exchange Sharp Words over Oil Revenue Dispute
By John Lee. Iraq's federal Ministry of Oil and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) have issued competing statements over the longstanding dispute regarding oil production and revenue sharing, highlighting the continued impasse that has cost the country billions of dollars in lost exports. Federal Government Position The federal Ministry of Oil in Baghdad has demanded that the Kurdistan Regional Government comply with the constitution, federal court decisions, and budget laws requiring the handover of oil produced in Kurdish territory to federal authorities for export. The ministry stated that despite sending official correspondence and delegations to the KRG, these efforts have proved fruitless. According to the federal ministry, the KRG's continued non-compliance is causing significant financial losses to Iraq through two mechanisms: firstly, by preventing the federal government from receiving and exporting Kurdish oil, and secondly, by forcing the ministry to reduce production from other Iraqi fields to comply with Iraq's OPEC quota, which includes Kurdish production regardless of compliance issues. The ministry also accused the KRG of continuing to smuggle oil outside Iraq and warned it would pursue all legal measures whilst holding the regional government fully responsible for such activities. Kurdish Regional Government Response The KRG's Ministry of Natural Resources issued a detailed rebuttal, characterising the federal statement as "political" and divorced from objective facts. The regional government accused Baghdad of violating the constitution and blocking the passage of a federal oil and gas law for years, instead relying on what it termed outdated centralised legislation from 1976 that contradicts federal principles. The KRG defended its constitutional right to manage its natural resources, stating that international oil companies would not have invested billions of dollars without proper legal foundations. The regional government claimed it had fulfilled all commitments regarding export resumption, including agreeing to sell oil through the federal marketing company SOMO and deposit revenues in the state treasury. Regarding smuggling allegations, the KRG accused federal authorities of engaging in widespread corruption and oil smuggling in southern Iraq, citing local and international reports. Financial Impact and Technical Details The dispute has resulted in the suspension of Kurdish oil exports since 25 March 2023, following legal action by Iraq's federal oil ministry against Turkey's energy ministry. The KRG stated this stoppage has cost the federal government, the region, and oil companies more than 25 billion dollars. The regional government reported delivering over 11.8 million barrels of oil to federal refineries over five months without receiving any payment, leading to production companies' reluctance to continue deliveries. The KRG also noted that budget law provisions setting production costs at six dollars per barrel have discouraged most companies from maintaining production levels. Ongoing Negotiations Both sides referenced attempts to resolve the dispute through joint committees and negotiations. The KRG emphasised its flexibility and readiness to cooperate, whilst the federal ministry maintained that previous discussions had been unsuccessful. A joint committee was established to draft federal oil and gas legislation, though the KRG accused federal authorities of delays in pursuing this critical file. The dispute continues to highlight fundamental disagreements over the interpretation of Iraq's federal constitution and the respective roles of Baghdad and Erbil in managing the country's oil resources. Click here to read the original statement from the Federal Ministry of Oil [Arabic] Click here to read the original statement from the Kurdistan Regional Government [Arabic] (Sources: Federal Ministry of Oil; Kurdistan Regional Government)
