logo
Sources: Iraq's CF rejects Election Law amendments amid tight timeline

Sources: Iraq's CF rejects Election Law amendments amid tight timeline

Shafaq News13-03-2025
Shafaq News/ The majority of Iraq's Shiite Coordination Framework (CF) factions have decided against amending the Election Law due to time constraints, sources within the bloc revealed on Thursday.
'Any amendments would need to be finalized by mid-April to allow the Independent High Electoral Commission sufficient time for implementation ahead of the general elections scheduled for October,' the sources told Shafaq News, adding that with less than two months remaining, such changes are deemed 'unrealistic.'
The sources also noted a lack of consensus among key political groups, including Kurdish and Sunni parties, regarding potential amendments. They warned that attempts to push for changes could extend the lifespan of the government and parliament, leading to prolonged political disputes that could last at least six months.
'Such delays would disrupt parliamentary work, hinder the political process, and potentially undermine the government's legitimacy,' they explained.
As for the proponents of amendments, the sources pointed out that they have sought to revise a clause allocating 20% of seats to candidates with the highest number of votes, regardless of party affiliation. 'The remaining 80% are distributed under the Sainte-Laguë method,' they clarified, describing this system as untested in Iraq.
The Parliamentary Legal Committee confirmed, in February, that no official proposals or drafts to amend the law have been submitted, either from the government, parties, political blocs, or members of parliament.
The proposed amendment to the Election Law and the shift to a multi-district system have recently stirred controversy in Iraq, especially as the elections approach.
A rift has emerged, some experts suggest, within the CF—an alliance of all Shiite political groups and factions in Iraq, except the Sadrist Movement—over the proposed amendment. According to our sources, the debate has divided the CF into three factions: one fears the amendment could jeopardize political stability, another remains undecided, and the third strongly supports the change.
Meanwhile, Kurdish forces reportedly maintain a neutral stance, while Sunni leaders deem the discussion premature.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defamation, exclusion stoke pre-vote tensions
Defamation, exclusion stoke pre-vote tensions

Shafaq News

timean hour ago

  • Shafaq News

Defamation, exclusion stoke pre-vote tensions

Shafaq News With the parliamentary elections scheduled for next November, scenes of political disagreement and tension are once again emerging in Iraq—both among rival political forces and within individual alliances. These disputes are tied to the underlying struggle for power and interests amid complex political, security, and economic conditions, turning the electoral process into a critical test for Iraq's political class and its ability to renew its legitimacy. Analysts are divided between those who view such disagreements as a natural aspect of democratic systems and those who warn that they may evolve into tools of 'defamation and exclusion,' ultimately draining the elections of their democratic substance. Questions are also being raised about the implications of government support for certain blocs, the role of external interests, and the cohesion of current alliances—despite official confirmations that the elections will proceed on schedule, regardless of ongoing tensions. Political Defamation Political affairs researcher Wael al-Rikabi states that the Iraqi political scene typically sees an intensification of disputes among political forces ahead of each electoral cycle, whether within individual components—Shiite, Sunni, or Kurdish—or between them, noting that 'this competition is natural in a democratic context.' Al-Rikabi told Shafaq News that the real risk arises when such competition turns into 'political defamation,' which, in his view, neither serves the public nor fulfills the popular demand for change. Rather, it transforms elections into a battle, rather than a transparent democratic contest. He explained that some parties have come to approach the elections with an exclusionary mindset, rejecting the emergence of new political figures or forces. This, he said, reflects fears of losing influence and financial privileges, stressing that the upcoming elections will, at their core, be about 'political capital,' making the stakes particularly high: loss of both financial gain and political position. Al-Rikabi added that while these conflicts may appear political on the surface, their underlying dimensions are economic, especially considering the diminished opportunities to control resources in the event of electoral failure. On the security front, Al-Rikabi affirmed that most political factions are working to preserve stability and foster a positive environment that encourages voter turnout, particularly among those disillusioned with the process. However, he pointed to the presence of 'parties that benefit from chaos and sectarianism,' though 'a minority incapable of influencing the broader scene.' Regarding rumors of a dispute between Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and State of Law Coalition leader Nouri al-Maliki, Al-Rikabi downplayed their significance, stating they are 'not major and cannot impact the electoral process or the country's stability,' especially given that both parties are committed to Iraq's security and electoral transparency. He also ruled out the possibility of postponing the elections, saying, 'There is no justification for a delay. The security situation is stable, funding is available, and the Electoral Commission has completed its tasks and approved the names of the blocs and candidates.' Foreign Interference Ibrahim al-Sikeni, a member of the State of Law Coalition, also denied any intent to postpone the vote. He confirmed to Shafaq News that 'the elections will be held on schedule, and this is not just a political decision, but one that reflects the will of the people,' adding that the electoral process represents the core of the country's democratic system. However, al-Sikeni revealed that 'hidden hands' are working to undermine the unity of the Shiite Coordination Framework, pointing to efforts by the United States and the United Kingdom to weaken the political forces leading the government. 'These countries are fueling internal divisions and pushing a narrative that the Framework is incapable of governing.' He also indicated that there are clear attempts to fragment the national front by targeting the Coordination Framework, emphasizing that the group remains committed to the democratic political process, which continues to have the support of the people. 'We will not abandon it, regardless of the pressure.' Conflicting Interests While al-Sikeni highlighted foreign pressure aimed at dividing the Framework, other analysts argue that tensions extend beyond it, touching on the broader political alliance landscape. Political affairs researcher Nawal al-Musawi explained that the growing rifts among Iraqi political forces stem from electoral competition and conflicting interests, often centered around power, control, and unequal access to resources. Al-Musawi told Shafaq News that many of these tensions currently focus on the Prime Minister, noting that his public support for candidates affiliated with his bloc and the granting of 'special privileges' have stirred discontent within parts of the Coordination Framework, deepening intra-bloc tensions. Regarding the alliances declared ahead of the elections, Al-Musawi asserted that they are 'mostly temporary' due to what she describes as 'internal contradictions' among their member parties. She suggested these alliances may not endure competitive pressure if member parties resort to political maneuvering or deceit. 'The main goal of these alliances is to secure political interests, even if wrapped in rhetoric about understanding and consensus,' she said, emphasizing the need to monitor political behavior closely to prevent competition from escalating into conflicts that could undermine electoral stability.

Banking reform plan needs adjustment, expert says
Banking reform plan needs adjustment, expert says

Shafaq News

timean hour ago

  • Shafaq News

Banking reform plan needs adjustment, expert says

Shafaq News – Baghdad On Thursday, Iraqi Economist Ahmed Abdul Rabah called for amending the banking reform standards announced by the Central Bank of Iraq (CBI). Abdul Rabah told Shafaq News that Central Bank Governor Ali Al-Allaq has unveiled a comprehensive banking reform plan, emphasizing the importance of the media's role in explaining the initiative transparently and accurately. He explained that among the proposals submitted by experts to the governor is permitting some banks to operate locally under direct CBI oversight, while others could apply international standards in partnership with firms such as Oliver Wyman. Abdul Rabah underscored the need for broad dialogue between the central bank and Iraqi banks to clarify the technical aspects of the reform document and discuss mechanisms for gradual implementation that take into account Iraq's economic realities. He stressed that while commitment to reform should be upheld in principle, the standards and procedures must be framed in a way that builds trust in the banking sector and contributes to its development. Al-Allaq met, on August 12, with global consultancy Oliver Wyman to discuss the details of a banking reform plan presented by the Iraqi Private Banks Association, as part of efforts to modernize the sector and align it with international standards.

SDF–Damascus talks proceed despite pressure allegations
SDF–Damascus talks proceed despite pressure allegations

Shafaq News

timean hour ago

  • Shafaq News

SDF–Damascus talks proceed despite pressure allegations

Shafaq News – Damascus Negotiations between the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and the Syrian government are continuing with US and French support, a senior Kurdish official told Shafaq News on Thursday. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Washington and Paris are working to arrange a meeting between the two sides despite Damascus' refusal to attend talks scheduled for this month, insisting instead that they be moved to the capital following a recent conference in Hasakah province. The source stressed that 'foreign powers are not pressuring the SDF to merge under a specific framework.' According to the official, US and European mediation aims to avert military escalation and secure a negotiated settlement under international sponsorship, while accusing Turkiye of pressuring the transitional government to escalate against the SDF and boycott planned talks in Paris. The source also revealed that last Monday, Syrian Democratic Council Co-Chair for Foreign Relations Ilham Ahmed met Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani in Damascus to address obstacles delaying implementation of the March 10 agreement signed by Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa and SDF Commander Mazloum Abdi in Paris. Separately, the Turkish Defense Ministry said on Thursday that the SDF had 'failed' to comply with the terms of its merger deal with the Syrian army. It reiterated support for Syria's political unity and territorial integrity, pledging training, planning, and advisory assistance to Damascus under an agreement signed on August 13.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store