logo
Protest to demand Standard Bank, TotalEnergies cut ties over alleged 'ecological destruction'

Protest to demand Standard Bank, TotalEnergies cut ties over alleged 'ecological destruction'

IOL News3 days ago
A coalition of activist groups is set to stage a protest on Tuesday in Rosebank, Johannesburg, targeting Standard Bank and TotalEnergies offices for their alleged exploitation activities in Africa.
The demonstration, part of a continent-wide Week of Action (August 18-24), calls on the bank to sever ties with the oil giant over alleged plundering and ecological destruction across Africa.
Organisers have said the protest will begin at Standard Bank HQ and proceed to TotalEnergies' local offices. It is timed to highlight what they describe as the financiers' complicity in fossil-fuel projects that harm communities and the environment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Standard Bank accused of 'frustrating the administration of justice' in Rand manipulation case
Standard Bank accused of 'frustrating the administration of justice' in Rand manipulation case

IOL News

time10 hours ago

  • IOL News

Standard Bank accused of 'frustrating the administration of justice' in Rand manipulation case

The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg listened to a third day of legal arguments relating to allegations of Rand-fixing, following an appeal by the Competition Commission. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers While Standard Bank accused the Competition Commission of 'sticking to its bloody-minded ignorance' by continuing to accuse the bank of allegedly being part of a cartel which manipulated the Rand/US dollar exchange, the commission had hit back to say the bank is pulling out all the stops in a bid not to face the music. Advocate Kate Hofmeyr, acting for Standard Bank, told the Constitutional Court this week that in 2017, when the commission told the media about its allegations that the banks were allegedly involved in an international cartel colluding to manipulate the Rand/US dollar, Standard Bank's share price dropped in a few days by 3.8%, which equated to R8.5bn. She argued that while the commission was investigating the case for a year and a half, it did not meet with Standard Bank at all to obtain information from it regarding the matter. Hofmeyr said because there was no proper investigation by the commission, it got its facts wrong. In turn, Standard Bank suffered reputational damages while these allegations are hanging over its head. She told the apex court that Standard Bank should not face the music and be subjected to a trial on the merits of the alleged Rand rigging issue, as it is not involved in the matter. The commission turned to the Constitutional Court to appeal the judgment of the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) issued last year, in which it found that the majority of the banks do not have to face a trial on the merits of the allegations. Local banks which form part of the appeal as respondents, together with various international banks, are Standard Bank, FirstRand Bank and Nedbank. In his rebuttal on Thursday following Standard Bank's submissions, Advocate Thembeka Ngcukaitobi, acting for the commission, argued that of all the respondent banks, Standard Bank is the most aggressive litigant. He said this matter has been running for the past 10 years because of procedural objections from the respondents, of which Standard Bank is the forerunner. 'We are subjected to protracted legal challenges by this bank, which pleads innocence.' Ngcukaitobi said while banks, such as Standard Bank had the financial resources to resort to these legal challenges, the commission did not have the same money to face these powerful entities. He accused the bank of frustrating the administration of justice in this matter. Ngcukaitobi said Standard Bank claimed that it did its own investigation into the allegations that there was a single overreaching conspiracy to manipulate the Rand/US dollar exchange. 'But they never told us what they found'. He argued that it would be irresponsible of the commission to simply not include Standard Bank in its referral to the tribunal simply because the bank said it is not part of the collusion. Three of the banks which lost their cases before the CAC – BNP, CSS and HBEU – meanwhile also appealed that ruling before the apex court. BNP submits that the CAC erred in dismissing its exception and argued that the commission's referral is contradictory, vague and embarrassing. It said that requiring it to answer to the allegations, violates its right to a fair hearing. CSS in turn argued that the commission never initiated a complaint against it, rendering its joinder unlawful and beyond the tribunal's jurisdiction. It also argued that the commission did not have jurisdiction over it as it does not have South African ties. The respondent banks that succeeded in the CAC meanwhile support that court's findings. They submitted that the commission has not pleaded sufficient facts to sustain a case against them, that the referral affidavit improperly conflates legal entities, and that the evidence relied upon is speculative and inconsistent with the required elements of a single overreaching conspiracy. [email protected]

VIDEO/PICTURES: Environmental activists march to kick polluters out of Africa
VIDEO/PICTURES: Environmental activists march to kick polluters out of Africa

The Citizen

time18 hours ago

  • The Citizen

VIDEO/PICTURES: Environmental activists march to kick polluters out of Africa

Environmental activists marched on Tuesday against the actions of Total Energies in Africa. The protesters marched between Standard Bank and Total Energies claiming the French energy giant is involved in land grabs, displacement of local populations, and ecological devastation surrounding its energy involvement in Africa, including the East African Crude Oil Pipeline Project (EACOP). Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen PICTURES: Strongman challenge at Randridge Mall

Environmental activists protest against Standard Bank and Total Energies over fossil fuel financing
Environmental activists protest against Standard Bank and Total Energies over fossil fuel financing

The Star

time2 days ago

  • The Star

Environmental activists protest against Standard Bank and Total Energies over fossil fuel financing

Koketso Phasha | Published 17 minutes ago A coalition of activist groups, Stop East African Crude Oil Pipeline (StopEACOP) embarked on a protest in Johannesburg with the intention of voicing their frustrations against Standard Bank and Total Energies for their alleged exploitative and non-environmentally friendly activities in Africa. According to StopEACOP, Standard Bank has positioned itself as a chief accomplice to Total Energies' wreckage across the African continent and is bankrolling the exploitation, destruction and harm imposed onto so many communities. In a memorandum on Tuesday, the coalition said to Total Energies: "We, organisations, communities and ordinary people from across South Africa and the African continent, are united in our unequivocal condemnation of Total Energies and its destructive fossil fuel operations. "As communities and activists demonstrate, come together and speak out through this week of action (18-24 August 2025), we send a clear and urgent message that Total must back off." Zaki Mamdoo, a coordinator of the StopEACOP outlined that the demonstration, part of a continentwide Week of Action (August 18-24), calls on the bank to sever ties with the oil giant over alleged plundering and ecological destruction across Africa. Expressing contentment and hope to succeed, the coalition said: "We welcome the decision of the Western Cape High Court setting aside the exploration right granted to Total Energies and its partners to pursue offshore oil and gas drilling along South Africa's southwest coast. The court found that the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) and Total Energies failed to adequately consult affected communities and ignored the serious environmental and climate risks posed by the project. This judgment is a victory for coastal communities, small-scale fishers, and environmental defenders who have long resisted the imposition of destructive projects that threaten their livelihoods, marine ecosystems, and our collective future." Mamdoo said: "For years, Standard Bank has not only ignored the legitimate concerns of communities but has met peaceful protest with arrogance and repression. Instead of engaging in good faith, Standard Bank has chosen to brutalise activists, dismiss civil society, and double down on investments that endanger millions of lives across Africa." StopEACOP said Standard Bank has by virtue of financing the Mozambique LNG Project, Coral FLNG (Floating LNG) Facility and East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) contributed to the destruction of communities across Africa, the carbon emissions driving climate collapse, the violence, human rights abuses, and ecological destruction that accompany these so-called 'developments. Under pressure from protestors, Total Energies committed to providing a written response to the memorandum within 14 days. Similarly, a Standard Bank representative promised a written response to the demands within 14 days, despite one protestor angrily demanding an immediate answer. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store